Di­min­ish­ing the FDA’s pow­er was my in­tent: Right-to-try au­thor scolds Scott Got­tlieb as agency im­ple­ments new law

In a bizarre twist for the new­ly signed “right-to-try” law, the FDA — cut out of the process of sign­ing off on cer­tain us­es of ex­per­i­men­tal drugs for ter­mi­nal­ly ill pa­tients by that law — now has to fig­ure out how to im­ple­ment it. And al­ready, the bill’s main au­thor is un­hap­py with com­mis­sion­er Scott Got­tlieb in the af­ter­math and has point­ed­ly made his feel­ings known in a let­ter.

“This law in­tends to di­min­ish the FDA’s pow­er over peo­ple’s lives, not in­crease it,” Sen­a­tor Ron John­son, Re­pub­li­can from Wis­con­sin, wrote to Got­tlieb yes­ter­day, dis­pleased over tweets and state­ments the com­mis­sion­er has made re­cent­ly around im­ple­men­ta­tion of the law. The state­ment is re­mark­able be­cause the is­sue has long been framed by “right-to-try” sup­port­ers as a win for ter­mi­nal­ly ill pa­tients and not an end-around to weak­en the FDA.

As we have re­port­ed, “right-to-try” is a land­mark win for the lib­er­tar­i­an Gold­wa­ter In­sti­tute and its po­lit­i­cal al­lies.

The FDA says it will re­view and di­rect­ly re­ply to Sen­a­tor John­son’s let­ter.

Be­fore the sen­a­tor’s let­ter was pub­lished yes­ter­day, the agency said in an emailed state­ment that it “is con­ven­ing an in­ter­nal group to as­sess how to ef­fec­tive­ly and ef­fi­cient­ly im­ple­ment the new law. We will re­port on our im­ple­men­ta­tion steps reg­u­lar­ly.”

In an email to FDA’s Cen­ter for Drug Eval­u­a­tion and Re­search (CDER) staff yes­ter­day, CDER Di­rec­tor Janet Wood­cock said: “We are re­view­ing the leg­is­la­tion and will work to im­ple­ment it in a man­ner con­sis­tent with Con­gres­sion­al in­tent and with FDA’s pub­lic health mis­sion. We re­al­ize that you may re­ceive ques­tions about this process. We will be work­ing ex­pe­di­tious­ly to de­vel­op fur­ther in­for­ma­tion on how to re­spond to such in­quiries. How­ev­er, we be­lieve that spon­sors are in the best po­si­tion to pro­vide in­for­ma­tion on the de­vel­op­ment sta­tus of their prod­ucts (which is crit­i­cal to de­ter­min­ing whether a drug or bi­o­log­i­cal prod­uct is el­i­gi­ble for use un­der Right to Try) and whether a spon­sor in­tends to make an in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al prod­uct avail­able un­der Right to Try.”

Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump signed in­to law the Trick­ett Wendler, Frank Mongiel­lo, Jor­dan McLinn, and Matthew Bel­li­na Right to Try Act of 2017 (Right to Try Act) Wednes­day to amend the Fed­er­al Food, Drug, and Cos­met­ic Act.

Wood­cock said the law “is in­tend­ed to in­crease ac­cess to cer­tain un­ap­proved, in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al treat­ments (drugs or bi­o­log­i­cal prod­ucts) for pa­tients di­ag­nosed with life-threat­en­ing dis­eases or con­di­tions who have ex­haust­ed ap­proved treat­ment op­tions and who are un­able to par­tic­i­pate in a clin­i­cal tri­al in­volv­ing the in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al drug, as cer­ti­fied by a physi­cian.‎”

She al­so ex­plained what el­i­gi­ble pa­tients and treat­ments are for ‘right-to-try’:

An el­i­gi­ble pa­tient is one with a life-threat­en­ing dis­ease as de­fined in 21 CFR 312.81 and who meets cer­tain oth­er con­di­tions set forth in the statute. An in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al drug or bi­o­log­i­cal prod­uct can on­ly be pro­vid­ed un­der Right to Try if it:

  • Is not ap­proved or li­censed for any use;
  • Has com­plet­ed a Phase 1 tri­al;
  • Ei­ther (1) is the sub­ject of an NDA or BLA filed with FDA or (2) is the sub­ject of an ac­tive IND, and is un­der in­ves­ti­ga­tion in a clin­i­cal tri­al that ‘is in­tend­ed to form the pri­ma­ry ba­sis of a claim of ef­fec­tive­ness’; and
  • Is ac­tive­ly be­ing de­vel­oped (‘ac­tive de­vel­op­ment…is on­go­ing’), not dis­con­tin­ued, and not on clin­i­cal hold.

“In the near term,” Wood­cock told staff, “if you re­ceive in­quiries about the leg­is­la­tion from pa­tients or physi­cians about a spe­cif­ic prod­uct, please re­fer them to the spon­sor of the in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al drug or bi­o­log­i­cal prod­uct. If spon­sors con­tact you re­gard­ing their oblig­a­tions un­der this law, we sug­gest that you re­fer them to the statute. If you re­ceive more de­tailed ques­tions re­gard­ing Right to Try, please re­fer those in­quiries to Drug­in­fo@fda.hhs.gov or by phone: (855) 543-3784.”

Hol­ly Fer­nan­dez Lynch of the De­part­ment of Med­ical Ethics and Health Pol­i­cy at Perel­man School of Med­i­cine, Uni­ver­si­ty of Penn­syl­va­nia, told Fo­cus: “I think there is lots of room for FDA to pro­tect pa­tients from po­ten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous ef­fects of the law, which I hope they will im­ple­ment through rule­mak­ing and guid­ance, al­though that will take time.”

She al­so of­fered a few pos­si­bil­i­ties for im­ple­men­ta­tion:

  1. Clar­i­fy that it is not enough to have a life-threat­en­ing ill­ness, but rather that the ill­ness should be im­me­di­ate­ly life-threat­en­ing.
  2. Re­quire ad­verse event re­port­ing not via the right to try law, but rather un­der the terms of the over­ar­ch­ing IND for the drug (this may be tricky, but not en­tire­ly im­plau­si­ble).
  3. Clar­i­fy what it means for a Phase 1 tri­al to be com­plet­ed, i.e., what is suc­cess?
  4. Re­quire that spon­sors de­vel­op con­tracts with cer­ti­fy­ing physi­cians that in or­der to ac­cess the drug, the physi­cian must col­lect and re­port safe­ty da­ta.
  5. Spec­i­fy the sorts of ad­verse event da­ta that needs to be col­lect­ed in or­der to sat­is­fy the re­quire­ments of the an­nu­al sum­ma­ry.
  6. Post as much in­for­ma­tion pub­licly as pos­si­ble, to help pa­tients and their physi­cians un­der­stand that the un­like­li­hood that right to try will be help­ful.
  7. En­cour­age pa­tients and com­pa­nies to uti­lize the ex­pand­ed ac­cess path­way rather than right to try.
  8. En­cour­age spon­sors and in­ves­ti­ga­tors to al­low for the broad­est clin­i­cal tri­al in­clu­sion con­sis­tent with par­tic­i­pant safe­ty and sci­en­tif­ic in­tegri­ty.

Ar­salan Arif con­tributed re­port­ing to this sto­ry.

First pub­lished here. Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus is the flag­ship on­line pub­li­ca­tion of the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety (RAPS), the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care and re­lat­ed prod­ucts, in­clud­ing med­ical de­vices, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, bi­o­log­ics and nu­tri­tion­al prod­ucts. Email news@raps.org for more in­for­ma­tion. 

Author

Zachary Brennan

managing editor, RAPS

Scott Gottlieb, AP Images

Scott Got­tlieb is once again join­ing a team that en­joyed good times at the FDA un­der his high-en­er­gy stint at the helm

Right after jumping on Michael Milken’s FasterCures board on Monday, the newly departed FDA commissioner is back today with news about another life sciences board post that gives him a ringside chair to cheer on a lead player in the real-world evidence movement — one with very close ties to the FDA.

Aetion is reporting this morning that Gottlieb is joining their board, a group that includes Mohamad Makhzoumi, a general partner at New Enterprise Associates, where Gottlieb returned after stepping out of his role at the FDA 2 years after he started.

Gottlieb — one of the best connected execs in biopharma — knows this company well. As head of FDA he championed the use of real-world evidence to help guide drug developers and the agency in gaining greater efficiencies, which helped set up Aetion as a high-profile player in the game.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Deborah Dunsire. Lundbeck

UP­DAT­ED: Deb­o­rah Dun­sire is pay­ing $2B for a chance to leap di­rect­ly in­to a block­buster show­down with a few of the world's biggest phar­ma gi­ants

A year after taking the reins as CEO of Lundbeck, Deborah Dunsire is making a bold bid to beef up the Danish biotech’s portfolio of drugs in what will likely be a direct leap into an intense rivalry with a group of giants now carving up a growing market for new migraine drugs.

Bright and early European time Monday morning the company announced that it will pay up to about $2 billion to buy Alder, a little biotech that is far along the path in developing a quarterly IV formulation of a CGRP drug aimed at cutting back the number of crippling migraines patients experience each month. In a followup call, Dunsire also noted that the company will likely need 200 to 250 reps for this marketing task on both sides of the Atlantic. And analysts were quick to note that the dealmaking at Lundbeck isn’t done, with another $2 billion to $3 billion available for more deals to beef up the pipeline.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

San Diego cou­ple charged with steal­ing trade se­crets, open­ing Chi­nese biotech as DOJ crack­down con­tin­ues

A San Diego couple has been charged with stealing trade secrets from a US hospital and opening a business based off those secrets in China as the controversial industry-wide crackdown on alleged corporate espionage continues. On the same day, the Department of Justice announced they had arrested Beijing representative Zhongsan Liu for allegedly trying to obtain research visas for government recruiters.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Bio­gen pulls the plug on prized IPF drug from $562M+ Stromedix buy­out

One of Biogen’s attempts to branch out has flopped as the biotech scraps a mid-stage program for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Warts for the win: Aclar­is' lead drug clears piv­otal study

Aclaris Therapeutics has found a way to get rid of the warts and all.

The company — which earlier this month decided to focus on its arsenal of kinase inhibitors — on Monday unveiled positive data from a pivotal study testing its lead experimental drug for use in common warts.

The drug, A-101, was tested in a 502-patient study called THWART-2 — patients enrolled had one to six warts before qualifying for the trial. Patients either self-administered A-101 topical solution or a vehicle twice a week over a two-month period. A higher proportion of patients on the drug (a potent hydrogen peroxide topical solution) saw their warts disappear at day 60, versus the vehicle (p<0.0001) — meeting the main goal of the study.  Each secondary endpoint also emerged in favor of A-101, the company said.

Tower Bridge in London [Shutterstock]

#UK­BIO19: Join GSK’s Hal Bar­ron and a group of top biotech ex­ecs for our 2nd an­nu­al biotech sum­mit in Lon­don

Over the past 10 years I’ve made a point of getting to know the Golden Triangle and the special role the UK biopharma industry plays there in drug development. The concentration of world class research institutes, some of the most accomplished scientists I’ve ever seen at work and a rising tide of global investment cash leaves an impression that there’s much, much more to come as biotech hubs are birthed and nurtured.

It’s fi­nal­ly over: Bio­gen, Ei­sai scrap big Alzheimer’s PhI­I­Is af­ter a pre­dictable BACE cat­a­stro­phe rais­es safe­ty fears

Months after analysts and investors called on Biogen and Eisai to scrap their BACE drug for Alzheimer’s and move on in the wake of a string of late-stage failures and rising safety fears, the partners have called it quits. And they said they were dropping the drug — elenbecestat — after the independent monitoring board raised concerns about…safety.

We don’t know exactly what researchers found in this latest catastrophe, but the companies noted in their release that investigators had determined that the drug was flunking the risk/benefit analysis.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Charles Nichols, LSU School of Medicine

Could psy­che­delics tack­le the obe­si­ty cri­sis? A long­time re­searcher in the field says his lat­est mouse study sug­gests po­ten­tial

Psychedelics have experienced a renaissance in recent years amid a torrent of preclinical and clinical research suggesting it might provide a path to treat mood disorders conventional remedies have only scraped at. Now a preclinical trial from a young biotech suggests at least one psychedelic compound has effects beyond the mind, and — if you believe the still very, very early hype — could provide the first single remedy for some of the main complications of obesity.

Ac­celeron drops a de­vel­op­ment pro­gram as #2 drug fails to spark func­tion­al ben­e­fits in pa­tients with a rare neu­ro­mus­cu­lar ail­ment

Acceleron is scrapping a muscular dystrophy development program underway for its number 2 drug in the pipeline after pouring over some failed mid-stage secondary data.

Gone is the ACE-083 project in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Their drug hit the primary endpoint on building muscle but flopped on key secondaries for functional improvements in patients, which execs felt was vital to the drug’s success.