Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn [Images: AP Images, Illustration: Endpoints News]

UK's John­son, Cor­byn bick­er over US trade and Ver­tex deal

John Bercow

As an­oth­er UK elec­tion beck­ons, prime min­is­ter Boris John­son and op­po­si­tion leader Je­re­my Cor­byn en­gaged in yet an­oth­er dust­up about the state of the Na­tion­al Health Ser­vice (NHS) in the last round of Prime Min­is­ter’s Ques­tions presided by leg­endary out­go­ing speak­er John Bercow.

Cor­byn ac­cused John­son and his gov­ern­ment of con­duct­ing ‘se­cret meet­ings’ with US phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal ex­ec­u­tives as part of a post-Brex­it trade deal, cit­ing re­ports in­clud­ing Chan­nel 4 dis­patch­es that re­port­ed on Tues­day that the price the NHS pays for US med­i­cines could soar un­der a fu­ture trade deal.

As is cus­tom, the two lead­ers blamed the op­po­site par­ty of in­ept NHS man­age­ment and poor re­source al­lo­ca­tion to the health ser­vice dur­ing the week­ly ses­sion at the House of Com­mons. But a po­ten­tial trade deal be­tween the “spe­cial friends” was on the top of Cor­byn’s agen­da.

“This gov­ern­ment is prepar­ing to sell out the NHS, our health ser­vice is in more dan­ger than at any oth­er time in its glo­ri­ous his­to­ry be­cause of…the trade deals he wants to strike,” a vis­i­bly per­turbed Cor­byn as­sert­ed in an ex­change with John­son.

John­son re­it­er­at­ed that the NHS is “not on the ta­ble” in trade dis­cus­sions with the Unit­ed States.

“We have learned this week, that gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials have met US phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies five times as part of the PM’s planned trade deal,” Cor­byn ar­gued. “The US has asked for full mar­ket ac­cess to our NHS, which would mean the prices of some of the most im­por­tant med­i­cines will in­crease by up to sev­en-fold.”

John­son re­tal­i­at­ed by sug­gest­ing that it was im­per­a­tive that the UK ne­go­ti­ates with the US phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies, cit­ing the ex­am­ple of the re­cent Ver­tex Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals’ $VRTX deal for cys­tic fi­bro­sis med­i­cines.

Af­ter four years of pro­tract­ed ne­go­ti­a­tions, Ver­tex last week fi­nal­ly clinched a deal with au­thor­i­ties in Eng­land to cov­er the use of its cys­tic fi­bro­sis drugs, Orkam­bi and Symke­vi, for the el­i­gi­ble 5,000 CF pa­tients in Eng­land.

Each drug car­ries a list price of more than £100,000 per pa­tient per year — the terms of the deal were not di­vulged. Drug­mak­ers typ­i­cal­ly ne­go­ti­ate prices with EU coun­tries on a case by case ba­sis af­ter a drug has se­cured ap­proval from the EMA, but do not typ­i­cal­ly spell out the nuts and bolts of each agree­ment.

“The shame is we are not told what the deal is with the com­pa­ny con­cerned,” Cor­byn said, re­fer­ring to Ver­tex.

“The SNP (Scot­tish Na­tion­al Par­ty) gov­ern­ment ne­go­ti­at­ed a much high­er price for Orkam­bi in Scot­land, it oc­curs to me,” John­son shot back. “They did, they got the price to­tal­ly wrong — he should have a word with them.”

Scot­land an­nounced its deal with Ver­tex in Sep­tem­ber. De­tails of the agree­ment were not dis­closed.

“Re­call that Ver­tex has pre­vi­ous­ly of­fered the UK an an­nu­al cost of 104,000 pounds per year list price, and at the time, it was fram­ing its of­fer made to Eng­land (oth­er terms and any net-ad­just­ment from list were con­fi­den­tial) as the best deal it had of­fered any coun­try in the world,” Stifel’s Paul Mat­teis wrote in a note last week.

“(W)hile we can’t be cer­tain, we’d imag­ine that ac­tu­al the net price agreed up­on with Eng­land is some­thing ma­te­ri­al­ly be­low six fig­ures, per­haps in the £50-80k/year range — though again this can­did­ly is spec­u­la­tion.”

2019 Trin­i­ty Drug In­dex Eval­u­ates Ac­tu­al Com­mer­cial Per­for­mance of Nov­el Drugs Ap­proved in 2016

Fewer Approvals, but Neurology Rivals Oncology and Sees Major Innovations

This report, the fourth in our Trinity Drug Index series, outlines key themes and emerging trends in the industry as we progress towards a new world of targeted and innovative products. It provides a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of novel drugs approved by the FDA in 2016, scoring each on its commercial performance, therapeutic value, and R&D investment (Table 1: Drug ranking – Ratings on a 1-5 scale).

UP­DAT­ED: FDA’s golodirsen CRL: Sarep­ta’s Duchenne drugs are dan­ger­ous to pa­tients, of­fer­ing on­ly a small ben­e­fit. And where's that con­fir­ma­to­ry tri­al?

Back last summer, Sarepta CEO Doug Ingram told Duchenne MD families and investors that the FDA’s shock rejection of their second Duchenne MD drug golodirsen was due to some concerns regulators raised about the risk of infection and the possibility of kidney toxicity. But when pressed to release the letter for all to see, he declined, according to a report from BioPharmaDive, saying that kind of move “might not look like we’re being as respectful as we’d like to be.”

He went on to assure everyone that he hadn’t misrepresented the CRL.

But Ingram’s public remarks didn’t include everything in the letter, which — following the FDA’s surprise about-face and unexplained approval — has now been posted on the FDA’s website and broadly circulated on Twitter early Wednesday.

The CRL raises plenty of fresh questions about why the FDA abruptly decided to reverse itself and hand out an OK for a drug a senior regulator at the FDA believed — 5 months ago, when he wrote the letter — is dangerous to patients. It also puts the spotlight back on Sarepta $SRPT, which failed to launch a confirmatory study of eteplirsen, which was only approved after a heated internal controversy at the FDA. Ellis Unger, director of CDER’s Office of Drug Evaluation I, notes that study could have clarified quite a lot about the benefit and risks associated with their drugs — which can cost as much as a million dollars per patient per year, depending on weight.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

How to cap­i­talise on a lean launch

For start-up biotechnology companies and resource stretched pharmaceutical organisations, launching a novel product can be challenging. Lean teams can make setting a launch strategy and achieving your commercial goals seem like a colossal undertaking, but can these barriers be transformed into opportunities that work to your brand’s advantage?
We spoke to Managing Consultant Frances Hendry to find out how Blue Latitude Health partnered with a fledgling subsidiary of a pharmaceutical organisation to launch an innovative product in a
complex market.
What does the launch environment look like for this product?
FH: We started working on the product at Phase II and now we’re going into Phase III trials. There is a significant unmet need in this disease area, and everyone is excited about the launch. However, the organisation is still evolving and the team is quite small – naturally this causes a little turbulence.

Wuhan virus out­break trig­gers in­evitable small-biotech ral­ly

Every few years, a public health crisis (think Ebola, Zika) spurred by a rogue pathogen triggers a small-biotech rally, as drugmakers emerge from the woodwork with ambitious plans to treat the mounting outbreak. In most cases, that enthusiasm never quite delivers.

Things are no different, as the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China takes hold. There have been close to 300 confirmed human infections in China, and at least four deaths. Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses, which include MERS and SARS. On Tuesday, the CDC reported the virus was detected in a US traveler returning from Wuhan.

Hal Barron and Emma Walmsley, GSK

GSK’s ‘break­through’ BC­MA can­cer drug gets a pri­or­i­ty re­view — and a big win for the on­col­o­gy R&D team

After largely whiffing the past 2 years on the pharma R&D front, GlaxoSmithKline research chief Hal Barron has seized boasting rights to a key win that puts them back in the cancer drug development game.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Who are the young bio­phar­ma lead­ers shap­ing the in­dus­try? Nom­i­nate them for End­points' spe­cial re­port

Update: Nominations open through end of day, Monday, January 27

Two years ago, when we did our first Endpoints 20-under-40, we profiled a set of up-and-comers who promised to help reshape the industry as we know it. Now we’re back and once again looking for the top 20 biopharma professionals under the age of 40. We’ll be profiling folks who have accomplished a lot at a young age but seem on the verge of accomplishing so much more.

John Oyler, Endpoints

BeiGene lines up its first shot at crack­ing the megablock­buster PD-1 mar­ket for lung can­cer. But can they over­come un­der­dog sta­tus?

BeiGene took another big step towards challenging Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca and some other Big Pharma heavyweights for a share of the lucrative lung cancer market for the PD-(L)1s racking up billions in annual revenue.

The China-based biotech $BGNE run by CEO John Oyler posted positive top-line progression-free survival results for their pivotal Chinese study on their PD-1 antibody tislelizumab combined with chemo for squamous non-small cell lung cancer in frontline cases. Squamous NSCLC accounts for about 30% of the overall lung cancer market.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 70,300+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Brex­it fears, Wood­ford woes over­shad­owed UK biotech and cut 2019 fi­nanc­ing by al­most half

The venture tide might have subsided, the IPO window may be closing and certain listed biotechs may be having a tough time amid Neil Woodford’s well-publicized demised, but there’s still plenty to celebrate in the UK BioIndustry Association’s eyes.

Overall investment in UK biotech last year fell from the record-breaking £2.2 billion levels of 2018 to £1.3 billion — including £679 million in venture capital, a meager £64 million in IPOs plus £596 million when you add up all public financings, according to a new report from the BIA.

Blue­print Med­i­cines po­ten­tial­ly de­lays Ay­vak­it de­ci­sion; Con­trol beats treat­ment in mesothe­lioma tri­al

→ Blueprint Medicines filed an amendment to its application to get the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) drug Ayvakit approved in fourth-line GIST, the company disclosed in the prospectus for a new $325 million public offering.  Blueprint got a big accelerated OK on the drug this month in a particular mutation, but because the FDA decided to split their review in two, they didn’t hear on fourth-line GIST. They were supposed to hear before February 14, but this amendment could push that date back by 3 months. Blueprint wrote that the amendment is designed to allow the company to comply with the FDA’s request for data from the Phase III VOYAGER before they give a judgment.