Hack­ing in­to macrophage at­tack cir­cuits, Stan­ford sci­en­tists pitch a bet­ter ear­ly-warn­ing alert sys­tem for tu­mors

Af­ter years of fine tun­ing ways to en­list the im­mune sys­tem in the fight against can­cer, im­munother­a­py has tak­en the field by storm, with a No­bel prize and a pair of block­buster check­point drugs to boast. But can im­mune cells help in an even broad­er ef­fort — flag­ging ma­lig­nant tu­mors be­fore they are de­tectable by tra­di­tion­al in­stru­ments?

Push­ing the thresh­old of can­cer di­ag­noses to ear­li­er and ear­li­er stages of the dis­ease is one of the Holy Grails in on­col­o­gy, in­spir­ing mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar in­vest­ments in­to star­tups like Grail. This week, a team from Stan­ford has chipped in with their own pitch and some mouse da­ta to show for it.

Pi­o­neer­ing a new de­f­i­n­i­tion of the con­cept “im­mun­odi­ag­notics,” San­jiv “Sam” Gamb­hir of Stan­ford’s Ca­nary Cen­ter for Ear­ly De­tec­tion re­pur­posed macrophages to re­port the pres­ence of dis­ease or dam­aged cells, achiev­ing de­tec­tion of tu­mors as small as 4 mil­lime­ters in di­am­e­ter, out­per­form­ing “some of the most ad­vanced ear­ly tu­mor de­tec­tion meth­ods out there.”

Im­age: San­jiv “Sam” Gamb­hir. Steve Fisch, STAN­FORD

His tech­nique, re­port­ed in Na­ture Biotech­nol­o­gy, makes use of macrophages’ in­nate abil­i­ty to find (and eat) mal­func­tion­ing or dead cells. That’s sim­ple; the big chal­lenge is to hack the process in a way such that these im­mune cells emit a de­tectable sig­nal be­fore they be­gin to feast.

To do that, Gamb­hir’s team tagged a mol­e­c­u­lar mark­er to a gene pro­mot­er that awak­ens and ac­ti­vates the gene di­rect­ing the macrophage on­slaught in the pres­ence of a tu­mor.

“The mol­e­c­u­lar mark­er is called Gaus­sia lu­ciferase, and un­der cer­tain chem­i­cal cir­cum­stances, it glows,” Gamb­hir said in a state­ment. “So the idea is, we pick a gene that turns on when a macrophage sens­es a tu­mor cell, we link that gene’s pro­mot­er to Gaus­sia lucer­iferase and fi­nal­ly, we in­te­grate it in­to the macrophages.”

Macrophages have been a key im­mune cell type of in­ter­est, at­tract­ing a num­ber of biotechs to re­move the “don’t eat me” sig­nal that tu­mors of­ten de­ploy to pre­vent an at­tack.

There are, of course, lim­i­ta­tions with the method. For one, macrophages don’t just re­spond to can­cer­ous tar­gets, so a “hit” on this test rep­re­sents a call for oth­er, con­fir­ma­to­ry tests rather than a de­fin­i­tive di­ag­no­sis. But the ap­proach, which in­volves cre­at­ing a syn­thet­ic bio­mark­er, is a ma­jor de­par­ture from the tra­di­tion­al prac­tice, which re­lies on iden­ti­fy­ing bio­mark­ers in the body.

The syn­thet­ic na­ture of this tech­nique means the strat­e­gy can be ap­plied to mul­ti­ple in­stru­ments and im­mune cells — all pos­si­bil­i­ties that Gamb­hir is ex­plor­ing with his start­up, Ear­li.

Mov­ing for­ward, Gamb­hir plans to test the method in oth­er types of can­cers and an­i­mal mod­els, while re­fin­ing the tech­nique to home in on just tu­mor cells, not cells with oth­er types of dam­age.

Hal Barron and Rick Klausner (GSK, Lyell)

Ex­clu­sive: GSK’s Hal Bar­ron al­lies with Rick Klaus­ner’s $600M cell ther­a­py start­up, look­ing to break new ground blitz­ing sol­id tu­mors

LONDON — Chances are, you’ve heard little or nothing about Rick Klausner’s startup Lyell. But that ends now.

Klausner, the former head of the National Cancer Institute, former executive director for global health at the Gates Foundation, co-founder at Juno and one of the leaders in the booming cell therapy field, has brought together one of the most prominent teams of scientists tackling cell therapy 2.0 — highlighted by a quest to bridge a daunting tech gap that separates some profound advances in blood cancers with solid tumors. And today he’s officially adding Hal Barron and GlaxoSmithKline as a major league collaborator which is pitching in a large portion of the $600 million he’s raised in the past year to make that vision a reality.

“We’ve being staying stealth,” Klausner tells me, then adding with a chuckle: “and going back to stealth after this.”

“Cell therapy has a lot of challenges,” notes Barron, the R&D chief at GSK, ticking off the resistance put up by solid tumors to cell therapies, the vein-to-vein time involved in taking immune cells out of patients, engineering them to attack cancer cells, and getting them back in, and more. “Over the years Rick and I talked about how it would be wonderful to take that on as a mission.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

First place fin­ish: Eli Lil­ly just moved to fran­chise leader with their sec­ond mi­graine drug OK in 1 year

In a rare twist for Eli Lilly’s historically slow-moving R&D group, the pharma giant has seized bragging rights to a first-in-class new drug approval. And all signs point to an aggressive marketing followup as they look to outclass some major franchise rivals hobbled by internal dissension.

The FDA came through with an OK for lasmiditan on Friday evening, branding it as Reyvow and lining it up — once a substance classification comes through from the DEA — for a major market release. The oral drug binds to 5-HT1F receptors and is designed to stop an acute migraine after it starts. That makes it a complementary therapy to their CGRP drug Emgality, which has a statistically significant impact on preventing attacks.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Allogene HQ Open House on September 17, 2019 in South San Francisco. (Jeff Rumans, Endpoints News)

The next 10 years: Where is biotech head­ed?

The last 10 years have seen a revolution in drug development. Timelines have shortened, particularly in oncology. Regulators have opened up. Investment has skyrocketed. China became a player. Biotechs have multiplied as gene and cell therapy has exploded — offering major new advances in the way diseases are treated, and sometimes cured.

So where are we headed from here? I journeyed out to San Francisco in September to discuss the answer to that question at Allogene’s open house. If the last 10 years have been an eye-opener, what does the next decade hold in store?

George Scangos / Credit: Cornell University

ARCH, Soft­Bank-backed Vir Biotech­nol­o­gy un­der­whelms with $143 mil­lion IPO

George Scangos went back to Wall Street, and came back 700 million pennies short.

Scangos’ vaunted startup Vir Biotechnology raised $143 million in an IPO they hoped would earn $150 million. Shares were priced at $20, the low-end of the $20-$22 target.

Launched with backing from ARCH Venture’s Robert Nelsen, Masayoshi Son’s SoftBank Vision Fund, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the infectious disease startup was one of a new wave of well-resourced biotechs that emerged with deep enough coffers to pursue a full R&D line rather than slowly build their case by picking off a single lead program.

Patrick Mahaffy, Getty Images

Court green-lights Clo­vis case af­ter de­tail­ing ev­i­dence the board ‘ig­nored red flags’ on false safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy da­ta

Clovis investors have cleared a major hurdle in their long-running case against the board of directors, with a Delaware court making a rare finding that they had a strong enough case against the board to proceed with the action.

In a detailed ruling at the beginning of the month that’s been getting careful scrutiny at firms specializing in biotech and corporate governance, the Delaware Court of Chancery found that the attorneys for the investors had made a careful case that the board — a collection of experts that includes high-profile biotech entrepreneurs, a Harvard professor and well-known investigator as well as Clovis CEO Patrick Mahaffy — repeatedly ignored obvious warnings that Mahaffy’s executive crew was touting inflated, unconfirmed data for their big drug Roci. Serious safety issues were also reportedly overlooked while the company continued a fundraising campaign that brought in more than a half-billion dollars. And that leaves the board open to claims related to their role in the fiasco.

The bottom line:

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Bill Gates backs Gink­go Biowork­s' $350M raise to fu­el the buzzy syn­thet­ic bi­ol­o­gy 'rev­o­lu­tion'

If you want to understand Ginkgo Bioworks, the name should suffice: Bioworks, a spin off “ironworks,” that old industrial linchpin devoted to leveraging scale as a wellspring for vast new industries capable of remaking society. Ginkgo wants to be the ironworks for the revolution it’s heralded with as much fanfare as they can, playing off of one of the buzziest technologies in biotech.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UCB bags a ri­val to Soliris in $2.1B buy­out deal — but will an in­creas­ing­ly vig­i­lant FTC sign off?

UCB is buying out Ra Pharma $RARX, announcing an acquisition deal that rings up at $48 a share, or $2.1 billion net of cash, and puts them toe-to-toe with Alexion on a clinical showdown.

Ra shares closed at $22.70 on Wednesday.

There’s a small pipeline in play at Ra, but UCB is going for the lead drug — a C5 inhibitor called zilucoplan in Phase III for myasthenia gravis (MG) looking to play rival to Alexion’s Soliris. Soliris has the market advantage, though, with a much earlier approval in MG in late 2017 that UCB feels confident in challenging.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

A new play­er is tak­ing the field in a push for a he­mo­phil­ia A gene ther­a­py, and it’s a big one

BioMarin, the execs at Spark (and buyer-to-be Roche) as well as the Sangamo/Pfizer team have a new rival striding onto the hemophilia block. And it’s a big one.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Stuck with a PhI­II gene ther­a­py fail­ure at 96 weeks, Gen­Sight prefers the up­beat as­sess­ment

Two years after treatment, the best thing that GenSight Biologics $SIGHT can say about their gene therapy for vision-destroying cases of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy is that it’s just a bit better than a placebo — just maybe because one treatment can cover both eyes.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 62,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.