The list of the top 10 most ex­pen­sive drugs on the plan­et will soon have a new open­ing

The world’s most ex­pen­sive drug — and first gene ther­a­py — will soon be­come ex­tinct.

UniQure an­nounced this morn­ing that it has de­cid­ed not to seek the reau­tho­riza­tion au­thor­i­ty that would have been re­quired to keep this drug on the mar­ket past Oc­to­ber. But af­ter by­pass­ing the FDA as a lost cause and see­ing on­ly one re­port­ed use of the gene ther­a­py in Eu­rope, which pro­vid­ed a con­di­tion­al ap­proval, the com­pa­ny would pre­fer to stick with its new­ly re­fo­cused pipeline plan.

Matthew Ka­pus­ta

Matthew Ka­pus­ta, chief ex­ec­u­tive of­fi­cer of uniQure, said:

“Gly­bera’s us­age has been ex­treme­ly lim­it­ed and we do not en­vi­sion pa­tient de­mand in­creas­ing ma­te­ri­al­ly in the years ahead.”

MIT Tech­nol­o­gy Re­view re­vealed last year that the drug was be­ing kept on the shelf, as pay­ers re­quired a mas­sive ef­fort to get an ap­proval for use and ques­tions lin­gered about its longterm ef­fi­ca­cy.

list of the world’s most ex­pen­sive drugs re­cent­ly ap­peared, from Rein­sur­ance Group of Amer­i­ca, and we thought that this would be a good time to show you how, and why, a swelling group of pricey or­phan ther­a­pies has been hit­ting the mar­ket.

In a re­cent in­ves­ti­ga­tion, Kaiser Health News con­clud­ed that the law on or­phan drugs — which of­fers a num­ber of in­cen­tives, in­clud­ing sev­en years of mar­ket­ing ex­clu­siv­i­ty — had in­spired a long list of pricey new ther­a­pies. Here are the most ex­pen­sive ones, ac­cord­ing to an­nu­al list prices. There are undis­closed dis­counts avail­able.

1. Gly­bera – $1,210,000

Com­pa­ny: uniQure
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease — EU on­ly
(ali­po­gene tipar­vovec)

The world’s first gene ther­a­py is the prici­est — and al­so one of the least used — ap­proved drug on the plan­et. OK’d on­ly in Eu­rope for lipopro­tein li­pase de­fi­cien­cy, pay­ers don’t want to cov­er this one. UniQure has had to re­struc­ture the com­pa­ny in re­cent months, tai­lor­ing R&D to fo­cus on the com­pet­i­tive he­mo­phil­ia B area, Parkin­son’s and a col­lab­o­ra­tion with Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb.

2. Rav­ic­ti — $793,632

Com­pa­ny: Hori­zon Phar­ma
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(glyc­erol phenyl­bu­tyrate)

Ap­proved ini­tial­ly for Hy­pe­r­i­on in 2013 as a treat­ment for urea cy­cle dis­or­ders, Hori­zon saw the po­ten­tial and ac­quired the com­pa­ny for about $1.1 bil­lion, boost­ing its port­fo­lio of rare dis­ease drugs.

3. Lu­mizyme — $626,400

Com­pa­ny: Sanofi – Gen­zyme
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(al­glu­cosi­dase al­fa)

This drug for Pompe’s dis­ease helped make the rare dis­ease field pop­u­lar in bio­phar­ma. Ap­proved in 2010, Sanofi liked the pro­file at Gen­zyme and bought out the com­pa­ny for about $20 bil­lion a year lat­er. The FDA hand­ed out their or­phan drug des­ig­na­tion for this drug in 1997.

4. Carbaglu — $585,408

Com­pa­ny: Recor­dati
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(car­g­lu­mic acid)

This drug treats rare cas­es of N-acetyl­glu­ta­mate syn­thase de­fi­cien­cy. Al­so ap­proved in 2010, there are on­ly a hand­ful of cas­es of NAGs dis­ease every year. The con­di­tion is char­ac­ter­ized by hy­per­am­mone­mia, en­cephalopa­thy, and res­pi­ra­to­ry al­ka­lo­sis and has fre­quent­ly led to the swift deaths of new­borns.

5. Ac­tim­mune — $572,292

Com­pa­ny: Hori­zon
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(In­ter­fer­on gam­ma 1-b)

Ap­proved for se­vere, ma­lig­nant os­teopet­ro­sis and chron­ic gran­u­lo­ma­tous dis­ease, rare ge­net­ic dis­eases, Ac­tim­mune not­ed last last year that the drug failed a Phase III for Friedre­ich’s atax­ia. Hori­zon ob­tained a sep­a­rate or­phan drug des­ig­na­tion for the drug when it de­cid­ed to mount the study.

6. Soliris — $542,640

Com­pa­ny: Alex­ion
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­eases – or­phan drug
(eculizum­ab)

This is the drug that built Alex­ion, and its suc­cess has helped in­spire some new ri­vals to see if they can do it one bet­ter in parox­ys­mal noc­tur­nal he­mo­glo­bin­uria and atyp­i­cal he­molyt­ic ure­mic syn­drome. It’s al­so un­der re­view now for re­frac­to­ry gen­er­al­ized myas­the­nia gravis, which earned the com­pa­ny an­oth­er or­phan drug des­ig­na­tion.

7. Al­pro­lix — $503,880

Com­pa­ny: Biover­a­tiv
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(Co­ag­u­la­tion Fac­tor IX [Re­com­bi­nant], Fc Fu­sion Pro­tein)

This long-act­ing he­mo­phil­ia B med­i­cine was re­cent­ly spun out — along with Eolctate — from Bio­gen and So­bi in­to Biover­a­tiv, which start­ed out life with hun­dreds of mil­lions in cash and plans to build a rare dis­ease drug pipeline. Plen­ty of new drugs are in the works now that could rev­o­lu­tion­ize this field.

8. Idelvion — $500,000

Com­pa­ny: CSL Behring
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease — or­phan drug
(al­butrepenonacog al­fa)

Ap­proved last year at the FDA, Idelvion is an­oth­er long-act­ing he­mo­phil­ia B drug that is the first in its class to in­clude the blood pro­tein al­bu­min. The drug is de­signed to re­place Fac­tor IX, a nat­u­ral­ly oc­cur­ring clot­ting fac­tor miss­ing in he­mo­phil­ia B pa­tients.

9. Naglazyme — $485,747

Com­pa­ny: Bio­marin
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(gal­sul­fase)

Naglazyme was orig­i­nal­ly ap­proved back in 2005 for mu­copolysac­cha­ri­do­sis type VI (MPS VI). On­ly a few dozen pa­tients are pre­scribed this en­zyme re­place­ment drug in the US every year.

10. Folo­tyn — $450,540

Com­pa­ny: Spec­trum Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals
Cat­e­go­ry: Rare dis­ease – or­phan drug
(prala­trex­ate)

This drug first be­gan at­tract­ing at­ten­tion for its price back in 2099, when it was priced at $30,000 a month af­ter be­ing ap­proved to treat rare cas­es of pe­riph­er­al T-cell lym­phoma. Al­los, which de­vel­oped the drug, de­fend­ed the price as in line with oth­er drugs for rare can­cers. Spec­trum bought out Al­los in 2012.

Has the mo­ment fi­nal­ly ar­rived for val­ue-based health­care?

RBC Capital Markets’ Healthcare Technology Analyst, Sean Dodge, spotlights a new breed of tech-enabled providers who are rapidly transforming the way clinicians deliver healthcare, and explores the key question: can this accelerating revolution overturn the US healthcare system?

Key points

Tech-enabled healthcare providers are poised to help the US transition to value, not volume, as the basis for reward.
The move to value-based care has policy momentum, but is risky and complex for clinicians.
Outsourced tech specialists are emerging to provide the required expertise, while healthcare and tech are also converging through M&A.
Value-based care remains in its early stages, but the transition is accelerating and represents a huge addressable market.

Lat­est on ul­tra-rare dis­ease ap­proval; Pos­i­tive, if mixed, signs for Bio­gen's ALS drug; Clay Sie­gall finds a new job; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

Over the last four years, we’ve honored 80 women whose extraordinary accomplishments have changed the game in biopharma R&D. You can now nominate someone to be highlighted in this year’s special report. Details are here.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 163,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA ad­vi­sors unan­i­mous­ly rec­om­mend ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval for Bio­gen's ALS drug

A panel of outside advisors to the FDA unanimously recommended that the agency grant accelerated approval to Biogen’s ALS drug tofersen despite the drug failing the primary goal of its Phase III study, an endorsement that could pave a path forward for the treatment.

By a 9-0 vote, members of the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee said there was sufficient evidence that tofersen’s effect on a certain protein associated with ALS is reasonably likely to predict a benefit for patients. But panelists stopped short of advocating for a full approval, voting 3-5 against (with one abstention) and largely citing the failed pivotal study.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 163,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA spells out how can­cer drug de­vel­op­ers can use one tri­al for both ac­cel­er­at­ed and full ap­provals

The FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence has been a bright spot within the agency in terms of speeding new treatments to patients. That flexibility was on full display this morning as FDA released new draft guidance spelling out exactly how oncology drug developers can fulfill both the accelerated and full approval’s requirements with just a single randomized controlled trial.

While Congress recently passed legislation that will allow FDA to require confirmatory trials to be recruiting and ongoing prior to granting an accelerated approval, the agency is now making clear that the initial trial used to win the AA, if designed appropriately, can also serve as the trial for converting the accelerated approval into a full approval.

Clay Siegall, Morphimmune CEO

Up­dat­ed: Ex-Seagen chief Clay Sie­gall emerges as CEO of pri­vate biotech

Clay Siegall will be back in the CEO seat, taking the helm of a private startup working on targeted cancer therapies.

It’s been almost a year since Siegall resigned from Seagen, the biotech he co-founded and led for more than 20 years, in the wake of domestic violence allegations by his then-wife. His eventual successor, David Epstein, sold the company to Pfizer in a $43 billion deal unveiled last week.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 163,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Eu­ro­pean doc­tors di­al up dig­i­tal com­mu­ni­ca­tion with phar­mas, but still lean to­ward in-per­son med meet­ings, study finds

As in-person sales rep access declines in the big five European countries, a corresponding uptick in virtual rep access is happening. It’s not surprising, but it does run counter to pharma companies’ assessment – along with long-held sales rep sway in Europe – that in-person access hadn’t changed.

CMI Media Group and Medscape’s recent study reports that 75% of physicians in the EU5 countries of Spain, Germany, Italy, France and the UK already limit engagements with pharma sales reps, and 25% of those surveyed plan to decrease time with reps.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 163,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Judge al­lows ex­pert tes­ti­mo­ny in GSK tri­al al­leg­ing Zan­tac link to can­cer

A California judge will allow a plaintiff in a state court case to introduce expert testimony connecting a potential carcinogen in former blockbuster medicine Zantac to cancer.

The order was handed down on Thursday from state judge Evelio Grillo, who is now allowing both parties to introduce expert testimony in an upcoming trial after what’s known as a Sargon hearing, where a judge determines the admissibility of expert witnesses and expert opinions.

No­vo Nordisk oral semaglu­tide tri­al shows re­duc­tion in blood sug­ar, plus weight loss

Novo Nordisk is testing higher levels of its oral version of its GLP-1, semaglutide, and its type 2 diabetes trial results released today show reductions in blood sugar as well as weight loss.

In the Phase IIIb trial, Novo compared its oral semaglutide in 25 mg and 50 mg doses with the 14 mg version that’s currently the maximum approved dose. The trial looked at how the doses compared when added to a stable dose of one to three oral antidiabetic medicines in people with type 2 diabetes who were in need of an intensified treatment.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 163,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ly­me vac­cine test com­ple­tion is pushed back by a year as Pfiz­er, Val­ne­va say they'll ad­just tri­al

Valneva and Pfizer have adjusted the end date for the Phase III study of their investigational Lyme disease vaccine, pushing it back by a year after issues at a contract researcher led to thousands of US patients being dropped from the test.

In a March 20 update to clinicaltrials.gov, Valneva and Pfizer moved the primary completion date on the trial, called VALOR, from the end of 2024 to the end of 2025.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.