No­var­tis posts land­mark CAR-T da­ta as head-to-head ri­val­ry with Kite Phar­ma looms

Vas­ant Narasimhan, chief med­ical of­fi­cer of No­var­tis AG, looks on dur­ing a Jan­u­ary 2017 news con­fer­ence in Basel  Michele Lim­i­na/Bloomberg

No­var­tis’ pi­o­neer­ing CAR-T drug CTL019 (ti­s­agen­le­cleu­cel) scored high in treat­ing dif­fuse large B-cell lym­phoma (DL­B­CL), spot­light­ing num­bers that will like­ly al­low the phar­ma gi­ant to plunge head-to-head in the mar­ket against its main ini­tial ri­val, Kite Phar­ma. But No­var­tis al­so found it­self de­fend­ing its man­u­fac­tur­ing op­er­a­tions Wednes­day morn­ing, as an­a­lysts ze­roed in on a num­ber of pa­tients who couldn’t be treat­ed in the study.

The fig­ures — drawn from its ea­ger­ly an­tic­i­pat­ed Phase II JULI­ET study — that will at­tract every­one’s at­ten­tion first: At three months the over­all re­sponse rate hit 45% among 23 of 51 pa­tients eval­u­at­ed with an im­pres­sive 37% achiev­ing a com­plete re­sponse and 8% achiev­ing a par­tial re­sponse. And those CRs con­tin­ued be­yond the three months to the da­ta cut­off in prep­ping for the an­nounce­ment, of­fer­ing a glimpse of dura­bil­i­ty that will help make No­var­tis’ case.

“For us as a med­ical com­pa­ny and from my or­ga­ni­za­tion’s stand­point, we want to have a dra­mat­ic im­pact,” No­var­tis $NVS chief med­ical of­fi­cer Vas Narasimhan tells me. “This is, of course, trans­for­ma­tive… It gives us the con­vic­tion to move ahead.”

Narasimhan in par­tic­u­lar high­light­ed ear­ly ev­i­dence of per­sis­tence for this ther­a­py, which will be cru­cial to dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing their drug from all the CAR-T ther­a­pies to come, from any an­gle.

The best rea­son to sug­gest why CTL019 could be a stand­out, he says, points to their drug’s use of the 4-1BB cos­tim­u­la­to­ry do­main, dis­tin­guished from the CD28 do­main used by Kite’s ri­val drug and Juno’s ini­tial lead ther­a­py, now scrapped in fa­vor of a drug that us­es 4-1BB. That 4-1BB do­main may ex­plain why the ini­tial ramp up of T cell ex­pres­sion is slight­ly slow­er, adding to longterm per­sis­tence. And it may al­so ex­plain No­var­tis’ rel­a­tive­ly clean safe­ty pro­file, with no ma­jor is­sues (so far) re­lat­ed to neu­ro­tox­i­c­i­ty, which will like­ly be giv­en care­ful scruti­ny at the FDA.

All that, though, has yet to be de­ter­mined.

Purists hate cross-tri­al com­par­isons, not­ing hard-to-score com­par­isons in the pa­tients stud­ied. But Wall Street’s first re­sponse will be to line up the da­ta from the phar­ma gi­ant against the num­bers for Kite’s KTE-C19 (axi­cab­ta­gene ciloleu­cel) at 3 months. Their drug hit an ORR of 39% among 51 pa­tients, with 33% achiev­ing a com­plete re­sponse — com­pa­ra­ble, though, mar­gin­al­ly less sig­nif­i­cant re­sults that will leave these two com­pa­nies bat­tling it out.

Narasimhan de­clined to touch my ques­tion about com­par­ing num­bers in the piv­otal stud­ies, which was to be ex­pect­ed. But Twit­ter was abuzz this morn­ing.

As ex­pect­ed, cy­tokine re­lease syn­drome was com­mon, with 57% ex­pe­ri­enc­ing CRS — al­though no one died from it. No deaths were at­trib­uted to the drug.

Kite’s num­bers have ma­tured be­yond that to the 6-month mark, slip­ping slight­ly but re­main­ing strong­ly com­pet­i­tive, as Kite CEO Arie Bellde­grun pre­dict­ed it would. And af­ter the JULI­ET da­ta were ini­tial­ly re­leased in an ab­stract ear­ly Wednes­day, cir­cu­lat­ing on Twit­ter, Kite’s shares jumped 6% af­ter in­vestors got a chance to eval­u­ate how the two drugs stacked up.

No­var­tis will get the first crack at an ap­proval for chil­dren with acute lym­phoblas­tic leukemia, with an FDA ex­pert pan­el slat­ed for Ju­ly 12. And with a pri­or­i­ty re­view, the agency is com­mit­ted to a quick re­sponse with a de­ci­sion due lat­er this year. Kite is about two months be­hind with a PDU­FA date of No­vem­ber 29.

An­oth­er area that No­var­tis, Kite and any fu­ture ri­vals will com­pete on is man­u­fac­tur­ing time.

Says Narasimhan: “Vein-to-vein time (the stretch from ex­tract­ing cells to get­ting them back in as a ther­a­py) we ex­pect to have in the range of 20 days. We were slow­er in the clin­i­cal tri­als,” with the man­u­fac­tur­ing arm bring­ing that down from 29 days.

Cowen got the dis­cus­sion about man­u­fac­tur­ing start­ed Wednes­day morn­ing by not­ing the ab­stract’s fig­ures on pa­tients in the study who nev­er made it to the in­fu­sion point. No­var­tis re­spond­ed with a state­ment, not­ing that they had fac­tored in a high dropout rate due to the very ad­vanced stage of an ag­gres­sive dis­ease and the rapid de­te­ri­o­ra­tion you would ex­pect in their sta­tus.

An­a­lysts al­so not­ed that a num­ber of pa­tients nev­er were treat­ed be­cause of man­u­fac­tur­ing prob­lems — a po­ten­tial­ly se­ri­ous sna­fu. But No­var­tis says it is get­ting a bet­ter han­dle on that and down­played the is­sue, adding:

 On­ly 6% (9 of 141) of en­rolled pa­tients were dis­con­tin­ued due to in­abil­i­ty to man­u­fac­ture an ad­e­quate dose of CART cells. Over the course of JULI­ET, with con­tin­u­ous process im­prove­ments, man­u­fac­tur­ing suc­cess rate im­proved to 97% for the last 30 pa­tients.

In JULI­ET, pa­tients could re­ceive bridg­ing chemother­a­py, re­flect­ing the ag­gres­sive na­ture of dis­ease in pa­tients with r/r DL­B­CL, so even pa­tients in poor con­di­tion could be en­rolled and in­fused. The cry­op­re­served leuka­phere­sis used in JULI­ET gives physi­cians the flex­i­bil­i­ty to sched­ule aphere­sis at a time that is in the best in­ter­est of their pa­tients, in­clud­ing times far in ad­vance of man­u­fac­tur­ing. The tri­al de­sign and pop­u­la­tion in­fused re­flects the re­al world chal­lenges in treat­ing pa­tients with an ag­gres­sive can­cer such as r/r DL­B­CL.

As for man­u­fac­tur­ing, we are con­fi­dent we will be able to meet the re­quired man­u­fac­tur­ing de­mands mov­ing for­ward.

The ac­tu­al cell pro­cess­ing time is 10-12 days. We an­tic­i­pate that the time from man­u­fac­ture start to prod­uct re­lease (in­clud­ing Qual­i­ty as­sess­ments) will be 22 days at the time of com­mer­cial launch. We have a rig­or­ous qual­i­ty as­sess­ment process to en­sure a GMP com­pli­ant prod­uct is re­leased to pa­tients.

Sig­nif­i­cant­ly, Kite CMO David Chang told me at AS­CO that they have vein-to-vein down to about 17 days, and would still like to shave a few days off that.

No­tably, No­var­tis’ man­u­fac­tur­ing chief for CAR-T re­cent­ly re­signed to take a sim­i­lar job at Seat­tle Ge­net­ics, rais­ing con­cerns with­in the phar­ma gi­ant’s R&D op­er­a­tions that the con­tin­u­ing ex­o­dus of ex­ecs out of No­var­tis — par­tic­u­lar­ly fol­low­ing last sum­mer’s re­or­ga­ni­za­tion — could ham­per its per­for­mance.

No­var­tis ex­ecs, though, have in­sist­ed that the multi­na­tion­al com­pa­ny is com­plete­ly com­mit­ted to mak­ing this all work com­mer­cial­ly, not­ing their lead role in the field.

An­a­lysts have been de­bat­ing for months now how the com­pe­ti­tion will shake out. The lead CAR-T at Juno im­plod­ed last year af­ter it killed five pa­tients due to cere­bral ede­ma. Then Kite rat­tled the mar­ket re­cent­ly with the news that one of its pa­tients al­so died from cere­bral ede­ma. Some have the­o­rized that the added safe­ty threat could be due to the dif­fer­ent cos­tim­u­la­to­ry do­mains used in the drug, with Kite and Juno’s first lead us­ing CD28 and No­var­tis fo­cused on 4-1BB. It’s nev­er been es­tab­lished, though, as re­searchers con­tin­ue to gain new in­sights on the best way to de­sign these CAR-Ts.

No­var­tis has made CTL019 one of its top on­col­o­gy pro­grams, push­ing hard to gain first-mar­ket ad­van­tage for a new kind of can­cer treat­ment that reengi­neers pa­tients cells in­to a ther­a­py. Its best ear­ly promise lies in liq­uid tu­mors with in­ves­ti­ga­tors work­ing to tack­le a broad slate of these can­cers. Next stop: find­ing bet­ter ways to go af­ter sol­id tu­mors with this tech­nol­o­gy. Be­hind that, Cel­lec­tis and oth­ers will try to de­vel­op off-the-shelf ther­a­pies that can be di­rect­ly ad­min­is­tered to pa­tients.

Narasimhan al­so men­tioned that the phar­ma gi­ant has been work­ing on freez­ing cells for lat­er use, per­haps prepar­ing ther­a­pies that can be used at a lat­er stage, if a pa­tient needs them to bat­tle drug re­sis­tance. How that sort of op­er­a­tion could be squared with pay­ers, though, he freely ad­mits will be a com­plex chal­lenge.

This first round of da­ta marks the cut­ting edge of the com­pe­ti­tion. There’s much, much more to come.

Vac­cine doc­u­ments, young lead­ers and mar­ket tur­moil: End­points' 10 biggest sto­ries of 2022

It’s been a volatile year in the world of biopharma. Market declines reset M&A valuations, and may be beginning to tempt bigger buyers back into dealmaking. Russia’s war in Ukraine disrupted drug sales and clinical trials. A new generation of young biotech leaders emerged in the Endpoints 20(+1) Under 40. And as capital runs dry in a tough environment for raising new funds, companies big and small are taking a look at their headcounts and operations for ways to make it through lean times.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Tom Riga, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals CEO

Spec­trum im­plodes af­ter a harsh pub­lic slap­down and now a CRL from Richard Paz­dur

The FDA has gone out of its way several times to flatten any expectations for Spectrum’s lung cancer drug poziotinib, including slamming the regulatory door in the biotech’s face four years ago when the their executive crew came calling for a breakthrough drug designation and encouragement from the oncology wing of the FDA.

That stinging early rebuke pointed straight down the path to a corrosive in-house agency review of Spectrum’s attempt to land an accelerated approval for the oral EGFR TKI and a public whipping that included a classic takedown by none other than Richard Pazdur, who slammed the company for “poor drug development” that led to confusion over the dose needed for a slice of NSCLC patients harboring HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Big Phar­ma's Twit­ter ex­o­dus; Mer­ck wa­gers $1.35B on buy­out; $3.5M gene ther­a­py; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

As you start planning for #JPM23, we hope you will consider joining Endpoints News for our live and virtual events. For those who are celebrating Thanksgiving, we hope you are enjoying the long weekend with loved ones. And if you’re not — we’ll see you next week!

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO (John Thys/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Pfiz­er CEO un­der fire from UK watch­dog over vac­cine com­ments — re­port

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla told the BBC last December that he had “no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favor” of vaccinating 5- to 11-year-olds for Covid-19. Almost a year later, those comments have reportedly landed him in trouble with a UK pharma watchdog.

Children’s advocacy group UsForThem filed a complaint with the UK’s Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) last year accusing Bourla of making “disgracefully misleading” statements during the BBC interview, including one that “Covid in schools is thriving.” At the time, UK regulators had not yet cleared the vaccine for the 5 to 11 age group, though the vaccine did have a positive opinion from the EMA’s human medicines committee.

Robert Califf, FDA commissioner (Jose Luis Magana/AP Images)

Fourth ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval in Duchenne? Sarep­ta gets pri­or­i­ty re­view for gene ther­a­py amid FDA scruti­ny

Sarepta is once again on the accelerated approval path for a Duchenne drug, picking up a priority review Monday morning.

The FDA granted the accelerated review to SRP-9001, Sarepta announced Monday, which would become the biotech’s fourth Duchenne drug if approved. Much like SRP-9001 will do, each of the previous three therapies went through the accelerated approval pathway. But unlike the others, SRP-9001 is a gene therapy.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sanofi's new headquarters, La Maison Sanofi, in Paris (Credit: Luc Boegly)

Sanofi wel­comes 500 staffers to new Paris HQ af­ter €30M ren­o­va­tion

When Paul Hudson took the helm at Sanofi back in 2019, he promised to reinvent the pharma giant — including its Paris headquarters. This week, the company set up shop in new “state-of-the-art” digs.

La Maison Sanofi, as the new HQ is called, is officially open for business, Hudson announced on Monday. The 9,000-square-meter (just under 97,000-square-foot) space accommodates 500 employees across the company’s government and global support functions teams, including finance, HR, legal and corporate affairs — and it was built with environmental sustainability and hybrid work in mind.

Sta­da to place $50M+ in­vest­ment in a new fa­cil­i­ty in Ro­ma­nia

While Romania may conjure up images of vast mountain ranges and tales of medieval kings, one generic manufacturer has broken ground on a new facility there.

German pharma company Stada said Monday that it has placed a €50 million ($51.9 million) investment into a 100,000 square-meter (1.08 million square-foot) site in Turda, Romania, a city in the Southeast of the country. According to a Stada spokesperson in an email to Endpoints News, the company has developed only 281,500 square feet of the site so far.

Rachael Rollins (Charles Krupa/AP Images)

US seeks jail time for co-CEO of New Eng­land com­pound­ing cen­ter af­ter dead­ly 2012 fun­gal out­break

The US attorney for the district of Massachusetts late last week called on the state’s district court to sentence the former co-owner of the now-defunct New England Compounding Center to 18 months of jail time for his role in the center’s quality deviations that led to more than 100 people dead from a fungal meningitis outbreak.

Gregory Conigliaro was convicted of conspiring with more than a dozen others at NECC to deceive the FDA and misrepresent the fact that the center was only dispensing drugs pursuant to patient-specific prescriptions.

FDA tells Catal­ent to fix is­sues at two man­u­fac­tur­ing sites on its own

The CDMO Catalent will have to fix issues at two manufacturing plants in the US and Europe that were subject to inspections by the FDA this summer, giving the company room to correct the issues without facing further regulatory action.

The FDA gave Catalent a “voluntary action indicated” response to two inspections at the contract manufacturer’s site in Bloomington, IN, and Brussels, Belgium. Fixing the issues on its own is a preferable outcome to facing an “official action indicated” response, meaning that an official warning would be sent out or a sit-down with the FDA would be required.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.