Stormy Daniels’ lawyer: No­var­tis made $400K in 'sus­pi­cious' pay­ments to Trump at­tor­ney Michael Co­hen

Stormy Daniels’ at­tor­ney Michael Ave­nat­ti has out­lined a se­ries of “sus­pi­cious fi­nan­cial trans­ac­tions” in­volv­ing close to $400,000 in pay­ments No­var­tis made to the ac­count of Es­sen­tial Con­sul­tants, which was ear­li­er used by Don­ald Trump’s per­son­al at­tor­ney Michael Co­hen to pay $130,000 to the adult film ac­tress to keep her silent about al­le­ga­tions of an af­fair with the pres­i­dent.

Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, No­var­tis $NVS made four wire pay­ments of $99,980 each, just un­der the $100,000 mark, which Ave­nat­ti not­ed be­gan last fall and were wrapped in ear­ly Jan­u­ary of this year, just weeks be­fore soon-to-be CEO Vas Narasimhan met with Trump in Davos. [This sto­ry has been up­dat­ed with new in­for­ma­tion here: No­var­tis now says that it paid Co­hen’s com­pa­ny $1.2M]

A spokesper­son for No­var­tis re­spond­ed to a query I sent Tues­day night, say­ing: “Still chas­ing af­ter this – but want to clar­i­fy for your in­for­ma­tion that any agree­ments with Es­sen­tial Con­sul­tants were en­tered be­fore our cur­rent CEO tak­ing of­fice in Feb­ru­ary of this year and have ex­pired.” Lat­er, the phar­ma gi­ant tried to put some ad­di­tion­al dis­tance be­tween Narasimhan and the pay­ments, which they said in­volved “health­care pol­i­cy mat­ters.”

Who­ev­er drove the deal at No­var­tis, get­ting swept up in the Daniels scan­dal at the height of the me­dia tem­pest — days ahead of a ma­jor pol­i­cy ini­tia­tive on drug pric­ing by Trump — is ex­tra­or­di­nar­i­ly em­bar­rass­ing for the Swiss com­pa­ny, which still has plen­ty of ex­plain­ing to do.

The bomb­shell in the re­port spot­light­ed $500,000 paid by Russ­ian oli­garch Vik­tor Vek­sel­berg, with close ties to Rus­sia’s au­thor­i­tar­i­an leader Vladimir Putin, af­ter the elec­tion. Ac­cord­ing to Ave­nat­ti, that mon­ey could have been used to re­pay Co­hen for the hush mon­ey he paid Daniels. An­oth­er $200,000 came from AT&T, which has con­firmed the pay­ments to re­porters cov­er­ing the sto­ry, say­ing it paid for “in­sights in­to un­der­stand­ing the new ad­min­is­tra­tion.” Ko­rea Aero­space In­dus­tries paid $150,000.

“Mr.  Vek­sel­berg  and  his  cousin  Mr.  An­drew  In­trater  rout­ed  eight  pay­ments  to  Mr.  Co­hen  through  a  com­pa­ny  named  Colum­bus  No­va  LLC  (“Colum­bus”)  be­gin­ning  in  Jan­u­ary  2017  and  con­tin­u­ing  un­til  at  least  Au­gust  2017,” states Ave­nat­ti’s re­port.

“Al­so  in­clud­ed  in  these  sus­pi­cious  fi­nan­cial  trans­ac­tions  are  four  pay­ments  in  late  2017  and  ear­ly  2018  to­tal­ing  $399,920  made  by  glob­al  phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal  gi­ant  No­var­tis  di­rect­ly  to  Es­sen­tial  in  four  sep­a­rate  trans­ac­tions  of  $99,980  each  (just  be­low  $100,000).

“Fol­low­ing  these  pay­ments,  re­ports  sur­faced  that  Mr.  Trump  took  a din­ner  meet­ing  with the  in­com­ing  CEO  of  No­var­tis be­fore  Mr.  Trump’s  speech at  the  World  Eco­nom­ic  Fo­rum  in  Davos,  Switzer­land  in  late  Jan­u­ary  2018.”

Ave­nat­ti in­clud­ed a link to a Fier­cePhar­ma sto­ry on the group of ex­ec­u­tives meet­ing with Trump for din­ner in Davos.

Overnight, No­var­tis ex­ecs scram­bled to cir­cle the wag­ons around their CEO, con­firm­ing the pay­ments but in­sist­ing Narasimhan was nev­er in­volved in the “arrange­ment.” Their state­ment:

In Feb­ru­ary 2017, No­var­tis en­tered in­to a one year agree­ment with Es­sen­tial Con­sul­tants short­ly af­ter the elec­tion of Pres­i­dent Trump fo­cused on US health­care pol­i­cy mat­ters. The terms were con­sis­tent with the mar­ket. The agree­ment ex­pired in Feb­ru­ary 2018.

As al­ready stat­ed, the en­gage­ment of Es­sen­tial Con­sul­tants pre­dat­ed Vas Narasimhan be­com­ing No­var­tis CEO. Dr. Narasimhan had no in­volve­ment what­so­ev­er with this arrange­ment.

No­var­tis was con­tact­ed in No­vem­ber 2017 by lawyers from the Spe­cial Coun­sel’s of­fice re­gard­ing the com­pa­ny’s agree­ment with Es­sen­tial Con­sul­tants. No­var­tis co­op­er­at­ed ful­ly with the Spe­cial Coun­sel’s of­fice and pro­vid­ed all the in­for­ma­tion re­quest­ed. No­var­tis con­sid­ers this mat­ter closed as to it­self and is not aware of any out­stand­ing ques­tions re­gard­ing the agree­ment.

Vas Narasimhan may have been still the in­com­ing CEO at No­var­tis at that point in late Jan­u­ary, but he had di­rect­ed the de­vel­op­ment ef­fort at the phar­ma gi­ant for sev­er­al years and had been tapped for the CEO’s job months be­fore his meet­ing with Trump, along with a large group of ex­ec­u­tives. He took the CEO job at the be­gin­ning of Feb­ru­ary as CEO Joe Jimenez stepped down.

This al­so isn’t No­var­tis’ first in­volve­ment in a cor­rup­tion in­ves­ti­ga­tion. A lit­tle more than a month ago the com­pa­ny agreed to pay a fine of $25 mil­lion to the SEC af­ter com­pa­ny reps were ac­cused of of­fer­ing doc­tors in Chi­na lav­ish en­ter­tain­ment in ex­change for boost­ing the use of No­var­tis’ drugs.

No­var­tis and the phar­ma in­dus­try in gen­er­al have been step­ping up their pres­ence in Wash­ing­ton DC, in­ten­si­fy­ing lob­by­ing ef­forts as Trump and his top of­fi­cials in health­care fo­cus on a pledge to dra­mat­i­cal­ly low­er drug prices in the US. Trump is ex­pect­ed to give a speech on that very top­ic this Fri­day. I fol­lowed up with some more ques­tions for No­var­tis, but haven’t heard back.

Ave­nat­ti, mean­while, took to Twit­ter to call out all the com­pa­nies in­volved in con­tribut­ing to a “slush fund.”

https://twit­ter.com/MichaelAve­nat­ti/sta­tus/994156631440216069

Im­age: Michael Ave­nat­ti Shut­ter­stock

RWE chal­lenges for to­day's bio­phar­ma

The rapid development of technology — and the resulting avalanche of data — are catalysts for significant change in the biopharmaceutical industry. This translates into urgent pressures for today’s biopharma, including a need to quickly and affordably develop products with proven therapeutic efficacy and value. This urgency is expedited by the growth of value-based contracting, where access to reimbursement and profit depends on these abilities.

UP­DAT­ED: In a stun­ning turn­around, Bio­gen says that ad­u­canum­ab does work for Alzheimer's — but da­ta min­ing in­cites con­tro­ver­sy and ques­tions

Biogen has confounded the biotech world one more time.

In a stunning about-face, the company and its partners at Eisai say that a new analysis of a larger dataset on aducanumab has restored its faith in the drug as a game-changer for Alzheimer’s and, after talking it over with the FDA, they’ll now be filing for an approval of a drug that had been given up for dead.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 63,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As shares suf­fer from a lin­ger­ing slump, a bruised Alk­er­mes slash­es 160 jobs in R&D re­struc­tur­ing

With its share price in a deep slump after suffering through a regulatory debacle over their depression drug ALKS 5461, Alkermes CEO Richard Pops is taking the ax to its R&D organization in a restructuring aimed at cutting costs ahead of its next attempt at a rollout in a tough field.

Richard Pops, Endpoints via Youtube

Click on the image to see the full-sized version

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 63,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Acor­da's Ron Co­hen brings the ax back out as new drug sales on­ly trick­le in while cash cow is led to the slaugh­ter

With its new drug earning meager sums and its one-time cash cow reduced to a bony shadow of its former self, Acorda Therapeutics today is rolling out a new restructuring aimed at slashing the staff and cutting costs to get through the hard times ahead.

The biotech is chopping a quarter of its staff today, carving back R&D as well as SG&A expenses. And CEO Ron Cohen is cutting deep.

Under the new austerity budget, Acorda’s R&D expenses for the full year 2019 are expected to be $55 – $60 million, reduced from $70 – $80 million. SG&A expenses for the full year 2019 are expected to be $185 – $190 million, reduced from $200 – $210 million. R&D expenses for the full year 2020 are expected to be $20 – $25 million and SG&A
expenses for the full year 2020 are expected to be $160 – $165 million.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 63,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

RAPT Ther­a­peu­tics re­turns to Wall Street to re­vive IPO bid

On May 24, FLX Bio, a small cancer and inflammation biotech with backing from GV, changed its name to RAPT Therapeutics and filed confidentially for an IPO. On July 5th, they filed to raise up to $86 million. On July 22, they announced the IPO with a $75 million goal.  And on August 1, they abruptly and without explanation called it all off.

Now, without explanation, they’re reviving the bid, filing again for a $75 million IPO, this time with a new bookrunner and a new drug candidate in the clinic. The terms will be the same: 5 million shares at $14-$16 per share. It would give them a diluted market value of $351 million.

EY vet set to re­place re­tir­ing Am­gen CFO Meline

Ahead of its third-quarter results next week, Amgen on Tuesday disclosed the planned retirement of David Meline, who has served as the company’s chief financial officer since 2014.

Meline will be replaced by Ernst & Young vet, Peter Griffith, as CFO come January 1, 2020 — but until then Griffith will serve as executive vice president, finance.

“Over the last 5 years at Amgen, Meline instituted many major changes that led to operational efficiencies and margin expansion while successfully returning cash to shareholders. Now that Amgen is on solid footing, it was a good time to step away,” Cowen’s Yaron Werber wrote in a note. “We do not anticipate any major changes to strategy or operations immediately due to this transition as Amgen is on solid footing.”

Eli Lil­ly’s USA, di­a­betes chief En­rique Con­ter­no is head­ing out af­ter 27 years, and he’s be­ing re­placed by a com­pa­ny in­sid­er

Close to 3 years after Eli Lilly CEO Dave Ricks added the title of president of the US operations to Enrique Conterno’s resume, which included his helmsmanship of the diabetes franchise, the Peruvian born exec is set to retire after a 27-year run at the pharma giant.

Lilly put out the news just as it was posting Q3 results, with a mix of upbeat and downbeat results in the latest set of numbers from Lilly.
Conterno — a grizzled, deeply experienced and sometimes gruff veteran of the pharma world — was a high-profile figure at Lilly, stepping up to expanded duties as the company was forced to deal with intense pricing pressure on the diabetes side of the business. He had replaced outgoing US president Alex Azar, who later popped up as head of Health and Human Services in the Trump administration.
As head of the diabetes unit, Conterno had to deal with an extraordinarily competitive field as payers demanded bigger discounts. Trulicity’s success helped generate new revenue for the company, but Q3’s miss on revenue had a lot to do with the need for discounting the drug ahead of Novo Nordisk’s rival therapy, Rybelsus, which was priced on the wholesale level at an almost identical rate.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 63,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

No­var­tis hands off $80M in cash to part­ner up with a top biotech play­er in the fi­bro­sis sec­tor

Never underestimate the power of a good showing at a scientific conference.
In a presentation late last year, the researchers at Pliant Therapeutics launched a series of discussions about the preclinical data they were pulling together around their work on their small-molecule integrin inhibitor aimed at transforming growth factor beta, or TGF-β, a key pathway involved in fibrosis.
And they got some serious attention for the work.
“We got interest from pharma partners and at the end Novartis basically made it,” says Pliant CEO Bernard Coulie.

Is there a recipe for M&A suc­cess? The best and worst buy­out deals in the past decade of­fer some keys to suc­cess — and fail­ure

It’s not easy achieving a solid win in M&A in this industry. But if you follow a few simple guidelines, you may be able to increase your odds of success.
Geoffrey Porges and the team at SVB Leerink went about the “notoriously difficult” task of scoring the biopharma buyout of 2009 to 2019. Sizing up current and expected revenue from the products that were gained, they came up with the 5 winners:
Merck/Schering Plough
Bristol/Medarex
Gilead/Pharmasset
Sanofi/Genzyme
AstraZeneca/Acerta
It says a lot about the field that it’s much easier sorting out the 5 worst deals, though there’s also a lot more competition for that title, notes Porges. As picked by the analysts:
J&J/Actelion
Merck/Cubist
Alexion/Synageva
AbbVie/Stemcentrx
Gilead/Kite

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 63,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.