FDA doc re­veals agency charged Im­munomedics with da­ta in­tegri­ty breach af­ter Au­gust plant in­spec­tion

Hav­ing spent over three decades with­out an ap­proval, Im­munomedics has a trou­bled past that cul­mi­nat­ed in a man­age­ment shake­up at the be­hest of an ac­tivist share­hold­er cam­paign that was meant to re­ju­ve­nate the com­pa­ny’s for­tunes. But that hope was shat­tered when the FDA re­ject­ed the com­pa­ny’s breast can­cer drug in Jan­u­ary, cit­ing man­u­fac­tur­ing is­sues.

To be sure, the com­pa­ny was not ex­pect­ing the re­jec­tion. It hired a sales force back in No­vem­ber in an­tic­i­pa­tion of the Jan­u­ary ap­proval and told an­a­lysts in De­cem­ber that man­u­fac­tur­ing is­sues the US health reg­u­la­tor had flagged in Au­gust had since been ad­dressed.

Michael Pehl

It has now been re­vealed the FDA ac­tu­al­ly charged Im­munomedics with a da­ta in­tegri­ty breach in its Au­gust 2018 in­spec­tion, cit­ing ma­nip­u­lat­ed sam­ples and back­dat­ed batch records. In its heav­i­ly redact­ed re­port, the FDA said there was no as­sur­ance that sam­ples, batch records and com­mer­cial batch­es man­u­fac­tured be­fore Feb­ru­ary 2018 were not im­pact­ed by the da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion.

The agency al­so un­der­scored oth­er short­com­ings, in­clud­ing in­ad­e­quate raw ma­te­r­i­al sam­pling and test­ing as well as high­light­ing the in­suf­fi­cient clean­ing of equip­ment and mea­sures to pre­vent con­t­a­m­i­na­tion.

End­points News has con­tact­ed Im­munomedics $IM­MU for com­ment.

“The is­sues re­lat­ed to ap­prov­abil­i­ty in the CRL were ex­clu­sive­ly fo­cused on Chem­istry, Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Con­trol mat­ters and no new clin­i­cal or pre­clin­i­cal da­ta need to be gen­er­at­ed,” Im­munomedics chief Michael Pehl said in a state­ment last month, adding that the com­pa­ny in­tend­ed to re­quest a meet­ing with the FDA to bet­ter un­der­stand the agency’s re­quire­ments.

Andre Kalil, AP Images

A 9/11-era Om­a­ha fa­cil­i­ty, an old Ebo­la drug, and the ubiq­ui­tous Dr. Fau­ci: In­side the first US nov­el coro­n­avirus tri­al

The first 11 coronavirus patients who arrived in Omaha last week, airlifted across the globe after two weeks quarantined on a cruise ship, showed only minor symptoms or none at all. And then one of them — or one of the couple of Americans who arrived later — got worse. He developed pneumonia, a life-threatening complication for coronavirus patients.

In a biocontainment room at the University of Nebraska Medical Center on Friday, doctors infused him with an experimental Gilead drug once developed for Ebola, called remdesivir. Or they gave him a placebo. For the first time in the US, neither he nor the doctors knew.

The first US novel coronavirus trial was underway and with it, a mad dash for an answer. Sponsored by the NIH, the study marked a critical point in the epidemic. Since the start of the outbreak, the agency had helped lead a global effort to contain the virus. Now, as it spread worldwide and the CDC issued warnings the US could see a major internal outbreak, they were looking at home.

“We don’t have too much time,” Andre Kalil, the trial’s lead investigator, told Endpoints News. “Everything’s moving really fast.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Grow­ing ac­cep­tance of ac­cel­er­at­ed path­ways for nov­el treat­ments: but does reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proval lead to com­mer­cial suc­cess?

By Mwango Kashoki, MD, MPH, Vice President-Technical, and Richard Macaulay, Senior Director, of Parexel Regulatory & Access

In recent years, we’ve seen a significant uptake in the use of regulatory options by companies looking to accelerate the journey of life-saving drugs to market. In 2018, 73% of the novel drugs approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) were designated under one or more expedited development program categories (Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, Priority Review, and Accelerated Approval).ᶦ

Brian Stuglik (file photo)

Turn­ing fo­cus to clin­i­cal work, Ve­rastem ax­es 31 jobs, scales back can­cer drug pro­mo­tion af­ter dis­ap­point­ing sales

Months after taking the helm at Verastem Oncology, Brian Stuglik has a plan to take the biotech in a “new strategic direction” — but not before some layoffs.

Left out of an upbeat press release spelling out its clinical plans, and buried below news of a $100 million private placement in an SEC filing, is a planned restructuring that will claim 31 jobs. Alongside some other cost-saving measures, Verastem expects to cut expenses down by $70 million to $80 million per year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Olivier Brandicourt (AP Images)

Ex-Sanofi chief Olivi­er Brandi­court, cur­rent Black­stone ad­vi­sor, jumps on Al­ny­lam board

Former Sanofi chief Olivier Brandicourt, who departed his post with an unexpected early retirement last year, has made his move — as most C-suite executives inevitably do — to become a director on the board of a biopharma company.

RNAi player Alnylam is Brandicourt’s destination. Meanwhile, the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based drugmaker — which pioneered the first approval in the field — also disclosed the retirement of Alnylam co-founder Dr. Paul Schimmel from its board.

Sage con­firms sus­pen­sion of 2 de­pres­sion tri­als af­ter PhI­II flop; Es­pe­ri­on fol­lows up maid­en ap­proval with com­bo OK

→ In the wake of a flop in the crucial Phase III MOUNTAIN study, Sage Therapeutics confirmed in its quarterly update that it’s suspended enrollment in two other pivotal trials for the oral depression drug SAGE-217 (or zuranolone) as it awaits guidance from the FDA. While REDWOOD (measuring relapse) and RAINFOREST (for patients with both major depressive disorder and insomnia) are on hold pending amendments, though, the open-label SHORELINE has completed enrollment. CEO Jeff Jonas remained tight-lipped about what specific tweaks they are considering for the program, reiterating only there have been issues with compliance and room for a higher dose.

Dan O'Day (AP Images)

UP­DAT­ED: A name emerges out of the Gilead M&A ru­mor mill, and it’s a can­cer biotech

After months of questions and speculation about when and if Gilead will make a major acquisition, a name has emerged.

The California-based drugmaker has approached Forty Seven Inc, a cancer biotech, with a takeover offer, Bloomberg News reports. With Forty Seven’s market cap at $2.3 billion, an acquisition would likely be Gilead’s largest since they acquired Kite Pharma for $11.9 billion in 2017.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Biogen head of R&D Al Sandrock, Sangamo CEO Sandy Macrae

UP­DAT­ED: Bio­gen makes an­oth­er bold Alzheimer’s bet, drop­ping $350M up­front to part­ner with genome-edit­ing fo­cused Sang­amo

While the fate of Biogen’s resurrected Alzheimer’s drug aducanumab remains uncertain, the Cambridge, MA-based drugmaker is joining forces with genome editing company Sangamo Therapeutics to develop therapies for neurological conditions.

Sangamo is set to receive a meaty $350 million upfront in cash and stock and is eligible to receive up to $2.37 billion in milestone payments, in addition to royalties. In return, Biogen gets the rights to two Sangamo preclinical compounds: ST-501 (for use in tauopathies including Alzheimer’s disease) and ST-502 (for synucleinopathies including Parkinson’s disease).

“The partnership represents a lower-cost way to expand its work in neurologic disease,” Credit Suisse’s Evan Seigerman said in a note, referring to Biogen.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Take­da swoops in to buy lit­tle biotech part­ner and its celi­ac drug poised to 'change stan­dard of care'

Having spent three years carefully grooming PvP Biologics and its drug for celiac disease, Takeda is happy enough with the proof-of-concept data to buy it all.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 73,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jim Wilson's gene ther­a­py start­up Pas­sage Bio bucks mar­ket sen­ti­ments, rais­ing up­sized $216M IPO

A coronavirus fear-induced bloodbath on the Nasdaq has not stopped Passage Bio from making a public debut — and an exuberant one.

By pricing an upsized offering at $18, the top of the range, the gene therapy biotech bagged $216 million from its IPO, 72% more than it’s originally penciled in.

The proceeds likely reflected confidence in Jim Wilson, who gathered all the tools he’s built over decades of gene therapy research to assemble the startup and teamed up with Frazier and OrbiMed to hone its focus on rare, monogenic disorders of the central nervous system. Just before the IPO, Deerfield partner Bruce Goldsmith took over from OrbiMed’s Stephen Squinto as CEO.