As mag­ni­tude and fre­quen­cy of drug price hikes thaw, Ex­press Scripts re­ports low­est in­crease in spend­ing by com­mer­cial plans in 25 years

In an era where drug­mak­ers and pre­scrip­tion drug man­agers (PBMs) point fin­gers at each oth­er when it comes to jus­ti­fy­ing the rea­sons be­hind ris­ing drug prices — the largest US PBM, Ex­press Scripts, on Wednes­day re­leased a re­port in­di­cat­ing that in 2018 em­ploy­er-spon­sored plans paid rough­ly 6 cents more, on av­er­age, for a 30-day pre­scrip­tion (0.4% hike) ver­sus the pre­ced­ing year, mark­ing the small­est in­crease in com­mer­cial plans in a quar­ter cen­tu­ry.

The com­pa­ny an­a­lyzed pre­scrip­tion drug use da­ta of rough­ly 34.2 mil­lion mem­bers with a phar­ma­cy ben­e­fit plan and cal­cu­lat­ed that it had saved its mem­bers $45 bil­lion in pre­scrip­tion drug costs in 2018.

Al­though spend­ing on tra­di­tion­al, non-spe­cial­ty med­ica­tions dipped 5.8%, spend­ing on spe­cial­ty med­ica­tions rose 9.4%, Ex­press Scripts said. Drugs for in­flam­ma­to­ry con­di­tions such as rheuma­toid arthri­tis and Crohn’s dis­ease ac­count­ed for the costli­est ther­a­py class for the third con­sec­u­tive year, cost­ing em­ploy­ers $174.45 per mem­ber per year in 2018, up 14% from 2017, it added. Glob­al­ly, Ab­b­Vie’s in­flam­ma­to­ry drug Hu­mi­ra — the world’s best-sell­ing med­i­cine — gen­er­at­ed near­ly $20 bil­lion in 2018 sales.

Di­a­betes was the sec­ond costli­est ther­a­py class for em­ploy­ers at $114.85 per mem­ber per year, an in­crease of 4.1% over 2017, the com­pa­ny said, adding that spend­ing on in­sulin, which ac­counts for 15.3% of di­a­betes pre­scrip­tions, rose 0.3% in 2018 (a 1.5% de­cline in unit costs and a 1.8% rise in uti­liza­tion). Anec­do­tal re­ports of di­a­bet­ics ra­tioning or for­go­ing life-sav­ing in­sulin in the Unit­ed States are on the rise.

For a long time drug­mak­ers jus­ti­fied their pol­i­cy of sus­tained drug price hikes on the heavy cost of in­no­va­tion. How­ev­er, as PBMs in­creas­ing­ly threat­en to ex­clude treat­ments from for­mu­la­ries — un­less they man­age to ne­go­ti­ate a dis­count sat­is­fac­to­ry to their de­mands — drug­mak­ers in re­sponse have boost­ed re­bates, and in turn hiked prices in or­der to main­tain their cut of sales.

De­spite list price in­fla­tion of 7.3% for the most com­mon­ly used tra­di­tion­al brand med­ica­tions in 2018, costs for such drugs dipped 6.5% for its em­ploy­er-spon­sored plans, Ex­press Scripts said.

The com­pa­ny has dri­ven a 0.4% de­cline in drug unit costs by steer­ing mem­bers to low­er cost ther­a­pies, and by se­cur­ing deep­er dis­counts from man­u­fac­tur­ers and phar­ma­cies, it said, adding that about half of com­mer­cial plans saw a fall in per mem­ber drug spend­ing, and a 0.3% de­cline across Medicare plans.

Twen­ty five years ago, the era of block­buster drugs was tak­ing off, char­ac­ter­ized by mid-to-high-dou­ble-dig­it an­nu­al in­creas­es in drug spend­ing, the com­pa­ny said, not­ing that to­day we are in the age of break­through treat­ments with “break-the-bank pric­ing.”

“We ex­pect man­u­fac­tur­ers of high-priced spe­cial­ty drugs, which cur­rent­ly con­sume half of all drug spend­ing, to con­tin­ue to raise prices faster than core in­fla­tion. And we ex­pect the con­tentious pub­lic pol­i­cy de­bate on how to make pre­scrip­tion med­i­cine, and es­pe­cial­ly in­sulin and oth­er bi­o­log­ics, more af­ford­able for the unin­sured and un­der­in­sured to con­tin­ue,” the com­pa­ny said, fore­cast­ing an an­nu­al drug trend of 2% for the next three years.

Da­ta in­creas­ing­ly sug­gest that pric­ing is con­tribut­ing to a small­er slice of bio­phar­ma growth than ever be­fore. In a note pub­lished ear­li­er this week, Leerink’s Ge­of­frey Porges said “pos­i­tive list pric­ing has con­tributed at least two thirds of in­dus­try growth in re­cent years and this con­tri­bu­tion ap­pears to be fad­ing, if not dis­ap­pear­ing…in many strik­ing cas­es we are see­ing sig­nif­i­cant ab­solute re­duc­tions in price, which was pre­vi­ous­ly un­think­able for this in­dus­try.” For ex­am­ple, PC­SK9 an­ti­bod­ies by Am­gen as well as part­ners Sanofi and Re­gen­eron have re­cent­ly seen heavy dis­counts, while CGRP an­ti­bod­ies from Te­va, Lil­ly as well as part­ners Am­gen and No­var­tis have tak­en a large­ly con­ser­v­a­tive ap­proach to pric­ing.

Drug pric­ing has emerged as a bi­par­ti­san is­sue and a host of law­mak­ers, in­clud­ing those rep­re­sent­ing the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion, have pro­posed a num­ber of so­lu­tions to low­er the bur­den of drug costs on con­sumers.


Slides from Ex­press Scripts re­port

John Hood [file photo]

UP­DATE: Cel­gene and the sci­en­tist who cham­pi­oned fe­dra­tinib's rise from Sanofi's R&D grave­yard win FDA OK

Six years after Sanofi gave it up for dead, the FDA has approved the myelofibrosis drug fedratinib, now owned by Celgene.

The drug will be sold as Inrebic, and will soon land in the portfolio at Bristol-Myers Squibb, which is finalizing a deal to acquire Celgene.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder was axed — and No­var­tis names a new CSO in wake of an ethics scan­dal

Now at the center of a storm of controversy over its decision to keep its knowledge of manipulated data hidden from regulators during an FDA review, Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan has found a longtime veteran in the ranks to head the scientific work underway at AveXis, where the incident occurred. And the scientific founder has hit the exit.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ab­b­Vie gets its FDA OK for JAK in­hibitor upadac­i­tinib, but don’t look for this one to hit ex­ecs’ lofty ex­pec­ta­tions

Another big drug approval came through on Friday afternoon as the FDA OK’d AbbVie’s upadacitinib — an oral JAK1 inhibitor that is hitting the rheumatoid arthritis market with a black box warning of serious malignancies, infections and thrombosis reflecting fears associated with the class.

It will be sold as Rinvoq — at a wholesale price of $59,000 a year — and will likely soon face competition from a drug that AbbVie once controlled, and spurned. Reuters reports that a 4-week supply of Humira, by comparison, is $5,174, adding up to about $67,000 a year.

The top 10 fran­chise drugs in bio­phar­ma his­to­ry will earn a to­tal of $1.4T (tril­lion) by 2024 — what does that tell us?

Just in case you were looking for more evidence of just how important Amgen’s patent win on Enbrel is for the company and its investors, EvaluatePharma has come up with a forward-looking consensus estimate on what the list of top 10 drugs will look like in 2024.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: Sci­en­tist-CEO ac­cused of im­prop­er­ly us­ing con­fi­den­tial in­fo from uni­corn Alec­tor

The executive team at Alector $ALEC has a bone to pick with scientific co-founder Asa Abeliovich. Their latest quarterly rundown has this brief note buried inside:

On June 18, 2019, we initiated a confidential arbitration proceeding against Dr. Asa Abeliovich, our former consulting co-founder, related to alleged breaches of his consulting agreement and the improper use of our confidential information that he learned during the course of rendering services to us as our consulting Chief Scientific Officer/Chief Innovation Officer. We are in the early stage of this arbitration proceeding and are unable to assess or provide any assurances regarding its possible outcome.

There’s no explicit word in the filing on what kind of confidential info was involved, but the proceeding got started 2 days ahead of Abeliovich’s IPO.

Abeliovich, formerly a tenured associate professor at Columbia, is a top scientist in the field of neurodegeneration, which is where Alector is targeted. More recently, he’s also helped start up Prevail Therapeutics as the CEO, which raised $125 million in an IPO. And there he’s planning on working on new gene therapies that target genetically defined subpopulations of Parkinson’s disease. Followup programs target Gaucher disease, frontotemporal dementia and synucleinopathies.

But this time Abeliovich is the CEO rather than a founding scientist. And some of their pipeline overlaps with Alector’s.

Abeliovich and Prevail, though, aren’t taking this one lying down.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Chi­na has be­come a CEO-lev­el pri­or­i­ty for multi­na­tion­al phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies: the trend and the im­pli­ca­tions

After a “hot” period of rapid growth between 2009 and 2012, and a relatively “cooler” period of slower growth from 2013 to 2015, China has once again become a top-of-mind priority for the CEOs of most large, multinational pharmaceutical companies.

At the International Pharma Forum, hosted in March in Beijing by the R&D Based Pharmaceutical Association Committee (RDPAC) and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), no fewer than seven CEOs of major multinational pharmaceutical firms participated, including GSK, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck KGaA, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. A few days earlier, the CEOs of several other large multinationals attended the China Development Forum, an annual business forum hosted by the research arm of China’s State Council. It’s hard to imagine any other country, except the US, having such drawing power at CEO level.

As dis­as­ter struck, Ab­b­Vie’s Rick Gon­za­lez swooped in on Al­ler­gan with an of­fer Brent Saun­ders couldn’t say no to

Early March was a no good, awful, terrible time for Allergan CEO Brent Saunders. His big lead drug had imploded in a Phase III disaster and activists were after his hide — or at least his chairman’s title — as the stock price continued a steady droop that had eviscerated share value for investors.

But it was a perfect time for AbbVie CEO Rick Gonzalez to pick up the phone and ask Saunders if he’d like to consider a “strategic” deal.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

CEO Pascal Soriot via Getty Images

As­traZeneca's jug­ger­naut PARP play­er Lyn­parza scoops up an­oth­er dom­i­nant win in PhI­II as the FDA adds a 'break­through' for Calquence

AstraZeneca’s oncology R&D group under José Baselga keeps churning out hits.

Wednesday morning the pharma giant and their partners at Merck parted the curtains on a successful readout for their Phase III PAOLA-1 study, demonstrating statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for women with ovarian cancer in a first-line maintenance setting who added their PARP Lynparza to Avastin. This is their second late-stage success in ovarian cancer, which will help stave off rivals like GSK.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

ICER blasts FDA, PTC and Sarep­ta for high prices on DMD drugs Em­flaza, Ex­ondys 51

ICER has some strong words for PTC, Sarepta and the FDA as the US drug price watchdog concludes that as currently priced, their respective new treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy are decidedly not cost-effective.

The final report — which cements the conclusions of a draft issued in May — incorporates the opinion of a panel of 17 experts ICER convened in a public meeting last month. It also based its analysis of Emflaza (deflazacort) and Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) on updated annual costs of $81,400 and over $1 million, respectively, after citing “incorrect” lower numbers in the initial calculations.