Agenus touts blockchain tech to roll out new ‘dig­i­tal se­cu­ri­ty’ for its PD-1, but will it work?

Be­set with set­backs, a once cash-poor Agenus had some­thing to cheer late last year when be­he­moth Gilead signed on as a part­ner on up to five of its im­muno-on­col­o­gy pro­grams. On Tues­day, the biotech of­fered in­vestors an in­trigu­ing pro­pos­al: fund the de­vel­op­ment of a sin­gle drug, while pre­serv­ing share­hold­er eq­ui­ty.

In per­haps the first in­stance of a bio­phar­ma com­pa­ny con­duct­ing such a ‘dig­i­tal se­cu­ri­ty’ of­fer­ing, Agenus said it was launch­ing a to­ken  de­signed to en­able qual­i­fied in­vestors to di­rect­ly in­vest in a sin­gle biotech prod­uct – in this case, the to­kens is­sued will rep­re­sent a por­tion of po­ten­tial fu­ture US sales of AGEN2034, Agenus’ late-stage an­ti-PD-1 an­ti­body.

Biren Amin

“I have nev­er seen this type of arrange­ment. I think there may be lim­i­ta­tions in terms of par­tic­i­pa­tion from in­sti­tu­tion­al in­vestors who may not be able to par­tic­i­pate,” Jef­feries’ Biren Amin, who cov­ers Agenus $AGEN, told End­points News.

The Agenus to­ken is pow­ered by blockchain tech­nol­o­gy, which was was in­vent­ed by an uniden­ti­fied de­vel­op­er in 2008 to pow­er Bit­coin, but is now used across a num­ber of ap­pli­ca­tions. Es­sen­tial­ly, it is a se­quence of blocks or groups of trans­ac­tions that are chained to­geth­er and dis­trib­uted among users, map­ping an un­al­ter­able record of trans­ac­tions that are not de­pen­dent on an ex­ter­nal au­thor­i­ty to val­i­date da­ta.

In­vestors will be el­i­gi­ble to pur­chase the Agenus’ to­kens un­der pre­ferred terms in the ini­tial stage of the of­fer­ing, which is slat­ed for mid-Feb­ru­ary. The Lex­ing­ton, MA-based com­pa­ny ex­pects to raise up to $100 mil­lion to de­vel­op and sell AGEN2034.

“Agenus an­tic­i­pates the in­dus­try will adopt this fi­nanc­ing mod­el as an at­trac­tive means of ob­tain­ing cap­i­tal in com­ing years. BEST (Agenus’ to­ken) is ex­pect­ed to lead to the emer­gence of a new mar­ket­place for as­set-spe­cif­ic se­cu­ri­ties pro­vid­ing in­vestors with unique fund­ing al­ter­na­tives and op­tions for man­ag­ing risk,” the can­cer drug de­vel­op­er said in a state­ment on Tues­day.

Brad Lon­car, chief ex­ec­u­tive of Lon­car In­vest­ments which runs the Lon­car Can­cer Im­munother­a­py ETF, sug­gest­ed a num­ber of peo­ple in the in­dus­try were work­ing on such fund­ing arrange­ments.

Brad Lon­car at the US-Chi­na Bio­phar­ma In­no­va­tion and In­vest­ment Sum­mit in Shang­hai on Oc­to­ber 23, 2018; End­points News, Pharm­Cube

Click on the im­age to see the full-sized ver­sion


“Set­ting aside the specifics of this Agenus PD-1, I do think the con­cept has po­ten­tial. It would al­low com­pa­nies to raise funds for sin­gle as­sets with­in their pipelines and for in­vestors to back in­di­vid­ual projects. It’s a very unique and ap­peal­ing con­cept.”

But the fresh ap­proach to fund­ing comes with fresh ques­tions. For in­stance, gov­er­nance. “These would all be in­di­vid­ual se­cu­ri­ties so how do you en­sure there is ap­pro­pri­ate in­vestor ed­u­ca­tion and trans­paren­cy through­out the drugs’ de­vel­op­ment?,” Lon­car said.

Then there is the ques­tion about liq­uid­i­ty. “These are like­ly to be small projects so it re­mains to be seen if these will be liq­uid as­sets that are priced ef­fi­cient­ly,” Lon­car not­ed, adding that if in­vestors elect to sell to­kens they will pre­sum­ably do so on the sec­ondary mar­ket like any oth­er to­ken.

There are a laun­dry list of oth­er hy­po­thet­i­cals to pon­der: since each to­ken will rep­re­sent a slice of fu­ture US sales of AGEN2034, what hap­pens if the drug is re­ject­ed? In con­trast, if the drug is ap­proved, what im­pact does this strat­e­gy have on any po­ten­tial part­ner­ships Agenus may want to ink in or­der to com­mer­cial­ize?

End­points has con­tact­ed Agenus for com­ment.

Tar­get­ing a Po­ten­tial Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty of Cer­tain Can­cers with DNA Dam­age Re­sponse

Every individual’s DNA is unique, and because of this, every patient responds differently to disease and treatment. It is astonishing how four tiny building blocks of our DNA – A, T, C, G – dictate our health, disease, and how we age.

The tricky thing about DNA is that it is constantly exposed to damage by sources such as ultraviolet light, certain chemicals, toxins, and even natural biochemical processes inside our cells.¹ If ignored, DNA damage will accumulate in replicating cells, giving rise to mutations that can lead to premature aging, cancer, and other diseases.

Fol­low biotechs go­ing pub­lic with the End­points News IPO Track­er

The Endpoints News team is continuing to track IPO filings for 2021, and we’ve designed a new tracker page for the effort.

Check it out here: Biopharma IPOs 2021 from Endpoints News

You’ll be able to find all the biotechs that have filed and priced so far this year, sortable by quarter and listed by newest first. As of the time of publishing on Feb. 25, there have already been 16 biotechs debuting on Nasdaq so far this year, with an additional four having filed their S-1 paperwork.

Steve Cutler, Icon CEO (Icon)

In the biggest CRO takeover in years, Icon doles out $12B for PRA Health Sci­ences to fo­cus on de­cen­tral­ized clin­i­cal work

Contract research M&A had a healthy run in recent years before recently petering out. But with the market ripe for a big buyout and the Covid-19 pandemic emphasizing the importance of decentralized trials, Wednesday saw a tectonic shift in the CRO world.

Icon, the Dublin-based CRO, will acquire PRA Health Sciences for $12 billion in a move that will shake up the highest rungs of a fragmented market. The merger would combine the 5th- and 6th-largest CROs by 2020 revenue, according to Icon, and the merger will set the newco up to be the second-largest global CRO behind only IQVIA.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Tom Barnes (Orna)

The mR­NA era is here. MPM be­lieves the fu­ture be­longs to oR­NA — and Big Phar­ma wants a seat at the ta­ble

If the ultra-fast clinical development of Covid-19 vaccines opened the world’s eyes to the promises of messenger RNA, the subsequent delays in supply offered a crash course on the ultra-complex process of producing them. Even before the formulation and fill-finish steps, mRNA is the precious end product from an arduous journey involving enzyme-aided transcription, modification and purification.

For Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Gilead’s Kite and Astellas, it’s time to rethink the way therapeutic RNA is engineered.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

S&P ex­pects steady ero­sion in Big Phar­ma's cred­it pro­file in 2021 as new M&A deals roll in — but don't un­der­es­ti­mate their un­der­ly­ing strength

S&P Global has taken a look at the dominant forces shaping the pharma market and come to the conclusion that there will be more downgrades than upgrades in 2021 — the 8th straight year of steady decline.

But it’s not all bad news. Some things are looking up, and there’s still plenty of money to be made in an industry that enjoys a 30% to 40% profit margin, once you factor in steep R&D expenses.

Tal Zaks, Moderna CMO (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi, via still image from video)

CMO Tal Zaks bids Mod­er­na a sur­prise adieu as biotech projects $18.4B in rev­enue, plots post-Covid ex­pan­sion

How do you exit a company after six years in style? Developing one of the most lucrative and life-saving products in pharma history is probably not the worst way to go.

Tal Zaks, Moderna’s CMO since 2015, will leave the mRNA biotech in September, the biotech disclosed in their annual report this morning. The company has already retained the recruitment firm Russell Reynolds to find a replacement.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ken Frazier, Merck CEO (Bess Adler/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

UP­DAT­ED: Mer­ck takes a swing at the IL-2 puz­zle­box with a $1.85B play for buzzy Pan­dion and its au­toim­mune hope­fuls

When Roger Perlmutter bid farewell to Merck late last year, the drugmaker perhaps best known now for sales giant Keytruda signaled its intent to take a swing at early-stage novelty with the appointment of discovery head Dean Li. Now, Merck is signing a decent-sized check to bring an IL-2 moonshot into the fold.

Merck will shell out roughly $1.85 billion for Pandion Pharmaceuticals, a biotech hoping to gin up regulatory T cells (Tregs) to treat a range of autoimmune disorders, the drugmaker said Thursday.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Glax­o­SmithK­line re­thinks strat­e­gy for Covid-19 an­ti­body — not the Vir ones — af­ter tri­al flop. Is there hope in high-risk pa­tients?

In the search for a better Covid-19 therapeutic, GlaxoSmithKline and Vir have partnered up on two antibodies they hope have a chance. GSK is also testing its own in-house antibody, and early results may have shut the door on its widespread use.

A combination of GSK’s monoclonal antibody otilimab plus standard of care couldn’t best standard of care alone in preventing death and respiratory failure in hospitalized Covid-19 patients after 28 days, according to data from the Phase IIa OSCAR study unveiled Thursday.

Photo: Shutterstock

Bio­phar­ma's suc­cess rate in bring­ing drugs to mar­ket has long been abysmal. Can new tools help rewrite that trou­bled past?

In 2011, a team of researchers at British drugmaker AstraZeneca had a problem they were looking to solve.

For years, drug discovery and development were a wasteland for innovation. Novel drugs largely fell into one of two categories — monoclonal antibodies and small molecules — and new therapeutic modalities were hard to come by. After a rush of promising approvals in the late 1990s — including then-Biogen’s CD20 targeting antibody breakthrough Rituxan — the field stagnated and attrition rates stayed sky-high. What exactly is the industry doing wrong? AstraZeneca asked itself.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.