Clo­vis CEO Patrick Ma­haffy set­tles up on SEC charges of ly­ing about the ro­ci da­ta — and it won’t cost much

For 4 crit­i­cal months in 2015, Clo­vis $CLVS and its ex­ec­u­tives led by CEO Patrick Ma­haffy main­tained that their can­cer drug ro­ci had per­formed beau­ti­ful­ly in clin­i­cal tri­als, with a 60% ef­fi­ca­cy rate that blew the an­a­lysts away. That’s what they told in­vestors, rais­ing $298 mil­lion with a fat stock price in Ju­ly of 2015.

And, ac­cord­ing to the SEC, Ma­haffy knew it was a lie. He and for­mer CFO Er­le Mast were told ear­li­er that the ef­fi­ca­cy had shrunk con­sid­er­ably, but that wasn’t their pub­lic line. And when they dis­closed the truth in No­vem­ber, their share price plunged 70%.

To­day, though, they’re get­ting away with a slap on the wrist.

With­out any ad­mis­sion of guilt, the SEC is let­ting Ma­haffy — still CEO of Clo­vis — off with a $250,000 penal­ty. Mast is pay­ing $100,000 penal­ty, and dis­gorg­ing prin­ci­pal and in­ter­est he made sell­ing the com­pa­ny stock dur­ing that pe­ri­od to­tal­ing $454,145.

Clo­vis, or its in­vestors, are pay­ing $20 mil­lion to set­tle the claims.

Last year Ma­haffy was pro­vid­ed a com­pen­sa­tion pack­age worth $8.7 mil­lion. In 2015, when he was ac­cused of mis­lead­ing in­vestors, he took home a $5.7 mil­lion pack­age.

He’s nev­er re­spond­ed to re­quests for com­ments.

It was ap­par­ent years ago that Clo­vis had been gild­ing the lily on their da­ta.

Set­backs hap­pen in biotech. But some of the ex­perts who watched this drug say this was not the usu­al kind of clin­i­cal re­ver­sal that can eas­i­ly oc­cur in a risky field like drug de­vel­op­ment. Clo­vis ex­ecs had been pur­pose­ly mis­lead­ing in­vestors with a false por­trait of the da­ta, they claimed. 

“I feel that the ef­fi­ca­cy da­ta have, con­sis­tent­ly and re­peat­ed­ly, over many years, been mis­rep­re­sent­ed,” R&D ex­pert Kapil Dhin­gra told me months lat­er af­ter he wrote an analy­sis of the da­ta for An­nals of On­col­o­gy. “This is not sim­ply a case of gray zones, this is black and white un­true pre­sen­ta­tion of the da­ta. And it is not just a mi­nor mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion (such as pho­to­shop­ping a west­ern blot im­age etc that can get a ba­sic sci­en­tist in trou­ble); the true ef­fi­ca­cy is about half of what they rep­re­sent­ed.”

Im­age: Patrick Ma­haffy, by Kathryn Scott Osler GET­TY

Hal Barron, GSK

Break­ing the death spi­ral: Hal Bar­ron talks about trans­form­ing the mori­bund R&D cul­ture at GSK in a crit­i­cal year for the late-stage pipeline

Just ahead of GlaxoSmithKline’s Q2 update on Wednesday, science chief Hal Barron is making the rounds to talk up the pharma giant’s late-stage strategy as the top execs continue to woo back a deeply skeptical investor group while pushing through a whole new R&D culture.

And that’s not easy, Barron is quick to note. He told the Financial Times:

I think that culture, to some extent, is as hard, in fact even harder, than doing the science.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Michel Vounatsos, Getty Images

UP­DAT­ED: Stay tuned: Bio­gen’s num­bers are great — it’s their wor­ri­some fu­ture that leaves an­a­lysts skit­tish

Biogen came out with an upbeat assessment of their Q2 numbers today, discounting the arrival of a key rival for its blockbuster Spinraza franchise. But the top execs remain grimly determined to not say much anything new about the sore points that have dragged down its stock, including the future of its big investment in Alzheimer’s or how it plans to invest the considerable cash that the big biotech continues to reap.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Why wait? Cel­gene re­struc­tures a big Jounce pact — ze­ro­ing in on new I/O path­way with $530M deal and bump­ing ICOS

Celgene’s business team isn’t waiting for the big merger with Bristol-Myers Squibb to go through before syncing its strategy with the new mother ship.

Tuesday evening the big biotech unveiled a $530 million deal — $50 million in upfront cash — to amend their alliance with Jounce Therapeutics $JNCE to gain worldwide rights to JTX-8064, an antibody that targets the LILRB2 receptor on macrophages. Their old, $2.6 billion deal is being scrapped, leaving Jounce with a pipeline that includes the lead drug, the ICOS-targeting vopratelimab.

PACT Phar­ma says it's per­fect­ed the tech to se­lect neoanti­gens for per­son­al­ized ther­a­py — now on­to the clin­ic

At PACT Pharma, the lofty goal to unleash a “tsunami” of T cells personalized for each patient has hinged on the ability to correctly identify the neoantigens that form something of a fingerprint for each tumor, and extract the small group of T cells primed to attack the cancer. It still has a long way to go testing a treatment in humans, but the biotech says it has nailed that highly technical piece of the process.

UP­DAT­ED: My­ovan­t's uter­ine fi­broid drug looks com­pet­i­tive in PhI­II — but can they van­quish mighty Ab­b­Vie?

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Myovant $MYOV has closely matched its positive first round of Phase III data for their uterine fibroid drug relugolix, setting up a head-to-head rivalry with pharma giant AbbVie as the little biotech steers to the market with a planned filing in Q4.

Here’s how Myovant plans to prevail over the AbbVie $ABBV empire.

In the study, 71.2% of women receiving once-daily relugolix combination therapy achieved the clinical response they were looking for, compared to only 14.7% in the control arm. The data comfortably reflected the same outcomes in the first Phase III — 73.4% of women receiving once-daily oral relugolix combination therapy achieved the responder criteria compared with 18.9% of women receiving placebo — which will reassure regulators that they are getting the carefully randomized data that qualifies for the FDA’s gold standard for success.

Lit­tle Mar­i­nus sees its shares eclipsed as the Sage ri­val fails to com­pare on PPD in PhII

The executive team at Sage $SAGE have skirted another potential pitfall on its way to racking up a big future for its depression drug Zulresso.

Little Marinus Pharmaceuticals $MRNS had sought to challenge the Sage drug with an IV formulation — followed by an oral version — of ganaxolone for postpartum depression. But researchers say their Phase II study failed to positively differentiate itself from a placebo at 28 days — leaving them to hold up “clinically meaningful” data within the first day of administration compared to the control arm.

Roche cuts loose Tam­i­flu OTC rights, hand­ing Sanofi the keys as the phar­ma gi­ant dou­bles down on Xofluza

Roche set out to make a better flu medicine than Tamiflu as that franchise was headed to a generic showdown. Now they’ll see just how well Xofluza stacks up against the mainstay drug after handing off over-the-counter rights in the US to Sanofi.

Sanofi $SNY says it will now step in to negotiate a deal with the FDA to steer Tamiflu into the OTC market, a role that could well involve new studies to ease passage of the drug out of doctor’s hands and into the consumer end of the market. And the French pharma giant will have first dibs over “selected” OTC markets around the world as they push ahead.

Aca­dia is mak­ing the best of it, but their lat­est PhI­II Nu­plazid study is a bust

Acadia’s late-stage program to widen the commercial prospects for Nuplazid has hit a wall. The biotech reported that their Phase III ENHANCE trial flat failed. And while they $ACAD did their best to cherry pick positive data wherever they can be found, this is a clear setback for the biotech.

With close to 400 patients enrolled, researchers said the drug flunked the primary endpoint as an adjunctive therapy for patients with an inadequate response to antipsychotic therapy. The p-value was an ugly 0.0940 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, which the company called out as a positive trend.

Their shares slid 12% on the news, good for a $426 million hit on a $3.7 billion market cap at close.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Some Big Phar­mas stepped up their game on da­ta trans­paren­cy — but which flunked the test?

The nonprofit Bioethics International has come out with their latest scorecard on data transparency among the big biopharmas in the industry — flagging a few standouts while spotlighting some laggards who are continuing to underperform.

Now in its third year, the nonprofit created a new set of standards with Yale School of Medicine and Stanford Law School to evaluate the track record on trial registration, results reporting, publication and data-sharing practice.