Got­tlieb seeks new com­par­a­tive ap­proval stan­dard for opi­oids

With just a week left be­fore he de­parts from the FDA, Com­mis­sion­er Scott Got­tlieb on Thurs­day told the Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­a­tions Com­mit­tee that his agency is in­ter­est­ed in Con­gress cre­at­ing a new stan­dard for opi­oid ap­provals where­by those seek­ing ap­proval would be com­pared to opi­oids al­ready on the mar­ket.

“For this to work, the FDA be­lieves that there should be a pre­mar­ket demon­stra­tion that a new opi­oid is su­pe­ri­or to an al­ready-ap­proved opi­oid or opi­oid-con­tain­ing drug for the same gen­er­al in­di­ca­tion. The stan­dard should be that a new opi­oid or opi­oid-con­tain­ing drug pro­vides a sig­nif­i­cant ad­van­tage rel­a­tive to an al­ready-ap­proved opi­oid or opi­oid-con­tain­ing drug for the same gen­er­al in­di­ca­tion in terms of greater ef­fi­ca­cy or greater safe­ty,” he said.

Drugs that meet this new stan­dard could re­ceive break­through or some oth­er new des­ig­na­tion to fur­ther pri­or­i­tize their re­view. “Even­tu­al­ly, Con­gress could con­sid­er how oth­er in­cen­tives, in­clud­ing ex­clu­siv­i­ty pe­ri­ods, might help dri­ve de­vel­op­ment to­ward drugs with safer at­trib­ut­es,” Got­tlieb added.

While ac­knowl­edg­ing that opi­oids need to be treat­ed dif­fer­ent­ly from oth­er prod­ucts, he al­so said FDA is work­ing to im­ple­ment dif­fer­ent pro­vi­sions from the Sup­port Act, in­clud­ing new re­quire­ments for longer ef­fec­tive­ness stud­ies and oth­er au­thor­i­ties that al­low FDA to re­quire cer­tain pack­ag­ing to be made avail­able for opi­oids that pose a se­ri­ous risk of abuse or over­dose.

“The ques­tion is long-term safe­ty when these drugs are used chron­i­cal­ly, in par­tic­u­lar whether ef­fi­ca­cy de­clines and if that cre­ates safe­ty is­sues,” Got­tlieb said.

But on the ques­tion of whether any com­pa­ny is close to bring­ing a non-opi­oid painkiller to mar­ket, Got­tlieb said they’re in the ear­ly stages of de­vel­op­ment and it’s dif­fi­cult to pre­dict how quick­ly such a prod­uct would come to mar­ket.

He al­so did not seem to think the in­flux of il­lic­it opi­oids was un­der con­trol. “I don’t know that I can say we have a han­dle on it or an un­der­stand­ing of the full scope,” he added.

In ad­di­tion to the opi­oids dis­cus­sion, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked Got­tlieb about the agency’s frame­work for ap­prov­ing biosim­i­lar in­sulins, which is shift­ing in 2020 as prod­ucts ap­proved un­der new drug ap­pli­ca­tions are tran­si­tioned to bi­o­log­ics li­cens­es.

Got­tlieb said he thought that un­der the new biosim­i­lars path­way, “we’ll see much more com­pe­ti­tion” for in­sulins, as it will be eas­i­er to get to mar­ket and com­pete as in­ter­change­able prod­ucts. He ac­knowl­edged there may be one or two ap­pli­ca­tions that get caught and have to be re­sub­mit­ted be­cause of the shift, but he in­sist­ed there will be “vig­or­ous ac­tiv­i­ty un­der the new frame­work.”

He al­so said he hopes Con­gress would reau­tho­rize the im­por­tant biosim­i­lar ap­proval path­way, which is part of the Af­ford­able Care Act, if the ACA were in­val­i­dat­ed.

In his writ­ten tes­ti­mo­ny, Got­tlieb al­so dis­cussed trans­form­ing med­ical de­vice safe­ty and cy­ber­se­cu­ri­ty, med­ical coun­ter­mea­sures and drug com­pound­ing.


Im­age cred­it: Shut­ter­stock

First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

Author

Zachary Brennan

managing editor, RAPS

Jake Van Naarden, Josh Bilenker, Nisha Nanda (Credit: Loxo, Aisling Capital)

Josh Bilenker and his Loxo crew are tak­ing the reins on on­col­o­gy R&D at Eli Lil­ly, culling the weak and map­ping a new path

Josh Bilenker, Jake Van Naarden and Nisha Nanda came out of Eli Lilly’s $8 billion Loxo Oncology buyout with a bundle of cash and plenty of choices on what they could do next. Start a new company, go public. Live on the beach in 5-star luxury. Contemplate the stars — in their own observatory.

So what are they doing?

They formed a new executive team that is taking over the management of Eli Lilly’s hundreds-strong oncology R&D group — essentially using Loxo as a base for a bold new experiment in Big Pharma R&D in an attempt to create a true biotech environment with the deep pockets of a top-15 industry player. They’ve recruited David Hyman from Memorial Sloan Kettering to join the team as chief medical officer. And the mandate includes culling out the oncology pipeline, highlighting their star prospects and going after new programs wherever they can find the best prospects.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sangamo CEO Sandy Macrae

Pa­tient #9 has been a con­cern, but Sang­amo and Pfiz­er are bull­ish about win­ning the marathon he­mo­phil­ia A gene ther­a­py race

Patient number 9 has given Sangamo and its partners at Pfizer some heart palpitations in their high profile hemophilia A gene therapy program.

After watching his Factor VIII level rise following treatment like the rest, the crucial efficacy gauge they track saw a sudden and significant plunge. At week 13, the FVIII level had dropped below normal. Then it began to rise again.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

J&J team shows off 'break­through' BC­MA CAR-T da­ta, and that could cause a big headache at blue­bird and Bris­tol-My­ers

Just hours after J&J’s oncology team bragged about scoring a breakthrough therapy designation for their BCMA CAR-T drug, they pulled the wraps off of the multiple myeloma data for JNJ-4528 that impressed the FDA. And it’s easy to see why they may well be on a short path to a landmark approval — which may well be making the rival team at bluebird/Bristol-Myers more than a little nervous.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

J&J's Mathai Mammen at an Endpoints News event in Boston, June 2018 (Photo: Rob Tannenbaum for Endpoints News)

J&J fronts $750M cash to grab a failed can­cer drug that’s been re­pur­posed as a pow­er­ful an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry

J&J has stepped up with one of its blockbuster drug buys, agreeing to pay Austin-based XBiotech $XBIT $750 million in cash and up to $600 million more in milestones for their late stage-ready anti-inflammatory drug bermekimab — which some longtime biotech observers may recognize as a failed cancer therapy with a disaster-prone past.

The drug targets the IL-1a pathway. J&J $JNJ R&D chief Mathai Mammen is cutting a check for a drug that has produced positive mid-stage data in patients suffering from a skin condition called hidradenitis suppurativa with another mid-stage program underway for atopic dermatitis.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

One of the 100 limited-edition framed certificates we're sending to the first group of companies that signed up for an Enterprise plan

Un­lock the full End­points ex­pe­ri­ence for your com­pa­ny — and sup­port our mis­sion of in­de­pen­dent bio­phar­ma re­port­ing

I want to give readers a quick update on the most important part of our business model — premium subscriptions. We have some crucial financial goals we hope to achieve by the end of the year, and the team here in Lawrence is ready to ship some swag to kick off this limited December promotion.

We offer two premium plans — Enterprise for companies ($1,000/year, unlimited people), and Insider for individuals ($200/year). This month of December will be the last chance to enroll at the original rates — which have remained flat since we launched them in 2017.

One of Wall Street’s most high-pro­file hedge funds push­es Alex­ion's CEO to the auc­tion block — and he's not budg­ing

Fresh off buying Barnes & Noble and prodding AT&T with some heavy-handed criticism after picking up a $3.2 billion stake in the company, the activist — and supremely high profile — hedge fund Elliott Management has stepped up with some M&A advice for Alexion’s management team.
And the execs on the team $ALXN are giving them a polite — but very firm — stiff arm Friday morning.
In a release out early Friday, the big biotech said that the Elliott team had been in touch to encourage them to sell the company. But that’s not on the agenda.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Samantha Budd Haeberlein. Biogen via YouTube

UP­DAT­ED: Skep­tics pounce as Bio­gen de­tails pos­i­tive sub­group analy­sis on ad­u­canum­ab — and both sides are dig­ging in

“Exhilarating.” “A major advance.” “A milestone achievement.” If one had just tuned into the panel comments on Biogen’s presentation at CTAD, it would seem that the biotech had an impressive, disease-modifying Alzheimer’s drug in aducanumab.

But off the stage, reactions to their admittedly complicated dataset and the biotech’s explanation for resurrecting a drug that failed its futility analysis were a lot more mixed, with analysts continuing to question whether the evidence is substantial enough to warrant an FDA approval and raising new doubts on the safety side.

In an investor call later in the day, execs noted that they are not planning another study and stood by their intention, publicized in October to much surprise, to submit regulatory filings based on what they have.

“We don’t file willy nilly,” said Al Sandrock, head of R&D. “We only go to filing when we believe that there is a benefit-risk argument based on science, based on data. And if you look at our history, we haven’t done filings right and left without good reason.”

Biogen had a theory going into the Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Disease meeting.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Vas Narasimhan, Getty Images

No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan's R&D up­date spot­lights next wave of drug stars as well as late-stage fa­vorites

As one of the biggest spenders in biopharma R&D, Novartis execs love to tout the scope of its late-stage pipeline, spotlighting the winners most likely to create blockbuster revenue streams in the near future.

Building on the 5 drug approvals the pharma giant expects to end the year with, Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan — who’s done a slate of acquisitions topped by the recent $9.7 billion MedCo buyout — tapped the top emerging drugs as:

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jeff Jonas, Sage

UP­DAT­ED: Sage's star ex­per­i­men­tal de­pres­sion drug fails the cru­cial MOUN­TAIN study — shares crash

Sage Therapeutics’ crucial MOUNTAIN study for Sage-217 has failed, setting the stage for a quick and ugly investor backlash.

Widely viewed by analysts as the critical clinical study $SAGE needed to win on major depression, researchers say the drug failed to beat out a placebo at day 15, falling well short of the mark for statistical significance on the primary endpoint. And investors reacted with alacrity, fleeing the stock and gutting the price with a 60% instantaneous drop — erasing about $4.6 billion in market cap in an instant.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.