Bain’s Adam Kop­pel com­mits $350M to launch­ing a new biotech that is carv­ing out Pfiz­er’s neu­ro pipeline

Adam Kop­pel and his team at Bain Cap­i­tal are carv­ing out the neu­ro­sciences pipeline that Pfiz­er shut­tered at the be­gin­ning of the year, set­ting aside $350 mil­lion to back a start­up called Cerev­el which will now take con­trol of the work.

All of the mon­ey for this deal — to be an­nounced lat­er Tues­day morn­ing — is com­ing from Bain Cap­i­tal Pri­vate Eq­ui­ty and Kop­pel’s Bain Cap­i­tal Life Sci­ences.

Doug Gior­dano

Pfiz­er star­tled the neu­ro­sciences world at the be­gin­ning of this year with its de­ci­sion to abrupt­ly bow out of the field — ax­ing about 300 staffers in the process. Now Kop­pel is work­ing on re­cruit­ing his own team, which will be charged with tak­ing their 10 pro­grams through a planned Phase III, a Phase II and a slate of pre­clin­i­cal and ear­ly-stage work.

“This is a very unique deal for Bain Cap­i­tal,” Kop­pel tells me. But it’s al­so not like­ly the last time the pri­vate eq­ui­ty group will stand up new com­pa­nies like this. He com­pares it to Spring­Works, a com­pa­ny fund­ed by Bain, Or­biMed and oth­ers that took a slate of 4 drug pro­grams off the shelves of Pfiz­er last fall and point­ed them back in­to de­vel­op­ment.

The start­up al­so pops up in the wake of a sim­i­lar deal at Al­lo­gene, which raced to pick up Pfiz­er’s off-the-shelf CAR-T work and bar­rel straight in­to a record-set­ting IPO to back the play by Arie Bellde­grun and David Chang. In Al­lo­gene’s case though, the part­ners were gift­ed with a team of 40 Pfiz­er re­searchers who were deeply en­gaged in the process.

In this case, Kop­pel says they are bring­ing over a few Pfiz­er staffers, but not many. “There are a cou­ple of key peo­ple com­ing over, but it’s not a lot, as we are large­ly fo­cused on build­ing out a team,” he notes.

Aside from Pfiz­er’s BACE drug, which is be­ing left aside in the wake of a de­fin­i­tive late-stage fail­ure for the lead BACE at Mer­ck, Cerev­el is get­ting every­thing Pfiz­er had, with plans to be ful­ly op­er­a­tional in Q1 2019.

Mor­ris Birn­baum

Pfiz­er, which gets 25% of the eq­ui­ty in Cerev­el in ex­change for the pipeline, al­so plans to stay di­rect­ly en­gaged at the com­pa­ny, with Doug Gior­dano, se­nior vice pres­i­dent of world­wide busi­ness de­vel­op­ment, and Mor­ris Birn­baum, se­nior vice pres­i­dent, CSO of in­ter­nal med­i­cine, join­ing the board along­side Kop­pel and Chris Gor­don, an­oth­er man­ag­ing di­rec­tor at Bain.

Kop­pel is still keep­ing many of his cards close to his vest. He’s not say­ing how many staffers he ex­pects to re­cruit for the ini­tial ef­fort. An IPO may even­tu­al­ly be one way to go, but it’s not on his agen­da for dis­cussing with writ­ers to­day. 

The com­pa­ny won’t lack for mon­ey; Bain is ready to put up more cash if nec­es­sary.

Says Kop­pel: “This com­pa­ny will be well fund­ed.”

Their mon­ey will go to a late-stage D1 par­tial ag­o­nist, which Kop­pel ex­pects to en­ter Phase III next year as they ex­plore the drug’s po­ten­tial for con­trol­ling symp­toms of Parkin­son’s. A Phase II-ready se­lec­tive GA­BA 2/3 ag­o­nist will start off in an epilep­sy pro­gram. The com­pa­ny al­so has ac­tive pro­grams in ear­ly de­vel­op­ment, dis­cov­ery and a re­search pro­gram in neu­roin­flam­ma­tion. 

I sug­gest­ed that neu­ro­sciences, which has seen a va­ri­ety of Big Phar­mas bow out in the wake of fear­some fail­ure rates, was a tough field to jump in­to. But Kop­pel didn’t agree, cit­ing cas­es where Sage, Neu­ro­crine and oth­ers have been mak­ing a rep­u­ta­tion for them­selves.

The key here, he says, is whether a lean­er, mean­er biotech ma­chine can more ef­fi­cient­ly de­vel­op this pipeline of drugs, which is an idea that Pfiz­er is wide open to. And if it works, they can be one of the lead­ing biotechs in the field as well.


Im­age: Adam Kop­pel. BAIN

Nick Leschly via Getty

UP­DAT­ED: Blue­bird shares sink as an­a­lysts puz­zle out $1.8M stick­er shock and an un­ex­pect­ed de­lay

Blue­bird bio $BLUE has un­veiled its price for the new­ly ap­proved gene ther­a­py Zyn­te­glo (Lenti­Glo­bin), which came as a big sur­prise. And it wasn’t the on­ly un­ex­pect­ed twist in to­day’s sto­ry.

With some an­a­lysts bet­ting on a $900,000 price for the β-tha­lassemia treat­ment in Eu­rope, where reg­u­la­tors pro­vid­ed a con­di­tion­al ear­ly OK, blue­bird CEO Nick Leschly said Fri­day morn­ing that the pa­tients who are suc­cess­ful­ly treat­ed with their drug over 5 years will be charged twice that — $1.8 mil­lion — on the con­ti­nent. That makes this drug the sec­ond most ex­pen­sive ther­a­py on the plan­et, just be­hind No­var­tis’ new­ly ap­proved Zol­gens­ma at $2.1 mil­lion, with an­a­lysts still wait­ing to see what kind of pre­mi­um can be had in the US.

Bain’s biotech team has cre­at­ed a $1B-plus fund — with an eye to more Big Phar­ma spin­outs

One of the biggest investors to burst onto the biotech scene in recent years has re-upped with more than a billion dollars flowing into its second fund. And this next wave of bets will likely include more of the Big Pharma spinouts that highlighted their first 3 years in action.

Adam Koppel and Jeff Schwartz got the new life sciences fund at Bain Capital into gear in the spring of 2016, as they were putting together a $720 million fund with $600 million flowing in from external investors and the rest drawn from the Bain side of the equation. This time the external investors chipped in $900 million, with Bain coming in for roughly $180 million more.

They’re not done with Fund I, with plans to add a couple more deals to the 15 they’ve already posted. And once again, they’re estimating another 15 to 20 investments over a 3- to 5-year time horizon for Fund II.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Adding mar­quee in­vestors, Black­Thorn bags $76M to back an AI-dri­ven strat­e­gy for pre­ci­sion neu­ro med­i­cine

As ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence and ma­chine learn­ing loom ever larg­er in drug dis­cov­ery and de­vel­op­ment, a biotech op­er­at­ing at the “nexus” of tech­nol­o­gy and neu­ro­sciences has cashed in with $76 mil­lion in fresh fi­nanc­ing.

The big idea at Black­Thorn Ther­a­peu­tics is to do for neu­robe­hav­ioral dis­or­ders what ge­net­i­cal­ly tar­get­ed ther­a­py has done for on­col­o­gy: Re­de­fine pa­tient pop­u­la­tions by the un­der­ly­ing bi­ol­o­gy — dys­reg­u­lat­ed brain cir­cuits, or neu­rotypes — in­stead of symp­toms, there­by find­ing the pa­tients who are most like­ly to ben­e­fit at en­roll­ment phase.

Neil Woodford, Woodford Investment Management via YouTube

Un­der siege, in­vest­ment man­ag­er Wood­ford faces an­oth­er in­vest­ment shock

Em­bat­tled UK fund man­ag­er Neil Wood­ford — who has con­tro­ver­sial­ly blocked in­vestors from pulling out from his flag­ship fund to stem the blood­let­ting, af­ter a slew of dis­ap­point­ed in­vestors fled fol­low­ing a se­ries of sour bets — is now pay­ing the price for his ac­tions via an in­vestor ex­o­dus on an­oth­er fund.

Har­g­reaves Lans­down, which has in the past sold and pro­mot­ed the Wood­ford funds via its re­tail in­vest­ment plat­form, has re­port­ed­ly with­drawn £45 mil­lion — its en­tire po­si­tion — from the in­vest­ment man­ag­er’s In­come Fo­cus Fund.

Ted Love. HAVERFORD COLLEGE

Glob­al Blood Ther­a­peu­tics poised to sub­mit ap­pli­ca­tion for ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval, with new piv­otal da­ta on its sick­le cell dis­ease drug

Global Blood Therapeutics is set to submit an application for accelerated approval in the second-half of this year, after unveiling fresh data from a late-stage trial that showed just over half the patients given the highest dose of its experimental sickle cell disease drug experienced a statistically significant improvement in oxygen-wielding hemoglobin, meeting the study's main goal.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Gene ther­a­pies seize the top of the list of the most ex­pen­sive drugs on the plan­et — and that trend has just be­gun

Anyone looking for a few simple reasons why the gene therapy field has caught fire with the pharma giants need only look at the new list of the 10 most expensive therapies from GoodRx.

Two recently approved gene therapies sit atop this list, with Novartis’ Zolgensma crowned the king of the priciest drugs at $2.1 million. Right below is Luxturna, the $850,000 pioneer from Spark, which Roche is pushing hard to acquire as it adds a gene therapy group to the global mix.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Fol­low­ing CAR-T pi­o­neer­s' foot­steps, Tes­sa launch­es Chi­na JV in $120M deal

These days just about every biotech se­ri­ous about glob­al de­vel­op­ment — and not just com­mer­cial­iza­tion — has a Chi­na strat­e­gy. Tes­sa Ther­a­peu­tics, a Bay­lor as­so­ci­at­ed out­fit based out of Sin­ga­pore, is no ex­cep­tion.

Tak­ing a page out of the CAR-T pi­o­neers’ play­book, Tes­sa is es­tab­lish­ing a joint ven­ture with Chi­na-Sin­ga­pore Guangzhou Knowl­edge City, which is ini­tial­ly putting down $40 mil­lion for a 13% stake with $40 mil­lion more to come in a sec­ond stage. The biotech, which now re­tains an 87% con­trol, is al­so rolling out its own con­tri­bu­tions in two phas­es, start­ing with $20 mil­lion and all its tech­nol­o­gy li­cense rights for Chi­na.

News­mak­ers at #EHA19: Re­gen­eron, Ar­Qule track progress on re­sponse rates

Re­gen­eron’s close­ly-watched bis­pe­cif­ic con­tin­ues to ring up high re­sponse rates

Re­gen­eron’s high-pro­file bis­pe­cif­ic REGN1979 is back in the spot­light at the Eu­ro­pean Hema­tol­ogy As­so­ci­a­tion sci­en­tif­ic con­fab. And while the stel­lar num­bers we saw at ASH have erod­ed some­what as more blood can­cer pa­tients are eval­u­at­ed, the re­sponse rates for this CD3/CD20 drug re­main high.

A to­tal of 13 out of 14 fol­lic­u­lar lym­phomas re­spond­ed to the drug, a 93% ORR, down from 100% at the last read­out. In 10 out of 14, there was a com­plete re­sponse. In dif­fuse large B-cell lym­phoma the re­sponse rate was 57% among pa­tients treat­ed at the 80 mg to 160 mg dose range. They were all com­plete re­spons­es. And 2 of these Cars were for pa­tients who had failed CAR-T ther­a­py.

Search­ing for the next block­buster to fol­low Darza­lex, J&J finds a $150M an­ti-CD38 drug from part­ner Gen­mab

Now that J&J and Genmab have thrust Darzalex onto the regulatory orbit for first-line use in multiple myeloma, the partners are lining up a deal for a next-gen follow-on to the leading CD38 drug.


Janssen — J&J’s biotech unit — has its eyes on HexaBody-CD38, a preclinical compound generated on Genmab’s tech platform designed to make drugs more potent via hexamerization.


Genmab is footing the bill on studies in multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; once it completes clinical proof of concept, Janssen has the option to license the drug for a $150 million exercise fee. There’s also $125 million worth of milestones in play.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.