Geoff Green, Longeveron

Longeveron's cell ther­a­py flops ear­ly walk test study as ex­ecs tout flim­sy sup­port­ing da­ta

Mi­a­mi biotech Longeveron has sold it­self to in­vestors on the promise of us­ing cell ther­a­py to im­prove the lives of ag­ing pa­tients un­able to walk for long dis­tances, but new da­ta don’t look promis­ing at all.

Longeveron’s lome­cel-B, a cell ther­a­py for ag­ing frailty, flopped the key six-minute walk test end­point of a Phase 2b tri­al of the drug, the biotech said Fri­day, and in­vestors weren’t pleased.

At 180 days, pa­tients re­ceiv­ing the drug post­ed no sig­nif­i­cant im­prove­ment on a walk test com­pared to place­bo, Longeveron said, “af­ter ad­just­ing for mul­ti­ple com­par­isons us­ing the Hochberg method” to de­ter­mine false dis­cov­ery. Lome­cel-B is an off-the-shelf prod­uct us­ing “med­i­c­i­nal sig­nal­ing cells” de­rived from healthy donors’ bone mar­row.

But all hope is not lost in Longeveron’s telling: At that same 180-day mark, the drug post­ed a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant dose-re­sponse curve com­pared with place­bo — a pos­i­tive sign, it said. Mean­while, Longeveron said pa­tients did post a sig­nif­i­cant im­prove­ment on the walk test at day 270 us­ing what it called a pre-spec­i­fied analy­sis, but was not part of the pri­ma­ry end­point.

What those sup­port­ing fig­ures could mean in the long term or whether they have any ef­fect on clin­i­cal out­comes is un­clear, but Longeveron said it would re­view the da­ta with an in­de­pen­dent steer­ing com­mit­tee and con­sid­er the best path for­ward for the pro­gram.

Mean­while, Longeveron tout­ed safe­ty da­ta from the study but those da­ta weren’t avail­able in the topline re­lease.

Shares of $LGVN were trad­ing down around 25% late Fri­day af­ter­noon.

Ed­i­tor’s Note: This sto­ry has been up­dat­ed.

Health­care Dis­par­i­ties and Sick­le Cell Dis­ease

In the complicated U.S. healthcare system, navigating a serious illness such as cancer or heart disease can be remarkably challenging for patients and caregivers. When that illness is classified as a rare disease, those challenges can become even more acute. And when that rare disease occurs in a population that experiences health disparities, such as people with sickle cell disease (SCD) who are primarily Black and Latino, challenges can become almost insurmountable.

The End­points 11: They've got mad mon­ey and huge am­bi­tions. It's time to go big or go home

These days, selecting a group of private biotechs for the Endpoints 11 spotlight begins with a sprint to get ahead of IPOs and the M&A teams at Big Pharma. I’ve had a couple of faceplants earlier this year, watching some of the biotechs on my short list choose a quick leap onto Nasdaq or into the arms of a buyer.

Vividion, you would have been a great pick for the Endpoints 11. I’m sorry I missed you.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Kunwoo Lee, GenEdit CEO

Eli Lil­ly gets be­hind the lat­est ap­proach to solv­ing gene ther­a­py's de­liv­ery prob­lem

Kunwoo Lee was a graduate student at UC-Berkeley when gene editing pioneer Jennifer Doudna — who happened to work in the same building where he studied — published a paper on CRISPR/Cas9. So he did what any aspiring bioengineer would do: He ran to her lab, and grabbed a postdoc there.

“We started really thinking about the future coming (for) gene therapy and gene editing,” he said.

Lee’s research with Doudna led him to co-found a small San Francisco-based biotech called GenEdit in 2016, the same year he graduated. After five quiet years, the team is now unveiling a $26 million Series A round with support from some big names like Eli Lilly to fund their work on one of the most pressing challenges in gene therapy: what Lee calls the “delivery problem.”

In step for­ward for re­ju­ve­na­tion field, re­searchers turn back the clock on mice hearts

When Thomas Braun was starting out as a young professor at Germany’s University of Würzburg in 1997, he decided to try his hand at a new field: heart regeneration, a sci-fi-esque premise that could offer a way to treat patients recovering from a heart attack. He thought it would take a few years before they got results.

“We were,” he acknowledges now, “rather naïve.”

But on Thursday, after two and a half decades of fitful starts and abandoned leads, Braun and a team of researchers at the Max Planck Institute showed that they could reprogram heart cells in mice and get the animals to regenerate cardiac tissue after a heart attack. The breakthrough, published in Scienceadds new evidence that it will eventually be possible to help patients recover muscle lost in heart attacks and gives another boon to anti-aging researchers who want to one day apply these rejuvenation techniques across much of the body.

Lon­za un­veils new ex­pan­sion plans at Swiss man­u­fac­tur­ing sites, cap­ping off a very busy pan­dem­ic

Lonza will expand its drug development in Switzerland yet again with investments in three of its manufacturing sites, the company announced Wednesday, capping off a very busy year for the Euro giant.

The expansion will feature the addition of an aseptic filling line for clinical supply of drug products in Stein, as well as additions to support both clinical and commercial manufacturing at Basel and Visp.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 118,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UNC re­searchers re­port a new way to charge CAR-T against sol­id tu­mors

When researchers first started putting CAR-T cells into cancer patients in the 1990s, the cells didn’t do very much. They swam around in the blood, killing very little of what they were meant to kill, before dying a quiet death some months later.

There were several big reasons for the failures. Researchers at first picked the wrong diseases, going after solid tumors that, it turned out, were uniquely adept at keeping out T cells. And they didn’t even really know which parts of these tumors were the best to aim at.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 118,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA's can­cer drug ad­vi­sors will re­view 2 more dan­gling ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­provals for mul­ti­ple myelo­ma, leukemia

In an attempt to get its house of accelerated approvals in order, the FDA is holding its second adcomm of 2021 to review cancer drugs that won accelerated approvals but failed to confirm clinical benefit in subsequent trials or have taken a long time to read those data out.

On Dec. 2, the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will review two accelerated approvals from Secura Bio’s Farydak (panobinostat), a third-line multiple myeloma drug, and Acrotech Biopharma’s Marqibo, as a third-line drug for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Both drugs have been marketed for more than five years under their accelerated approvals but have recorded negligible sales in their respective indications in recent years.

Michel Vounatsos, Biogen CEO (Credit: World Economic Forum/Valeriano Di Domenico)

Fol­low­ing con­tro­ver­sial Aduhelm ap­proval, DC-based neu­rol­o­gy cen­ter bans Bio­gen rep­re­sen­ta­tives from its of­fices — re­port

CEO Michael Vounatsos confessed earlier this month that Biogen was struggling to get its controversial new Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm off the ground, with some major health systems refusing to administer it.

Now, a DC-based medical center is taking its small rebellion against the drug’s approval one step further.

The Neurology Center has reportedly banned all Biogen representatives from its seven DC-area offices, according to a photo circulating on Twitter.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 118,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Martin Babler, Esker CEO

Fore­site re­cruits Prin­cip­ia vet Mar­tin Babler — and his old team — to oc­cu­py the C-suite of a start­up

Almost a year to the day after Sanofi closed on its $3.7 billion Principia buyout, handing CEO Martin Babler $81 million for his chunk of equity, the biotech exec is ending his sabbatical and getting back to the helm of a startup. And he’s bringing the old Principia team along with him for the R&D scrimmage ahead.

Babler is taking over the top post at Esker Therapeutics from June Lee, who helped found the upstart, which Foresite hatched out of its labs and endowed with a $70 million launch round. The immunology specialist broke out of stealth mode back in May with a tiny staff and a Phase I plan for a TYK2 drug — initially for psoriasis — part of its plan to address genetically defined patient groups in a field dominated by blockbusters and blockbuster wannabes.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 118,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.