Genen­tech takes aim at Bio­gen and No­var­tis, high­light­ing an ear­ly look at pos­i­tive re­sults for their oral SMA drug from PTC

Af­ter get­ting hit with a set­back that forced the phar­ma gi­ant Roche to aban­don its lead drug for spinal mus­cu­lar at­ro­phy, com­pa­ny ex­ecs are back with a new drug in-li­censed from PTC $PTCT that they be­lieve has legs.

It’s an in­ter­im, up­dat­ed look at a tiny da­ta set for ris­diplam (or RG7916), but re­searchers spot­light­ed ev­i­dence that the drug could help sig­nif­i­cant per­cent­ages of in­fants sit, kick and con­trol their head move­ments — all el­e­ments that the dis­ease de­stroys as it re­lent­less­ly push­es these chil­dren to an ear­ly death.

San­dra Horn­ing

This is a sin­gle-arm study be­ing pur­sued by Genen­tech, the same kind of ap­proach that AveX­is scored on in the sum­mer of 2017 for the gene ther­a­py AVXS-101, when not­ed in­ves­ti­ga­tor Jer­ry Mendell and his team high­light­ed their own im­pres­sive re­sults in a small study. That set of da­ta pro­pelled the biotech to out­line plans for an ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval, as well as in­spir­ing No­var­tis’ Vas Narasimhan to buy the com­pa­ny for $8.7 bil­lion. It’s still wide­ly con­sid­ered the top con­tender.

No­var­tis al­so has an oral drug sim­i­lar to Roche’s called LMI070 (branaplam), which got back in­to the clin­ic last fall af­ter it was forced in­to a 2-year hia­tus trig­gered by safe­ty fears raised by an­i­mal stud­ies that had high­light­ed the risk of nerve dam­age.

Roche turned to its oral SMN2 splic­ing mod­i­fi­er last sum­mer af­ter reg­u­la­tors on both sides of the At­lantic de­mand­ed new late-stage work be­fore they would con­sid­er ap­prov­ing their drug ole­soxime. Roche punt­ed the drug in­stead.

Both No­var­tis and Roche are now hot on the trail of Spin­raza, the pi­o­neer­ing drug in the field from Bio­gen, which was priced at $750,000 — mak­ing it one of the most ex­pen­sive drugs on the plan­et. It’s al­so ripe for be­ing over­tak­en by oth­ers. And Baird’s Bri­an Sko­r­ney likes Roche’s chances with this drug. He not­ed:

The da­ta is com­pelling so far, and sug­gests that ris­diplam could im­pact Spin­raza’s mar­ket share, if it comes to mar­ket, giv­en its con­ve­nience as an oral small mol­e­cule.

In the FIRE­FISH study, re­searchers re­port­ed that a key score on dis­ease pro­gres­sion showed more than half of the in­fants with type 1 SMA hit 40-plus. They not­ed:

The me­di­an CHOP-IN­TEND scores in­creased over time (37.5 at 6 months [n=20] com­pared to 41.5 at eight months [n=14]). The me­di­an age at first dose in FIRE­FISH was 6.7 months and me­di­an treat­ment du­ra­tion was 9.5 months. Nine­teen out of 21 in­fants en­rolled (90 per­cent) re­main alive with two hav­ing dis­con­tin­ued due to the fa­tal pro­gres­sion of their dis­ease. Three pa­tients are now over 24 months old. No in­fant has re­quired a tra­cheosto­my or per­ma­nent ven­ti­la­tion since study ini­ti­a­tion, and no in­fant has lost the abil­i­ty to swal­low.

In the Sun­fish study for type 2 and 3 SMA, they found:

Of the pa­tients treat­ed with ris­diplam for at least one year (n=30), the me­di­an change from base­line in Mo­tor Func­tion Mea­sure (MFM), the pri­ma­ry end­point in the con­fir­ma­to­ry part of SUN­FISH and a scale used to as­sess mo­tor func­tion in neu­ro­mus­cu­lar dis­eases, was a 3.1-point im­prove­ment. Six­ty-three per­cent of pa­tients ex­pe­ri­enced an im­prove­ment in MFM over base­line of three points or more af­ter one year. Such im­prove­ments were seen both in pa­tients un­der 12 years old (76 per­cent; n=17) and over 12 years old (46 per­cent; n=13).

“SMA ther­a­pies that pro­duce a sus­tained in­crease in SMN pro­tein in both the CNS and pe­riph­ery may pro­vide com­pre­hen­sive ben­e­fits to peo­ple di­ag­nosed with SMA, and we look for­ward to shar­ing ad­di­tion­al da­ta on ris­diplam as the clin­i­cal pro­gram pro­gress­es,” said CMO San­dra Horn­ing in a state­ment.

De­vel­op­ment of the Next Gen­er­a­tion NKG2D CAR T-cell Man­u­fac­tur­ing Process

Celyad’s view on developing and delivering a CAR T-cell therapy with multi-tumor specificity combined with cell manufacturing success
Overview
Transitioning potential therapeutic assets from academia into the commercial environment is an exercise that is largely underappreciated by stakeholders, except for drug developers themselves. The promise of preclinical or early clinical results drives enthusiasm, but the pragmatic delivery of a therapy outside of small, local testing is most often a major challenge for drug developers especially, including among other things, the manufacturing challenges that surround the production of just-in-time and personalized autologous cell therapy products.

Paul Hudson, Getty Images

UP­DAT­ED: Sanofi CEO Hud­son lays out new R&D fo­cus — chop­ping di­a­betes, car­dio and slash­ing $2B-plus costs in sur­gi­cal dis­sec­tion

Earlier on Monday, new Sanofi CEO Paul Hudson baited the hook on his upcoming strategy presentation Tuesday with a tell-tale deal to buy Synthorx for $2.5 billion. That fits squarely with hints that he’s pointing the company to a bigger future in oncology, which also squares with a major industry tilt.

In a big reveal later in the day, though, Hudson offered a slate of stunners on his plans to surgically dissect and reassemble the portfoloio, saying that the company is dropping cardio and diabetes research — which covers two of its biggest franchise arenas. Sanofi missed the boat on developing new diabetes drugs, and now it’s pulling out entirely. As part of the pullback, it’s dropping efpeglenatide, their once-weekly GLP-1 injection for diabetes.

“To be out of cardiovascular and diabetes is not easy for a company like ours with an incredibly proud history,” Hudson said on a call with reporters, according to the Wall Street Journal. “As tough a choice as that is, we’re making that choice.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Roger Perlmutter, Merck

#ASH19: Here’s why Mer­ck is pay­ing $2.7B to­day to grab Ar­Qule and its next-gen BTK drug, lin­ing up Eli Lil­ly ri­val­ry

Just a few months after making a splash at the European Hematology Association scientific confab with an early snapshot of positive data for their BTK inhibitor ARQ 531, ArQule has won a $2.7 billion buyout deal from Merck.

Merck is scooping up a next-gen BTK drug — which is making a splash at ASH today — from ArQule in an M&A pact set at $20 a share $ARQL. That’s more than twice Friday’s $9.66 close. And Merck R&D chief Roger Perlmutter heralded a deal that nets “multiple clinical-stage oral kinase inhibitors.”

This is the second biotech buyout pact today, marking a brisk tempo of M&A deals in the lead-up to the big JP Morgan gathering in mid-January. It’s no surprise the acquisitions are both for cancer drugs, where Sanofi will try to make its mark while Merck beefs up a stellar oncology franchise. And bolt-ons are all the rage at the major pharma players, which you could also see in Novartis’ recent $9.7 billion MedCo buyout.

ArQule — which comes out on top after their original lead drug foundered in Phase III — highlighted early data on ‘531 at EHA from a group of 6 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients who got the 65 mg dose. Four of them experienced a partial response — a big advance for a company that failed with earlier attempts.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Paul Hudson, Sanofi

Paul Hud­son promis­es a bright new fu­ture at Sanofi, kick­ing loose me-too drugs and fo­cus­ing on land­mark ad­vances. But can he de­liv­er?

Paul Hudson was on a mission Tuesday morning as he stood up to address Sanofi’s new R&D and business strategy.

Still fresh into the job, the new CEO set out to convince his audience — including the legions of nervous staffers inevitably devoting much of their day to listening in — that the pharma giant is shedding the layers of bureaucracy that had held them back from making progress in the past, dropping the duds in the pipeline and reprioritizing a more narrow set of experimental drugs that were promised as first-in-class or best-in-class.  The company, he added, is now positioned to “go after other opportunities” that could offer a transformational approach to treating its core diseases.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Left top to right: Mark Timney, Alex Denner, Vas Narasimhan. (The Medicines Company, Getty, AP/Endpoints News)

In a play-by-play of the $9.7B Med­Co buy­out, No­var­tis ad­mits it over­paid while of­fer­ing a huge wind­fall to ex­ecs

A month into his tenure at The Medicines Company, new CEO Mark Timney reached out to then-Novartis pharma chief Paul Hudson: Any interest in a partnership?

No, Hudson told him. Not now, at least.

Ten months later, Hudson had left to run Sanofi and Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan was paying $9.7 billion for the one-drug biotech – the largest in the string of acquisitions Narasimhan has signed since his 2017 appointment.

The deal was the product of an activist investor and his controversial partner working through nearly a year of cat-and-mouse negotiations to secure a deal with Big Pharma’s most expansionist executive. It represented a huge bet in a cardiovascular field that already saw two major busts in recent years and brought massive returns for two of the industry’s most eye-raising names.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Paul Hudson. Sanofi

New Sanofi CEO Hud­son adds next-gen can­cer drug tech to the R&D quest, buy­ing Syn­thorx for $2.5B

When Paul Hudson lays out his R&D vision for Sanofi tomorrow, he will have a new slate of interleukin therapies and a synthetic biology platform to boast about.

The French pharma giant announced early Monday that it is snagging San Diego biotech Synthorx in a $2.5 billion deal. That marks an affordable bolt-on for Sanofi but a considerable return for Synthorx backers, including Avalon, RA Capital and OrbiMed: At $68 per share, the price represents a 172% premium to Friday’s closing.

Synthorx’s take on alternative IL-2 drugs for both cancer and autoimmune disorders — enabled by a synthetic DNA base pair pioneered by Scripps professor Floyd Romesberg — “fits perfectly” with the kind of innovation that he wants at Sanofi, Hudson said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Am­gen puts its foot down in shiny new South San Fran­cis­co hub as it re­or­ga­nizes R&D ops

Amgen has signed up to be AbbVie’s neighbor in South San Francisco as it moves into a nine-story R&D facility in the booming biotech hub.

The arrangement gives Amgen 240,000 square feet of space on the Gateway of Pacific Campus, just a few minutes drive from its current digs at Oyster Point. The new hub will open in 2022 and house the big biotech’s Bay Area employees working on cardiometabolic, inflammation and oncology research.

Ab­b­Vie, Scripps ex­pand part­ner­ship, for­ti­fy fo­cus on can­cer drugs

Scripps and AbbVie go way back. Research conducted in the lab of Scripps scientist Richard Lerner led to the discovery of Humira. The antibody, approved by the FDA in 2002 and sold by AbbVie, went on to become the world’s bestselling treatment. In 2018, the drugmaker and the non-profit organization signed a pact focused on developing cancer treatments — and now, the scope of that partnership has broadened to encompass a range of diseases, including immunological and neurological conditions.

South Ko­rea jails 3 Sam­sung ex­ecs for de­stroy­ing ev­i­dence in Bi­o­Log­ics probe

Three Samsung executives in Korea are going to jail.

The convictions came in what prosecutors had billed as “biggest crime of evidence destruction in the history of South Korea”: a case of alleged corporate intrigue that was thrown open when investigators found what was hidden beneath the floor of a Samsung BioLogics plant. Eight employees in total were found guilty of evidence tampering and the three executives were each sentenced to up to two years in prison.