No sur­pris­es in FDA staff re­view for Aim­mune peanut al­ler­gy ther­a­py — fo­cus re­mains on safe­ty, tol­er­a­bil­i­ty pro­file

Ahead of the keen­ly an­tic­i­pat­ed in­de­pen­dent pan­el set to dis­cuss Aim­mune’s peanut al­ler­gy im­munother­a­py on Fri­day, FDA staff is­sued a pre­dictable re­view on Wednes­day, high­light­ing the po­ten­tial safe­ty and tol­er­a­bil­i­ty is­sues as­so­ci­at­ed with the prod­uct, while back­ing its ef­fi­ca­cy.

Tra­di­tion­al­ly, peanut al­ler­gies are man­aged by avoid­ance, but the threat of ac­ci­den­tal ex­po­sure can­not be nul­li­fied. In the Unit­ed States, da­ta sug­gest peanut al­ler­gies af­fect an es­ti­mat­ed 1.2% of the to­tal pop­u­la­tion — this is the mar­ket Aim­mune is itch­ing to ad­dress with its im­munother­a­py.

The prod­uct — AR101 — is ef­fec­tive­ly a small amount of en­cap­su­lat­ed peanut flour. It is first giv­en in es­ca­lat­ing dos­es to es­sen­tial­ly re­set the pa­tient’s im­mune ap­pa­ra­tus — fol­low­ing which a main­te­nance dose is con­tin­u­al­ly ad­min­is­tered to sus­tain de­sen­si­ti­za­tion. The ther­a­py, which is set to be chris­tened Pal­forzia, has been test­ed in two late-stage tri­als, in ad­di­tion to an ex­ten­sion study.

In the 551-pa­tient PAL­ISADES tri­al in the Unit­ed States, pa­tients ei­ther re­ceived Aim­mune’s drug or a place­bo. In the first tranche of the study, pa­tients re­ceived in­creas­ing­ly high­er dos­es of the drug/place­bo for about 22 weeks and then were ad­min­is­tered with 300 mg (main­te­nance dose) of Pal­forzia/place­bo per day for ap­prox­i­mate­ly six months. At the end of that reg­i­men, pa­tients un­der­went a ‘food chal­lenge’ in which their abil­i­ty to in­gest a sin­gle dose of at least 600 mg of peanut pro­tein was mea­sured.

The ef­fi­ca­cy re­sults were dra­mat­ic. About 67% of the pa­tients who re­ceived the drug (250 of 372 par­tic­i­pants) were able to con­sume 600 mg of peanut pro­tein ver­sus 4% in the place­bo group. Over 100 pa­tients en­rolled in a fol­low-on study where they were giv­en Pal­forzia once a day. Near­ly 80% of those pa­tients were able to tol­er­ate at least 1,000 mg of peanut pro­tein, while near­ly half man­aged to with­stand a 2,000 mg dose.

Jayson Dal­las Aim­mune

“Our hy­poth­e­sis is…that once we get to some­where around 3-4-5 years, we will see that the pa­tients are no longer need­ing ther­a­py and we can stop them,” Aim­mune chief Jayson Dal­las said in an in­ter­view with End­points News ahead of the FDA staff re­view.

But da­ta on the safe­ty side caused some pause — 11.6% of pa­tients (43 par­tic­i­pants) giv­en the drug with­drew from the tri­al due to side-ef­fects, ver­sus 2.4% (3 pa­tients) from the place­bo group. Ad­di­tion­al­ly, over the course of the tri­al 14% (52 pa­tients) of Pal­forzia-treat­ed pa­tients re­ceived an ep­i­neph­rine shot, ver­sus 6.5% (8 pa­tients) in the place­bo group.

In their re­view, FDA staff un­der­scored these find­ings af­ter re­view­ing the to­tal­i­ty of the da­ta pre­sent­ed to the agency. “(T)he Pal­forzia treat­ment group had an in­creased num­ber of dis­con­tin­u­a­tions, sys­temic al­ler­gic re­ac­tions and re­ports of eosinophilic esophagi­tis com­pared to the place­bo-treat­ed group, though both groups fol­lowed a peanut avoid­ance di­et,” re­view­ers not­ed.

“(T)hese brief­ing docs look fair­ly be­nign,” Baird’s Bri­an Sko­r­ney wrote in a note. “Im­por­tant­ly, the ef­fi­ca­cy analy­sis looks clear as day and there are no new safe­ty con­cerns raised. We ex­pect the pan­el to be com­plete­ly di­rect­ed to­wards dis­cus­sions around ep­i­neph­rine use and cas­es of eosinophilic esophagi­tis (EoE), things we be­lieve the pa­tient/physi­cian com­mu­ni­ty un­der­stand well and will will­ing­ly ac­cept.”

In his in­ter­view with End­points, Aim­mune chief Dal­las of­fered a com­par­i­son. “The side-ef­fect pro­file that we’re see­ing with our prod­uct is no more than you would ex­pect if you were treat­ing some­body for grass and pollen al­ler­gies, which un­like peanut al­ler­gies, are not life-threat­en­ing.”

There is al­so a mis­con­cep­tion that if ep­i­neph­rine is used, it must be due to a se­vere re­ac­tion, he added. “Some­times par­ents will give their kids ep­i­neph­rine if they get a bit of tin­gling on their tongue…there is ze­ro cor­re­la­tion be­tween us­ing ep­i­neph­rine and the sever­i­ty of a re­ac­tion.”

Some physi­cians have long been dos­ing pa­tients with peanut pow­der oral­ly, al­beit off la­bel, to wean them off their al­ler­gies. So why should physi­cians and pay­ers en­dorse Aim­mune’s prod­uct?

Peanuts can car­ry three dif­fer­ent types of pro­teins that can trig­ger al­ler­gies — and prod­ucts found on su­per­mar­ket shelves, such as peanut flour, peanut but­ter, or cook­ies em­bell­ished with peanuts, con­tain dif­fer­ent con­cen­tra­tions of some or all of these pro­teins. This is why Aim­mune’s prod­uct — which car­ries each pro­tein in equal con­cen­tra­tion — is ben­e­fi­cial, Dal­las as­sert­ed.

In ad­di­tion, when peanuts are boiled, that dis­si­pates those pro­teins to an ex­tent. “You run in­to a sit­u­a­tion where some­body be­lieves they are pro­tect­ed. But in fact, they’re not pro­tect­ed,” he said.

Aim­mune $AIMT and arch-ri­val DBV Tech­nolo­gies $DB­VT have been locked in a race to the fin­ish line to mar­ket their peanut al­ler­gy treat­ments in the Unit­ed States. Aim­mune ef­fec­tive­ly leapfrogged DBV when the lat­ter re­scind­ed an ap­pli­ca­tion to mar­ket its Vi­askin Peanut patch last year in re­sponse to FDA con­cerns about the state of man­u­fac­tur­ing and qual­i­ty con­trol da­ta sub­mit­ted.

In Ju­ly, in­flu­en­tial cost-ef­fec­tive­ness watch­dog ICER con­clud­ed that the ex­ist­ing body of ev­i­dence is not strong enough to sug­gest that AR101 or Vi­askin Peanut of­fer a su­pe­ri­or net health ben­e­fit ver­sus strict peanut avoid­ance, in ad­di­tion to the un­cer­tain­ty sur­round­ing the long-term ef­fects of ei­ther ther­a­py. Both drug de­vel­op­ers con­test­ed the re­port.

An FDA de­ci­sion for AR101 is ex­pect­ed in Jan­u­ary 2020, while DBV sub­mit­ted its mar­ket­ing ap­pli­ca­tion in Au­gust. In its cal­cu­la­tions, ICER used an­a­lyst pro­jec­tions to eval­u­ate each ther­a­py’s long-term cost-ef­fec­tive­ness: AR101 at $4,200/year and Vi­askin Peanut at $6,500/year.

Grass and pollen al­ler­gy prod­ucts, af­ter ac­count­ing for dis­counts, cost about $5,000 a year, Dal­las said. “And those are for non-life threat­en­ing events and so we kind of see that as the floor and we’ll sort of work a lit­tle bit around that.”

Ac­cord­ing to Aim­mune, there are more than 1.6 mil­lion chil­dren and teenagers af­fect­ed by peanut al­ler­gies in the Unit­ed States, which rep­re­sents a $1 bil­lion-plus peak sales op­por­tu­ni­ty. Aim­mune’s shares $AIMT rose about 8.6% to $23.97 be­fore the bell on Wednes­day.

The so-far un­tapped mar­ket is ex­pect­ed to grow to $4.5 bil­lion in 2027 glob­al­ly, Glob­al­Da­ta es­ti­mates.

A fa­vorite in Alex­ion’s C-suite is leav­ing, and some mighty sur­prised an­a­lysts aren’t the least bit hap­py about it

Analysts hate to lose a biotech CFO they’ve come to trust and admire — especially if they’re being blindsided by a surprise exit.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

While No­var­tis ban­ish­es Zol­gens­ma scan­dal scars — Bio­gen goes on a Spin­raza 'of­fen­sive'

While Novartis painstakingly works to mop up the stench of the data manipulation scandal associated with its expensive gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) Zolgensma— rival Biogen is attempting to expand the use of its SMA therapy, Spinraza. 

The US drugmaker $BIIB secured US approval for Spinraza for use in the often fatal genetic disease in 2016. The approval covered a broad range of patients with infantile-onset (most likely to develop Type 1) SMA. 

Jason Kelly. Mike Blake/Reuters via Adobe

Eye­ing big ther­a­peu­tic push, Gink­go bags $290M to build a cell pro­gram­ming em­pire

Ginkgo Bioworks is on a roll. Days after publicizing a plan to nurture new startups via partnerships with accelerators Y Combinator and Petri, the Boston biotech says it has raised another $290 million for its cell programming platform to reach further and wider.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Speak­er Nan­cy Pelosi to un­veil bill for fed­er­al­ly ne­go­ti­at­ed drug prices

After months of buzz from both sides of the aisle, Speaker Nancy Pelosi will today introduce her plan to allow the federal government to negotiate prices for 250 prescription drugs, setting up a showdown with a pharmaceutical industry working overtime to prevent it.

The need to limit drug prices is a rare point of agreement between President Trump and Democrats, although the president has yet to comment on the proposal and will likely face pressure to back a more conservative option or no bill at all. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley is reportedly lobbying his fellow party members on a more modest proposal he negotiated with Democratic Senator Ron Wyden in July.

David Grainger [file photo]

'Dis­con­nect the bas­tard­s' — one biotech's plan to break can­cer cell­s' uni­fied de­fens­es

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the current gladiators of cancer treatment, but they come with well-known limitations and side-effects. The emergence of immunotherapy — a ferocious new titan in oncologist’s toolbox — takes the brakes off the immune system to kill cancer cells with remarkable success in some cases, but the approach is not always effective. What makes certain forms of cancer so resilient? Scientists may have finally pieced together a tantalizing piece of the puzzle, and a new biotech is banking on a new approach to fill the gap.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jeff Kindler's Cen­trex­ion re­news bid to make pub­lic de­but

Jeffrey Kindler’s plan to take his biotech — which is developing a slate of non-opioid painkillers — public, is back on.

The Boston based company, led by former Pfizer $PFE chief Kindler, originally contemplated a $70 million to $80 million IPO last year— but eventually postponed that strategy. On Wednesday, the company revived its bid to make a public debut in a filing with the SEC — although no pricing details were disclosed.

Zachary Hornby. Boundless

'A fourth rev­o­lu­tion in can­cer ther­a­pies': ARCH-backed Bound­less Bio flash­es big check, makes big­ger promis­es in de­but

It was the cellular equivalent of opening your car door and finding an active, roaring engine in the driver seat.

Scientists learned strands of DNA could occasionally appear outside of its traditional home in the nucleus in the 1970s, when they appeared as little, innocuous circles on microscopes; inexplicable but apparently innate. But not until UC San Diego’s Paul Mischel published his first study in Science in 2014 did researchers realize these circles were not only active but potentially overactive and driving some cancer tumors’ superhuman growth.

It’s fi­nal­ly over: Bio­gen, Ei­sai scrap big Alzheimer’s PhI­I­Is af­ter a pre­dictable BACE cat­a­stro­phe rais­es safe­ty fears

Months after analysts and investors called on Biogen and Eisai to scrap their BACE drug for Alzheimer’s and move on in the wake of a string of late-stage failures and rising safety fears, the partners have called it quits. And they said they were dropping the drug — elenbecestat — after the independent monitoring board raised concerns about…safety.

We don’t know exactly what researchers found in this latest catastrophe, but the companies noted in their release that investigators had determined that the drug was flunking the risk/benefit analysis.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 59,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Mer­ck helps bankroll new part­ner Themis' game plan to fin­ish the chikun­gun­ya race and be­gin on­colyt­ic virus quest

As Themis gears up for a Phase III trial of its chikungunya vaccine, the Vienna-based biotech has closed out €40 million ($44 million) to foot the clinical and manufacturing bills.

Its heavyweight partners at Merck — which signed a pact around a mysterious “blockbuster indication” last month — jumped into the Series D, led by new investors Farallon Capital and Hadean Ventures. Adjuvant Capital also joined, as did current investors Global Health Investment Fund, aws Gruenderfonds, Omnes Capital, Ventech and Wellington Partners Life Sciences.