Agenus touts blockchain tech to roll out new ‘dig­i­tal se­cu­ri­ty’ for its PD-1, but will it work?

Be­set with set­backs, a once cash-poor Agenus had some­thing to cheer late last year when be­he­moth Gilead signed on as a part­ner on up to five of its im­muno-on­col­o­gy pro­grams. On Tues­day, the biotech of­fered in­vestors an in­trigu­ing pro­pos­al: fund the de­vel­op­ment of a sin­gle drug, while pre­serv­ing share­hold­er eq­ui­ty.

In per­haps the first in­stance of a bio­phar­ma com­pa­ny con­duct­ing such a ‘dig­i­tal se­cu­ri­ty’ of­fer­ing, Agenus said it was launch­ing a to­ken  de­signed to en­able qual­i­fied in­vestors to di­rect­ly in­vest in a sin­gle biotech prod­uct – in this case, the to­kens is­sued will rep­re­sent a por­tion of po­ten­tial fu­ture US sales of AGEN2034, Agenus’ late-stage an­ti-PD-1 an­ti­body.

Biren Amin

“I have nev­er seen this type of arrange­ment. I think there may be lim­i­ta­tions in terms of par­tic­i­pa­tion from in­sti­tu­tion­al in­vestors who may not be able to par­tic­i­pate,” Jef­feries’ Biren Amin, who cov­ers Agenus $AGEN, told End­points News.

The Agenus to­ken is pow­ered by blockchain tech­nol­o­gy, which was was in­vent­ed by an uniden­ti­fied de­vel­op­er in 2008 to pow­er Bit­coin, but is now used across a num­ber of ap­pli­ca­tions. Es­sen­tial­ly, it is a se­quence of blocks or groups of trans­ac­tions that are chained to­geth­er and dis­trib­uted among users, map­ping an un­al­ter­able record of trans­ac­tions that are not de­pen­dent on an ex­ter­nal au­thor­i­ty to val­i­date da­ta.

In­vestors will be el­i­gi­ble to pur­chase the Agenus’ to­kens un­der pre­ferred terms in the ini­tial stage of the of­fer­ing, which is slat­ed for mid-Feb­ru­ary. The Lex­ing­ton, MA-based com­pa­ny ex­pects to raise up to $100 mil­lion to de­vel­op and sell AGEN2034.

“Agenus an­tic­i­pates the in­dus­try will adopt this fi­nanc­ing mod­el as an at­trac­tive means of ob­tain­ing cap­i­tal in com­ing years. BEST (Agenus’ to­ken) is ex­pect­ed to lead to the emer­gence of a new mar­ket­place for as­set-spe­cif­ic se­cu­ri­ties pro­vid­ing in­vestors with unique fund­ing al­ter­na­tives and op­tions for man­ag­ing risk,” the can­cer drug de­vel­op­er said in a state­ment on Tues­day.

Brad Lon­car, chief ex­ec­u­tive of Lon­car In­vest­ments which runs the Lon­car Can­cer Im­munother­a­py ETF, sug­gest­ed a num­ber of peo­ple in the in­dus­try were work­ing on such fund­ing arrange­ments.

Brad Lon­car at the US-Chi­na Bio­phar­ma In­no­va­tion and In­vest­ment Sum­mit in Shang­hai on Oc­to­ber 23, 2018; End­points News, Pharm­Cube

Click on the im­age to see the full-sized ver­sion


“Set­ting aside the specifics of this Agenus PD-1, I do think the con­cept has po­ten­tial. It would al­low com­pa­nies to raise funds for sin­gle as­sets with­in their pipelines and for in­vestors to back in­di­vid­ual projects. It’s a very unique and ap­peal­ing con­cept.”

But the fresh ap­proach to fund­ing comes with fresh ques­tions. For in­stance, gov­er­nance. “These would all be in­di­vid­ual se­cu­ri­ties so how do you en­sure there is ap­pro­pri­ate in­vestor ed­u­ca­tion and trans­paren­cy through­out the drugs’ de­vel­op­ment?,” Lon­car said.

Then there is the ques­tion about liq­uid­i­ty. “These are like­ly to be small projects so it re­mains to be seen if these will be liq­uid as­sets that are priced ef­fi­cient­ly,” Lon­car not­ed, adding that if in­vestors elect to sell to­kens they will pre­sum­ably do so on the sec­ondary mar­ket like any oth­er to­ken.

There are a laun­dry list of oth­er hy­po­thet­i­cals to pon­der: since each to­ken will rep­re­sent a slice of fu­ture US sales of AGEN2034, what hap­pens if the drug is re­ject­ed? In con­trast, if the drug is ap­proved, what im­pact does this strat­e­gy have on any po­ten­tial part­ner­ships Agenus may want to ink in or­der to com­mer­cial­ize?

End­points has con­tact­ed Agenus for com­ment.

The DCT-OS: A Tech­nol­o­gy-first Op­er­at­ing Sys­tem - En­abling Clin­i­cal Tri­als

As technology-enabled clinical research becomes the new normal, an integrated decentralized clinical trial operating system can ensure quality, deliver consistency and improve the patient experience.

The increasing availability of COVID-19 vaccines has many of us looking forward to a time when everyday things return to a state of normal. Schools and teachers are returning to classrooms, offices and small businesses are reopening, and there’s a palpable sense of optimism that the often-awkward adjustments we’ve all made personally and professionally in the last year are behind us, never to return. In the world of clinical research, however, some pandemic-necessitated adjustments are proving to be more than emergency stopgap measures to ensure trial continuity — and numerous decentralized clinical trial (DCT) tools and methodologies employed within the last year are likely here to stay as part of biopharma’s new normal.

Onno van de Stolpe, Galapagos CEO (Thierry Roge/Belga Mag/AFP via Getty Images)

Gala­pa­gos chops in­to their pipeline, drop­ping core fields and re­or­ga­niz­ing R&D as the BD team hunts for some­thing 'trans­for­ma­tive'

Just 5 months after Gilead gutted its rich partnership with Galapagos following a bitter setback at the FDA, the Belgian biotech is hunkering down and chopping the pipeline in an effort to conserve cash while their BD team pursues a mission to find a “transformative” deal for the company.

The filgotinib disaster didn’t warrant a mention as Galapagos laid out its Darwinian restructuring plans. Forced to make choices, the company is ditching its IPF molecule ’1205, while moving ahead with a Phase II IPF study for its chitinase inhibitor ’4617.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Stéphane Bancel, Getty

Mod­er­na CEO brush­es off US sup­port for IP waiv­er, eyes more than $19B in Covid-19 vac­cine sales in 2021

Moderna is definitively more concerned with keeping pace with Pfizer in the race to vaccinate the world against Covid-19 than it is with Wednesday’s decision from the Biden administration to back an intellectual property waiver that aims to increase vaccine supplies worldwide.

In its first quarter earnings call on Thursday, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel shrugged off any suggestion that the newly US-backed intellectual property waiver would impact his company’s vaccine or bottom line. Still, the company’s stock price fell by about 9% in early morning trading.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Angela Merkel (AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

Covid-19 roundup: Pfiz­er sub­mits vac­cine for full ap­proval; Merkel op­pos­es Biden pro­pos­al to sus­pend IP for vac­cines

Pfizer and BioNTech said Friday that they’ve submitted a biologics license application to the FDA for full approval of their mRNA vaccine for those over the age of 16.

How long it will take the FDA to decide on the BLA will be set once it’s been formally accepted by the agency.

Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, previously told Endpoints News that the review of the BLA should take between three and four months, but it may be even faster than that.

UP­DAT­ED: EMA safe­ty com­mit­tee seeks more in­fo on heart in­flam­ma­tion fol­low­ing Pfiz­er Covid-19 vac­cine

The European Medicines Agency’s safety committee said Friday that it’s aware of cases of inflammation of the heart muscle and inflammation of the membrane around the heart, mainly reported following vaccination with Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, known in Europe as Comirnaty.

“There is no indication that these cases are due to the vaccine,” the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca caps PD-L1/CT­LA-4/chemo com­bo come­back with OS win. Is treme­li­mum­ab fi­nal­ly ready for ap­proval?

AstraZeneca’s closely-watched POSEIDON study continues to be the rare bright spot in its push for an in-house PD-L1/CTLA-4 combo.

Combining Imfinzi and tremelimumab with physicians’ choice of chemotherapy helped patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer live longer, the company reported — marking the first time the still-experimental tremelimumab has demonstrated an OS benefit.

For AstraZeneca and CEO Pascal Soriot, the positive readout — which is devoid of numbers — offers much-needed validation for the big bet they made on Imfinzi plus tremelimumab, after the PD-L1/CTLA-4 regimen failed multiple trials in head and neck cancer as well as lung cancer.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ron DePinho (file photo)

A 'fly­over' biotech launch­es in Texas with four Ron De­Pin­ho-found­ed com­pa­nies un­der its belt

In his 13 years at Genzyme, Michael Wyzga noticed something about East Coast drugmakers. Execs would often jet from Boston or New York to San Francisco to find more assets, and completely miss the work being done in flyover states, like Texas or Wisconsin.

“If it doesn’t come out of MGH or MIT or Harvard, probably not that interesting,” he said of the mindset.

Now, he and some well-known industry players are looking to change that, and they’ve reeled in just over $38 million to do it.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 104,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

An­oth­er failed tri­al for Or­p­hazyme's 'pipeline-in-a-pro­duc­t' leaves shad­ow on drug's fu­ture

The tumultuous ride for Orphazyme continued on Friday as the company announced that a pivotal trial for its lead drug arimoclomol failed yet again, this time in the treatment of ALS, seeding doubt in a drug that had recently been cleared by the FDA for priority review. The latest failure casts a darker shadow on the upcoming decision despite Orphazyme’s upbeat outlook.

In a statement, the Danish biotech announced that the drug did not meet its primary or secondary endpoints evaluating function and survival. But the company has not announced any data surrounding the failure, instead saying that it will publish the complete results later this year.

In­cyte ponies up $12M to set­tle char­i­ty foun­da­tion kick­back claims; US ex­er­cis­es op­tion for more dos­es of mon­key­pox vac­cine

One in a string of lawsuits targeting copay charity foundations, the DOJ has been hunting drugmaker Incyte for what prosecutors alleged was a kickback scheme to court patients. Now, Incyte is clearing its name.

Incyte will shell out $12.6 million to settle claims it funneled funds through a charity foundation to cover federal copays for patients taking its JAK inhibitor Jakafi, the DOJ said this week.