With the emer­gence of re­al-world ev­i­dence as a promis­ing way to cap­ture da­ta points out­side of clin­i­cal tri­als and speed up drug de­vel­op­ment, con­tract re­search or­ga­ni­za­tions — the stal­warts of tra­di­tion­al tri­al ex­e­cu­tion — are of­ten lead­ing the charge in adopt­ing new tech­nol­o­gy. Parex­el, a lead­ing play­er in the field, is step­ping up that com­mit­ment through a deal with Data­vant.

Jamie Mac­don­ald

Spawned by Vivek Ra­maswamy’s start­up fac­to­ry Roivant and led by Travis May, Data­vant has po­si­tioned it­self as a key ag­gre­ga­tor link­ing up the dis­parate datasets that ex­ist in health­care, of­ten in si­los. In the new part­ner­ship, its soft­ware will be in­te­grat­ed in­to Parex­el’s work­flow such that all the da­ta from their stud­ies will be con­nect­ed to re­al-world da­ta such as elec­tron­ic health records, claims and di­ag­nos­tics, as well as in­for­ma­tion re­lat­ing to ge­nomics, wear­able de­vices, so­cioe­co­nom­ic and be­hav­ioral da­ta and oth­ers.

All the da­ta gen­er­at­ed in the process are al­so quick­ly de-iden­ti­fied — one of Data­vant’s key pitch­es amid in­creas­ing con­cerns about pa­tient pri­va­cy.

“(O)ne of the most sig­nif­i­cant bar­ri­ers to gen­er­at­ing re­al-world ev­i­dence is over­com­ing lim­i­ta­tions of sin­gle da­ta sources,” Parex­el CEO Jamie Mac­don­ald said in a state­ment. “Part­ner­ing with Data­vant has pro­vid­ed Parex­el the abil­i­ty to link dis­parate da­ta sets to dri­ve the com­plex analy­ses nec­es­sary for pro­vid­ing in­no­v­a­tive sci­en­tif­ic and clin­i­cal da­ta strate­gies.”

Travis May

Mac­don­ald be­gan work­ing with Data­vant last Sep­tem­ber, a few months af­ter he took the helm. Af­ter ham­mer­ing out how best to in­cor­po­rate Data­vant’s tech in­to Parex­el’s way of de­sign­ing and con­duct­ing tri­als, the duo has agreed to for­mal­ly ex­pand the re­la­tion­ship in­to a mul­ti-year strate­gic pact.

The use of re­al-world ev­i­dence has gained steam as bio­phar­ma com­pa­nies look to trim the cost of clin­i­cal de­vel­op­ment and ad­vo­cate for a sort of pa­tient-cen­tric nar­ra­tive in which their day-to-day ex­pe­ri­ence with ther­a­pies can be tak­en in­to reg­u­la­to­ry ac­count. The FDA kick-start­ed its own pi­lot projects to eval­u­ate whether RWE can help pre­dict the re­sults of clin­i­cal tri­als that have yet to wrap up. The dis­cus­sion is still lim­it­ed to drugs al­ready on the mar­ket — for which de­vel­op­ers might be seek­ing la­bel changes — and ques­tions about da­ta qual­i­ty stan­dards re­main, but the mo­men­tum is there to cre­ate new ways to build a fran­chise treat­ment.

So­cial im­age: Jamie Mac­don­ald, Travis May

As concerns rise around the J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines, global attention is increasingly turning to the little, 33-year-old, productless, bankruptcy-flirting biotech that could: Novavax.

In the now 16-month race to develop and deploy Covid-19 vaccines, Novavax has at times seemed like the pandemic’s most unsuspecting frontrunner and at times like an overhyped also-ran. Although they started the pandemic with only enough cash to last 6 months, they leveraged old connections and believers into $2 billion and emerged last summer with data experts said surpassed Pfizer and Moderna. They unveiled plans to quickly scale to 2 billion doses. Then they couldn’t even make enough material to run their US trial and watched four other companies beat them to the finish line.

The FDA wrapped up its inspection of Emergent’s troubled vaccine manufacturing plant in Baltimore on Tuesday, after halting production there on Monday. By Wednesday morning, the agency already released a series of scathing observations on the cross contamination, sanitary issues and lack of staff training that caused the contract manufacturer to dispose of millions of AstraZeneca and J&J vaccine doses.

Although Thursday’s Senate health committee hearing was focused on how foreign countries and adversaries might be trying to steal or negatively influence biomedical research in the US, the only country mentioned by the senators and expert witnesses was China.

Committee chair Patty Murray (D-WA) made clear in her opening remarks that the US cannot “let the few instances of bad actors” overshadow the hard work of the many immigrant researchers in the US, many of which have won Nobel prizes for their work. But she also said, “There is more the NIH can be doing here.”

When Paul Wotton became CEO of Obsidian Therapeutics two years ago, he asked his team to explore where they could apply the company’s technology beyond cancer.

Launched by Michael Gilman in 2017, the GV-backed company had been working on a way of controlling cell therapies after they’re administered to a patient, allowing doctors to modulate the potency of CAR-T and other drugs as you might volume on a television set. Wotton wanted to them look beyond cancer, into areas such as gene editing.