Bris­tol-My­ers stag­gered by a stun­ning check­point set­back, hands Mer­ck a free pass on front­line lung can­cer com­bo

Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb $BMY fans can scratch any hopes of an ac­cel­er­at­ed fil­ing for a com­bi­na­tion of Op­di­vo and Yer­voy as a front­line ther­a­py for lung can­cer. The big biotech an­nounced in a terse state­ment late Thurs­day that it will not pur­sue an ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval due to the “re­view of da­ta avail­able at this time.”

More in­sight? For­get about it. Says Bris­tol-My­ers:

“In or­der to pro­tect the in­tegri­ty of on­go­ing reg­is­tra­tional stud­ies, the com­pa­ny will not be pro­vid­ing ad­di­tion­al de­tails.”

The an­nounce­ment nix­es any hopes that the com­bo can pro­vide near-term re­lief from Mer­ck’s as­sault on the front­line fran­chise with its stun­ning ear­ly fil­ing on a com­bi­na­tion of Keytru­da and chemo for first line use. Bris­tol-My­ers’s work on Check­mate-227, the key clin­i­cal pro­gram that will de­cide the fate of Op­di­vo’s fu­ture, is ex­pect­ed to last in­to 2018.

Bris­tol-My­ers’ shares plunged 10% in ear­ly trad­ing Fri­day, elim­i­nat­ing more than $9 bil­lion in mar­ket cap. Its loss was Mer­ck’s gain, which saw its stock jump 4%. And As­traZeneca was caught in this vor­tex as well, with shares drop­ping 2% in pre-mar­ket trad­ing as an­a­lysts raised doubts about its strat­e­gy for dur­val­um­ab, which will play a crit­i­cal role in CEO Pas­cal So­ri­ot’s plan to make a come­back at the phar­ma gi­ant.

Mer­ck now has plen­ty of time to grab the lead with its own ear­ly com­bo ap­proach, as As­traZeneca still looks for a come-from-be­hind win on dur­val­um­ab and treme­li­mum­ab, with pro­gres­sion-free sur­vival da­ta slat­ed to ar­rive this sum­mer — though over­all sur­vival da­ta won’t like­ly ar­rive on that ex­per­i­men­tal com­bo un­til 2018 as well.

Sea­mus Fer­nan­dez, Leerink

Sea­mus Fer­nan­dez at Leerink had some time to con­sid­er the im­pact, and he was dis­turbed by the im­pli­ca­tions for Bris­tol-My­ers as well as As­traZeneca. He not­ed:

This is a clear set­back for BMY, par­tic­u­lar­ly in light of the agency’s re­cent ac­cep­tance of MRK’s (MP) fil­ing for the Keytru­da (pem­brolizum­ab; an­ti-PD-1) + chemother­a­py reg­i­men. With the CM-227 tri­al ex­pect­ed to read­out in 1H:18, this al­so could give AZN (OP) a pot’l head start with its dur­val­um­ab (an­ti-PD-L1) + treme­li­mum­ab (an­ti-CT­LA-4) com­bi­na­tion in 1L NSCLC, as­sum­ing pos­i­tive da­ta from the MYS­TIC tri­al (ex­pect­ed in mid-2017). How­ev­er, if MRK and RHH­BY’s (NR) Phase 3 IO+Chemo tri­als are both suc­cess­ful and IO+IO com­bos fail to im­press, this would leave very lit­tle room for ei­ther BMY or AZN to dif­fer­en­ti­ate them­selves in the 1L NSCLC mar­ket. This would be par­tic­u­lar­ly sur­pris­ing and dis­ap­point­ing in the wake of our re­cent dis­cus­sions with lung can­cer KOLs.

In an­oth­er ma­jor set­back for Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb, its first piv­otal study for Op­di­vo in front­line lung can­cer failed last year, in part be­cause in­ves­ti­ga­tors de­cid­ed to tack­le a broad swathe of pa­tients. Its con­sis­tent­ly dis­ap­point­ing re­sponse on lung can­cer has ran­kled an­a­lysts and in­vestors, who once gam­bled that Bris­tol would be the king­pin in check­point drugs.

Mer­ck $MRK in the mean­time, is fol­low­ing up with dozens of stud­ies of Keytru­da com­bos. Just a few days ago the com­pa­ny turned heads once again with plans to com­bine Keytru­da with In­cyte’s IDO1 in­hibitor epaca­do­stat in lung can­cer and sev­er­al oth­er on­col­o­gy in­di­ca­tions.

John Hood [file photo]

UP­DATE: Cel­gene and the sci­en­tist who cham­pi­oned fe­dra­tinib's rise from Sanofi's R&D grave­yard win FDA OK

Six years after Sanofi gave it up for dead, the FDA has approved the myelofibrosis drug fedratinib, now owned by Celgene.

The drug will be sold as Inrebic, and will soon land in the portfolio at Bristol-Myers Squibb, which is finalizing a deal to acquire Celgene.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder was axed — and No­var­tis names a new CSO in wake of an ethics scan­dal

Now at the center of a storm of controversy over its decision to keep its knowledge of manipulated data hidden from regulators during an FDA review, Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan has found a longtime veteran in the ranks to head the scientific work underway at AveXis, where the incident occurred. And the scientific founder has hit the exit.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ab­b­Vie gets its FDA OK for JAK in­hibitor upadac­i­tinib, but don’t look for this one to hit ex­ecs’ lofty ex­pec­ta­tions

Another big drug approval came through on Friday afternoon as the FDA OK’d AbbVie’s upadacitinib — an oral JAK1 inhibitor that is hitting the rheumatoid arthritis market with a black box warning of serious malignancies, infections and thrombosis reflecting fears associated with the class.

It will be sold as Rinvoq — at a wholesale price of $59,000 a year — and will likely soon face competition from a drug that AbbVie once controlled, and spurned. Reuters reports that a 4-week supply of Humira, by comparison, is $5,174, adding up to about $67,000 a year.

The top 10 fran­chise drugs in bio­phar­ma his­to­ry will earn a to­tal of $1.4T (tril­lion) by 2024 — what does that tell us?

Just in case you were looking for more evidence of just how important Amgen’s patent win on Enbrel is for the company and its investors, EvaluatePharma has come up with a forward-looking consensus estimate on what the list of top 10 drugs will look like in 2024.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Sci­en­tist-CEO ac­cused of im­prop­er­ly us­ing con­fi­den­tial in­fo from uni­corn Alec­tor

The executive team at Alector $ALEC has a bone to pick with scientific co-founder Asa Abeliovich. Their latest quarterly rundown has this brief note buried inside:

On June 18, 2019, we initiated a confidential arbitration proceeding against Dr. Asa Abeliovich, our former consulting co-founder, related to alleged breaches of his consulting agreement and the improper use of our confidential information that he learned during the course of rendering services to us as our consulting Chief Scientific Officer/Chief Innovation Officer. We are in the early stage of this arbitration proceeding and are unable to assess or provide any assurances regarding its possible outcome.

There’s no explicit word in the filing on what kind of confidential info was involved, but the proceeding got started 2 days ahead of Abeliovich’s IPO.

Abeliovich, formerly a tenured associate professor at Columbia, is a top scientist in the field of neurodegeneration, which is where Alector is targeted. More recently, he’s also helped start up Prevail Therapeutics as the CEO, which raised $125 million in an IPO. And there he’s planning on working on new gene therapies that target genetically defined subpopulations of Parkinson’s disease. Followup programs target Gaucher disease, frontotemporal dementia and synucleinopathies.

But this time Abeliovich is the CEO rather than a founding scientist. And some of their pipeline overlaps with Alector’s.

Abeliovich and Prevail, though, aren’t taking this one lying down.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Chi­na has be­come a CEO-lev­el pri­or­i­ty for multi­na­tion­al phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies: the trend and the im­pli­ca­tions

After a “hot” period of rapid growth between 2009 and 2012, and a relatively “cooler” period of slower growth from 2013 to 2015, China has once again become a top-of-mind priority for the CEOs of most large, multinational pharmaceutical companies.

At the International Pharma Forum, hosted in March in Beijing by the R&D Based Pharmaceutical Association Committee (RDPAC) and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), no fewer than seven CEOs of major multinational pharmaceutical firms participated, including GSK, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck KGaA, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. A few days earlier, the CEOs of several other large multinationals attended the China Development Forum, an annual business forum hosted by the research arm of China’s State Council. It’s hard to imagine any other country, except the US, having such drawing power at CEO level.

As dis­as­ter struck, Ab­b­Vie’s Rick Gon­za­lez swooped in on Al­ler­gan with an of­fer Brent Saun­ders couldn’t say no to

Early March was a no good, awful, terrible time for Allergan CEO Brent Saunders. His big lead drug had imploded in a Phase III disaster and activists were after his hide — or at least his chairman’s title — as the stock price continued a steady droop that had eviscerated share value for investors.

But it was a perfect time for AbbVie CEO Rick Gonzalez to pick up the phone and ask Saunders if he’d like to consider a “strategic” deal.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

CEO Pascal Soriot via Getty Images

As­traZeneca's jug­ger­naut PARP play­er Lyn­parza scoops up an­oth­er dom­i­nant win in PhI­II as the FDA adds a 'break­through' for Calquence

AstraZeneca’s oncology R&D group under José Baselga keeps churning out hits.

Wednesday morning the pharma giant and their partners at Merck parted the curtains on a successful readout for their Phase III PAOLA-1 study, demonstrating statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for women with ovarian cancer in a first-line maintenance setting who added their PARP Lynparza to Avastin. This is their second late-stage success in ovarian cancer, which will help stave off rivals like GSK.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

ICER blasts FDA, PTC and Sarep­ta for high prices on DMD drugs Em­flaza, Ex­ondys 51

ICER has some strong words for PTC, Sarepta and the FDA as the US drug price watchdog concludes that as currently priced, their respective new treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy are decidedly not cost-effective.

The final report — which cements the conclusions of a draft issued in May — incorporates the opinion of a panel of 17 experts ICER convened in a public meeting last month. It also based its analysis of Emflaza (deflazacort) and Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) on updated annual costs of $81,400 and over $1 million, respectively, after citing “incorrect” lower numbers in the initial calculations.