Faster, prici­er and of­ten worth­less: Study slams reg­u­la­tors for wave of ques­tion­able can­cer drug OKs

The ex­plo­sion of new can­cer drugs that’s oc­curred over the past decade in­cludes some ma­jor stand­outs that in­clude ther­a­pies that have reg­is­tered some jaw-drop­ping re­sults in clin­i­cal tri­als. But when re­searchers at King’s Col­lege Lon­don and the Lon­don School of Eco­nom­ics took a step back and ex­am­ined 68 can­cer in­di­ca­tions ap­proved in Eu­rope over a 5-year pe­ri­od through 2013, they found that many were OK’d on on­ly flim­sy da­ta de­rived from un­re­li­able tri­al de­signs and at least 10 of these OKs have nev­er proved to have any re­al val­ue for pa­tients.

Endpoints News

Unlock this article instantly by becoming a free subscriber.

You’ll get access to free articles each month, plus you can customize what newsletters get delivered to your inbox each week, including breaking news.