Robert Fos­ter Con­traVir

→ As hoped, Cel­gene $CELG and its part­ners at Ac­celeron $XL­RN have se­cured pri­or­i­ty re­view for their red blood cell boost­ing drug, lus­pa­ter­cept, which has been pegged to even­tu­al­ly gen­er­ate peak sales of $2 bil­lion. The bi­o­log­ic has been de­vel­oped to man­age ane­mia re­sult­ing from myelodys­plas­tic syn­drome (MDS) as well as be­ta tha­lassemia. The FDA ex­pects to make its de­ci­sion on the be­ta-tha­lassemia in­di­ca­tion by De­cem­ber 4, while the MDS in­di­ca­tion will be dealt with by April 4, 2020. The Eu­ro­pean re­view of the drug is al­so un­der­way, the com­pa­nies said on Tues­day.

→ Au­rinia’s $AUPH largest share­hold­er is skep­ti­cal that the com­pa­ny’s lead­er­ship team is up to task com­mer­cial­iz­ing its lead drug, vo­closporin, as the Cana­di­an biotech revs up late-stage stud­ies in lu­pus and dry eye dis­ease. Ko­rea-based Iljin has nom­i­nat­ed three in­de­pen­dent di­rec­tors to the eight-mem­ber board in an at­tempt to rein in in­sid­ers who they say have been plac­ing self-in­ter­ests above those of in­vestors. Chief among the three nom­i­nees is Robert Fos­ter, the ex-CEO of Isotech­ni­ka whom Iljin cred­its for the dis­cov­ery of vo­closporin. The oth­er two, Soon-Yub (Samuel) Kwon and Myeong-Hee Yu, bring reg­u­la­to­ry and sci­en­tif­ic ex­per­tise, re­spec­tive­ly. CEO Pe­ter Green­leaf — re­cent­ly ap­point­ed af­ter stints at Cere­cor, Su­cam­po and Med­Im­mune — and chair­man George Milne have pre­vi­ous­ly urged in­vestors to re­ject Iljin’s nom­i­na­tions.

Robert Ian­none Linkedin

→ In April, the chief med­ical of­fi­cer of the em­bat­tled biotech Im­munomedics $IM­MU Robert Ian­none said he was leav­ing the com­pa­ny to work in Penn­syl­va­nia to be “close to his fam­i­ly.” On Mon­day, it was re­vealed that the for­mer As­traZeneca $AZN ex­ec­u­tive is head­ed to Jazz Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals $JAZZ, where he will lead glob­al R&D.

→ Peanut al­ler­gy drug mak­er Aim­mune $AIMT pre­sent­ed da­ta from a rollover 28-week study on Tues­day that fol­lowed its land­mark piv­otal study. The re­sults sug­gest­ed that its treat­ment, AR101, can help pa­tients tol­er­ate high­er dos­es of peanut pro­tein, thus re­in­forc­ing the ra­tio­nale for con­tin­ued dai­ly dos­ing of AR101 be­yond one year, as test­ed in the late-stage PAL­ISADE tri­al. An FDA ap­proval de­ci­sion for AR101 is ex­pect­ed in Jan­u­ary 2020.

John Oyler BeiGene

→ In a sign of Chi­na’s grow­ing in­flu­ence on glob­al biotech, BeiGene chief John Oyler has been elect­ed to BIO’s board of di­rec­tors as well as the or­ga­ni­za­tion’s health sec­tion gov­ern­ing board.

→ Cam­bridge, Mass­a­chu­setts-based Strand Ther­a­peu­tics — which is fo­cused on gene ther­a­pies — has se­cured a $6 mil­lion seed round led by Play­ground Glob­al with par­tic­i­pa­tion from Alexan­dria Ven­ture In­vest­ments, AN­RI, and a group of pri­vate in­vestors. “This cap­i­tal will be in­stru­men­tal to build­ing out and scal­ing Strand’s mR­NA pro­gram­ming tech­nol­o­gy,” said Ja­cob Be­craft, the com­pa­ny’s co-founder and CEO, in a state­ment.

Celyad’s view on developing and delivering a CAR T-cell therapy with multi-tumor specificity combined with cell manufacturing success
Overview
Transitioning potential therapeutic assets from academia into the commercial environment is an exercise that is largely underappreciated by stakeholders, except for drug developers themselves. The promise of preclinical or early clinical results drives enthusiasm, but the pragmatic delivery of a therapy outside of small, local testing is most often a major challenge for drug developers especially, including among other things, the manufacturing challenges that surround the production of just-in-time and personalized autologous cell therapy products.

The biopharma R&D food chain is paying off with a plan at Sanofi to pitch regulators on a new drug for an orphan disease called cold agglutinin disease.

The pharma giant ushered out a statement Tuesday morning — after it spelled out plans to radically restructure the company, abandoning cardio and diabetes research altogether — saying that their C1s inhibitor sutimlimab had cleared the pivotal study.

Inscripta presentations can begin with the advent of agriculture. Or even further back: The emergence of man.

“We’ve come a long way, starting with natural selection,” Inscripta microbial director Nandini Krishnamurthy told a session this year at SynBioBeta, the new annual conference for the synthetic biology field.

Behind her was a slide that’s recurred in company presentations, showing from left to right across the bottom the classic evolution-of-man chart (the ‘humorous’ kind that ends on an overweight soda-drinker), a picture showing the development of corn from thin strand to bulbous Iowan, and then a squiggly protein close-up of “directed evolution.” Below that runs an arrow and a ticker of how long each takes, from 10^9 years to 1.

Nancy Pelosi unveiled the Democrats’  drug pricing bill back in September and brought the fight straight to the industry with a proposal to empower the US government to negotiate prices for select drugs. Republicans, who decried the bill reeks of heavy-handed government intervention which will stifle innovation, now have a counterproposal they claim will result in cheaper drugs and incentivize R&D — further clouding the prospects of a bipartisan compromise that could land on Donald Trump’s desk.

Perceptive Advisors is one of those prolific biotech investor groups which has traditionally enjoyed zeroing in on clinical-stage investments and crossover rounds, a group that prefers more established drug development players with near-term payoff potential.

But now they’re partnering with Xontogeny chief and longtime biotech entrepreneur Chris Garabedian on a $210 million fund — with money contributed by institutional investors and family funds — to go into the launch space with their first early-stage VC fund. Dubbed the Perceptive Xontogeny Venture Fund, LP, or just PXV Fund, they plan to favor upstarts that Garabedian is fostering in his incubator. But they’ll also plan to reach outside that inner circle for more A rounds to back, with plans to dominate initial funding with $10 million to $20 million per newborn biotech.