Af­ter set­tling with the SEC, biotech VC Steven Bur­rill now faces up to 30 years for fraud, tax eva­sion charges

Not on­ly did Steven Bur­rill loot mil­lions from his biotech fund to sup­port a lav­ish lifestyle and find ways to pam­per his wife and girl­friend, he al­so al­leged­ly failed to pay tax­es on the mon­ey he ad­mit­ted tak­ing. And now Bur­rill, once one of the most promi­nent ven­ture cap­i­tal­ists in the in­dus­try, faces mul­ti­ple counts of fraud and up to 30 years in prison if con­vict­ed.

Ear­li­er this week the US De­part­ment of Jus­tice spread the word that Bur­rill had been in­dict­ed by a fed­er­al grand ju­ry in San Fran­cis­co on some 34 counts that he com­mit­ted wire fraud, in­vest­ment ad­vis­er fraud, and tax eva­sion in tak­ing cash out of his biotech fund.

Marc Howard Berg­er was charged with help­ing him pre­pare those al­leged­ly fraud­u­lent tax re­turns.

Ac­cord­ing to the DoJ:

Bur­rill in­duced “lim­it­ed part­ners to con­tribute cap­i­tal to the Fund with false and mis­lead­ing let­ters. In ad­di­tion, the in­dict­ment al­leges Bur­rill caused the Fund to trans­fer mil­lions of dol­lars in man­age­ment fees to com­pa­nies he con­trolled; the mon­ey was in ex­cess of the man­age­ment fees that were due and al­low­able un­der the agree­ments that gov­erned the Fund. Fur­ther, the in­dict­ment al­leges Bur­rill filed false and fraud­u­lent U.S. In­di­vid­ual In­come Tax Re­turn, Forms 1040, which un­der­stat­ed his in­come by ex­clud­ing mon­ey Bur­rill trans­ferred out of the Fund and in­to ac­counts he con­trolled.”

Add it all up, and that comes to up to 20 years in prison to cov­er the wire fraud charges, 5 years for in­vest­ment ad­vis­er fraud and 5 more years for tax eva­sion, along with mil­lions of dol­lars in po­ten­tial fines.

Ac­cord­ing to the SEC’s lit­i­ga­tion, Bur­rill’s mon­ey prob­lems start­ed in 2007, when he first dipped in­to the $283 mil­lion Fund III to cov­er ex­pens­es at his man­age­ment com­pa­ny. Over the next 7 years, such trans­fers be­came rou­tine, in­clud­ing tap­ping the fund to top up his per­son­al bank ac­count. About $4.6 mil­lion was al­leged­ly used to cov­er per­son­al costs, in­clud­ing jew­el­ry from Tiffany’s.

Bur­rill’s prob­lems turned crit­i­cal af­ter he had a falling out with some of his staffers. Af­ter he fired them, they alert­ed in­vestors, who quick­ly seized con­trol of the fund and start­ed a chain of events that has yet to ful­ly play out.

Im­age: Steven Bur­rill, fif­teen years ago, pos­ing at a fo­rum “No­bel Prizes and Biotech­nol­o­gy Gu­rus cel­e­brate DNA Dis­cov­ery’s 50th An­niver­sary” in Ly­on, France Get­ty

Hal Barron, GSK

Break­ing the death spi­ral: Hal Bar­ron talks about trans­form­ing the mori­bund R&D cul­ture at GSK in a crit­i­cal year for the late-stage pipeline

Just ahead of GlaxoSmithKline’s Q2 update on Wednesday, science chief Hal Barron is making the rounds to talk up the pharma giant’s late-stage strategy as the top execs continue to woo back a deeply skeptical investor group while pushing through a whole new R&D culture.

And that’s not easy, Barron is quick to note. He told the Financial Times:

I think that culture, to some extent, is as hard, in fact even harder, than doing the science.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Some Big Phar­mas stepped up their game on da­ta trans­paren­cy — but which flunked the test?

The nonprofit Bioethics International has come out with their latest scorecard on data transparency among the big biopharmas in the industry — flagging a few standouts while spotlighting some laggards who are continuing to underperform.

Now in its third year, the nonprofit created a new set of standards with Yale School of Medicine and Stanford Law School to evaluate the track record on trial registration, results reporting, publication and data-sharing practice.

Busy Gilead crew throws strug­gling biotech a life­line, with some cash up­front and hun­dreds of mil­lions in biobucks for HIV deal

Durect $DRRX got a badly needed shot in the arm Monday morning as Gilead’s busy BD team lined up access to its extended-release platform tech for HIV and hepatitis B.

Gilead, a leader in the HIV sector, is paying a modest $25 million in cash for the right to jump on the platform at Durect, which has been using its technology to come up with an extended-release version of bupivacaine. The FDA rejected that in 2014, but Durect has been working on a comeback.

In­tec blitzed by PhI­II flop as lead pro­gram fails to beat Mer­ck­'s stan­dard com­bo for Parkin­son’s

Intec Pharma’s $NTEC lead drug slammed into a brick wall Monday morning. The small-cap Israeli biotech reported that its lead program — coming off a platform designed to produce a safer, more effective oral drug for Parkinson’s — failed the Phase III at the primary endpoint.

Researchers at Intec, which has already seen its share price collapse over the past few months, says that its Accordion Pill-Carbidopa/Levodopa failed to prove superior to Sinemet in reducing daily ‘off’ time. 

Cel­gene racks up third Ote­zla ap­proval, heat­ing up talks about who Bris­tol-My­ers will sell to

Whoever is taking Otezla off Bristol-Myers Squibb’s hands will have one more revenue stream to boast.

The drug — a rising star in Celgene’s pipeline that generated global sales of $1.6 billion last year — is now OK’d to treat oral ulcers associated with Behçet’s disease, a common symptom for a rare inflammatory disorder. This marks the third FDA approval for the PDE4 inhibitor since 2014, when it was greenlighted for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Vlad Coric (Biohaven)

In an­oth­er dis­ap­point­ment for in­vestors, FDA slaps down Bio­haven’s re­vised ver­sion of an old ALS drug

Biohaven is at risk of making a habit of disappointing its investors.

Late Friday the biotech $BHVN reported that the FDA had rejected its application for riluzole, an old drug that they had made over into a sublingual formulation that dissolves under the tongue. According to Biohaven, the FDA had a problem with the active ingredient used in a bioequivalence study back in 2017, which they got from the Canadian drugmaker Apotex.

Apotex, though, has been a disaster ground. The manufacturer voluntarily yanked the ANDAs on 31 drugs — in late 2017 — after the FDA came across serious manufacturing deficiencies at their plants in India. A few days ago, the FDA made it official.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Francesco De Rubertis

Medicxi is rolling out its biggest fund ever to back Eu­rope's top 'sci­en­tists with strange ideas'

Francesco De Rubertis built Medicxi to be the kind of biotech venture player he would have liked to have known back when he was a full time scientist.

“When I was a scientist 20 years ago I would have loved Medicxi,’ the co-founder tells me. It’s the kind of place run by and for investigators, what the Medicxi partner calls “scientists with strange ideas — a platform for the drug hunter and scientific entrepreneur. That’s what I wanted when I was a scientist.”

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter a decade, Vi­iV CSO John Pot­tage says it's time to step down — and he's hand­ing the job to long­time col­league Kim Smith

ViiV Healthcare has always been something unique in the global drug industry.

Owned by GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer — with GSK in the lead as majority owner — it was created 10 years ago in a time of deep turmoil for the field as something independent of the pharma giants, but with access to lots of infrastructural support on demand. While R&D at the mother ship inside GSK was souring, a razor-focused ViiV provided a rare bright spot, challenging Gilead on a lucrative front in delivering new combinations that require fewer therapies with a more easily tolerated regimen.

They kept a massive number of people alive who would otherwise have been facing a death sentence. And they made money.

And throughout, John Pottage has been the chief scientific and chief medical officer.

Until now.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Chas­ing Roche's ag­ing block­buster fran­chise, Am­gen/Al­ler­gan roll out Avastin, Her­ceptin knock­offs at dis­count

Let the long battle for biosimilars in the cancer space begin.

Amgen has launched its Avastin and Herceptin copycats — licensed from the predecessors of Allergan — almost two years after the FDA had stamped its approval on Mvasi (bevacizumab-awwb) and three months after the Kanjinti OK (trastuzumab-anns). While the biotech had been fielding biosimilars in Europe, this marks their first foray in the US — and the first oncology biosimilars in the country.