Te­va turns the last cor­ner in the CGRP mi­graine drug race with its 2nd round of promis­ing PhI­II da­ta

Te­va has brought in its sec­ond suc­cess­ful Phase III study of its CGRP mi­graine drug fre­manezum­ab (TEV-48125), rack­ing up a fresh slate of promis­ing da­ta across all end­points that will soon be pack­aged and de­liv­ered in­to the hands of reg­u­la­tors.

Te­va re­cruit­ed a heav­i­ly af­flict­ed group of pa­tients for this episod­ic study with a mean num­ber of 9.1 mi­graine days per month go­ing in. Their $TE­VA core da­ta boils down to this: a 1.5-day ad­van­tage in re­duced mi­graine days for the drug arm, putting it in the mix of around 2 days im­prove­ment across a full slate of CGRP ri­vals test­ed in a wide va­ri­ety of mid- and late-stage stud­ies.

Umer Raf­fat at Ever­cor­eISI has been fol­low­ing the num­bers, and high­light­ed this point:

(I)n to­day’s da­ta, there is an­oth­er impt tid­bit:  Te­va prospec­tive­ly ran­dom­ized a sub­group of pa­tients in this episod­ic tri­al on sta­ble pro­phy meds … and in this sub­group, Te­va showed a 1.7-2 day stat sig mi­graine day re­duc­tion (both for quar­ter­ly and month­ly dos­es).  This may al­so help from la­bel­ing per­spec­tive.

Raf­fat de­clined to com­pare these new num­bers for episod­ic mi­graine with Am­gen or Lil­ly, not­ing the dif­fer­ence in tri­al length that makes it im­pos­si­ble to line up the stats.

The de­tails:

Fre­manezum­ab giv­en month­ly im­proved the av­er­age num­ber of mi­graine days, rel­a­tive to base­line, by 41.6% for the du­ra­tion of the tri­al (-3.7 days vs. -2.2 days for place­bo, p < 0.0001). Num­ber of days with dis­abil­i­ty were de­creased by 64.7% (p =0.0021) and med­ica­tion con­sump­tion was de­creased by 39.0%( p < 0.0001). The quar­ter­ly SC dose, which was unique­ly test­ed in this pro­gram, al­so yield­ed high­ly sig­nif­i­cant re­sults for de­crease in mi­graine days (-3.4 days or 37.0%, p < 0.0001) and for all oth­er com­par­isons. Al­so unique to this de­vel­op­ment, both dose reg­i­mens high­ly sig­nif­i­cant­ly im­proved mi­graine in sub­jects on sta­ble dos­es of oth­er pro­phy­lac­tic med­ica­tions (-4.0 days for month­ly dose vs -2.0 days for place­bo, p = 0.001; -3.7 days for quar­ter­ly dose, p = 0.006).

It all looks good enough for an ap­proval, with de­cent odds that this drug will ap­pear on the mar­ket along­side a slate of ri­vals next year. Te­va, though, is hop­ing that its month­ly and quar­ter­ly dos­ing reg­i­mens will help dif­fer­en­ti­ate it from the com­pe­ti­tion to come.

Michael Hay­den, Te­va

“Te­va’s HA­LO tri­als are the on­ly Phase III an­ti-CGRP stud­ies to demon­strate ef­fi­ca­cy with both month­ly and quar­ter­ly dos­ing for chron­ic and episod­ic pa­tients and in pa­tients al­ready re­ceiv­ing pre­ven­tion ther­a­pies. This is a ma­jor ad­vance on ex­ist­ing da­ta. The ef­fi­ca­cy and rapid on­set, as both add-on and monother­a­py, quar­ter­ly dos­ing, and ef­fect on dis­abil­i­ty and qual­i­ty of life in­di­cate that this ther­a­py has the po­ten­tial to set new and dif­fer­ent bench­marks in the re­lief of mi­graine suf­fer­ing,” said Te­va R&D chief Michael Hay­den in a state­ment. “We are im­mense­ly proud to be able to bring to the mi­graine com­mu­ni­ty the hope that they might soon have a new op­tion that could pro­vide a mean­ing­ful re­duc­tion in the mi­graine bur­den pa­tients ha­bit­u­al­ly suf­fer.”

A few weeks ago it was Eli Lil­ly’s $LLY turn to cel­e­brate its Phase III re­sults for gal­canezum­ab, with a con­sis­tent 2-day re­duc­tion in month­ly mi­graines. Lit­tle Alder $AL­DR is al­so plan­ning to wage a com­mer­cial war with their drug. And Al­ler­gan $AGN has a late-stage pro­gram un­der­way for an oral CGRP ther­a­py it in-li­censed from Mer­ck in 2015 with a $250 mil­lion up­front. No­var­tis $NVS and Am­gen $AMGN — cred­it­ed as the fron­trun­ners in the race to the first OK — were the first to come up with pos­i­tive Phase III da­ta for erenum­ab (AMG 334) last fall, when a 70 mg dose scored an av­er­age 1.1 day per month drop in mi­graine episodes.

Martin Shkreli [via Getty]

Pris­on­er #87850-053 does not get to add drug de­vel­op­er to his list of cred­its

Just days after Retrophin shed its last ties to founder Martin Shkreli, the biotech is reporting that the lead drug he co-invented flopped in a pivotal trial. Fosmetpantotenate flunked both the primary and key secondary endpoints in a placebo-controlled trial for a rare disease called pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, or PKAN.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

We­bi­nar: Re­al World End­points — the brave new world com­ing in build­ing fran­chise ther­a­pies

Several biopharma companies have been working on expanding drug labels through the use of real world endpoints, combing through the data to find evidence of a drug’s efficacy for particular indications. But we’ve just begun. Real World Evidence is becoming an important part of every clinical development plan, in the soup-through-nuts approach used in building franchises.

I’ve recruited a panel of 3 top experts in the field — the first in a series of premium webinars — to look at the practical realities governing what can be done today, and where this is headed over the next few years, at the prodding of the FDA.

ZHEN SU — Merck Serono’s Senior Vice President and Global Head of Oncology
ELLIOTT LEVY — Amgen’s Senior Vice President of Global Development
CHRIS BOSHOFF — Pfizer Oncology’s Chief Development Officer

A premium subscription to Endpoints News is required to attend this webinar. Please upgrade to either an Insider or Enterprise plan for access. Already have Endpoints Premium? Please sign-in below. You can contact our Subscriptions team at help@endpointsnews.com with any issues.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hal Barron. GSK

GSK's Hal Bar­ron her­alds their sec­ond pos­i­tive piv­otal for cru­cial an­ti-BC­MA ther­a­py, point­ing to a push for quick OKs in a crowd­ed field

Hal Barron has his second positive round of Phase III data in hand for his anti-BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916). And GSK’s research chief says the data paves the way for their drive in search of an FDA approval for treating multiple myeloma.

It’s hard to overestimate the importance of this drug for GSK, a cornerstone of Barron’s campaign to make a dramatic impact on the oncology market and provide some long-lost excitement for the pharma giant’s pipeline. They’re putting this BCMA program at the front of that charge — looking to lead a host of rivals all aimed at the same target.

We don’t know what the data are yet, but DREAMM-2 falls on the heels of a promising set of data delivered 5 months ago for DREAMM-1. There investigators noted that complete responses among treatment-resistant patients rose to 15% in the extra year’s worth of data to look over, with a median progression-free survival rate of 12 months, up from 7.9 months reported earlier. The median duration of response was 14.3 months.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: An em­bold­ened As­traZeneca splurges $95M on a pri­or­i­ty re­view vouch­er. Where do they need the FDA to hus­tle up?

AstraZeneca is in a hurry.

We learned this morning that the pharma giant — not known as a big spender, until recently — forked over $95 million to get its hands on a priority review voucher from Sobi, otherwise known as Swedish Orphan Biovitrum.

That marks another step down on price for a PRV, which allows the holder to slash 4 months off of any FDA review time.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bob Smith, Pfizer

Pfiz­er is mak­ing a $500M state­ment to­day: Here’s how you be­come a lead play­er in the boom­ing gene ther­a­py sec­tor

Three years ago, Pfizer anted up $150 million in cash to buy Bamboo Therapeutics in Chapel Hill, NC as it cautiously stuck a toe in the small gene therapy pool of research and development.

Company execs followed up a year later with a $100 million expansion of the manufacturing operations they picked up in that deal for the UNC spinout, which came with $495 million in milestones.

And now they’re really going for it.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Video: Putting the AI in R&D — with Badhri Srini­vasan, Tony Wood, Rosana Kapeller, Hugo Ceule­mans, Saurabh Sa­ha and Shoibal Dat­ta

During BIO this year, I had a chance to moderate a panel among some of the top tech experts in biopharma on their real-world use of artificial intelligence in R&D. There’s been a lot said about the potential of AI, but I wanted to explore more about what some of the larger players are actually doing with this technology today, and how they see it advancing in the future. It was a fascinating exchange, which you can see here. The transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity. — John Carroll

As­traZeneca’s Imfinzi/treme com­bo strikes out — again — in lung can­cer. Is it time for last rites?

AstraZeneca bet big on the future of their PD-L1 Imfinzi combined with the experimental CTLA-4 drug tremelimumab. But once again it’s gone down to defeat in a major Phase III study — while adding damage to the theory involving targeting cancer with a high tumor mutational burden.

Early Wednesday the pharma giant announced that their NEPTUNE study had failed, with the combination unable to beat standard chemo at overall survival in high TMB cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We won’t get hard data until later in the year, but the drumbeat of failures will call into question what — if any — future this combination can have left.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 58,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Why would Am­gen want to buy Alex­ion? An­a­lysts call hot­ly ru­mored takeover un­like­ly, but seize the mo­ment

A rumor that Amgen is closing in on buyout deal for Alexion has sparked a guessing game on just what kind of M&A strategy Amgen is pursuing and how much Alexion is worth.

Mizuho analyst Salim Syed first lent credence to the report out of the Spanish news outlet Intereconomía, which said Amgen is bidding as much as $200 per share. While the source may be questionable, “the concept of this happening doesn’t sound too crazy to me,” he wrote.