Mi­cro­cap Capri­cor soars on in­ter­im PhII DMD da­ta show­ing func­tion­al ben­e­fit for old­er pa­tients

With the in­ter­im analy­sis for its Phase II Duchenne mus­cu­lar dy­s­tro­phy, lit­tle Capri­cor Ther­a­peu­tics was mere­ly look­ing for a guide­post, a sig­nal, a trend that the ef­fects seen in an ear­li­er tri­al can be repli­cat­ed with a new dos­ing reg­i­men and de­liv­ery method. In­stead, the biotech found it­self blessed with a bas­ket of da­ta points that seem to buck the nat­ur­al his­to­ry trend and sep­a­rate the drug from place­bo in a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant way, more than dou­bling its tiny stock $CAPR in pre-mar­ket trad­ing.

Lin­da Mar­bán Capri­cor

The pri­ma­ry end­point for the HOPE-2 tri­al is PUL 2.0, a mea­sure of up­per limb func­tion and one of sev­er­al ways Capri­cor quan­ti­fied skele­tal mus­cle im­prove­ment. Ex­ecs al­so spot­light­ed pul­monary and car­diac ben­e­fits in the top-line re­sults — fac­tors that are par­tic­u­lar­ly for the pa­tient pop­u­la­tion that they are tar­get­ing, who tend to be old­er and non-am­bu­la­to­ry.

Con­sist­ing of prog­en­i­tor cells de­rived from donor hearts, CAP-1002 is de­signed to re­lease ex­o­somes that kick off a cy­cle of mus­cle re­pair by sup­press­ing in­flam­ma­tion and dri­ving im­munomod­u­la­tion.

Cur­rent­ly, a num­ber of DMD pa­tients take glu­co­cor­ti­cos­teroids for that pur­pose, in­clud­ing pred­nisone and de­flaza­cort (sold in the US by Marathon as Em­flaza). There’s al­so Sarep­ta’s ex­on-skip­ping drug, eteplirsen (Ex­ondys 51), though its ben­e­fits have yet to be borne out; Sarep­ta and a hand­ful of ri­vals are now in hot pur­suit of a sup­posed one-time cure to re­place the miss­ing dy­s­trophin gene in pa­tients.

“While there had been ad­vances in gene ther­a­py, we be­lieve that con­trol­ling in­flam­ma­tion over and above what can be done by steroids is im­por­tant,” CEO Lin­da Mar­bán said in a con­fer­ence call.

Her hus­band, Ed­uar­do Mar­bán, had de­vel­oped the tech at Johns Hop­kins.

Da­ta from the small, place­bo-con­trolled study sug­gest that with a high­er dose than the past and de­liv­ered in­tra­venous­ly, the ther­a­py is work­ing. At the six-month cut, 6 pa­tients were evalu­able in each arm. For those treat­ed with CAP1002 mid-lev­el PUL — think mov­ing el­bows and pulling hand to mouth — de­te­ri­o­rat­ed by an av­er­age of 0.2 on a 6-point scale, com­pared to 0.8 on place­bo. The p-val­ue was 0.0389.

This and grip strength are the on­ly im­prove­ments still sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant af­ter six months (there was al­so a three-month snap­shot), but Capri­cor stressed pos­i­tive trends through­out.

“I’d like to just re­mind peo­ple that this pop­u­la­tion of DMD re­al­ly rep­re­sents more than half of all DMD pa­tients and there re­al­ly have not been ther­a­pies that have re­al­ly fo­cused on this pop­u­la­tion which have just in­cred­i­bly high bur­den of dis­ease,” Craig Mc­Don­ald, the na­tion­al PI and a pro­fes­sor at UC Davis, said in the call.

On the key is­sue of safe­ty, Capri­cor not­ed that there had on­ly been one se­ri­ous ad­verse event among 30 in­fu­sions af­ter it put a stan­dard pre-med­ica­tion reg­i­men in place to mit­i­gate po­ten­tial im­mune re­ac­tions. Two pa­tients had had im­me­di­ate im­mune re­ac­tions to the treat­ment late last year, which prompt­ed the com­pa­ny to put a vol­un­tary hold on the tri­al.

Armed with these num­bers and an RMAT des­ig­na­tion from the FDA, Capri­cor is now look­ing in­to a “lean, ef­fi­cient” piv­otal study to po­si­tion the cell ther­a­py for a BLA — if it can find the cash to do so.

A few months ago it was forced to chop 21 staffers, or half of its work­force, in or­der to car­ry on with clin­i­cal ac­tiv­i­ties un­til the end of this year.

So­cial im­age: Shut­ter­stock

Martin Shkreli [via Getty]

Pris­on­er #87850-053 does not get to add drug de­vel­op­er to his list of cred­its

Just days after Retrophin shed its last ties to founder Martin Shkreli, the biotech is reporting that the lead drug he co-invented flopped in a pivotal trial. Fosmetpantotenate flunked both the primary and key secondary endpoints in a placebo-controlled trial for a rare disease called pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, or PKAN.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

We­bi­nar: Re­al World End­points — the brave new world com­ing in build­ing fran­chise ther­a­pies

Several biopharma companies have been working on expanding drug labels through the use of real world endpoints, combing through the data to find evidence of a drug’s efficacy for particular indications. But we’ve just begun. Real World Evidence is becoming an important part of every clinical development plan, in the soup-through-nuts approach used in building franchises.

I’ve recruited a panel of 3 top experts in the field — the first in a series of premium webinars — to look at the practical realities governing what can be done today, and where this is headed over the next few years, at the prodding of the FDA.

ZHEN SU — Merck Serono’s Senior Vice President and Global Head of Oncology
ELLIOTT LEVY — Amgen’s Senior Vice President of Global Development
CHRIS BOSHOFF — Pfizer Oncology’s Chief Development Officer

A premium subscription to Endpoints News is required to attend this webinar. Please upgrade to either an Insider or Enterprise plan for access. Already have Endpoints Premium? Please sign-in below. You can contact our Subscriptions team at help@endpointsnews.com with any issues.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron. GSK

GSK's Hal Bar­ron her­alds their sec­ond pos­i­tive piv­otal for cru­cial an­ti-BC­MA ther­a­py, point­ing to a push for quick OKs in a crowd­ed field

Hal Barron has his second positive round of Phase III data in hand for his anti-BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916). And GSK’s research chief says the data paves the way for their drive in search of an FDA approval for treating multiple myeloma.

It’s hard to overestimate the importance of this drug for GSK, a cornerstone of Barron’s campaign to make a dramatic impact on the oncology market and provide some long-lost excitement for the pharma giant’s pipeline. They’re putting this BCMA program at the front of that charge — looking to lead a host of rivals all aimed at the same target.

We don’t know what the data are yet, but DREAMM-2 falls on the heels of a promising set of data delivered 5 months ago for DREAMM-1. There investigators noted that complete responses among treatment-resistant patients rose to 15% in the extra year’s worth of data to look over, with a median progression-free survival rate of 12 months, up from 7.9 months reported earlier. The median duration of response was 14.3 months.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: An em­bold­ened As­traZeneca splurges $95M on a pri­or­i­ty re­view vouch­er. Where do they need the FDA to hus­tle up?

AstraZeneca is in a hurry.

We learned this morning that the pharma giant — not known as a big spender, until recently — forked over $95 million to get its hands on a priority review voucher from Sobi, otherwise known as Swedish Orphan Biovitrum.

That marks another step down on price for a PRV, which allows the holder to slash 4 months off of any FDA review time.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bob Smith, Pfizer

Pfiz­er is mak­ing a $500M state­ment to­day: Here’s how you be­come a lead play­er in the boom­ing gene ther­a­py sec­tor

Three years ago, Pfizer anted up $150 million in cash to buy Bamboo Therapeutics in Chapel Hill, NC as it cautiously stuck a toe in the small gene therapy pool of research and development.

Company execs followed up a year later with a $100 million expansion of the manufacturing operations they picked up in that deal for the UNC spinout, which came with $495 million in milestones.

And now they’re really going for it.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Video: Putting the AI in R&D — with Badhri Srini­vasan, Tony Wood, Rosana Kapeller, Hugo Ceule­mans, Saurabh Sa­ha and Shoibal Dat­ta

During BIO this year, I had a chance to moderate a panel among some of the top tech experts in biopharma on their real-world use of artificial intelligence in R&D. There’s been a lot said about the potential of AI, but I wanted to explore more about what some of the larger players are actually doing with this technology today, and how they see it advancing in the future. It was a fascinating exchange, which you can see here. The transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity. — John Carroll

As­traZeneca’s Imfinzi/treme com­bo strikes out — again — in lung can­cer. Is it time for last rites?

AstraZeneca bet big on the future of their PD-L1 Imfinzi combined with the experimental CTLA-4 drug tremelimumab. But once again it’s gone down to defeat in a major Phase III study — while adding damage to the theory involving targeting cancer with a high tumor mutational burden.

Early Wednesday the pharma giant announced that their NEPTUNE study had failed, with the combination unable to beat standard chemo at overall survival in high TMB cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We won’t get hard data until later in the year, but the drumbeat of failures will call into question what — if any — future this combination can have left.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Why would Am­gen want to buy Alex­ion? An­a­lysts call hot­ly ru­mored takeover un­like­ly, but seize the mo­ment

A rumor that Amgen is closing in on buyout deal for Alexion has sparked a guessing game on just what kind of M&A strategy Amgen is pursuing and how much Alexion is worth.

Mizuho analyst Salim Syed first lent credence to the report out of the Spanish news outlet Intereconomía, which said Amgen is bidding as much as $200 per share. While the source may be questionable, “the concept of this happening doesn’t sound too crazy to me,” he wrote.