Alex­ion has scored an ad­di­tion­al FDA OK for its key­stone rare ther­a­py Soliris, un­lock­ing what a key an­a­lyst calls a sig­nif­i­cant part of its C5 fran­chise and el­e­vat­ing that port­fo­lio fur­ther up the block­buster ranks.

The drug is now ap­proved to treat neu­romyelitis op­ti­ca spec­trum dis­or­der, a rare au­toim­mune con­di­tion char­ac­ter­ized by sud­den at­tacks on the cen­tral ner­vous sys­tem. The dis­ease of­ten strikes women in their 30s and 40s, and could be con­fused with mul­ti­ple scle­ro­sis. While off-la­bel Rit­ux­an helps most pa­tients — ap­prox­i­mate­ly 70% — keep the dis­ease at bay, re­laps­es still threat­en to do ir­re­versible harm and cause se­vere dis­abil­i­ty to those for whom the stan­dard of care doesn’t work.

Ge­of­frey Porges

In a Phase III test­ing the drug in pa­tients who had mul­ti­ple re­laps­es de­spite pri­or im­muno-sup­pres­sive ther­a­pies, Soliris re­duced the risk of NMOSD re­lapse by 94.2% com­pared to place­bo (p<0.0001) — a stel­lar re­sult. And in the lat­est da­ta cut at 144 weeks, 96% of the Soliris group didn’t ex­pe­ri­ence an at­tack, com­pared to 45% of pa­tients in the place­bo arm who re­mained re­lapse-free.

No­tably, reg­u­la­tors did not lim­it Soliris’ use to non-re­spon­ders, of­fer­ing a blan­ket la­bel that cov­ers any pa­tient with an­ti-aqua­por­in-4 an­ti­bod­ies — which is be­lieved to ac­ti­vate the com­ple­ment sys­tem that Soliris in­hibits.

That sur­prised SVB Leerink’s George Porges, a big cheer­leader of the drug, but he is care­ful to note that a broad­er la­bel does not guar­an­tee a broad­er pa­tient pop­u­la­tion.

De­spite the la­bel, we don’t think Soliris will cap­ture sig­nif­i­cant use in front line treat­ment giv­en Rit­ux­an’s fa­vor­able cost-ben­e­fit pro­file (~70% dis­ease con­trol un­der Rit­ux­an and ~$60K first year cost com­pared ~$700K first year cost for Soliris). We ex­pect most in­sur­ance pay­ers to re­quire ev­i­dence of Rit­ux­an fail­ure be­fore re­im­burs­ing for Soliris in this dis­ease, but do ex­pect rel­a­tive­ly open ac­cess to Soliris for re­lapsed pa­tients in late line treat­ment.

He notes that Alex­ion is soon start­ing a Phase III tri­al in the same in­di­ca­tion for Ul­tomiris, its fol­lowup to Soliris that’s eas­i­er to use. By his es­ti­mates, be­tween the two drugs the NMOSD sales alone will bring in around $1 bil­lion in 2028, rep­re­sent­ing one-fifth of the to­tal C5 fran­chise that year.

As far as com­pe­ti­tion goes, Roche and its Chugai sub­sidiary has some Phase III da­ta to show for its IL-6 in­hibitor satral­izum­ab. As­traZeneca spin­out Viela Bio is fast on its heels with the CD-19 in­hibitor inebi­lizum­ab. But with no di­rect ri­val in the C5 class, Porges sees Soliris cap­tur­ing the dom­i­nant share in re­lapse cas­es.

For Alex­ion’s part, R&D chief John Orloff is hap­py to high­light the fact that Soliris is the first drug ap­proved to re­duce the risk of NMOSD re­lapse. Re­views in Eu­rope and Japan are on­go­ing.

After the FDA lambasted their PD-1 ahead of an adcomm earlier this week, Incyte ran into new trouble Thursday as ODAC panelists voted against an accelerated OK by a wide margin.

Members of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee recommended with a 13-4 vote to defer a regulatory decision on Incyte’s retifanlimab until after more data can be collected from a placebo-controlled trial. The PD-1 therapy is due for a PDUFA date in late July after receiving priority review earlier this year.

The FDA on Thursday called to include those with incurable cancers (when there is no potential for cure or for prolonged/near normal survival) in appropriate clinical trials, regardless of whether they have received existing alternative treatments.

Historically, many cancer clinical trials have required that participating patients previously received multiple therapies, according to Richard Pazdur, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence.

Gene therapy companies have faced huge hurdles trying to deliver healthy genes into muscular dystrophy patients’ muscle cells, so here’s an idea: Why don’t we just replace the muscle cells themselves?

Over the last two years, Vita Therapeutics has been exploring that possibility, building on early stem cell work from Johns Hopkins professor Peter Andersen. And on Tuesday they announced a $32 million Series A to begin to move their first therapy into the clinic, where they hope it will help rebuild muscle in patients with a type of dystrophy that afflicts the arms and legs.

The biotech industry has seen no shortage of innovation in recent years, but in one area — drug pricing — the field has been anything but innovative. Now, two brash startups taking different roads to upset the drug pricing model will partner up to create a sort of “super-disruptor.”

EQRx and UK-based AI specialist Exscientia will team up on a discovery-through-commercialization collaboration the partners hope will work better than the sum of its parts to bring cheaper medicines to patients faster, the companies said Thursday.