Aptinyx shares crater as lead drug fails in PhII neu­ro­path­ic pain study

Aptinyx’s ap­proach to mod­u­lat­ing the NM­DA re­cep­tor to treat dis­or­ders of the cen­tral ner­vous sys­tem has hit a sig­nif­i­cant snag, as its lead ex­per­i­men­tal drug failed a mid-stage study in pa­tients with di­a­bet­ic pe­riph­er­al neu­ropa­thy (DPN), oblit­er­at­ing the re­cent­ly pub­lic com­pa­ny’s stock on Wednes­day.

Nor­bert Riedel

The drug — dubbed NYX-2925 — was de­vel­oped by the Evanston, IL-based biotech that went pub­lic last Ju­ly bank­ing on its ap­proach to mod­u­late NM­DA re­cep­tors, which are cru­cial to brain and ner­vous sys­tem func­tion. The Phase II tri­al pit­ted three oral dos­es of the drug (10 mg, 50 mg, or 200 mg) ver­sus a place­bo in 300 pa­tients over four weeks. The ex­per­i­men­tal treat­ment failed to con­fer a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant im­prove­ment in av­er­age dai­ly pain — as mea­sured by a Nu­mer­i­cal Rat­ing Scale (NRS) — at week four, miss­ing the pri­ma­ry end­point of the study.

The com­pa­ny’s shares $AP­TX plum­met­ed about 70% in ear­ly trad­ing.

The com­pa­ny sug­gest­ed its 50mg dose had the most promis­ing im­pact. Pa­tients treat­ed with the dose showed a 1.61-point re­duc­tion in av­er­age dai­ly pain on the NRS — the largest de­crease among the dose lev­els eval­u­at­ed — ver­sus the 1.23-point fall in those giv­en the place­bo, re­sult­ing in a non-sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant im­prove­ment (p=0.1586).  Pa­tients on the 50 mg dose al­so showed im­prove­ment on key sec­ondary end­points, in­clud­ing sleep and pain on walk­ing, Aptinyx added.

“While the study did not meet its pri­ma­ry end­point…we be­lieve the to­tal body of clin­i­cal da­ta in­di­cates the po­ten­tial of NYX-2925 to treat chron­ic pain,” Aptinyx chief Nor­bert Riedel said in a state­ment, adding that the com­pa­ny is now in process of find­ing a way for­ward for NYX-2925.

“It seems that at best that path for­ward may con­sist of an­oth­er phase II tri­al in DPN, us­ing the two dos­es that showed a nu­mer­i­cal dif­fer­ence to place­bo (50mg and 200mg) and in­cor­po­rat­ing longer du­ra­tion of treat­ment (8 or 12 weeks). Such a study could be­gin in H2 2019 and pro­duce a re­sult in 2020. How­ev­er, it is not clear yet whether the com­pa­ny’s board, in­ves­ti­ga­tors, ad­vi­sors and in­vestors will en­dorse the in­vest­ment in that (cost­ly) tri­al. In­vestors are like­ly to elim­i­nate all val­ue for this pro­gram from the com­pa­ny’s stock to­day and thus leave the stock re­liant up­on ear­li­er pro­grams tar­get­ing more chal­leng­ing dis­ease in­di­ca­tions in­clud­ing cog­ni­tive im­pair­ment in Parkin­son’s dis­ease (NYX-458) and post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­or­der (PTSD) (NYX-783),” Leerink’s Ge­of­frey Porges wrote in a note.

In a sep­a­rate on­go­ing ex­plorato­ry mid-stage study, NYX-2925 has shown en­cour­ag­ing re­sults in a small group of pa­tients with fi­bromyal­gia, the com­pa­ny not­ed in an in­ter­im analy­sis post­ed last month. The full re­sults of that study are ex­pect­ed in the first half of this year.

“We don’t re­gard the stock as “dead mon­ey” af­ter to­day’s news, but do rec­og­nize that a sig­nif­i­cant part of its pri­or val­u­a­tion is now im­paired. Ear­li­er this month the com­pa­ny pro­vid­ed pos­i­tive bio­mark­er da­ta for NYX-2925 in its oth­er in­di­ca­tion of fi­bromyal­gia; at this stage those bio­mark­er ef­fects are en­cour­ag­ing but in­suf­fi­cient,” Porges added.

Var­i­ous drug de­vel­op­ers are fo­cus­ing on the NM­DA re­cep­tor, de­vel­op­ing com­pounds to ac­ti­vate or in­hib­it it to treat CNS dis­or­ders, but that strat­e­gy has seen a se­ries of set­backs in part due to safe­ty con­cerns. Aptinyx be­lieves its ap­proach — with­out ever ful­ly turn­ing the re­cep­tor “on” or “off” — will al­low it to evade these chal­lenges. Al­ler­gan has bought in­to this Aptinyx phi­los­o­phy, hav­ing li­censed their de­pres­sion drug, which is now called AGN-241751. Aptinyx it­self was was spun out of Al­ler­gan’s $1.7 bil­lion buy­out of Nau­rex which CEO Brent Saun­ders want­ed for its lead NM­DA drug — now dubbed ra­pastinel — for ma­jor de­pres­sion.

In terms of pain, pa­tients have few ef­fec­tive op­tions oth­er than high­ly ad­dic­tive opi­oids, and there­fore drug de­vel­op­ers work­ing on non-opi­oid op­tions are keen­ly watched. This is like­ly one of the rea­sons the FDA grant­ed NYX-2925 fast track sta­tus for neu­ro­path­ic pain as­so­ci­at­ed with DPN.

Biotech Half­time Re­port: Af­ter a bumpy year, is biotech ready to re­bound?

The biotech sector has come down firmly from the highs of February as negative sentiment takes hold. The sector had a major boost of optimism from the success of the COVID-19 vaccines, making investors keenly aware of the potential of biopharma R&D engines. But from early this year, clinical trial, regulatory and access setbacks have reminded investors of the sector’s inherent risks.

RBC Capital Markets recently surveyed investors to take the temperature of the market, a mix of specialists/generalists and long-only/ long-short investment strategies. Heading into the second half of the year, investors mostly see the sector as undervalued (49%), a large change from the first half of the year when only 20% rated it as undervalued. Around 41% of investors now believe that biotech will underperform the S&P500 in the second half of 2021. Despite that view, 54% plan to maintain their position in the market and 41% still plan to increase their holdings.

Covid-19 vac­cine boost­ers earn big thumbs up, but Mod­er­na draws ire over world sup­ply; What's next for Mer­ck’s Covid pill?; The C-suite view on biotech; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

You may remember that at the beginning of this year, Endpoints News set a goal to go broader and deeper. We are still working towards that, and are excited to share that Beth Snyder Bulik will be joining us on Monday to cover all things pharma marketing. You can sign up for her weekly Endpoints MarketingRx newsletter in your reader profile.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 119,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

No­var­tis de­vel­op­ment chief John Tsai: 'We go deep in the new plat­form­s'

During our recent European Biopharma Summit, I talked with Novartis development chief John Tsai about his experiences over the 3-plus years he’s been at the pharma giant. You can read the transcript below or listen to the exchange in the link above.

John Carroll: I followed your career for quite some time. You’ve had more than 20 years in big pharma R&D and you’ve obviously seen quite a lot. I really was curious about what it was like for you three and a half years ago when you took over as R&D chief at Novartis. Obviously a big move, a lot of changes. You went to work for the former R&D chief of Novartis, Vas Narasimhan, who had his own track record there. So what was the biggest adjustment when you went into this position?

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Susan Galbraith, Executive VP, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca

As­traZeneca on­col­o­gy R&D chief Su­san Gal­braith: 'Y­ou're go­ing to need or­thog­o­nal com­bi­na­tion­s'

 

Earlier in the week we broadcast our 4th annual European Biopharma Summit with a great lineup of top execs. One of the one-on-one conversations I set up was with Susan Galbraith, the oncology research chief at AstraZeneca. In a wide-ranging discussion, Galbraith reviewed the cancer drug pipeline and key trends influencing development work at the pharma giant. You can watch the video, above, or stick with the script below. — JC

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Amit Etkin, Alto Neuroscience CEO (Alto via Vimeo)

A star Stan­ford pro­fes­sor leaves his lab for a start­up out to re­make psy­chi­a­try

About five years ago, Amit Etkin had a breakthrough.

The Stanford neurologist, a soft-spoken demi-prodigy who became a professor while still a resident, had been obsessed for a decade with how to better define psychiatric disorders. Drugs for depression or bipolar disorder didn’t work for many patients with the conditions, and he suspected the reason was how traditional diagnoses didn’t actually get at the heart of what was going on in a patient’s brain.

Roche's Tecen­triq cross­es the fin­ish line first in ad­ju­vant lung can­cer, po­ten­tial­ly kick­ing off gold rush

While falling behind the biggest PD-(L)1 drugs in terms of sales, Roche has looked to carve out a space for its Tecentriq with a growing expertise in lung cancer. The drug will now take an early lead in the sought-after adjuvant setting — but competitors are on the way.

The FDA on Friday approved Tecentriq as an adjuvant therapy for patients with Stage II-IIIA non small cell lung cancer with PD-(L)1 scores greater than or equal to 1, making it the first drug of its kind approved in an early setting that covers around 40% of all NSCLC patients.

Susan Galbraith speaking at Endpoints News' virtual EUBIO21 summit

Imfinzi/treme­li­mum­ab com­bo scores As­traZeneca an­oth­er OS win — this time in liv­er can­cer

Is the tide turning on AstraZeneca’s battered PD-L1/CTLA4 combo?

A single priming dose of the experimental tremelimumab, followed by Imfinzi every four weeks, beat Nexavar (sorafenib) in helping a group of liver cancer patients live longer in a Phase III study, the company reported, meeting the primary endpoint.

Specifically, the two drugs extended overall survival for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received prior systemic therapy and were not eligible for localized treatment.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 119,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA+ roundup: Marks on Wood­cock­'s tenure as act­ing com­mis­sion­er; FDA lead­ers of­fer per­spec­tive on bar­ri­ers to di­ver­si­ty in re­search

CBER director Peter Marks praised Janet Woodcock’s work as acting FDA commissioner, and while noting that Biden needs to nominate someone to fill the role permanently by Nov. 16, he said he has “no idea” when that actually might occur.

“Dr. Woodcock has been at the agency for over three decades and she, during that time, has proven herself to be a remarkably capable manager,” Marks said at the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine’s meeting Tuesday. “And she’s been managing as if she’s commissioner, unlike some previous acting [commissioners] who are afraid to actually do things. She doesn’t appear to be afraid to do things. I have not felt any different now from when we had a commissioner in place,” he added.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

FDA ad­comm votes unan­i­mous­ly in sup­port of a J&J Covid-19 boost­er two months af­ter one-dose shot

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on Friday voted 19-0 in favor of authorizing a second shot of J&J’s Covid-19 vaccine to follow at least two months after the initial dose.

Regulators don’t have to follow VRBPAC’s recommendation, but they almost always do. Considering that the CDC’s advisory committee has already been set to review the expanded EUA, VRBPAC’s recommendation is likely to be adopted.