FDA fol­lows through with a ground­break­ing OK for Yescar­ta, Gilead­'s new CAR-T break­through

Just two weeks af­ter Gilead closed on its $12 bil­lion Kite buy­out, the FDA has fol­lowed through with a ground­break­ing ap­proval of Yescar­ta (axi-cel), putting its CAR-T drug neck-and-neck with No­var­tis’ pi­o­neer Kym­ri­ah as the two drugs are prepped for a launch.

In a vir­tu­al heart­beat, Gilead used its con­sid­er­able cash re­serves to reach a deal to buy out Kite and axi-cel 6 weeks ago, ac­quir­ing its new­ly ap­proved CAR-T and all the next-gen tech­nol­o­gy now in the works. The ac­qui­si­tion made Gilead an overnight leader in CAR-T. While beat­en to a his­toric first FDA ap­proval for a CAR-T by an ag­gres­sive group at No­var­tis — ini­tial­ly green-light­ed at the end of Au­gust for pe­di­atric and young adult pa­tients with a form of acute lym­phoblas­tic leukemia — Gilead is re­tain­ing most of the Kite gang and hon­ing its man­u­fac­tur­ing ef­fort, shav­ing off the time it takes to turn around these per­son­al­ized ther­a­pies.

In clas­sic ag­gres­sive form, Gilead came out gun­ning, of­fer­ing the ther­a­py at a price of $373,000 — $102,000 less than its ri­val at No­var­tis. On the oth­er hand, No­var­tis of­fered a val­ue-based deal to a num­ber of pay­ers in which they on­ly get re­im­burse­ment for pa­tients who re­spond to ther­a­py, evening the play­ing field.

Once again, FDA com­mis­sion­er Scott Got­tlieb took the hon­ors in con­grat­u­lat­ing the de­vel­op­ers, as he did when No­var­tis came out in front. And this time, he promised to lend the agency’s help for the rest of the bur­geon­ing cell ther­a­py field. Said Got­tlieb:

“To­day marks an­oth­er mile­stone in the de­vel­op­ment of a whole new sci­en­tif­ic par­a­digm for the treat­ment of se­ri­ous dis­eases. In just sev­er­al decades, gene ther­a­py has gone from be­ing a promis­ing con­cept to a prac­ti­cal so­lu­tion to dead­ly and large­ly un­treat­able forms of can­cer. This ap­proval demon­strates the con­tin­ued mo­men­tum of this promis­ing new area of med­i­cine and we’re com­mit­ted to sup­port­ing and help­ing ex­pe­dite the de­vel­op­ment of these prod­ucts. We will soon re­lease a com­pre­hen­sive pol­i­cy to ad­dress how we plan to sup­port the de­vel­op­ment of cell-based re­gen­er­a­tive med­i­cine. That pol­i­cy will al­so clar­i­fy how we will ap­ply our ex­pe­dit­ed pro­grams to break­through prod­ucts that use CAR-T cells and oth­er gene ther­a­pies. We re­main com­mit­ted to sup­port­ing the ef­fi­cient de­vel­op­ment of safe and ef­fec­tive treat­ments that lever­age these new sci­en­tif­ic plat­forms.”

The CD19 T cell im­munother­a­py — which reengi­neers pa­tient cells in­to a po­tent can­cer ther­a­py — has been ap­proved for adult pa­tients with re­lapsed or re­frac­to­ry large B-cell lym­phoma af­ter two or more lines of sys­temic ther­a­py. That la­bel in­cludes dif­fuse large B-cell lym­phoma (DL­B­CL), pri­ma­ry me­di­asti­nal large B-cell lym­phoma, high-grade B-cell lym­phoma, and DL­B­CL aris­ing from fol­lic­u­lar lym­phoma.

Alessan­dro Ri­va

The R&D work will now be led by Alessan­dro Ri­va, a for­mer No­var­tis sci­en­tist pro­mot­ed yes­ter­day to ex­ec­u­tive vice pres­i­dent in charge of on­col­o­gy R&D, with a seat on the lead­er­ship team.

Left be­hind in the race to CAR-T dom­i­nance, for now at least, is Juno Ther­a­peu­tics. Its ri­val drug was mired down by a lethal tox­i­c­i­ty is­sue that killed 5 pa­tients, forc­ing the biotech to switch over to its num­ber 2 pro­gram.

No­var­tis man­aged to sur­prise quite a few an­a­lysts by peg­ging Kym­ri­ah at $475,000, which is sig­nif­i­cant­ly low­er than the $600,000 max­i­mum pro­vid­ed in some of the spreads. In a sto­ry we pub­lished yes­ter­day, how­ev­er, a num­ber of ex­perts said the full cost of ther­a­py may well end up at $1 mil­lion to $1.5 mil­lion.

The da­ta, though, are jaw drop­ping.

The FDA’s ap­proval comes through on the da­ta for ZU­MA-1, which demon­strat­ed that 72% of the pa­tients in­volved had an ob­jec­tive re­sponse rate to the ther­a­py. And 51% demon­strat­ed a com­plete re­mis­sion, with no sign of the can­cer left.

In a re­cent farewell let­ter to the staff, Kite CEO Arie Bellde­grun summed it up by writ­ing:

In a span of just a few short years, we grew from few­er than 10 em­ploy­ees to al­most 700. The com­pa­ny’s val­ue in­creased 2300% from the time of our IPO to near­ly $12 bil­lion with the ac­qui­si­tion by Gilead Sci­ences. Our clos­ing $180 per share price rep­re­sents not just a 960% ap­pre­ci­a­tion from the IPO price of $17 per share, but the largest ever pre-com­mer­cial bio­phar­ma ac­qui­si­tion.

Now Gilead can see if it’s ag­gres­sive team can make the most of the block­buster peak sales es­ti­mates that have yet to be climbed.

To­day, Bellde­grun had this to say:

“The FDA ap­proval of Yescar­ta is a land­mark for pa­tients with re­lapsed or re­frac­to­ry large B-cell lym­phoma. This ap­proval would not have been pos­si­ble with­out the coura­geous com­mit­ment of pa­tients and clin­i­cians, as well as the on­go­ing ded­i­ca­tion of Kite’s em­ploy­ees. We must al­so rec­og­nize the FDA for their abil­i­ty to em­brace and sup­port trans­for­ma­tion­al new tech­nolo­gies that treat life-threat­en­ing ill­ness­es. We be­lieve this is on­ly the be­gin­ning for CAR T ther­a­pies.”

UP­DAT­ED: FDA’s golodirsen CRL: Sarep­ta’s Duchenne drugs are dan­ger­ous to pa­tients, of­fer­ing on­ly a small ben­e­fit. And where's that con­fir­ma­to­ry tri­al?

Back last summer, Sarepta CEO Doug Ingram told Duchenne MD families and investors that the FDA’s shock rejection of their second Duchenne MD drug golodirsen was due to some concerns regulators raised about the risk of infection and the possibility of kidney toxicity. But when pressed to release the letter for all to see, he declined, according to a report from BioPharmaDive, saying that kind of move “might not look like we’re being as respectful as we’d like to be.”

He went on to assure everyone that he hadn’t misrepresented the CRL.

But Ingram’s public remarks didn’t include everything in the letter, which — following the FDA’s surprise about-face and unexplained approval — has now been posted on the FDA’s website and broadly circulated on Twitter early Wednesday.

The CRL raises plenty of fresh questions about why the FDA abruptly decided to reverse itself and hand out an OK for a drug a senior regulator at the FDA believed — 5 months ago, when he wrote the letter — is dangerous to patients. It also puts the spotlight back on Sarepta $SRPT, which failed to launch a confirmatory study of eteplirsen, which was only approved after a heated internal controversy at the FDA. Ellis Unger, director of CDER’s Office of Drug Evaluation I, notes that study could have clarified quite a lot about the benefit and risks associated with their drugs — which can cost as much as a million dollars per patient per year, depending on weight.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

2019 Trin­i­ty Drug In­dex Eval­u­ates Ac­tu­al Com­mer­cial Per­for­mance of Nov­el Drugs Ap­proved in 2016

Fewer Approvals, but Neurology Rivals Oncology and Sees Major Innovations

This report, the fourth in our Trinity Drug Index series, outlines key themes and emerging trends in the industry as we progress towards a new world of targeted and innovative products. It provides a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of novel drugs approved by the FDA in 2016, scoring each on its commercial performance, therapeutic value, and R&D investment (Table 1: Drug ranking – Ratings on a 1-5 scale).

How to cap­i­talise on a lean launch

For start-up biotechnology companies and resource stretched pharmaceutical organisations, launching a novel product can be challenging. Lean teams can make setting a launch strategy and achieving your commercial goals seem like a colossal undertaking, but can these barriers be transformed into opportunities that work to your brand’s advantage?
We spoke to Managing Consultant Frances Hendry to find out how Blue Latitude Health partnered with a fledgling subsidiary of a pharmaceutical organisation to launch an innovative product in a
complex market.
What does the launch environment look like for this product?
FH: We started working on the product at Phase II and now we’re going into Phase III trials. There is a significant unmet need in this disease area, and everyone is excited about the launch. However, the organisation is still evolving and the team is quite small – naturally this causes a little turbulence.

Stephen Hahn, AP

The FDA has de­val­ued the gold stan­dard on R&D. And that threat­ens every­one in drug de­vel­op­ment

Bioregnum Opinion Column by John Carroll

A few weeks ago, when Stephen Hahn was being lightly queried by Senators in his confirmation hearing as the new commissioner of the FDA, he made the usual vow to maintain the gold standard in drug development.

Neatly summarized, that standard requires the agency to sign off on clinical data — usually from two, well-controlled human studies — that prove a drug’s benefit outweighs any risks.

Over the last few years, biopharma has enjoyed an unprecedented loosening over just what it takes to clear that bar. Regulators are more willing to drop the second trial requirement ahead of an accelerated approval — particularly if they have an unmet medical need where patients are clamoring for a therapy.

That confirmatory trial the FDA demands can wait a few years. And most everyone in biopharma would tell you that’s the right thing for patients. They know its a tonic for everyone in the industry faced with pushing a drug through clinical development. And it’s helped inspire a global biotech boom.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: New play­ers are jump­ing in­to the scram­ble to de­vel­op a vac­cine as pan­dem­ic pan­ic spreads fast

When the CNN news crew in Wuhan caught wind of the Chinese government’s plan to quarantine the city of 11 million people, they made a run for one of the last trains out — their Atlanta colleagues urging them on. On the way to the train station, they were forced to skirt the local seafood market, where the coronavirus at the heart of a brewing outbreak may have taken root.

And they breathlessly reported every moment of the early morning dash.

In shuttering the city, triggering an exodus of masked residents who caught wind of the quarantine ahead of time, China signaled that they were prepared to take extreme actions to stop the spread of a virus that has claimed 17 lives, sickened many more and panicked people around the globe.

CNN helped illustrate how hard all that can be.

The early reaction in the biotech industry has been classic, with small-cap companies scrambling to headline efforts to step in fast. But there are also new players in the field with new tech that has been introduced since the last of a series of pandemic panics that could change the usual storylines. And they’re volunteering for a crash course in speeding up vaccine development — a field where overnight solutions have been impossible to prove.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Mer­ck KGaA spin­out gets first fund­ing to bring dual-act­ing can­cer mol­e­cules in­to the clin­ic

Two and a half years after launch, Merck KGaA spinout iOnctura is getting its first major round of funding.

The oncology startup raised €15 million ($16.6 million) to put its lead drug into the clinic and get its second drug past IND-enabling tests. INKEF Capital and VI Partners co-led the round and were joined by the biotech’s longtime backer M Ventures, an arm of Merck KGaA, and Schroder Adveq.

Eli Lil­ly’s $1.6B can­cer drug failed to spark even the slight­est pos­i­tive gain for pa­tients in its 1st PhI­II

Eli Lilly had high hopes for its pegylated IL-10 drug pegilodecakin when it bought Armo last year for $1.6 billion in cash. But after reporting a few months ago that it had failed a Phase III in pancreatic cancer, without the data, its likely value has plunged. And now we’re getting some exact data that underscore just how little positive effect it had.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Am­gen aug­ments Asia foothold by tak­ing over Astel­las joint ven­ture in Japan

California-based Amgen, which does the bulk of its business in the United States, made its ambition to reinvigorate its growth prospects by expanding its presence in Asia clear at the sidelines of the JP Morgan healthcare conference in San Francisco earlier this month.

The Thousand Oaks-based company on Thursday executed its plan to dissolve the joint venture with Astellas — created in 2013 — to operate the unit independently in Japan. With its rapidly aging population, the region represents an appealing market for Amgen’s osteoporosis treatments Prolia and Evenity as well as a cholesterol-lowering injection Repatha.

Daphne Zohar (PureTech)

PureTech bags $200M from sale of Karuna shares — still siz­zling from promis­ing schiz­o­phre­nia da­ta

Cashing in on the exuberance around Karuna Therapeutics and its potential blockbuster CNS drug, PureTech has sold a chunk of the biotech’s shares to Goldman Sachs for $200 million.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.