Brex­it who? Record in­vest­ment last year fu­els big spike in reg­is­tered UK biotech firms

LON­DON — Af­ter Britain nar­row­ly signed up to leave the Eu­ro­pean Union in June 2016, the prog­no­sis for in­dus­try was pro­ject­ed to be grim. A new analy­sis sug­gests that UK biotech has es­caped that noose — and in­deed flour­ished — over the pe­ri­od that the di­vorce terms were meant to be for­mu­lat­ed.

By an­a­lyz­ing da­ta from the Com­pa­nies House reg­is­ter — a place where in­for­ma­tion about firms reg­is­tered in the UK is made pub­licly avail­able by the gov­ern­ment —  Lon­don-based in­vest­ment man­ag­er Down­ing found that 3,456 ac­tive com­pa­nies are cur­rent­ly in­volved in biotech­nol­o­gy R&D ac­tiv­i­ties, a stag­ger­ing 65% in­crease from 2,095 such firms in the first quar­ter of 2016.

Some 44% of ac­tive biotech­nol­o­gy busi­ness­es have been in­cor­po­rat­ed in the three years since Jan­u­ary 2016 — in­clud­ing 127 in the first two months of 2019, or rough­ly three every work­ing day in Jan­u­ary and Feb­ru­ary, the analy­sis sug­gest­ed.

The surge has been sup­port­ed by record in­vest­ment in UK biotech 2018 — a £2.2 bil­lion in­jec­tion, up  85% from 2017 (with ven­ture cap­i­tal con­tribut­ing to more than half of UK biotech fund­ing: from £681 mil­lion in 2016 to £1.1 bil­lion in 2018), Down­ing said, cit­ing UK BioIn­dus­try As­so­ci­a­tion and In­for­ma Phar­ma In­tel­li­gence da­ta.

Al­though pri­vate firms ac­count for the bulk of UK biotech (96% as of Q1 2019), the num­ber of pub­licly list­ed com­pa­nies are al­so grow­ing (from 30 in Q1 2016 to 42 in Q1 2019), Down­ing found.

“So not on­ly are there a lot of new com­pa­nies be­ing es­tab­lished, the fund­ing is grow­ing across ar­eas as well…from 2017, Se­ries A, Se­ries B and post Se­ries B have all in­creased quite dra­mat­i­cal­ly, es­pe­cial­ly at se­ries B and a lat­er stage, which is a sign that the health­care, health tech­nol­o­gy and biotech­nol­o­gy mar­ket (in the UK) is ac­tu­al­ly ma­tur­ing,” said Will Brooks, who di­rects the health­care ac­tiv­i­ties for Down­ing’s ven­ture funds, in an in­ter­view with End­points News.

“The fund­ing has dou­bled for Se­ries A, more than dou­bled for Se­ries B and post Se­ries B…and peo­ple see that the ma­tu­ri­ty of the com­pa­nies is chang­ing — its no longer be­ing led by a huge num­ber of small com­pa­nies strug­gling for cap­i­tal. I think there seems to be more ap­petite for con­tin­u­al fund­ing, and al­so var­i­ous dif­fer­ent ex­it routes, from M&A to the pub­lic mar­ket…I think that cre­ates a con­fi­dence fac­tor in the fi­nan­cial com­mu­ni­ty.”

Brooks sug­gest­ed ge­net­ics-fo­cused firms, dig­i­tal health com­pa­nies and those in­volved in health­care-re­lat­ed da­ta min­ing for screen­ing, drug de­vel­op­ment, and dis­ease eti­ol­o­gy are the ones gar­ner­ing sig­nif­i­cant in­ter­est. Along­side, the larg­er phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies are now see­ing more val­ue in ear­ly stage tech­nolo­gies, which is trig­ger­ing M&A, he said.

Ge­net­ics and big da­ta-fo­cused deals are all the rage across both sides of the At­lantic. Apart from the slate of re­cent deals bet­ting on gene ther­a­pies, As­traZeneca has sharp­ened its fo­cus on ge­nomics by pour­ing its R&D re­sources in­to a new cen­ter in part­ner­ship with Can­cer Re­search UK to de­vel­op per­son­al­ized can­cer drugs. Fel­low British drug­mak­er GSK $GSK, has tied up with 23andMe to gain ac­cess to the lat­ter’s data­base — to look for dis­ease rel­e­vant genes. Re­gen­eron $REGN has carved out its own ge­net­ics cen­tre, Am­gen $AMGN is delv­ing deep­er to iden­ti­fy and val­i­date dis­ease tar­gets with its in­vest­ment in Ox­ford Nanopore Tech­nolo­gies and ac­qui­si­tion of de­CODE ge­net­ics, while Ver­tex $VRTX has part­nered with UK-based Ge­nomics plc on their plat­form for ge­net­ics and ma­chine learn­ing.

With a surge in biotech busi­ness and in­vest­ment comes an uptick in hir­ing.

De­mand for work­ers with­in the larg­er UK life sci­ences in­dus­try jumped by 11% last year, ac­cord­ing to da­ta com­piled for the As­so­ci­a­tion of Pro­fes­sion­al Staffing Com­pa­nies (AP­SCo). Clin­i­cal va­can­cies rose the high­est, with an in­crease of 37%, while de­mand for R&D per­son­nel re­mained rel­a­tive­ly flat at 4.6%. Over­all, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal firms con­tin­ued to of­fer the li­on’s share of work op­por­tu­ni­ties, al­though CRO job open­ings saw a steep spike of 25.6%.

Sy­neos Health is now the largest sin­gle re­cruiter for sci­en­tif­ic roles in the UK, while IQVIA and GSK are al­so dri­ving sig­nif­i­cant de­mand for tal­ent, with va­can­cies at these firms in­creas­ing by 81% and 14% re­spec­tive­ly, ac­cord­ing to the analy­sis.

Ann Swain

“De­spite un­cer­tain­ty sur­round­ing Brex­it, the strength of the UK phar­ma sec­tor has been thriv­ing over the past year, with clin­i­cal va­can­cies show­ing ex­treme­ly pos­i­tive growth. Glob­al test­ing vol­umes are ris­ing due to an age­ing pop­u­la­tion, sur­plus in man­age­ment of dis­eases, and in­creased ac­cess to care. This rea­son, and the fact that the UK is home to three of the top five uni­ver­si­ties for pre-clin­i­cal, clin­i­cal and health sci­ences, ex­plains why there is such a high de­mand for pro­fes­sion­als in this sec­tor,” AP­SCo chief Ann Swain said in a state­ment.

But a Glob­al­Da­ta sur­vey pub­lished last No­vem­ber in­di­cat­ed damp­en­ing en­thu­si­asm for the sec­tor —  a mere 23% of health­care pro­fes­sion­als sur­veyed across the US, UK, and EU thought that the UK would be an at­trac­tive des­ti­na­tion for health­care com­pa­nies to con­duct re­search and man­u­fac­tur­ing fol­low­ing Brex­it.

“The Brex­it ef­fect has not re­al­ly fun­neled through — in terms of fund­ing — for com­pa­nies on the pure­play fi­nan­cial lev­el. Where it may have an im­pact is on the abil­i­ty to ac­cess re­search fund­ing and re­search grants through the Eu­ro­pean fund­ing agen­cies — I think that will have a knock on ef­fect in the fu­ture, but it’s not re­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant just now,” said Brooks.

All things con­sid­ered, the fu­ture for UK biotech looks bright — bar­ring an un­fore­seen macro event, he added.

“For now there’s a de­gree of con­fi­dence in the sec­tor, I think peo­ple are un­der­stand­ing it bet­ter. The biotech mar­ket has now been go­ing for 25-30 years, and I think now you’re get­ting a ma­tu­ri­ty amongst the in­vestors, that they un­der­stand what they’re ac­tu­al­ly do­ing. More flex­i­ble in­vest­ment prod­ucts are com­ing up as well, mak­ing it eas­i­er for com­pa­nies to fund them­selves. I think you’ll see an in­crease in ac­tu­al fund­ing round sizes and a con­tin­u­al stream of com­pa­nies mov­ing from seed cap­i­tal to fund­ing rounds.”

John Hood [file photo]

UP­DATE: Cel­gene and the sci­en­tist who cham­pi­oned fe­dra­tinib's rise from Sanofi's R&D grave­yard win FDA OK

Six years after Sanofi gave it up for dead, the FDA has approved the myelofibrosis drug fedratinib, now owned by Celgene.

The drug will be sold as Inrebic, and will soon land in the portfolio at Bristol-Myers Squibb, which is finalizing a deal to acquire Celgene.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder was axed — and No­var­tis names a new CSO in wake of an ethics scan­dal

Now at the center of a storm of controversy over its decision to keep its knowledge of manipulated data hidden from regulators during an FDA review, Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan has found a longtime veteran in the ranks to head the scientific work underway at AveXis, where the incident occurred. And the scientific founder has hit the exit.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ab­b­Vie gets its FDA OK for JAK in­hibitor upadac­i­tinib, but don’t look for this one to hit ex­ecs’ lofty ex­pec­ta­tions

Another big drug approval came through on Friday afternoon as the FDA OK’d AbbVie’s upadacitinib — an oral JAK1 inhibitor that is hitting the rheumatoid arthritis market with a black box warning of serious malignancies, infections and thrombosis reflecting fears associated with the class.

It will be sold as Rinvoq — at a wholesale price of $59,000 a year — and will likely soon face competition from a drug that AbbVie once controlled, and spurned. Reuters reports that a 4-week supply of Humira, by comparison, is $5,174, adding up to about $67,000 a year.

The top 10 fran­chise drugs in bio­phar­ma his­to­ry will earn a to­tal of $1.4T (tril­lion) by 2024 — what does that tell us?

Just in case you were looking for more evidence of just how important Amgen’s patent win on Enbrel is for the company and its investors, EvaluatePharma has come up with a forward-looking consensus estimate on what the list of top 10 drugs will look like in 2024.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Sci­en­tist-CEO ac­cused of im­prop­er­ly us­ing con­fi­den­tial in­fo from uni­corn Alec­tor

The executive team at Alector $ALEC has a bone to pick with scientific co-founder Asa Abeliovich. Their latest quarterly rundown has this brief note buried inside:

On June 18, 2019, we initiated a confidential arbitration proceeding against Dr. Asa Abeliovich, our former consulting co-founder, related to alleged breaches of his consulting agreement and the improper use of our confidential information that he learned during the course of rendering services to us as our consulting Chief Scientific Officer/Chief Innovation Officer. We are in the early stage of this arbitration proceeding and are unable to assess or provide any assurances regarding its possible outcome.

There’s no explicit word in the filing on what kind of confidential info was involved, but the proceeding got started 2 days ahead of Abeliovich’s IPO.

Abeliovich, formerly a tenured associate professor at Columbia, is a top scientist in the field of neurodegeneration, which is where Alector is targeted. More recently, he’s also helped start up Prevail Therapeutics as the CEO, which raised $125 million in an IPO. And there he’s planning on working on new gene therapies that target genetically defined subpopulations of Parkinson’s disease. Followup programs target Gaucher disease, frontotemporal dementia and synucleinopathies.

But this time Abeliovich is the CEO rather than a founding scientist. And some of their pipeline overlaps with Alector’s.

Abeliovich and Prevail, though, aren’t taking this one lying down.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Chi­na has be­come a CEO-lev­el pri­or­i­ty for multi­na­tion­al phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies: the trend and the im­pli­ca­tions

After a “hot” period of rapid growth between 2009 and 2012, and a relatively “cooler” period of slower growth from 2013 to 2015, China has once again become a top-of-mind priority for the CEOs of most large, multinational pharmaceutical companies.

At the International Pharma Forum, hosted in March in Beijing by the R&D Based Pharmaceutical Association Committee (RDPAC) and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), no fewer than seven CEOs of major multinational pharmaceutical firms participated, including GSK, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck KGaA, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. A few days earlier, the CEOs of several other large multinationals attended the China Development Forum, an annual business forum hosted by the research arm of China’s State Council. It’s hard to imagine any other country, except the US, having such drawing power at CEO level.

As dis­as­ter struck, Ab­b­Vie’s Rick Gon­za­lez swooped in on Al­ler­gan with an of­fer Brent Saun­ders couldn’t say no to

Early March was a no good, awful, terrible time for Allergan CEO Brent Saunders. His big lead drug had imploded in a Phase III disaster and activists were after his hide — or at least his chairman’s title — as the stock price continued a steady droop that had eviscerated share value for investors.

But it was a perfect time for AbbVie CEO Rick Gonzalez to pick up the phone and ask Saunders if he’d like to consider a “strategic” deal.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

CEO Pascal Soriot via Getty Images

As­traZeneca's jug­ger­naut PARP play­er Lyn­parza scoops up an­oth­er dom­i­nant win in PhI­II as the FDA adds a 'break­through' for Calquence

AstraZeneca’s oncology R&D group under José Baselga keeps churning out hits.

Wednesday morning the pharma giant and their partners at Merck parted the curtains on a successful readout for their Phase III PAOLA-1 study, demonstrating statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for women with ovarian cancer in a first-line maintenance setting who added their PARP Lynparza to Avastin. This is their second late-stage success in ovarian cancer, which will help stave off rivals like GSK.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

ICER blasts FDA, PTC and Sarep­ta for high prices on DMD drugs Em­flaza, Ex­ondys 51

ICER has some strong words for PTC, Sarepta and the FDA as the US drug price watchdog concludes that as currently priced, their respective new treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy are decidedly not cost-effective.

The final report — which cements the conclusions of a draft issued in May — incorporates the opinion of a panel of 17 experts ICER convened in a public meeting last month. It also based its analysis of Emflaza (deflazacort) and Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) on updated annual costs of $81,400 and over $1 million, respectively, after citing “incorrect” lower numbers in the initial calculations.