Yale Law School's free speech group says Boehringer's IRA argument is 'fundamentally flawed'
Yale Law School’s Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression described Boehringer Ingelheim’s First Amendment arguments in its Inflation Reduction Act lawsuit as “extraordinarily troubling.”
Boehringer filed suit in August against the federal government, alleging the IRA’s Medicare price negotiation provisions violate the First, Fifth and Eighth Amendments, in part by compelling the company’s speech. But the Abrams Institute, which “promotes freedom of speech, freedom of the press, access to information and government transparency,” said Boehringer’s free speech arguments are “fundamentally flawed.”
Unlock this article instantly by becoming a free subscriber.
You’ll get access to free articles each month, plus you can customize what newsletters get delivered to your inbox each week, including breaking news.