No­var­tis banks on the promise of dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics in the man­age­ment of chron­ic dis­or­ders

Dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics may not have yet earned cult sta­tus with­in the health­care in­dus­try, but their promise in non-com­mu­ni­ca­ble dis­eases — that are of­ten caused or wors­ened by un­sa­vory be­hav­iors — is hard to de­ny, as Big Phar­ma makes a deep­er for­ay in­to clin­i­cal­ly-val­i­dat­ed dig­i­tal in­ter­ven­tions de­signed to en­cour­age sus­tain­able lifestyle changes to com­ple­ment tra­di­tion­al ther­a­peu­tics.

No­var­tis $NVS unit San­doz along with part­ner Pear Ther­a­peu­tics on Mon­day launched re­SET, an FDA-ap­proved dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tic de­signed to de­liv­er cog­ni­tive be­hav­ioral ther­a­py over 12 weeks to pa­tients with sub­stance abuse dis­or­der (SUD) who are in out­pa­tient treat­ment un­der the su­per­vi­sion of a doc­tor.

Richard Fran­ci

“Adding re­SET to out­pa­tient ther­a­py en­hances be­hav­iors as­so­ci­at­ed with re­cov­ery. It lever­ages new tech­nol­o­gy to help pa­tients im­prove ab­sti­nence in sub­stances of abuse and stay in treat­ment pro­grams longer than out­pa­tient ther­a­py alone,” said San­doz chief Richard Fran­cis in a state­ment.

Poor treat­ment out­comes are the norm for SUD — a chron­ic, re­laps­ing dis­ease caused by the per­sis­tent use of al­co­hol and/or drugs — as in­con­sis­tent ac­cess and qual­i­ty of treat­ment as well as dis­par­i­ties in pay­ment and in­sur­ance for be­hav­ioral health ser­vices have cul­mi­nat­ed in low rates of ab­sti­nence and high dropout rates for a type of ther­a­py that is usu­al­ly re­source-in­ten­sive and ne­ces­si­tates face-to-face clin­i­cian in­ter­ac­tions. In 2014, about 21.5 mil­lion Amer­i­cans aged 12 and old­er (8.1%) were clas­si­fied with a sub­stance use dis­or­der in the past year, ac­cord­ing to es­ti­mates from HHS’ Sub­stance Abuse and Men­tal Health Ser­vices Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

The FDA ap­proved re­SET last year on the ba­sis of a NI­DA-spon­sored tri­al in­volv­ing 399 pa­tients with SUD. Pa­tients were ran­dom­ized to re­ceive stan­dard treat­ment — com­pris­ing in­ten­sive face-to-face coun­selling — or re­duced amount of face-to-face coun­selling plus the dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tic. Pa­tients on the dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tic more than dou­bled the rate of ab­sti­nence com­pared to stan­dard face-to-face coun­selling.

Dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics is an um­brel­la term that in­cludes tech­nol­o­gy such as wear­able de­vices, mo­bile apps and telemed­i­cine plat­forms — which is typ­i­cal­ly dri­ven by soft­ware to pre­vent, man­age, or treat dis­or­ders, in­de­pen­dent­ly or in con­cert with med­ica­tion and/or med­ical de­vices. These tools are large­ly de­signed to ad­dress chron­ic dis­eases such as di­a­betes, heart or res­pi­ra­to­ry dis­or­ders, by tar­get­ing be­hav­iors such as di­et, ex­er­cise and lifestyle that have a sig­nif­i­cant im­pact on the in­ci­dence and man­age­ment of dis­ease. Pre­scrip­tion dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics — such as re­SET and Abil­i­fy Mycite, the first dig­i­tal pill that car­ries an em­bed­ded sen­sor to track if pa­tients are tak­ing their med­ica­tion prop­er­ly — are val­i­dat­ed in ran­dom­ized clin­i­cal tri­als to demon­strate safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy.

Pear Ther­a­peu­tics is al­so de­vel­op­ing dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics for a host of oth­er dis­or­ders in­clud­ing schiz­o­phre­nia, PTSD and gen­er­al anx­i­ety dis­or­der. Al­though the rapid pen­e­tra­tion of smart­phones and tablets and low­er health­care costs have dri­ven the growth of the glob­al dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics mar­ket, pri­va­cy con­cerns could tem­per the pace of adop­tion. Still, ac­cord­ing to Al­lied Mar­ket Re­search the size of the mar­ket is set to grow to $7.83 bil­lion in 2025 from $1.75 bil­lion last year.

Biotech Half­time Re­port: Af­ter a bumpy year, is biotech ready to re­bound?

The biotech sector has come down firmly from the highs of February as negative sentiment takes hold. The sector had a major boost of optimism from the success of the COVID-19 vaccines, making investors keenly aware of the potential of biopharma R&D engines. But from early this year, clinical trial, regulatory and access setbacks have reminded investors of the sector’s inherent risks.

RBC Capital Markets recently surveyed investors to take the temperature of the market, a mix of specialists/generalists and long-only/ long-short investment strategies. Heading into the second half of the year, investors mostly see the sector as undervalued (49%), a large change from the first half of the year when only 20% rated it as undervalued. Around 41% of investors now believe that biotech will underperform the S&P500 in the second half of 2021. Despite that view, 54% plan to maintain their position in the market and 41% still plan to increase their holdings.

Covid-19 vac­cine boost­ers earn big thumbs up, but Mod­er­na draws ire over world sup­ply; What's next for Mer­ck’s Covid pill?; The C-suite view on biotech; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

You may remember that at the beginning of this year, Endpoints News set a goal to go broader and deeper. We are still working towards that, and are excited to share that Beth Snyder Bulik will be joining us on Monday to cover all things pharma marketing. You can sign up for her weekly Endpoints MarketingRx newsletter in your reader profile.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 119,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

No­var­tis de­vel­op­ment chief John Tsai: 'We go deep in the new plat­form­s'

During our recent European Biopharma Summit, I talked with Novartis development chief John Tsai about his experiences over the 3-plus years he’s been at the pharma giant. You can read the transcript below or listen to the exchange in the link above.

John Carroll: I followed your career for quite some time. You’ve had more than 20 years in big pharma R&D and you’ve obviously seen quite a lot. I really was curious about what it was like for you three and a half years ago when you took over as R&D chief at Novartis. Obviously a big move, a lot of changes. You went to work for the former R&D chief of Novartis, Vas Narasimhan, who had his own track record there. So what was the biggest adjustment when you went into this position?

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Roche's Tecen­triq cross­es the fin­ish line first in ad­ju­vant lung can­cer, po­ten­tial­ly kick­ing off gold rush

While falling behind the biggest PD-(L)1 drugs in terms of sales, Roche has looked to carve out a space for its Tecentriq with a growing expertise in lung cancer. The drug will now take an early lead in the sought-after adjuvant setting — but competitors are on the way.

The FDA on Friday approved Tecentriq as an adjuvant therapy for patients with Stage II-IIIA non small cell lung cancer with PD-(L)1 scores greater than or equal to 1, making it the first drug of its kind approved in an early setting that covers around 40% of all NSCLC patients.

Amit Etkin, Alto Neuroscience CEO (Alto via Vimeo)

A star Stan­ford pro­fes­sor leaves his lab for a start­up out to re­make psy­chi­a­try

About five years ago, Amit Etkin had a breakthrough.

The Stanford neurologist, a soft-spoken demi-prodigy who became a professor while still a resident, had been obsessed for a decade with how to better define psychiatric disorders. Drugs for depression or bipolar disorder didn’t work for many patients with the conditions, and he suspected the reason was how traditional diagnoses didn’t actually get at the heart of what was going on in a patient’s brain.

Susan Galbraith, Executive VP, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca

As­traZeneca on­col­o­gy R&D chief Su­san Gal­braith: 'Y­ou're go­ing to need or­thog­o­nal com­bi­na­tion­s'

 

Earlier in the week we broadcast our 4th annual European Biopharma Summit with a great lineup of top execs. One of the one-on-one conversations I set up was with Susan Galbraith, the oncology research chief at AstraZeneca. In a wide-ranging discussion, Galbraith reviewed the cancer drug pipeline and key trends influencing development work at the pharma giant. You can watch the video, above, or stick with the script below. — JC

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Tillman Gerngross, Adagio CEO

Q&A: Till­man Gern­gross ex­plains why his Covid mAb will have an edge over an al­ready crowd­ed field

If anyone knows about monoclonal antibodies, it’s serial entrepreneur, Adimab CEO, and Dartmouth professor of bioengineering Tillman Gerngross.

Even the name of Gerngross’ new antibody startup Adagio Therapeutics is meant to reflect his vision behind the development of his Covid-19 mAb: slowly, he said, explaining that “everyone else, whether it’s Regeneron, Lilly, or AstraZeneca, Vir, they all valued speed over everything.”

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Susan Galbraith speaking at Endpoints News' virtual EUBIO21 summit

Imfinzi/treme­li­mum­ab com­bo scores As­traZeneca an­oth­er OS win — this time in liv­er can­cer

Is the tide turning on AstraZeneca’s battered PD-L1/CTLA4 combo?

A single priming dose of the experimental tremelimumab, followed by Imfinzi every four weeks, beat Nexavar (sorafenib) in helping a group of liver cancer patients live longer in a Phase III study, the company reported, meeting the primary endpoint.

Specifically, the two drugs extended overall survival for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received prior systemic therapy and were not eligible for localized treatment.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 119,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Alex Gorsky, J&J CEO (Evan Vucci/AP Images)

As suits mount, J&J spins out talc li­a­bil­i­ties in­to Chap­ter 11 us­ing 'Texas two-step' ma­neu­ver

With lawsuits piling up alleging its talc baby powder products are unsafe, J&J has taken the controversial step of spinning out its related liabilities into a new company and filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, according to court papers filed late Thursday.

The procedures will now head to bankruptcy court in North Carolina, halting all lawsuits and their respective discovery processes. It’s a move that comes a few months after the Wall Street Journal and Reuters both reported J&J was exploring this option, and after a federal judge said the process could move forward in August.