As a promi­nent an­a­lyst pre­dicts (even­tu­al) drug price con­trols, bio­phar­ma braces for a blow while Trump balls his fist

Some­time this week, no one is sure when, Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump is ex­pect­ed to give his long-await­ed speech on drug pric­ing. And a long line­up of key play­ers in the field has been scratch­ing their heads, anx­ious­ly try­ing to de­ter­mine just how far the na­tion’s most un­pre­dictable pres­i­dent could go.

Trump, of course, has been free with his pop­ulist brand of an­ti-in­dus­try rhetoric for more than a year now, af­ter es­tab­lish­ing the base­line with re­peat­ed as­ser­tions that phar­ma com­pa­nies have been get­ting away with mur­der for years. 

But there’s been lit­tle di­rect ac­tion, be­yond the work at the FDA to hus­tle up new gener­ic ap­provals while try­ing to use the pub­lic spot­light to whip up some fresh com­pe­ti­tion for the price gougers. 

FDA com­mis­sion Scott Got­tlieb like­ly tipped the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand on one point in a pre­view he of­fered on pric­ing last week, in­di­cat­ing that in­dus­try prac­tices in fight­ing a de­lay­ing ac­tion against gener­ics and biosim­i­lars will face some di­rect chal­lenges. But while sig­nif­i­cant, that by it­self won’t bend any longterm trends on pric­ing in fa­vor of pay­ers.

Mean­while, pub­lic anger over drug pric­ing is re­peat­ed­ly stoked with an un­end­ing se­ries of high pro­file as­saults on cer­tain play­ers that have used their pric­ing pow­er to jack up rev­enue from old drugs.

Just last night, Mallinck­rodt was back in the spot­light with Ac­thar, which has gone from $40 a vial in 2001 to $40,000, threat­en­ing the ba­sic po­lice and fire ser­vices pro­vid­ed by the town of Rock­ford, IL.

For­mer Rock­ford May­or Lar­ry Mor­ris­sey set the stage for a 60 Min­utes seg­ment with this quote: “‘Why is health­care so ex­pen­sive? Be­cause the fix is in. That’s the an­swer. That’s the short an­swer.”

And it’s not the kind of an­swer bio­phar­ma wants to hear right now, es­pe­cial­ly on 60 Min­utes.

The in­dus­try is still dis­grun­tled over the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­ci­sion to get phar­ma to cov­er part of the donut hole in Medicare drug prices. But they can live with that. There’s been a steady fo­cus at PhRMA on try­ing to shift the fo­cus from the man­u­fac­tur­ers to the in­sur­ers and PBMs that man­age the ben­e­fit. But it hasn’t worked. And re­cent­ly that tac­tic has pro­duced some painful­ly awk­ward sal­lies on so­cial me­dia that tends to at­tract as much spon­ta­neous laugh­ter as dis­cus­sion.

With pub­lic anger per­co­lat­ing at an un­prece­dent­ed rate — a ma­jor­i­ty told Kaiser Health that re­duc­ing drug pric­ing should be a top pri­or­i­ty of pol­i­cy mak­ers — some an­a­lysts be­lieve that what­ev­er Trump comes up with it won’t be enough to stop the one strat­e­gy that would make the bio­phar­ma in­dus­try reel: Price con­trols.

Se­nior Wells Far­go an­a­lyst David Maris put it in blunt terms a few days ago.

We be­lieve the US is on a longer-term arc to­ward price con­trols and low­er mar­gins, as there is an up­ris­ing that has been per­co­lat­ing for years against high drug prices. While the caus­es are many and the prob­lem much more com­pli­cat­ed and nu­anced than many oth­ers would lead read­ers to be­lieve, there is a re­bel­lion at hand. Ar­gu­ments about the cost to de­vel­op a drug or how oth­er sup­ply chain con­stituents are to blame are not ap­pre­ci­at­ed by the par­ent stand­ing at a phar­ma­cy counter aban­don­ing their child’s pre­scrip­tion be­cause they can­not af­ford it due to an out­ra­geous de­ducible or high co-pay. And ex­am­ples of un­con­scionable drug price in­creas­es have fur­ther hard­ened many con­sumer opin­ions. 

That day prob­a­bly won’t ar­rive this week. But if that’s the path we’re on, Trump is faced with ei­ther sat­is­fy­ing the anger with some grand com­pro­mis­es, or stok­ing it by pulling his punch­es.


Im­age: Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump at a speech in Oc­to­ber, 2017. AP IM­AGES

Biotech in­vestors and CEOs see two paths to growth, but are they equal­ly vi­able?

The dynamic in the biotech market has been highly volatile in the last few years, from the high peaks immediately after the COVID vaccine in 2021, to the lowest downturns of the last 20 years in 2022. This uncertainty makes calling the exact timing of the market’s turn something of a fool’s errand, according to Dr. Chen Yu, Founder and Managing Partner of TCG Crossover (TCG X). He speaks with RBC’s Noël Brown, Head of US Biotechnology Investment Banking, about the market’s road ahead and two possible paths for growth.

Fireside chat between Hal Barron and John Carroll, UKBIO19

It’s time we talked about bio­phar­ma — live in Lon­don next week

Zoom can only go so far. And I think at this stage, we’ve all tested the limits of staying in touch — virtually. So I’m particularly happy now that we’ve revved up the travel machine to point myself to London for the first time in several years.

Whatever events we have lined up, we’ve always built in plenty of opportunities for all of us to get together and talk. For London, live, I plan to be right out front, meeting with and chatting with the small crowd of biopharma people we are hosting on October 12 at Silicon Valley Bank’s London headquarters. And there’s a lengthy mixer at the end I’m most looking forward to, with several networking openings between sessions.

Casey McPherson shows his daughters Rose (left) and Weston around Everlum Bio, a lab that he co-founded to spark a treatment for Rose and others with ultra-rare conditions. (Ilana Panich-Linsman)

Fa­ther starts lab af­ter in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty is­sues stymie rare dis­ease drug de­vel­op­ment

Under bright lab lights, Casey McPherson holds his 6-year-old daughter, Rose. His free hand directs Rose’s gaze toward a computer screen with potential clues in treating her one-of-a kind genetic condition.

Gray specks on the screen show her cells that scientists reprogrammed with the goal of zeroing in on a custom medicine. McPherson co-founded the lab, Everlum Bio, to spark a treatment for Rose — and others like her. A regarded singer-songwriter, McPherson never imagined going into drug development.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Take­da to pull key hy­poparathy­roidism drug from the mar­ket af­ter years of man­u­fac­tur­ing woes

Takeda on Tuesday morning made an announcement that almost 3,000 people with the rare disease known as hypoparathyroidism were fearing.

Due to unresolved supply issues and manufacturing woes, Takeda said it will cut its losses and discontinue its hypoparathyroidism drug, known as Natpara (parathyroid hormone), halting all manufacturing of the drug by the end of 2024, but the entire inventory will be available until depleted or expired, a company spokesperson said via email.

Pfizer and BioNTech's original Marvel comic book links evolving Covid vaccine science to Avengers' evolving villain-fighting tools.(Source: Pfizer LinkedIn post)

Pfiz­er, BioN­Tech part­ner with Mar­vel for Avengers and Covid-fight­ing com­ic book

Pfizer and BioNTech are collaborating with Marvel to celebrate “everyday” people getting Covid-19 vaccines in a custom comic book.

In the “Everyday Heroes” digital comic book, an evolving Ultron, one of the Avengers’ leading villains, is defeated by Captain America, Ironman and others. The plotline and history of Ultron is explained by a grandfather who is waiting with his family at a clinic for Covid-19 vaccinations.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA+ roundup: Ad­comm date set for Cy­to­ki­net­ics heart drug; New gener­ic drug guid­ance to re­duce fa­cil­i­ty de­lays

The FDA on Wednesday set Dec. 13 as the day that its Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee will review Cytokinetics’ potential heart drug, meaning regulators aren’t likely to meet the Nov. 30 PDUFA date that was previously set.

The drug, known as omecamtiv mecarbil, read out its first Phase III in November 2020, hitting the primary endpoint of reducing the odds of hospitalization or other urgent care for heart failure by 8%. But it also missed a key secondary endpoint analysts had pegged as the key to breaking into the market, failing to significantly differ in reducing cardiovascular death from placebo.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Car­olyn Bertozzi (Illustration: Assistant editor Kathy Wong for Endpoints News)

Car­olyn Bertozzi, re­peat biotech founder and launch­er of a field, shares in chem­istry No­bel win

Carolyn Bertozzi, predicted by some to become a Nobel laureate, clinched one of the world’s top awards in the wee hours of Wednesday, winning the Nobel Prize in Chemistry alongside a repeat winner and a Copenhagen researcher.

The Stanford professor, Morten Meldal of University of Copenhagen and 2001-awardee K. Barry Sharpless of Scripps shared the prize equally. The Nobel is sometimes split in quarters and/or halves.

Eli Lil­ly and Te­va pre­pare for court bat­tle over mi­graine med ri­val­ry

It looks like Eli Lilly and Teva Pharmaceuticals are going to trial.

A federal appeals court on Monday refused to invalidate three of Teva’s patents for its migraine treatment Ajovy, while also declining to issue a summary judgment in favor of either company, which would effectively end the case without a full trial.

Teva filed suit against Lilly back in 2018, alleging that the company infringed upon nine patents with its rival migraine drug Emgality. The rival drugs were both approved in September 2018 for the preventative treatment of migraine, and are designed to block calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a protein associated with the onset of migraine pain.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)

Af­ter cov­er­age re­stric­tions for Alzheimer's drugs, bi­par­ti­san House bill would force CMS to re­view drugs in­di­vid­u­al­ly

When Biogen’s controversial Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm was hit with a national decision from CMS that restricted coverage to only randomized trials, practically guaranteeing a commercial flop in the near term, questions surfaced over why CMS also included all amyloid-targeted monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer’s disease.

With Eisai and Biogen’s second Alzheimer’s drug, lecanemab, now showing it can slow the rate of cognitive decline versus placebo, lining up for a likely full approval next spring, the question now turns to whether that data, which is being presented at the Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Congress in San Francisco in late November, will be enough for CMS when it asks, “Does the anti-amyloid mAb meaningfully improve health outcomes (i.e., slow the decline of cognition and function) for patients in broad community practice?”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.