As­traZeneca's Farx­i­ga scores FDA nod to cut risk of hos­pi­tal­iza­tion for heart fail­ure in di­a­bet­ics

While the FDA re­cent­ly spurned an ap­pli­ca­tion to al­low As­traZeneca’s block­buster drug Farx­i­ga for type 1 di­a­betes that can­not be con­trolled by in­sulin, cit­ing safe­ty con­cerns — the US reg­u­la­tor has en­dorsed the use of the SGLT2 treat­ment to re­duce the risk of hos­pi­tal­i­sa­tion for heart fail­ure in pa­tients with type-2 di­a­betes and es­tab­lished car­dio­vas­cu­lar dis­ease or mul­ti­ple CV risk fac­tors.

Farx­i­ga is the first SGLT2 in the Unit­ed States to se­cure ap­proval in this pa­tient pop­u­la­tion, As­traZeneca in­di­cat­ed on Mon­day.

Pa­tients with di­a­betes are of­ten af­flict­ed with oth­er co­mor­bidi­ties, such as obe­si­ty, CV dis­ease, and kid­ney prob­lems. SGLT2 mak­ers have been clam­or­ing for a broad­er mar­ket share by dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing their drugs on the ba­sis of ther­a­peu­tic im­pact on these in­ter­sect­ing in­di­ca­tions — but the ma­jor, most lu­cra­tive bat­tle­ground is the heart.

The ap­proval em­anates from da­ta tab­u­lat­ed in the DE­CLARE-TI­MI 58 study, which tracked the CV im­pact of Farx­i­ga ver­sus a place­bo over a pe­ri­od of up to five years in more than 17,000 adults. In the tri­al, the ther­a­py hit one of two pri­ma­ry ef­fi­ca­cy end­points.

The re­sults showed that the Farx­i­ga treat­ment did trig­ger a low­er rate of hos­pi­tal­iza­tion for heart fail­ure — but the ther­a­py was not bet­ter or worse than place­bo in its im­pact on the rate of ma­jor ad­verse car­dio­vas­cu­lar events (MACE), de­fined as car­dio­vas­cu­lar death, my­ocar­dial in­farc­tion, or is­chemic stroke.

On the pri­ma­ry goal of MACE — 8.8% of Farx­i­ga pa­tients and 9.4% in the place­bo group suf­fered MACE events (haz­ard ra­tio: 0.93; P=0.17), al­though the dif­fer­ence was not deemed sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant. On the oth­er end­point, Farx­i­ga did re­sult in a low­er rate of car­dio­vas­cu­lar death or hos­pi­tal­iza­tion for heart fail­ure (4.9% in the Farx­i­ga arm vs. 5.8% on the place­bo group; P=0.005), which re­flect­ed a low­er rate of hos­pi­tal­iza­tion for heart fail­ure (haz­ard ra­tio, 0.73); there was no be­tween-group dif­fer­ence in car­dio­vas­cu­lar death.

The FDA ap­proval fol­lows a sim­i­lar up­date to the drug’s la­bel by the EMA  in Au­gust.

Farx­i­ga, akin to In­vokana from J&J $JNJ and Jar­diance from Eli Lil­ly $LLY, be­longs to a class of di­a­betes drugs called sodi­um-glu­cose co-trans­porter 2 (SGLT2) in­hibitors, which work by curb­ing the ab­sorp­tion of glu­cose via the kid­neys so that sur­plus glu­cose is ex­cret­ed through uri­na­tion. Al­though the class of drugs is unit­ed by sim­i­lar­i­ties, In­vokana’s la­bel is crip­pled with the risk of am­pu­ta­tion, un­like Jar­diance and Farx­i­ga.

In Sep­tem­ber, As­traZeneca un­veiled da­ta from the DA­PA-HF tri­al, which showed the drug cut the risk of CV death or the wors­en­ing of heart fail­ure in pa­tients with heart dis­ease.

The 4,744-pa­tient tri­al test­ed Farx­i­ga in pa­tients with re­duced ejec­tion frac­tion (HFrEF) — in which the heart mus­cle is not able to con­tract am­ply and, there­fore, ex­pels less oxy­gen-rich blood in­to the body — on stan­dard of care treat­ment, in­clud­ing those with and with­out type-II di­a­betes.

Farx­i­ga re­duced the com­pos­ite end­point of car­dio­vas­cu­lar (CV) death or wors­en­ing of heart fail­ure by 26% (p<0.0001) — in­clud­ing a re­duc­tion in each of the in­di­vid­ual com­po­nents of the end­point. Da­ta showed there was a 30% de­crease (p<0.0001) in the risk of ex­pe­ri­enc­ing a first episode of wors­en­ing heart fail­ure and an 18% cut (p=0.0294) in the risk of death from car­dio­vas­cu­lar caus­es.

Farx­i­ga, which was ap­proved for use in type-II di­a­betes back in 2014 — whose sales un­der­whelmed an­a­lyst ex­pec­ta­tions in the sec­ond quar­ter — is al­so be­ing eval­u­at­ed for pa­tients with heart fail­ure in the DE­LIV­ER (HF­pEF) and DE­TER­MINE (HFrEF and HF­pEF) tri­als, in ad­di­tion to chron­ic kid­ney dis­ease in the DA­PA-CKD tri­al. Its ri­vals are test­ing their di­a­betes of­fer­ings in a range of heart and kid­ney tri­als as well.

Late last month, the FDA ex­pand­ed In­vokana’s la­bel to slow the pro­gres­sion of di­a­bet­ic nephropa­thy (DKD), as well as to re­duce the risk of hos­pi­tal­iza­tion for heart fail­ure in pa­tients with type II di­a­betes and DKD — an in­di­ca­tion that no oth­er type II di­a­betes med­i­cine is ap­proved for.

Secretary of health and human services Alex Azar speaking in the Rose Garden at the White House (Photo: AFP)

Trump’s HHS claims ab­solute au­thor­i­ty over the FDA, clear­ing path to a vac­cine EUA

The top career staff at the FDA has vowed not to let politics overrule science when looking at vaccine data this fall. But Alex Azar, who happens to be their boss’s boss, apparently won’t even give them a chance to stand in the way.

In a new memorandum issued Tuesday last week, the HHS chief stripped the FDA and other health agencies under his purview of their rule making ability, asserting all such power “is reserved to the Secretary.” Sheila Kaplan of the New York Times first obtained and reported the details of the September 15 bulletin.

Israel Lowy (Regeneron)

#ES­MO20: 'As good as any PD-1 out there': Re­gen­eron flash­es PD-(L)1 lung can­cer da­ta to ri­val Mer­ck

Regeneron entered the PD-(L)1 game late, so they devised a two-pronged strategy to catch up with Big Pharma rivals: They would push it into cancers where PD-1s had yet been tested, and they would prove that it’s as powerful in the big indications as any other on the market.

They cleared a hurdle on the first goal Friday, showing a 31% response in patients with the rare skin cancer basal cell carcinoma. And with the data they’re rolling out Monday, Regeneron cancer chief Israel Lowy is ready to declare success on the second.

Two wild weeks for Grail end in $8B Il­lu­mi­na buy­out

Grail’s whirlwind two weeks have ended in the wealthy arms of its former founder and benefactors.

Illumina has shelled out $8 billion to reacquire the closely-watched liquid biopsy startup they spun out just 5 years ago and sold off much of its shares just 3 years ago. The deal comes nearly two weeks after the well-heeled startup filed for a potentially massive IPO — one that was disrupted just a week later when Bloomberg reported that Illumina was in talks to buy their former spinout for up to $8 billion.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Roche vaults to the front of the NL­RP3 clin­i­cal race, pay­ing $448M up­front to bag In­fla­zome

Roche is going all in on NLRP3.

The pharma giant is putting down $448 million (€380 million) upfront to snatch Novartis-backed Inflazome, which makes it a clinical player in the space overnight.

Dublin and Cambridge, UK-based Inflazome is the second NLRP3-focused biotech Roche has acquired in less than two years, and although no numbers were disclosed in the Jecure buyout, this is almost certainly a much larger deal.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Eli Lilly CSO Dan Skovronsky (file photo)

UP­DAT­ED: #ES­MO20: Eli Lil­ly shows off the da­ta for its Verzenio suc­cess. Was it worth $18 bil­lion?

The press release alone, devoid of any number except for the size of the trial, added nearly $20 billion to Eli Lilly’s market cap back in June. Now investors and oncologists will get to see if the data live up to the hype.

On Sunday at ESMO, Eli Lilly announced the full results for its Phase III MonarchE trial of Verzenio, showing that across over 5,000 women who had had HR+, HER2- breast cancer, the drug reduced the odds of recurrence by 25%. That meant 7.8% of the patients on the drug arm saw their cancers return within 2 years, compared with 11.3% on the placebo arm.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca pub­lish­es Covid-19 vac­cine PhI­II pro­to­cols in lock­step with Mod­er­na and Pfiz­er. How are they dif­fer­ent?

Following in the steps of Moderna and Pfizer, the other two American drugmakers currently in Phase III trials for their Covid-19 vaccines, AstraZeneca posted its own study protocols over the weekend. The move is the latest in a series of rare peeks behind the curtain, as such blueprints are typically shared once such trials are completed.

“Given the unprecedented global impact of the Coronavirus pandemic and the need for public information, AstraZeneca has published the detailed protocol and design of our AZD1222 clinical trial. As with most clinical development, protocols are not typically shared publicly due to the importance of maintaining confidentiality and integrity of trials. AstraZeneca continues to work with industry peers to ensure a consistent approach to sharing timely clinical trial information,” the company said in a statement.

#ES­MO20: As­traZeneca aims to spur PRO­found shift in prostate can­cer treat­ment with Lyn­parza OS da­ta

AstraZeneca has unveiled the final, mature overall survival data that cemented Lynparza’s first approval in prostate cancer approval — touting its lead against rivals with the only PARP inhibitor to have demonstrated such benefit.

But getting the Merck-partnered drug to the right patients remains a challenge, something the companies are hoping to change with the new data cut.

The OS numbers on the subgroup with BRCA1/2 or ATM-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are similar to the first look on offer when the FDA expanded the label in May: Lynparza reduced the risk of death by 31% versus Xtandi and Zytiga. Patients on Lynparza lived a median of 19.1 months, compared to 14.7 months for the anti-androgen therapies (p = 0.0175).

Greg Friberg (File photo)

#ES­MO20: Am­gen team nails down sol­id ear­ly ev­i­dence of AMG 510’s po­ten­tial for NSCLC, un­lock­ing the door to a wave of KRAS pro­grams

The first time I sat down with Amgen’s Greg Friberg to talk about the pharma giant’s KRAS G12C program for sotorasib (AMG 510) at ASCO a little more than a year ago, there was high excitement about the first glimpse of efficacy from their Phase I study, with 5 of 10 evaluable non-small cell lung cancer patients demonstrating a response to the drug.

After decades of failure targeting KRAS, sotorasib offered the first positive look at a new approach that promised to open a door to a whole new approach by targeting a particular mutation to a big target that had remained “undruggable” for decades.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

#ES­MO20: Out to beat Tagris­so, J&J touts 100% ORR for EGFR bis­pe­cif­ic/TKI com­bo — fu­el­ing a quick leap to PhI­II

J&J’s one-two punch on EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer has turned up some promising — although decidedly early — results, fueling the idea that there’s yet room to one up on third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Twenty out of 20 advanced NSCLC patients had a response after taking a combination of an in-house TKI dubbed lazertinib and amivantamab, a bispecific antibody targeting both EGFR and cMET engineered on partner Genmab’s platform, J&J reported at ESMO. All were treatment-naïve, and none has seen their cancer progress at a median follow-up of seven months.