Aim­ing to shed last-place rep, Eli Lil­ly touts its PhI­II pipeline and promis­es a faster game in R&D

Eli Lil­ly wants you to know that it is de­ter­mined to lose its rep as a last-place fin­ish­er in the race to get new block­busters to the mar­ket. And the phar­ma gi­ant is sig­nal­ing that the R&D group is look­ing for more drugs it can bring in to com­plete a promised surge in new drug ap­provals over the next 5 years.

Eli Lil­ly $LLY laid out its strat­e­gy for the next wave of R&D work to­day, vow­ing to hit the gas in ac­cel­er­at­ing new de­vel­op­ment ef­forts. Lil­ly ex­ecs high­light­ed their top drugs in the pipeline and al­so made a mod­est bet on STING last night, a tar­get that has come un­der a dark cloud on the can­cer side in re­cent months. 

Lil­ly, though, put down $12 mil­lion to al­ly with Aduro $ADRO — which has been ham­mered by a string of set­backs — on the cGAS-STING path­way in­hibitor pro­gram for au­toim­mune dis­eases, adding sig­nif­i­cant mile­stones for every suc­cess­ful ef­fort.

Daniel Skovron­sky

That deal, which drove up Aduro’s bat­tered stock by 29% in af­ter-mar­ket trad­ing, fol­lows a string of new deals at Lil­ly aimed at beef­ing up the pipeline for the next 5 years.

Lil­ly has big promis­es to keep. It’s halfway through a dri­ve to get 20 drug ap­provals over 10 years, with 10 more to go over the next 5 years. Av­er­ag­ing 2 new drug ap­provals a year isn’t easy. But num­bers like that al­so mat­ter less than the earn­ing pow­er of each.

Here are the new drugs, ex­per­i­men­tal and in need of ex­ten­sions, which are at the fore­front in their 5 core ar­eas:

— On­col­o­gy: Verzenio, pegilode­cakin
— Pain: Em­gal­i­ty, las­mid­i­tan, tanezum­ab
— Neu­rode­gen­er­a­tion: N3pG an­ti­body, tau an­ti­body, D1PAM
— Im­munol­o­gy: Olu­mi­ant, mirik­izum­ab
— Di­a­betes: In­sulins and Con­nect­ed Care, Trulic­i­ty, tirzepatide

At the top of the queue you’ll find nasal glucagon for hy­po­glycemia and las­mid­i­tan for acute mi­graine be­ing lined up for a po­ten­tial FDA ap­proval in 2019. 

Daniel Skovron­sky, the re­cent­ly named R&D chief at Lil­ly, is putting a big em­pha­sis on R&D speed through Phase III. The last 5 years may have vast­ly im­proved Lil­ly’s rep for be­ing able to de­vel­op new drugs and get an ap­proval, but it’s long been a no­to­ri­ous lag­gard in get­ting to the mar­ket, of­ten com­ing in last.

Skovron­sky’s goal is to re­duce the time from tar­get iden­ti­fi­ca­tion to the clin­ic to 3 years, then carve out 2 years in the time need­ed to com­plete the clin­i­cal pro­gram and con­tin­ue to beef up the pipeline with ex­ter­nal deals.

Lil­ly will con­tin­ue to spend the mon­ey that puts it in the top 15 of glob­al R&D spenders each year. The re­search bud­get will hit $5.6 bil­lion to $5.8 bil­lion in 2019. That’s a sig­nif­i­cant bump up from the $5 bil­lion to $5.2 bil­lion it fore­cast for this year.

Im­age: Eli Lil­ly cor­po­rate head­quar­ters in In­di­anapo­lis AP Pho­to

Fangliang Zhang, AP Images

UP­DAT­ED: Leg­end fetch­es $424 mil­lion, emerges as biggest win­ner yet in pan­dem­ic IPO boom as shares soar

Amid a flurry of splashy pandemic IPOs, a J&J-partnered Chinese biotech has emerged with one of the largest public raises in biotech history.

Legend Biotech, the Nanjing-based CAR-T developer, has raised $424 million on NASDAQ. The biotech had originally filed for a still-hefty $350 million, based on a range of $18-$20, but managed to fetch $23 per share, allowing them to well-eclipse the massive raises from companies like Allogene, Juno, Galapagos, though they’ll still fall a few dollars short of Moderna’s record-setting $600 million raise from 2018.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 83,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Is a pow­er­house Mer­ck team prepar­ing to leap past Roche — and leave Gilead and Bris­tol My­ers be­hind — in the race to TIG­IT dom­i­na­tion?

Roche caused quite a stir at ASCO with its first look at some positive — but not so impressive — data for their combination of Tecentriq with their anti-TIGIT drug tiragolumab. But some analysts believe that Merck is positioned to make a bid — soon — for the lead in the race to a second-wave combo immuno-oncology approach with its own ambitious early-stage program tied to a dominant Keytruda.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

As it hap­pened: A bid­ding war for an an­tibi­ot­ic mak­er in a mar­ket that has rav­aged its peers

In a bewildering twist to the long-suffering market for antibiotics — there has actually been a bidding war for an antibiotic company: Tetraphase.

It all started back in March, when the maker of Xerava (an FDA approved therapy for complicated intra-abdominal infections) said it had received an offer from AcelRx for an all-stock deal valued at $14.4 million.

The offer was well-timed. Xerava was approved in 2018, four years after Tetraphase posted its first batch of pivotal trial data, and sales were nowhere near where they needed to be in order for the company to keep its head above water.

Drug man­u­fac­tur­ing gi­ant Lon­za taps Roche/phar­ma ‘rein­ven­tion’ vet as its new CEO

Lonza chairman Albert Baehny took his time headhunting a new CEO for the company, making it absolutely clear he wanted a Big Pharma or biotech CEO with a good long track record in the business for the top spot. In the end, he went with the gold standard, turning to Roche’s ranks to recruit Pierre-Alain Ruffieux for the job.

Ruffieux, a member of the pharma leadership team at Roche, spent close to 5 years at the company. But like a small army of manufacturing execs, he gained much of his experience at the other Big Pharma in Basel, remaining at Novartis for 12 years before expanding his horizons.

Covid-19 roundup: Ab­b­Vie jumps in­to Covid-19 an­ti­body hunt; As­traZeneca shoots for 2B dos­es of Ox­ford vac­cine — with $750M from CEPI, Gavi

Another Big Pharma is entering the Covid-19 antibody hunt.

AbbVie has announced a collaboration with the Netherlands’ Utrecht University and Erasmus Medical Center and the Chinese-Dutch biotech Harbour Biomed to develop a neutralizing antibody that can treat Covid-19. The antibody, called 47D11, was discovered by AbbVie’s three partners, and AbbVie will support early preclinical work, while preparing for later preclinical and clinical development. Researchers described the antibody in Nature Communications last month.

Pfiz­er’s Doug Gior­dano has $500M — and some ad­vice — to of­fer a cer­tain breed of 'break­through' biotech

So let’s say you’re running a cutting-edge, clinical-stage biotech, probably public, but not necessarily so, which could see some big advantages teaming up with some marquee researchers, picking up say $50 million to $75 million dollars in a non-threatening minority equity investment that could take you to the next level.

Doug Giordano might have some thoughts on how that could work out.

The SVP of business development at the pharma giant has helped forge a new fund called the Pfizer Breakthrough Growth Initiative. And he has $500 million of Pfizer’s money to put behind 7 to 10 — or so — biotech stocks that fit that general description.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 83,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Leen Kawas, Athira CEO (Athira)

Can a small biotech suc­cess­ful­ly tack­le an Ever­est climb like Alzheimer’s? Athi­ra has $85M and some in­flu­en­tial back­ers ready to give it a shot

There haven’t been a lot of big venture rounds for biotech companies looking to run a Phase II study in Alzheimer’s.

The field has been a disaster over the past decade. Amyloid didn’t pan out as a target — going down in a litany of Phase III failures — and is now making its last stand at Biogen. Tau is a comer, but when you look around and all you see is destruction, the idea of backing a startup trying to find complex cocktails to swing the course of this devilishly complicated memory-wasting disease would daunt the pluckiest investors.

GSK presents case to ex­pand use of its lu­pus drug in pa­tients with kid­ney dis­ease, but the field is evolv­ing. How long will the mo­nop­oly last?

In 2011, GlaxoSmithKline’s Benlysta became the first biologic to win approval for lupus patients. Nine years on, the British drugmaker has unveiled detailed positive results from a study testing the drug in lupus patients with associated kidney disease — a post-marketing requirement from the initial FDA approval.

Lupus is a drug developer’s nightmare. In the last six decades, there has been just one FDA approval (Benlysta), with the field resembling a graveyard in recent years with a string of failures including UCB and Biogen’s late-stage flop, as well as defeats in Xencor and Sanofi’s programs. One of the main reasons the success has eluded researchers is because lupus, akin to cancer, is not just one disease — it really is a disease of many diseases, noted Al Roy, executive director of Lupus Clinical Investigators Network, an initiative of New York-based Lupus Research Alliance that claims it is the world’s leading private funder of lupus research, in an interview.

UP­DAT­ED: Es­ti­mat­ing a US price tag of $5K per course, remde­sivir is set to make bil­lions for Gilead, says key an­a­lyst

Data on remdesivir — the first drug shown to benefit Covid-19 patients in a randomized, controlled trial setting — may be murky, but its maker Gilead could reap billions from the sales of the failed Ebola therapy, according to an estimate by a prominent Wall Street analyst. However, the forecast, which is based on a $5,000-per-course US price tag, triggered the ire of one top drug price expert.