Rosana Kapeller listening to a member on the breakfast panel at #BIO19 discuss AI in R&D in Philadelphia (Jeff Rumans for Endpoints News)

Nim­bus founder Rosana Kapeller has a new com­pa­ny, with $50M and an eye on the ‘re­peatome’

Rosana Kapeller left Nim­bus two years ago de­ter­mined, af­ter 2 decades and 3 com­pa­nies, that her next spot would be as CEO. To­day, af­ter a 7-month sab­bat­i­cal and a stint at a top VC firm, the joc­u­lar com­pu­ta­tion­al bi­ol­o­gy pi­o­neer is back. And with full con­trol.

“I re­al­ly want­ed to… make a unique or­ga­ni­za­tion, a unique cul­ture,” Kapeller told End­points News. I want­ed that chal­lenge.”

And a chal­lenge it will be, both sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly and be­cause, well, there’s a pan­dem­ic keep­ing much of her 10-per­son team work­ing from her home. “This is a hard time to start a com­pa­ny,” she ac­knowl­edged.

Still, Kapeller is con­fi­dent, plac­ing her faith both in the am­bi­tious sci­ence of her new com­pa­ny and in her own ex­pe­ri­ence as a busi­ness­woman, dat­ing back to her up­bring­ing in a busi­ness-fo­cused fam­i­ly in Brazil. The new com­pa­ny is ROME Ther­a­peu­tics and it’s launch­ing out of stealth mode with $50 mil­lion in Se­ries A fund­ing from GV — where Kapeller served as en­tre­pre­neur-in-res­i­dence for the last year — ARCH Ven­tures, and Part­ners In­no­va­tion Fund. The biotech is one of a se­ries that have arisen in the past few years to tar­get parts of what was once deemed “junk DNA”: the 97-99% of ge­net­ic code that doesn’t code for pro­teins. Al­though sci­en­tists have known for decades now that at least parts of this vast nu­cle­ic flot­sam serve key func­tions, un­tan­gling those func­tions has been a ma­jor hur­dle. Drug­ging them has been an even larg­er one.

ROME will tar­get one seg­ment of this erst­while junk called the “re­peatome.” The name has yet to catch on — a PubMed search pro­duced 22 re­sults and the Wikipedia page is a sin­gle para­graph at­trib­uted to one PLOS pa­per out of France — but the field has slow­ly gained steam since a 2011 Sci­ence pa­per, on which ROME co-founder David Ting was lead au­thor.

The re­peatome refers to some 50% of hu­man DNA that is made up of se­quences that re­peat over and over again — like a mu­si­cal or lit­er­ary mo­tif — and that don’t make any pro­teins. Some of these, as sci­en­tists have long known, are retro­virus­es that in­fect­ed us and em­bed­ded their codes in our DNA over mil­lions of years of evo­lu­tions. Oth­er se­quences, though, are “virus-like,” said Ting. Most of the time these se­quences are blocked from do­ing any­thing, trapped by methyl agents or hi­s­tones that wrap like chains around DNA. But in some in­stances — such as some can­cers — dis­tressed cells take the chains off and trans­late the se­quences in­to RNA. Those RNA se­quences don’t make any pro­teins. But they look like RNA virus­es and ac­ti­vate the in­nate im­mune sys­tem as a virus would, call­ing it to at­tack a tu­mor.

“These re­peats are like the first re­spon­ders, telling the body these cells are be­com­ing un­con­trol­lable — con­trol it,” Kapeller said.

Two prob­lems can emerge. First, can­cer cells can de­vel­op ways of re­verse tran­scrib­ing these RNA se­quences back in­to their genome, both si­lenc­ing the im­mune sig­nals and adding to the can­cer’s ge­net­ic vari­abil­i­ty. In some au­toim­mune con­di­tions, the op­po­site prob­lem is at play, Kapeller said. Healthy cells send off these RNA re­peats, trig­ger­ing a dam­ag­ing im­mune re­sponse.

Kapeller talks about ROME’s role as restor­ing “yin and yang”: Keep­ing the im­mune sig­nals go­ing in can­cer and turn­ing them off in au­toim­mune dis­eases. ROME has not yet re­vealed how they plan on do­ing that, but when Ting first hy­poth­e­sized that can­cers were tran­scrib­ing these sig­nals, he start­ed a clin­i­cal tri­al with a com­mon HIV drug on 4th line colon can­cer pa­tients. The HIV drug, which is meant to stop the HIV virus from re­verse tran­scrib­ing it­self, ap­peared to in­hib­it the can­cer’s abil­i­ty to re­verse tran­scribe the RNA sig­nals. The pa­tients on the study main­tained their con­di­tion, a rar­i­ty for that form and stage of can­cer.

“Some­how can­cer has re­pur­posed this process to repli­cate and grow in­to tu­mor,” Ting told End­points, de­scrib­ing his dis­cov­ery. “It was kind of an ac­ci­dent, an ac­ci­dent of some­thing we were told was junk and find­ing the junk was ac­tu­al­ly do­ing some­thing.”

David Ting

Click on the im­age to see the full-sized ver­sion

That some­thing evad­ed sci­en­tists in part be­cause ear­ly DNA se­quencers lacked the abil­i­ty to pick up and an­a­lyze these vast codex­es of DNA and study which re­peats were be­ing tran­scribed in­to RNA. To do so, ROME will re­ly on two new but es­tab­lished tech­niques, se­quenc­ing of long stretch­es of DNA and se­quenc­ing of the RNA be­ing tran­scribed in­side a cell, along­side a ma­chine learn­ing ap­proach set up by the­o­ret­i­cal physi­cist Ben­jamin Green­baum. In part, that’s what made it a fit­ting project for Kapeller, who did com­pu­ta­tion­al work at Mil­len­ni­um and Ailleron and then was en­list­ed by At­las Ven­tures to launch Nim­bus, one of the first ma­jor com­pu­ta­tion­al biotechs.

Al­though it will be Kapeller’s first stint as a CEO, it will hard­ly be her first time in lead­er­ship. Nim­bus lacked a CEO for its first 4.5 years, she notes, leav­ing con­trol of the biotech be­tween her­self and the board. She says that she’s learned a few things from her ex­pe­ri­ence with past com­pa­nies: That con­trol and com­mand doesn’t work, trans­paren­cy is nec­es­sary, and di­ver­si­ty and putting women in man­age­ment mat­ters. She brings an MD-PhD’s un­der­stand­ing of pa­tients, she said, and she took some­thing be­sides busi­ness acu­men back from her home­town of Rio de Janeiro: a cer­tain warmth.

“I’m from Brazil and Brazil­ians love to use hu­mor a lot,” Kapel­lar said.

For in­stance, she led off the com­pa­ny’s first meet­ing with their PR firm with a slide of her­self and her co-founders in Ro­man glad­i­a­tor cos­tumes. She’s re­luc­tant to men­tion those jokes in in­ter­views, though, weary af­ter enough years as an ex­ec­u­tive of how it might be trans­lat­ed.

With the sci­ence, she’s bold­er. They’re one of the first jump­ing in­to a still-emerg­ing field, she said, and their goal is sus­tained re­mis­sion: can­cer and au­toim­mune treat­ments that won’t stop work­ing af­ter a few months, or years.

This is “com­plete­ly un­chart­ed ter­ri­to­ry,” Kapeller said.

Andrew Kruegel, Kures president and co-founder (Columbia Tech Ventures via Vimeo)

Af­ter psilo­cy­bin and ke­t­a­mine, a new biotech comes along de­vel­op­ing a drug Scott Got­tlieb fought

Andrew Kruegel was six years into his chemistry work at Columbia University, when, one day in August 2016, he learned he might have only 30 days before the government made him destroy his research.

Kruegel had been studying kratom, a leaf long used in Southeast Asia as a stimulant or for pain. It had opioid-like properties, he found, but seemed to offer pain relief without the addictive potential or respiratory side effects of traditional opioids — a riddle that might help illuminate how human opioid receptors work.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Regeneron CEO Leonard Schleifer speaks at a meeting with President Donald Trump, members of the Coronavirus Task Force, and pharmaceutical executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

OWS shifts spot­light to drugs to fight Covid-19, hand­ing Re­gen­eron $450M to be­gin large scale man­u­fac­tur­ing in the US

The US government is on a spending spree. And after committing billions to vaccines defense operations are now doling out more of the big bucks through Operation Warp Speed to back a rapid flip of a drug into the market to stop Covid-19 from ravaging patients — possibly inside of 2 months.

The beneficiary this morning is Regeneron, the big biotech engaged in a frenzied race to develop an antibody cocktail called REGN-COV2 that just started a late-stage program to prove its worth in fighting the virus. BARDA and the Department of Defense are awarding Regeneron a $450 million contract to cover bulk delivery of the cocktail starting as early as late summer, with money added for fill/finish and storage activities.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

For­bion spot­lights late-stage plays, carves out new €250M growth fund

Having staked its rep on picking out a mix of biotech investment opportunities across the “build,” “enable,” “growth” continuum, Forbion is launching its first fund dedicated to late-stage opportunities.

Forbion Growth Opportunities Fund’s first close brought in €185 million ($208 million). Existing investors Pantheon, KfW Capital and the European Investment Fund came on board, joined by new backers Eli Lilly, Horizon Therapeutics, Belgian Growth Fund and New Waves Investments.

Atul Deshpande, Harbour BioMed chief strategy officer & head, US operations (Harbour BioMed)

An­oth­er biotech IPO set-up? Multi­na­tion­al biotech leaps from round to round, scoop­ing up cash at a blis­ter­ing pace

A short four months after announcing a $75 million haul in Series B+ fundraising, the multinational biotech Harbour BioMed pulled in another round of investments and eclipsed the nine-digit mark in the process.

Harbour completed its Series C financing, the company announced Thursday morning, raising $102.8 million and bringing its total investment sum to over $300 million since its founding in late 2016. The biotech plans to use the money to transition early-stage candidates from the discovery phase, fund candidates already in the clinic, and prep late-stage candidates for commercialization.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

The home run count: The $100M+ mega-round boom in biotech in­spired a $7.3B feed­ing fren­zy — so far this year

Over the last 6 months there’s been a blizzard of money piling up drifts of the green stuff through the biotech landscape. And the forecast calls for more cash windfalls ahead.

Even as a global pandemic has killed more than half a million people, blighted economies and divided nations over the proper response, it’s also helped ignite an unprecedented burst of big-time investing. And not just in Covid-19 deals, as we’ve looked at before.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Ed Engleman (Stanford Blood Center)

Stan­ford star on­col­o­gy sci­en­tist Ed En­gle­man helped cre­ate the im­munother­a­py field. Now he wants to shake up neu­rode­gen­er­a­tion R&D

Over the last generation of drug R&D, Ed Engleman has been a standout scientist.

The Stanford professor co-founded Dendreon and provided the scientific insights needed to develop Provenge into a pioneering — though not particularly marketable — immunotherapy. He’s spurred a slate of startups, assisted by his well-connected perch as a co-founder of Vivo Capital, and took the dendritic cell story into its next chapter at a startup called Bolt.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Bio­gen shares spike as ex­ecs com­plete a de­layed pitch for their con­tro­ver­sial Alzheimer's drug — the next move be­longs to the FDA

Biogen is stepping out onto the high wire today, reporting that the team working on the controversial Alzheimer’s drug aducanumab has now completed their submission to the FDA. And they want the agency to bless it with a priority review that would cut the agency’s decision-making time to a mere 6 months.

The news drove a 10% spike in Biogen’s stock $BIIB ahead of the bell.

Part of that spike can be attributed to a relief rally. Biogen execs rattled backers and a host of analysts earlier in the year when they unexpectedly delayed their filing to the third quarter. That delay provoked all manner of speculation after CEO Michel Vounatsos and R&D chief Al Sandrock failed to persuade influential observers that the pandemic and other factors had slowed the timeline for filing. Actually making the pitch at least satisfies skeptics that the FDA was not likely pushing back as Biogen was pushing in. From the start, Biogen execs claimed that they were doing everything in cooperation with the FDA, saying that regulators had signaled their interest in reviewing the submission.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Nello Mainolfi (Kymera via YouTube)

Out to re­vive R&D, a resur­gent Sanofi pays $150M cash to part­ner up with a pi­o­neer­ing pro­tein degra­da­tion play­er

Frank Nestle was appointed Sanofi’s global head of immunology and inflammation research therapeutic area just days before dupilumab, the blockbuster-to-be IL-4 antibody, would be accepted for priority review. After four years of consolidating immunology expertise from multiple corners of the Sanofi family and recruiting new talents to build the discovery engine, he’s set eyes on a Phase I-ready program that he believes can grow into a Dupixent-sized franchise.

Covid-19 roundup: CDC de­bat­ing who should get first avail­able vac­cines; EU in Gilead talks af­ter US gob­bled first remde­sivir dos­es

The federal government has now spent billions of dollars accelerating the development of a Covid-19 vaccine, and yet they’ve remained hush-hush on who, precisely, would actually get inoculated once the first doses are approved and available. Internally, though, they have been debating it.

The CDC and an advisory committee of outside health experts have been working since April to devise a ranking system that would determine who receives a vaccine and when, The New York Times reported. The question of who is first in line for inoculation is important because no matter how many doses developers can make or how quickly they can make them, doses will still come out in batches; 300 million inoculations will not appear overnight.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 84,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.