Af­ter pa­tient deaths, failed part­ner­ships and a stock scan­dal, Han­mi fi­nal­ly gives up on con­tro­ver­sial ol­mu­tinib. What did we learn?

The ol­mu­tinib de­vel­op­ment pro­gram is fi­nal­ly dead.

South Ko­rea’s Han­mi has de­ter­mined that the drug —  once part­nered with Boehringer In­gel­heim and Zai Lab — is no longer com­mer­cial­ly vi­able. The drug was seen as more or less equiv­a­lent to As­traZeneca’s Tagris­so, ac­cord­ing to Han­mi. So they’ve opt­ed to punt the late-stage tri­al and shelve it once and for all.

“We will thor­ough­ly re­view the plan, putting pa­tients’ safe­ty first and fore­most,” Ko­rea’s health min­istry said in a state­ment, ac­cord­ing to Ko­rea Bio­med­ical Re­view. “We will al­so do our ut­most to make sure that pa­tients who are tak­ing the med­ica­tion will not face any dif­fi­cul­ty in their treat­ment.”

This is like­ly the fi­nal chap­ter for a drug that has re­peat­ed­ly stirred con­tro­ver­sy in Ko­rea. 

The tale goes back to Ju­ly, 2015, when a pa­tient in one of its ol­mu­tinib stud­ies died from Stevens-John­son dis­ease. Ac­cord­ing to sub­se­quent me­dia re­ports out of Ko­rea — not an easy place to ob­tain in­fo on cas­es like this — Han­mi was cit­ed for not re­port­ing the death un­til 14 months lat­er. Ac­cord­ing to Han­mi, they on­ly found out about it in Sep­tem­ber, 2016 — four months af­ter it was ap­proved in South Ko­rea. 

The con­tro­ver­sy was stirred by re­ports of heavy in­sid­er trad­ing on Han­mi shares just be­fore the news hit, and the op­po­si­tion par­ty lev­eled a va­ri­ety of ac­cu­sa­tions against Han­mi, ac­cus­ing the com­pa­ny of hid­ing ad­verse events — which re­port­ed­ly al­so claimed an­oth­er life — so that it could get the drug ap­proved first un­der an ac­cel­er­at­ed ac­tion pro­gram.

Boehringer In­gel­heim, which had signed a $730 mil­lion deal to part­ner on the drug, ex­it­ed just ahead of the in­ci­dent, with­out breath­ing a word of any safe­ty is­sues in its ini­tial state­ment. At the time, the com­pa­ny said the de­ci­sion was spurred by a “re-eval­u­a­tion of all avail­able clin­i­cal da­ta on ol­mu­tinib and re­cent treat­ment ad­vances made in the treat­ment of EGFR mu­ta­tion-pos­i­tive lung can­cer.” Boehringer lat­er told me that they knew of “two cas­es of tox­ic epi­der­mal necrol­y­sis, one of them fa­tal, and one case of Stevens-John­son-Syn­drome (non-fa­tal).” Com­pa­ny me­dia reps told me that they had done every­thing re­quired in alert­ing the prop­er reg­u­la­to­ry of­fi­cials.

Zai Lab did a deal for rights in Chi­na, but bowed out at the be­gin­ning of this month.

The sto­ry rais­es some un­com­fort­able ques­tions for the bio­phar­ma in­dus­try. De­vel­op­ers have re­peat­ed­ly hid­den deaths and oth­er se­ri­ous ad­verse events in their clin­i­cal tri­als from the pub­lic, sat­is­fied that they’ve met the let­ter of the law in alert­ing share­hold­ers, reg­u­la­tors and the tri­al sites where they work. As the de­vel­op­ment ef­fort goes glob­al, with a surge of hun­dreds of stud­ies in Asia, the lines around pub­lic ad­verse event re­port­ing gen­er­al­ly al­low pri­vate com­pa­nies to re­main mum — even though the in­for­ma­tion could be rel­e­vant to oth­er re­searchers, pa­tients and com­pa­nies study­ing sim­i­lar drugs. Han­mi, and more point­ed­ly a big de­vel­op­er like the pri­vate Boehringer, of­fers a case book ex­am­ple of how that can blow up. 

But there’s no sign that any of this is chang­ing, as re­cent ex­am­ples at Sol­id Bio and Unum il­lus­trate.

Hal Barron, GSK

Break­ing the death spi­ral: Hal Bar­ron talks about trans­form­ing the mori­bund R&D cul­ture at GSK in a crit­i­cal year for the late-stage pipeline

Just ahead of GlaxoSmithKline’s Q2 update on Wednesday, science chief Hal Barron is making the rounds to talk up the pharma giant’s late-stage strategy as the top execs continue to woo back a deeply skeptical investor group while pushing through a whole new R&D culture.

And that’s not easy, Barron is quick to note. He told the Financial Times:

I think that culture, to some extent, is as hard, in fact even harder, than doing the science.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Aca­dia is mak­ing the best of it, but their lat­est PhI­II Nu­plazid study is a bust

Acadia’s late-stage program to widen the commercial prospects for Nuplazid has hit a wall. The biotech reported that their Phase III ENHANCE trial flat failed. And while they $ACAD did their best to cherry pick positive data wherever they can be found, this is a clear setback for the biotech.

With close to 400 patients enrolled, researchers said the drug flunked the primary endpoint as an adjunctive therapy for patients with an inadequate response to antipsychotic therapy. The p-value was an ugly 0.0940 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, which the company called out as a positive trend.

Their shares slid 12% on the news, good for a $426 million hit on a $3.7 billion market cap at close.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Some Big Phar­mas stepped up their game on da­ta trans­paren­cy — but which flunked the test?

The nonprofit Bioethics International has come out with their latest scorecard on data transparency among the big biopharmas in the industry — flagging a few standouts while spotlighting some laggards who are continuing to underperform.

Now in its third year, the nonprofit created a new set of standards with Yale School of Medicine and Stanford Law School to evaluate the track record on trial registration, results reporting, publication and data-sharing practice.

Busy Gilead crew throws strug­gling biotech a life­line, with some cash up­front and hun­dreds of mil­lions in biobucks for HIV deal

Durect $DRRX got a badly needed shot in the arm Monday morning as Gilead’s busy BD team lined up access to its extended-release platform tech for HIV and hepatitis B.

Gilead, a leader in the HIV sector, is paying a modest $25 million in cash for the right to jump on the platform at Durect, which has been using its technology to come up with an extended-release version of bupivacaine. The FDA rejected that in 2014, but Durect has been working on a comeback.

In­tec blitzed by PhI­II flop as lead pro­gram fails to beat Mer­ck­'s stan­dard com­bo for Parkin­son’s

Intec Pharma’s $NTEC lead drug slammed into a brick wall Monday morning. The small-cap Israeli biotech reported that its lead program — coming off a platform designed to produce a safer, more effective oral drug for Parkinson’s — failed the Phase III at the primary endpoint.

Researchers at Intec, which has already seen its share price collapse over the past few months, says that its Accordion Pill-Carbidopa/Levodopa failed to prove superior to Sinemet in reducing daily ‘off’ time. 

Cel­gene racks up third Ote­zla ap­proval, heat­ing up talks about who Bris­tol-My­ers will sell to

Whoever is taking Otezla off Bristol-Myers Squibb’s hands will have one more revenue stream to boast.

The drug — a rising star in Celgene’s pipeline that generated global sales of $1.6 billion last year — is now OK’d to treat oral ulcers associated with Behçet’s disease, a common symptom for a rare inflammatory disorder. This marks the third FDA approval for the PDE4 inhibitor since 2014, when it was greenlighted for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Francesco De Rubertis

Medicxi is rolling out its biggest fund ever to back Eu­rope's top 'sci­en­tists with strange ideas'

Francesco De Rubertis built Medicxi to be the kind of biotech venture player he would have liked to have known back when he was a full time scientist.

“When I was a scientist 20 years ago I would have loved Medicxi,’ the co-founder tells me. It’s the kind of place run by and for investigators, what the Medicxi partner calls “scientists with strange ideas — a platform for the drug hunter and scientific entrepreneur. That’s what I wanted when I was a scientist.”

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter a decade, Vi­iV CSO John Pot­tage says it's time to step down — and he's hand­ing the job to long­time col­league Kim Smith

ViiV Healthcare has always been something unique in the global drug industry.

Owned by GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer — with GSK in the lead as majority owner — it was created 10 years ago in a time of deep turmoil for the field as something independent of the pharma giants, but with access to lots of infrastructural support on demand. While R&D at the mother ship inside GSK was souring, a razor-focused ViiV provided a rare bright spot, challenging Gilead on a lucrative front in delivering new combinations that require fewer therapies with a more easily tolerated regimen.

They kept a massive number of people alive who would otherwise have been facing a death sentence. And they made money.

And throughout, John Pottage has been the chief scientific and chief medical officer.

Until now.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Vlad Coric (Biohaven)

In an­oth­er dis­ap­point­ment for in­vestors, FDA slaps down Bio­haven’s re­vised ver­sion of an old ALS drug

Biohaven is at risk of making a habit of disappointing its investors.

Late Friday the biotech $BHVN reported that the FDA had rejected its application for riluzole, an old drug that they had made over into a sublingual formulation that dissolves under the tongue. According to Biohaven, the FDA had a problem with the active ingredient used in a bioequivalence study back in 2017, which they got from the Canadian drugmaker Apotex.

Apotex, though, has been a disaster ground. The manufacturer voluntarily yanked the ANDAs on 31 drugs — in late 2017 — after the FDA came across serious manufacturing deficiencies at their plants in India. A few days ago, the FDA made it official.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.