An­a­lysts as­sess the dam­age — and next steps — af­ter Re­gen­eron/Sanofi get slammed in court

A fed­er­al judge’s de­ci­sion to or­der Re­gen­eron and Sanofi to pull their PC­SK9 drug Pralu­ent from the mar­ket man­aged to stun some of the most griz­zled ob­servers of the biotech world.

These patent dis­putes are not at all un­usu­al and are al­most al­ways set­tled with a share of the roy­al­ties when there’s a case to be made. And the court ac­knowl­edged that cre­at­ing a mo­nop­oly here was not in the pub­lic’s best in­ter­est. But the judge came down square­ly for Am­gen, say­ing:

(P)lain­tiffs have demon­strat­ed ir­repara­ble harm, as well as the in­ad­e­qua­cy of mon­ey dam­ages.

In­vestors clear­ly didn’t like the sound of any of this. Re­gen­eron’s shares $REGN dropped 7% — about $3 bil­lion in mar­ket cap — and Sanofi saw its stock slide 3%, about the same in mar­ket cap. Am­gen’s stock, mean­while, jumped 4.5%.

The first re­sponse, which every­one an­tic­i­pat­ed, was word from Re­gen­eron/Sanofi that the part­ners would ap­peal the de­ci­sion. But the very re­al pos­si­bil­i­ty ex­ists that an ap­peals court may not be quick to over­turn a rul­ing that came af­ter Re­gen­eron/Sanofi’s los­ing ar­gu­ment was flat­tened by the court. And the pos­si­bil­i­ty that Am­gen will pre­vail here got some top an­a­lysts think­ing over­time about the im­pli­ca­tions and pos­si­ble out­comes. We’ve gath­ered a few be­low.

Ge­of­frey Porges, Leerink

Sales of these new cho­les­terol drugs have not been im­pres­sive. But de­spite the slow take­off, a num­ber of an­a­lysts still be­lieve that these drugs will grad­u­al­ly build up a mar­ket worth bil­lions. Ge­of­frey Porges at Leerink crunched the num­bers if Am­gen’s win sticks:

As­sum­ing that AMGN cap­tures the ma­jor­i­ty of the fu­ture ~$2bn US Pralu­ent sales and main­tains a sim­i­lar mar­gin struc­ture with these in­cre­men­tal sales, our DCF val­ue for AMGN in­creas­es by $13, or 8%. This rep­re­sents a cash flow in­crease of $600mm in 2020E grow­ing to a $950mm ben­e­fit in 2025E, which AMGN could use for con­tin­ued div­i­dend growth, share buy­backs, or fu­ture ac­qui­si­tions.

Bri­an Sko­r­ney, Baird an­a­lyst

Bri­an Sko­r­ney at Baird be­lieves a roy­al­ty deal is the most like­ly out­come. He writes:

Though the rul­ing does in­di­cate that if Sanofi/Re­gen­eron do not file to ap­peal the de­ci­sion with­in 30 days, Pralu­ent will be pulled from the mar­ket, we doubt that will be the re­al­i­ty in the long run. The U.S. Court sys­tem is clear­ly cre­at­ed to in­still com­pe­ti­tion, not cre­ate mo­nop­o­lies. The Judge’s opin­ion clear­ly notes that “the pub­lic gen­er­al­ly is bet­ter served by hav­ing a choice of avail­able treat­ments. There­fore, the court finds it­self be­tween a rock and a hard place…tak­ing an in­de­pen­dent­ly de­vel­oped, help­ful drug off the mar­ket does not ben­e­fit the pub­lic.” The Judge al­so clear­ly hopes fur­ther pro­ceed­ings with “en­cour­age the par­ties to each an ap­pro­pri­ate busi­ness res­o­lu­tion.” As a re­sult, we think a hefty set­tle­ment is like­ly, pos­si­bly to the tune of 20%+ roy­al­ties to Am­gen. As a re­sult, we are rais­ing our price tar­get to $165.

If it does go to an ap­peals court, Biren Amin at Jef­feries doesn’t like the odds for Sanofi/Re­gen­eron.

Re­call in Ju­ly, we wrote about AMGN’s fil­ing an ap­peal case WBIP v. Kohler in­volv­ing low-emis­sion house­boat gen­er­a­tors in which the Ap­peals Court va­cat­ed the judg­ment of the Dis­trict Court deny­ing WBIP a per­ma­nent in­junc­tion. In this case, the Dis­trict Court felt that a PI would de­prive the con­sum­ing pub­lic “a po­ten­tial­ly life-sav­ing prod­uct.” The Ap­peals Court ar­gued that the pub­lic in­ter­est ar­gu­ment alone was not suf­fi­cient to de­ny a PI for a life-sav­ing good and specif­i­cal­ly cit­ed phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal drugs as an ex­am­ple in its rul­ing. If the Ap­peals Court is con­sis­tent with the WBIP v. Kohler rul­ing, it would mean a low like­li­hood that an ap­peal will be grant­ed.

 

At the In­flec­tion Point for the Next Gen­er­a­tion of Can­cer Im­munother­a­py

While oncology researchers have long pursued the potential of cellular immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer, it was unclear whether these therapies would ever reach patients due to the complexity of manufacturing and costs of development. Fortunately, the recent successful development and regulatory approval of chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T (CAR-T) cells have demonstrated the significant benefit of these therapies to patients.

All about Omi­cron; We need more Covid an­tivi­rals; GSK snags Pfiz­er’s vac­cine ex­ec; Janet Wood­cock’s fu­ture at FDA; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

The slate of products we’re offering here at Endpoints is continuing to grow, and it’s not just limited to editorial. If you haven’t, do visit your reader profile to see if there are any other weekly newsletters you’re interested in — as each comes with its own exclusive content. And don’t miss the publisher’s note from Arsalan Arif on Endpoints Studio, our latest avenue for advertising on Endpoints.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 124,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Usama Malik

Ex-Im­munomedics CFO charged with in­sid­er trad­ing, faces up to 20 years in prison af­ter al­leged­ly tip­ping off girl­friend and rel­a­tives of a PhI­II suc­cess

The former CFO of Immunomedics, who helped steer the company to its $21 billion buyout by Gilead last year, has been charged with insider trading, the Department of Justice announced Thursday.

Usama Malik tipped off his then-girlfriend and four others that a Phase III study for Trodelvy would be stopped early four days before Immunomedics publicly announced the result in April 2020, DoJ alleged in its complaint. The individuals then purchased Immunomedics shares, selling them after the news broke and Immunomedics’ stock price doubled.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 124,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Merck's new antiviral molnupiravir (Quality Stock Arts / Shutterstock)

As Omi­cron spread looms, oral an­tivi­rals ap­pear to be one of the best de­fens­es — now we just need more

After South African scientists reported a new Covid-19 variant — dubbed Omicron by the WHO — scientists became concerned about how effective vaccines and monoclonal antibodies might be against it, which has more than 30 mutations in the spike protein.

“I think it is super worrisome,” Dartmouth professor and Adagio co-founder and CEO Tillman Gerngross told Endpoints News this weekend. Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel echoed similar concerns, telling the Financial Times that experts warned him, “This is not going to be good.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 124,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Common performs onstage, December 2020 (Getty Images)

Com­mon, Jamie Foxx among celebs stand­ing up for clin­i­cal tri­als in star-stud­ded can­cer group's pan­dem­ic push

Healthcare screenings and clinical trial enrollment were battered by the pandemic. But the well-known celebrity-backed Stand Up To Cancer non-profit, along with pharma and advocacy partners, has been working to reverse that and make up lost ground, by stepping up awareness campaigns.

Twelve campaigns launched in 2020 and another five in 2021 amplify the need for cancer screening and care, especially for underserved communities. While pharma companies have long been donors to the cancer research group, Covid brought new support — and increased awareness efforts.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 124,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Am­gen halts some drug dis­counts for safe­ty net hos­pi­tals as SCO­TUS takes on 340B case

Amgen will soon be the 10th biopharma company to pull back on offering drug discounts to contract pharmacies of safety-net hospitals under a federal program. Like its peers, Amgen argues that the growth of these contract pharmacies has ballooned in recent years and needs to be reigned in.

Beginning Jan. 3, 2022, Amgen’s policy will only allow 340B covered hospitals to designate a single pharmacy location, with the exception of federal grantees and contract pharmacies wholly owned by a 340B hospital, or that have common ownership with a health system.

In­cor­po­rat­ing Ex­ter­nal Da­ta in­to Clin­i­cal Tri­als: Com­par­ing Dig­i­tal Twins to Ex­ter­nal Con­trol Arms

Most drug development professionals are familiar with the nerve-racking wait for the read-out of a large trial. If it’s negative, is the investigational therapy ineffective? Or could the failure result from an unforeseen flaw in the design or execution of the protocol, rather than a lack of efficacy? The team could spend weeks analyzing data, but a definitive answer may be elusive due to insufficient power for such analyses in the already completed trial. These problems are only made worse if the trial had lower enrollment, or higher dropout than expected due to an unanticipated event like COVID-19. And if a trial is negative, the next one is likely to be larger and more costly — if it happens at all.

What's fair? New ICER re­port shows pay­ers gen­er­al­ly en­sur­ing fair ac­cess to drugs

The nonprofit Institute for Clinical and Economic Review on Wednesday released a new report highlighting the ways in which payers are generally ensuring fair access to prescription drugs, even when based on a set of criteria set by the nonprofit.

While noting the lack of transparency hindered the report’s results, ICER said that the “great majority” of payer policies in the formularies evaluated are structured in a way to support many key elements of how ICER defines “fair access.”

Ab­b­Vie tacks on a new warn­ing to Rin­voq la­bel as safe­ty frets crimp JAK class

The safety problems that continue to plague the JAK class as new data highlight some severe side effects are casting a large shadow over AbbVie’s Rinvoq.

As a result of a recent readout highlighting major adverse cardiac events (MACE), malignancy, mortality and thrombosis with Xeljanz a couple of months ago, AbbVie put out a notice late Friday afternoon that it is adding the new class risks to its label for their rival drug.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 124,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.