Ed­i­tas’ ri­vals ap­peal a re­cent set­back on patent fight, map­ping a glob­al war for CRISPR su­prema­cy

Em­manuelle Char­p­en­tier

The gene edit­ing con­sor­tium that has sought to bot­tle up ri­val Ed­i­tas $ED­IT with claims of patent in­fringe­ment are mak­ing a fed­er­al case out of a re­cent set­back in the US.

In mid-Feb­ru­ary the US Patent Tri­al and Ap­peal Board ruled that there was no in­ter­fer­ence be­tween the two sides in the dis­pute, al­low­ing each to patent their work on CRISPR/Cas9 and car­ry on. But the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, the Uni­ver­si­ty of Vi­en­na, and Dr. Em­manuelle Char­p­en­tier aren’t tak­ing no for an an­swer.

They have de­cid­ed to con­tin­ue the fight in fed­er­al court, ap­peal­ing the de­ci­sion to the U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the Fed­er­al Cir­cuit, tar­get­ing patents from The Broad In­sti­tute.

Jen­nifer Doud­na

The con­sor­tium in­cludes a group of biotech com­pa­nies found­ed on the IP es­tab­lished by Char­p­en­tier and her col­league Jen­nifer Doud­na: CRISPR Ther­a­peu­tics $CR­SP, In­tel­lia Ther­a­peu­tics $NT­LA, Cari­bou Bio­sciences and ERS Ge­nomics.

CRISPR/Cas9 re­search has ex­plod­ed in the last few years, spawn­ing a slate of biotech star­tups that are look­ing to use this new tech to ed­it dis­ease out of DNA. While still pre­clin­i­cal with years to go be­fore any prod­uct could con­ceiv­ably near the mar­ket, an­a­lysts and in­vestors have been whipped up by the rev­o­lu­tion­ary po­ten­tial of this tech­nol­o­gy, and the found­ing sci­en­tists have been at each oth­er’s throats over the IP.

Most patent fights in bio­phar­ma end with a sim­ple roy­al­ty agree­ment. But this time the fight is clear­ly per­son­al and the anger runs deep.

Feng Zhang

The group said to­day it is al­so wag­ing a glob­al patent bat­tle for CRISPR/Cas9 su­prema­cy over Ed­i­tas and its sci­en­tif­ic founder, Feng Zhang, who patent­ed the ri­val tech­nol­o­gy at The Broad.

They say they are “pur­su­ing ap­pli­ca­tions in the U.S. and oth­er ju­ris­dic­tions world­wide to ob­tain patents claim­ing the CRISPR/Cas9 tech­nol­o­gy and its use in non-cel­lu­lar and cel­lu­lar set­tings, in­clud­ing eu­kary­ot­ic cells. Cor­re­spond­ing patents have al­ready been grant­ed in the Unit­ed King­dom, and the Eu­ro­pean Patent Of­fice is al­so grant­i­ng a patent to UC, which will is­sue on May 10, 2017. UC’s ear­li­est patent ap­pli­ca­tion de­scrib­ing the CRISPR/Cas9 genome edit­ing tech­nol­o­gy and its use was filed on May 25, 2012, while the Broad’s ear­li­est patent ap­pli­ca­tion was filed more than six months lat­er, on De­cem­ber 12, 2012.”

Chas­ing Roche's ag­ing block­buster fran­chise, Am­gen/Al­ler­gan roll out Avastin, Her­ceptin knock­offs at dis­count

Let the long battle for biosimilars in the cancer space begin.

Amgen has launched its Avastin and Herceptin copycats — licensed from the predecessors of Allergan — almost two years after the FDA had stamped its approval on Mvasi (bevacizumab-awwb) and three months after the Kanjinti OK (trastuzumab-anns). While the biotech had been fielding biosimilars in Europe, this marks their first foray in the US — and the first oncology biosimilars in the country.

Seer adds ex-FDA chief Mark Mc­Clel­lan to the board; Her­cules Cap­i­tal makes it of­fi­cial for new CEO Scott Bluestein

→ On the same day it announced a $17.5 million Series C, life sciences and health data company Seer unveiled that it had lured former FDA commissioner and ex-CMS administrator Mark McClellan on to its board. “Mark’s deep understanding of the health care ecosystem and visionary insights on policy reform will be crucial in informing our thinking as we work to bring our liquid biopsy and life sciences products to market,” said Seer chief and founder Omid Farokhzad in a statement.

Norbert Bischofberger. Kronos

Backed by some of the biggest names in biotech, Nor­bert Bischof­berg­er gets his megaround for plat­form tech out of MIT

A little over a year ago when I reported on Norbert Bischofberger’s jump from the CSO job at giant Gilead to a tiny upstart called Kronos, I noted that with his connections in biotech finance, that $18 million launch round he was starting off with could just as easily have been $100 million or more.

With his first anniversary now behind him, Bischofberger has that mega-round in the bank.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Francesco De Rubertis

Medicxi is rolling out its biggest fund ever to back Eu­rope's top 'sci­en­tists with strange ideas'

Francesco De Rubertis built Medicxi to be the kind of biotech venture player he would have liked to have known back when he was a full time scientist.

“When I was a scientist 20 years ago I would have loved Medicxi,’ the co-founder tells me. It’s the kind of place run by and for investigators, what the Medicxi partner calls “scientists with strange ideas — a platform for the drug hunter and scientific entrepreneur. That’s what I wanted when I was a scientist.”

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter a decade, Vi­iV CSO John Pot­tage says it's time to step down — and he's hand­ing the job to long­time col­league Kim Smith

ViiV Healthcare has always been something unique in the global drug industry.

Owned by GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer — with GSK in the lead as majority owner — it was created 10 years ago in a time of deep turmoil for the field as something independent of the pharma giants, but with access to lots of infrastructural support on demand. While R&D at the mother ship inside GSK was souring, a razor-focused ViiV provided a rare bright spot, challenging Gilead on a lucrative front in delivering new combinations that require fewer therapies with a more easily tolerated regimen.

They kept a massive number of people alive who would otherwise have been facing a death sentence. And they made money.

And throughout, John Pottage has been the chief scientific and chief medical officer.

Until now.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Daniel O'Day

No­var­tis hands off 3 pre­clin­i­cal pro­grams to the an­tivi­ral R&D mas­ters at Gilead

Gilead CEO Daniel O’Day’s new task hunting up a CSO for the company isn’t stopping the industry’s dominant antiviral player from doing pipeline deals.

The big biotech today snapped up 3 preclinical antiviral programs from pharma giant Novartis, with drugs promising to treat human rhinovirus, influenza and herpes viruses. We don’t know what the upfront is, but the back end has $291 million in milestones baked in.

Vas Narasimhan, AP Images

On a hot streak, No­var­tis ex­ecs run the odds on their two most im­por­tant PhI­II read­outs. Which is 0.01% more like­ly to suc­ceed?

Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan is living in the sweet spot right now.

The numbers are running a bit better than expected, the pipeline — which he assembled as development chief — is performing and the stock popped more than 4% on Thursday as the executive team ran through their assessment of Q2 performance.

Year-to-date the stock is up 28%, so the investors will be beaming. Anyone looking for chinks in their armor — and there are plenty giving it a shot — right now focus on payer acceptance of their $2.1 million gene therapy Zolgensma, where it’s early days. And CAR-T continues to underperform, but Novartis doesn’t appear to be suffering from it.

So what could go wrong?

Actually, not much. But Tim Anderson at Wolfe pressed Narasimhan and his development chief John Tsai to pick which of two looming Phase III readouts with blockbuster implication had the better odds of success.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

On a glob­al romp, Boehringer BD team picks up its third R&D al­liance for Ju­ly — this time fo­cused on IPF with $50M up­front

Boehringer Ingelheim’s BD team is on a global deal spree. The German pharma company just wrapped its third deal in 3 weeks, going back to Korea for its latest pipeline pact — this time focused on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

They’re handing over $50 million to get their hands on BBT-877, an ATX inhibitor from Korea’s Bridge Biotherapeutics that was on display at a science conference in Dallas recently. There’s not a whole lot of data to evaluate the prospects here.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Servi­er scoots out of an­oth­er col­lab­o­ra­tion with Macro­Gen­ics, writ­ing off their $40M

Servier is walking out on a partnership with MacroGenics $MGNX — for the second time.

After the market closed on Wednesday MacroGenics put out word that Servier is severing a deal — inked close to 7 years ago — to collaborate on the development of flotetuzumab and other Dual-Affinity Re-Targeting (DART) drugs in its pipeline.

MacroGenics CEO Scott Koenig shrugged off the departure of Servier, which paid $20 million to kick off the alliance and $20 million to option flotetuzumab — putting a heavily back-ended $1 billion-plus in additional biobuck money on the table for the anti-CD123/CD3 bispecific and its companion therapies.