What's com­ing? Paz­dur, Marks and Wood­cock dis­cuss FDA changes

Three of the FDA’s di­rec­tors — Richard Paz­dur, Pe­ter Marks and Janet Wood­cock — took the stage Wednes­day at Pre­vi­sion Pol­i­cy’s Bio­phar­ma Con­gress to dis­cuss all things FDA: from why the agency is viewed more pos­i­tive­ly now than in the past to what needs to hap­pen in each of their cen­ters.

CDER di­rec­tor Wood­cock said that the dif­fer­ence be­tween years past, when FDA was viewed neg­a­tive­ly, and now is that there has been a sort of sci­en­tif­ic rev­o­lu­tion, with bi­ol­o­gy be­ing har­nessed in nov­el ways and in­vest­ments at NIH pay­ing off.

Richard Paz­dur

On­col­o­gy Cen­ter of Ex­cel­lence di­rec­tor Paz­dur al­so not­ed the tremen­dous growth in un­der­stand­ing dis­eases and in the im­munol­o­gy of can­cer.

“One part of the piece in on­col­o­gy is that our staff has em­braced these changes,” he said, not­ing they’re “not just bean coun­ters for sur­vival da­ta” but have got­ten in­volved in the sci­ence of on­col­o­gy. The staff are part­ners in the process rather than just tick­ing box­es, he said.

And Marks, di­rec­tor of the Cen­ter for Bi­o­log­ics Eval­u­a­tion and Re­search, ex­plained how the idea of screen­ing li­braries of com­pounds has gone out the win­dow, while nowa­days it’s more about ra­tio­nal drug de­vel­op­ment – “and gene ther­a­py is the epit­o­me of that.”

On the top­ic of gene ther­a­py, Marks not­ed there are now 700 in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al new drug ap­pli­ca­tions be­fore FDA. But com­pare that with cell ther­a­pies, he said, not­ing a gray mar­ket of un­proven treat­ments, which in some cas­es are noth­ing bet­ter than bad­ly man­u­fac­tured snake-oil that don’t con­tain live cells. He al­so said the use of un­ap­proved stem cell ther­a­pies around the coun­try is a sur­ro­gate mark­er for how Right to Try may play out. FDA doesn’t usu­al­ly learn about what is go­ing on un­til some­thing re­al­ly bad hap­pens, Marks added.

On the prospects of what’s to come at FDA, Wood­cock not­ed the re­al-time re­view pi­lot in the On­col­o­gy Cen­ter of Ex­cel­lence, which re­views parts of a sub­mis­sion be­fore the en­tire ap­pli­ca­tion is sub­mit­ted, is “fore­shad­ow­ing some­thing big­ger.” But she al­so ex­plained how the speed of re­views does not re­al­ly in­flu­ence the re­sults, say­ing: “what has changed is the cost of these drugs, and it’s changed the de­bate be­cause of val­ue.”

Nowa­days and mov­ing in­to the fu­ture, there’s a so­ci­etal ben­e­fit and harm dis­cus­sion that im­plic­it­ly in­vokes “trade-offs in val­ue – that’s the new de­bate we’re hav­ing – too fast and too slow is re­al­ly not the is­sue.”

For Marks, the biggest prob­lem mov­ing for­ward for gene ther­a­pies is the quan­tum leap need­ed in man­u­fac­tur­ing and to ap­ply­ing the tech­niques be­yond just rare dis­eases. “We need to do the kind of trans­for­ma­tion Steve Jobs did for dig­i­tal,” with man­u­fac­tur­ing gene ther­a­pies. He al­so not­ed FDA is “very le­nient” about some of its man­u­fac­tur­ing stan­dards for get­ting gene ther­a­pies in­to Phase 1 tri­als, but scal­ing up the man­u­fac­tur­ing is what’s dif­fi­cult.

Mov­ing in­to the fu­ture leg­isla­tive­ly, Wood­cock said she’s in­ter­est­ed in leg­is­la­tion on gener­ic drug la­bel­ing. “We have to clean up the ar­ma­men­tar­i­um so it doesn’t get out of date,” she said. She fur­ther not­ed FDA is work­ing with Con­gress on over-the-counter  drug re­forms, which is the ba­sis for the Of­fice of New Drug mod­ern­iza­tion. “If we don’t get the OTC re­form, we’ll have to pull back on the OND re­forms,” she said.


Im­age: Janet Wood­cock

First pub­lished here. reg­u­la­to­ry fo­cus is the flag­ship on­line pub­li­ca­tion of the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety (RAPS), the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care and re­lat­ed prod­ucts, in­clud­ing med­ical de­vices, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, bi­o­log­ics and nu­tri­tion­al prod­ucts. Email news@raps.org for more in­for­ma­tion.

Author

Zachary Brennan

managing editor, RAPS

UP­DAT­ED: Roche bags 'break­through' an­ti-fi­bro­sis drug in $1.4B biotech buy­out deal

Roche is snapping up a “breakthrough” anti-fibrotic drug in a $1.4 billion buyout.

The pharma giant announced Friday that it is acquiring Promedior, primarily to get its hands on PRM-151, a recombinant form of human pentraxin-2 (PTX-2) protein that has nailed down mid-stage clinical data on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and demonstrating its potential for a range of fibrotic conditions.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 65,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

(Image: Associated Press)

Amarin emerges from an ex­pert pan­el re­view with a clear en­dorse­ment for Vas­cepa and high odds of suc­cess when the FDA weighs in for­mal­ly

Several FDA experts who gathered Thursday to consider the landmark approval of Vascepa to reduce cardio events in an at-risk population voiced their unease about various aspects of the efficacy and safety data, or ultimately the population it should be used to treat. But the overwhelming belief that the data pointed to the drug’s benefit and clearly outweighed risks carried the day for Amarin.

The panel voted unanimously (16 to 0) to support the company’s positive data presentation — backing an OK for expanding the label to include reducing cardio risk. The vote points Amarin $AMRN down a short path to a formal decision by the FDA, with the odds heavily in its favor. Chances are the rest of the questions about the future of this drug will be hashed out in the label’s small print.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 65,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

No­var­tis spin­out’s first an­ti-ag­ing PhI­II is a flop, so now they’ll turn to Parkin­son’s chal­lenge as shares wilt

Novartis spinout resTORbio is grappling with the collapse of its lead clinical program this morning — an anti-aging R&D failure that will badly damage their rep in the field.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 65,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

(Image: Associated Press)

No­var­tis scores its lat­est FDA OK — this time for a new sick­le cell dis­ease drug picked up in a $665M deal

Novartis’ decision to buy Oklahoma-based biotech Selexys 3 years ago for up to $665 million has paid off with an FDA approval today.

Blessed with the FDA’s breakthrough drug designation for a speedy review, the pharma giant has pinned down an approval for crizanlizumab, a new therapy designed to reduce the frequency of painful incidents of vaso-occlusive crises among sickle cell disease patients 16 or older.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 65,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca gains EU nod for di­a­betes triple; Am­gen and Duke launch re­al-world PC­SK9 ob­ser­va­tion­al study

→ Weeks after winning EU approval to start marketing dapagliflozin as Forxiga, AstraZeneca has racked up another OK for a triplet combo involving the SGLT2 diabetes drug. Named Qtrilmet, the pill combines Forxiga with the DPP-4 inhibitor Onglyza (saxagliptin) and the bedrock drug metformin in a modified-release format. That 3-in-1 approach proved superior in reducing average blood glucose levels to a number of other dual combinations across 5 Phase III trials, including Forxiga plus metformin, Onglyza with metformin, or glimepiride with metformin.

Five drugs, in­clud­ing two No­var­tis ther­a­pies, win EMA en­dorse­ment

As is custom, an EMA panel on Friday issued its weekly recommendations on marketing applications submitted by drug developers. This week, the agency backed the use of five new therapies — including two Novartis drugs — but issued no negative reviews.

Novartis’ S1P drug for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) drug, Mayzent (known chemically as siponimod), which was approved by the FDA in March — has been given the nod by the EMA. The Swiss drugmaker already sells its other MS drug, Gilenya, in both regions.

Atom­wise's X-37 spin­out gets $14.5 mil­lion to launch AI dis­cov­ery ef­forts

The folks behind Atomwise’s spinout X-37 like to think in cosmological metaphors, and you can think of their AI drug development model as probes sent into space from a central station. That station just got $14.5 million in Series A funding from DCVC Bio, Alpha Intelligence Capital and Hemi Ventures to back those missions.

X-37 uses Atomwise’s AI platform to identify drug targets and – unlike the parent company, which largely sticks to computers  – bring those into a wet lab and preclinical testing.  In addition to AI professionals, it’s led in by part by drug developers from Velocity Pharmaceutical Development.

Ab­bott Lab­o­ra­to­ries CEO Miles White pass­es ba­ton down to suc­ces­sor; Lon­za CEO Marc Funk hits the ex­it

→ Abbott Laboratories has named a successor to CEO Miles White after he announced that he was stepping down in March after 21 years of service. Robert Ford, the company’s COO and president, will take the helm. Ford is known for his work in the $25 billion merger between St. Jude Medical into Abbott in January 2017. White will remain with the company as executive chairman of the board. 

→ After snapping up Novartis’ Swiss facility, Novartis Center of Excellence, in July, Lonza has announced that their CEO, Marc Funk, is hitting the exit for “personal reasons.” Funk has been the CEO of the company for less than a year — brought onto the company back in March. In the meantime, chairman Albert Baehny will serve as interim CEO. 

UCB adds on more pos­i­tive PhI­II da­ta for IL-17A/17F in­hibitor bimek­izum­ab, clear­ing a path to the FDA

A month after posting positive top-line data from their first Phase III trial of the IL-17A/17F inhibitor bimekizumab, Belgium’s UCB says they’ve added more upbeat results from their second late-stage test in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

That leaves the company on track for regulatory submissions in the middle of next year, says CMO Iris Loew-Friedrich.
Their drug beat out a placebo on the co-primaries — a 90% improvement in PASI 90 (the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) response of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1) at week 16, compared to placebo. Investigators also boasted of hitting some key secondaries.
UCB is angling to enter an increasingly crowded market space.
In their first of 3 Phase III studies for bimekizumab, researchers touted top-line wins on statistically significant results on clearing plaque psoriasis, including a victory over J&J’s IL-23 contender Stelara on key endpoints. The drug targets both IL-17A and IL-17F, a modification on the IL-17A strategy laid out for Taltz (Eli Lilly) and Cosentyx (Novartis). And the new group also includes J&J’s Tremfya and AbbVie’s Skyrizi.

Social image: UCB