Tom Lynch out­lines his come­back strat­e­gy for Bris­tol-My­ers’ bad­ly bruised R&D or­ga­ni­za­tion

Thomas Lynch

When Tom Lynch took the top R&D job at Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb, he got one of the best — and at the same time, one of the hard­est — jobs in biotech.

It was one of the best be­cause Bris­tol-My­ers built what is wide­ly con­sid­ered one of the most in­no­v­a­tive re­search groups for a bio­phar­ma of its size, in a heavy­weight class not known for home­made break­throughs. It was one of the hard­est be­cause the group had just de­railed, giv­ing up its first-place po­si­tion in im­muno-on­col­o­gy in a hard fall on a mis­guid­ed late-stage ef­fort on lung can­cer.

That’s how Lynch end­ed up with the job.

Dur­ing yes­ter­day’s Q1 call with an­a­lysts, Lynch — who made an un­usu­al move from the board to head of R&D — out­lined his strat­e­gy for what comes next. How can Bris­tol-My­ers re­trieve its lead po­si­tion?

As Lynch not­ed to a group that in­clud­ed some ex­pe­ri­enced skep­tics, his board­room po­si­tion gave him a bird’s eye view of the com­pa­ny’s op­er­a­tions. For a first in­ter­view with an­a­lysts, he pro­vid­ed an im­pres­sive, de­tailed strat­e­gy out­line, rec­og­niz­ing the weak­ness­es in Bris­tol-My­ers’ I/O ef­forts and of­fer­ing ways to deal with those weak­ness­es in the clin­ic.

Lynch’s game plan cen­ters on the com­pa­ny’s work on next-gen com­bos, look­ing to build on Op­di­vo (PD-1) and Yer­voy (CT­LA-4) — with all its faults — with new com­bos and less tox­ic al­ter­na­tives now in the clin­ic.

In Lynch’s words, here’s the strat­e­gy:

— (F)irst, ac­cel­er­at­ing the de­liv­ery of our next wave of I-O as­sets like IDO, which we re­cent­ly pre­sent­ed da­ta on at AACR. We’ll al­so be pre­sent­ing ear­ly re­sults for LAG-3, GITR, and the In­cyte IDO at AS­CO this year.

— Sec­ond, un­der­stand­ing the bi­ol­o­gy of I-O re­sis­tance, both in­trin­sic re­sis­tance and ac­quired, and bring­ing a laser-like fo­cus to over­com­ing this. We will fo­cus on ex­pand­ing in­to tu­mor types where I-O hasn’t had a broad im­pact yet, tu­mors like breast can­cer, col­orec­tal can­cer, and prostate can­cer. We will use our next-wave as­sets to cre­ate op­tions for pa­tients who progress on their ini­tial I-O ther­a­py.

— Third, we will con­tin­ue to de­vel­op com­bi­na­tion reg­i­mens, in­clud­ing I-O/I-O com­bi­na­tions, I-O/tar­get­ed com­bi­na­tions, and I-O/chemother­a­py com­bi­na­tions where these make sense.

— And fourth, we will ac­cel­er­ate the de­vel­op­ment of our most promis­ing as­sets in the car­dio­vas­cu­lar, im­muno-sci­ence, and fi­bro­sis pipeline. As [CEO] Gio­van­ni [Caforio] men­tioned, we re­cent­ly pre­sent­ed promis­ing Phase II da­ta on our FGF21 as­set in pa­tients with NASH at the In­ter­na­tion­al Liv­er Con­gress. The re­sults showed an im­prove­ment across mul­ti­ple as­pects of NASH, in­clud­ing a sig­nif­i­cant re­duc­tion in liv­er fat ver­sus place­bo.

He fol­lowed up by cit­ing an ex­pand­ed re­la­tion­ship with Cy­tomX to build a less tox­ic CT­LA-4, a move that could even­tu­al­ly have ma­jor im­pli­ca­tions for con­tenders like As­traZeneca, and all the big ri­vals cur­rent­ly in the mar­ket, from Mer­ck to Roche and Pfiz­er/Mer­ck KGaA. IDO com­bi­na­tions will play a role here as well.

Ge­off Meacham at Bar­clays ob­serves that it seems that the biggest op­por­tu­ni­ty is in “cold tu­mors, breast, ovar­i­an, colon, et cetera. To fol­low up on the ear­li­er com­ment, CT­LA-4 com­bos, do you guys feel, at this point, CT­LA-4 com­bos plus a PD-L1 is go­ing to be a com­po­nent of that?”

Lynch:

So we think we have mul­ti­ple op­por­tu­ni­ties to look at com­bi­na­tions of I-O/I-O agents in these cold tu­mors. We pre­sent­ed da­ta with our IDO as­set, as you men­tioned, and we al­so will be pre­sent­ing ini­tial da­ta at AS­CO this year with our GITR com­pound, which could be the type of agent that might play a role in the cold tu­mor space.

Tim An­der­son at Bern­stein al­so ze­roed in on grow­ing ques­tions about the fu­ture of PD-1, CT­LA-4 com­bos. “A bear’s point of view could say that this fore­tells prob­lems with Yer­voy and Op­di­vo, specif­i­cal­ly in front-line lung.”

Lynch:

I think the first is that again, just em­pha­siz­ing how com­plex and dif­fi­cult a dis­ease lung can­cer is to treat, it’s high­ly un­like­ly that there’s go­ing to be one ap­proach that’s go­ing to fit every pa­tient who presents in first-line. We be­lieve strong­ly that Yer­voy/Op­di­vo is cer­tain­ly one of the op­tions that needs to be pur­sued and de­vel­oped, and we’re look­ing at that in first-line lung can­cer. And we’re al­so look­ing at it in the set­ting of what ap­pro­pri­ate bio­mark­ers might be im­por­tant in eval­u­at­ing the po­ten­tial for this com­bi­na­tion and for re­al­ly all of our drugs in first-line lung can­cer.

Fi­nal­ly, on new R&D in­vest­ments:

“(W)e’ve got to ex­e­cute our pipeline. We’ve got to de­vel­op our next-gen­er­a­tion drugs. And to do that, we’re go­ing to need to in­vest in tu­mor bi­ol­o­gy and trans­la­tion­al med­i­cine as well as da­ta and an­a­lyt­ics.”

So there’s the plan. Tak­ing over at R&D now is like jump­ing on a rolling truck at Bris­tol-My­ers, which spent $5 bil­lion on re­search last year. You can grab the wheel, but then you have to man­age the mo­men­tum. That won’t be easy.

Susan Galbraith, AstraZeneca EVP, oncology R&D, at EUBIO22 (Rachel Kiki for Endpoints News)

Up­dat­ed: As­traZeneca jumps deep­er in­to cell ther­a­py 2.0 space with $320M biotech M&A

Right from the start, the execs at Neogene had some lofty goals in mind when they decided to try their hand at a cell therapy that could tackle solid tumors.

Its founders have helped hone a new approach that would pack in multiple neoantigen targets to create a personalized TCR treatment that would not just make the leap from blood to solid tumors, but do it with durability. And they managed to make their way rapidly to the clinic, unveiling their first Phase I program for advanced tumors just last May.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Ei­sai’s ex­pand­ed Alzheimer’s da­ta leave open ques­tions about safe­ty and clin­i­cal ben­e­fit

Researchers still have key questions about Eisai’s investigational Alzheimer’s drug lecanemab following the publication of more Phase III data in the New England Journal of Medicine Tuesday night.

In the paper, which was released in conjunction with presentations at an Alzheimer’s conference, trial investigators write that a definition of clinical meaningfulness “has not been established.” And the relative lack of new information, following topline data unveiled in September, left experts asking for more — setting up a potential showdown to precisely define how big a difference the drug makes in patients’ lives.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Catal­ent to cut about 200 jobs in Mary­land and Texas

Contract manufacturing company Catalent is cutting about 200 jobs in Maryland and Texas, according to WARN notices, trimming back some of its pandemic-era expansion.

The company will cut 77 jobs by Jan. 15 of next year at a cell therapy facility in Webster, TX, just outside of Houston. In Maryland, the company is reducing staff at two locations, with 82 jobs being eliminated at Catalent’s facility in Gaithersburg, and 53 in Rockville. The layoffs go into effect at those locations on Jan. 14.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

iECURE CEO Joe Truitt and founder Jim Wilson

Jim Wil­son biotech iECURE gets fresh $65M to push pe­di­atric liv­er dis­ease gene ther­a­py in­to the clin­ic

Jim Wilson-founded biotech iECURE has wrapped a $65M Series A extension round to get its lead candidate — a gene replacement therapy for a rare inherited liver disease known as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, or OTC — into the clinic.

This round was co-led by Novo Holdings and LYFE Capital, followed by initial investors Versant and OrbiMed as well. In September 2021, iECURE raised a $50 million Series A led by the latter two. The new cash infusion will get iECURE through an initial in-human trial, which CEO Joe Truitt told Endpoints News iECURE hopes to read out in 2024.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Illustration: Assistant Editor Kathy Wong for Endpoints News

Twit­ter dis­ar­ray con­tin­ues as phar­ma ad­ver­tis­ers ex­tend paus­es and look around for op­tions, but keep tweet­ing

Pharma advertisers on Twitter are done — at least for now. Ad spending among the previous top spenders flattened even further last week, according to the latest data from ad tracker Pathmatics, amid ongoing turmoil after billionaire boss Elon Musk’s takeover now one month ago.

Among 18 top advertisers tracked for Endpoints News, only two are spending: GSK and Bayer. GSK spending for the full week through Sunday was minimal at just under $1,900. Meanwhile, German drugmaker Bayer remains the industry outlier upping its spending to $499,000 last week from $480,000 the previous week. Bayer’s spending also marks a big increase from a month ago and before the Musk takeover, when it spent $16,000 per week.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Vi­a­tris with­draws ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval for top­i­cal an­timi­cro­bial 24 years lat­er

After 24 years without confirming clinical benefit, the FDA announced Tuesday morning that Viatris (formed via Mylan and Pfizer’s Upjohn) has decided to withdraw a topical antimicrobial agent, Sulfamylon (mafenide acetate), after the company said conducting a confirmatory study was not feasible.

Sulfamylon first won FDA’s accelerated nod in 1998 as a topical burn treatment, with the FDA noting that last December, Mylan told the agency that it wasn’t running the trial.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sana, Codex­is lay off staff, reshuf­fle pipeline in bid to fo­cus cell ther­a­py, en­zyme en­gi­neer­ing work

As its market cap shrinks to a fraction of its heyday, flashy cell therapy startup Sana Biotechnology is laying off 15% of its staffers in a move to rejig the pipeline and restructure the company.

Sana is among a growing group of biotechs that, feeling the weight of a broader market downturn and seeing their shares tumble steadily, are tightening the purse strings and adjusting their focus. Also on Tuesday, Codexis, an enzyme engineering company based in California and now helmed by former Sierra Oncology CEO Stephen Dilly, announced it will reduce the workforce by 18%.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

John Carroll with David Chang, Allogene CEO (Credit: Jeff Rumans Photography)

Al­lo­gene takes the stage in New York to go deep on its off-the-shelf cell ther­a­pies — de­clar­ing a first for sol­id tu­mors

NEW YORK — In most cases, a biotech like Allogene would wait until the next big science conference to offer its latest series of snapshots of its data. But most biotechs aren’t like Allogene, where the veteran leaders from Kite garnered a substantial number of kudos over the years for their in-depth reviews of the company’s progress.

So on Tuesday, the leaders at Allogene converged on Manhattan once again to give a detailed breakdown of their latest steps forward, looking to stay out front in the busy off-the-shelf cell therapy arena, keep a clean bill of health on the safety front and prove that they can not only match the autologous pioneers they helped create but make the all-important leap into solid tumors. It’s another step forward in a journey that has a long way to go before even the first big regulatory finish lines appear on the track. But for CEO David Chang, who spent some time with me running through the data ahead of the Tuesday session, it all amounts to forward momentum toward the desired goal.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

UK reg­u­la­tor warns of se­vere eye re­ac­tions fol­low­ing use of Sanofi and Re­gen­eron's Dupix­ent

The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) on Tuesday warned of some new and serious eye-related side effects following the use of Sanofi and Regeneron’s atopic dermatitis and asthma treatment Dupixent (dupilumab).

While Dupixent is already associated with cases of conjunctivitis and allergic conjunctivitis, dry eye and with infrequent cases of keratitis and ulcerative keratitis, the MHRA is calling on health professionals to be on the lookout for any of these eye-related side effects as “it is not currently possible to predict who may experience the rarer and most severe ocular adverse reactions, such as ulcerative keratitis.”