Bat­tered by le­gal ex­pens­es, opi­oid drug­mak­er In­sys files for bank­rupt­cy days af­ter $225M deal to set­tle gov­ern­ment probes

To no­body’s sur­prise, con­tro­ver­sial opi­oid drug­mak­er In­sys is fil­ing for bank­rupt­cy.

John Kapoor In­sys

Last week, the com­pa­ny $IN­SY agreed to pay $225 mil­lion to set­tle the US gov­ern­ment’s sep­a­rate crim­i­nal and civ­il in­ves­ti­ga­tions re­lat­ed to its fen­tanyl spray Sub­sys, about a month af­ter its founder and for­mer se­nior ex­ec­u­tive team were found guilty by a fed­er­al ju­ry of rack­e­teer­ing. Founder John Kapoor and his four com­pa­tri­ots’ an­tics in­clud­ed brib­ing doc­tors to pre­scribe the po­tent, ad­dic­tive painkiller and dup­ing in­sur­ers in­to pay­ing for the dead­ly opi­oid drug.

The US De­part­ment of Jus­tice set­tle­ment com­pound­ed the stress on a fi­nan­cial­ly strained In­sys. Last month, the com­pa­ny in­di­cat­ed it was fac­ing a liq­uid­i­ty cri­sis trig­gered by the litany of law­suits it was sub­ject to, and in April, In­sys’ au­di­tor raised doubts on the drug­mak­er’s abil­i­ty to con­tin­ue as a go­ing con­cern.

“Af­ter con­duct­ing a thor­ough re­view of avail­able strate­gic al­ter­na­tives, we de­ter­mined that a court-su­per­vised sale process is the best course of ac­tion to max­i­mize the val­ue of our as­sets and ad­dress our lega­cy le­gal chal­lenges…” In­sys CEO An­drew Long said in a state­ment on Mon­day. The com­pa­ny’s shares $IN­SY sank about 46% in­to pen­ny stock ter­ri­to­ry at 71 cents in ear­ly morn­ing trad­ing.

The chap­ter 11 fil­ing will al­low for the pletho­ra of lit­i­ga­tion against In­sys to be pre­sent­ed be­fore a soli­tary judge who will de­ter­mine what each plain­tiff will re­ceive.

The firm will con­tin­ue to sell Sub­sys, while it looks for buy­ers for the spray and its oth­er as­sets. If In­sys is un­able to woo a Sub­sys suit­or in 90 days, the com­pa­ny will be com­pelled to stop mar­ket­ing it, ac­cord­ing to a June 5 agree­ment with the HHS. Sub­sys ac­count­ed for a bulk of $82 mil­lion in 2018 In­sys sales (to­tal loss for that year was about $124 mil­lion), down from $141 mil­lion in 2017 and a far cry from $242 mil­lion in 2016.

Af­ter re­view­ing In­sys’ court doc­u­ments, Er­ic Sny­der of NYC-based law firm Wilk Aus­lan­der found that the In­sys has 92 patents and 62 patent ap­pli­ca­tions pend­ing, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult to val­ue the com­pa­ny’s as­sets. “They say that they are seek­ing to con­duct an auc­tion sale of all of their as­sets on an ex­pe­dit­ed ba­sis, but they have yet to file a mo­tion seek­ing this au­thor­i­ty,” he said in an emailed state­ment.

“This case is very un­usu­al, be­cause they (In­sys) do not have a se­cured cred­i­tor/lender.  So, they are self-fund­ing the bank­rupt­cy. This is very ex­pen­sive and that is prob­a­bly the rea­son they mov­ing for an im­me­di­ate auc­tion, even though they have no “stalk­ing horse” (par­ties in con­tract) bid­ders,” added Sny­der, who serves as chair­man of his firm’s bank­rupt­cy de­part­ment.

In­sys is hard­ly the on­ly opi­oid drug mak­er in fi­nan­cial trou­ble. Pur­due Phar­ma — the mak­er of one of the most wide­ly abused pre­scrip­tion opi­oid painkiller Oxy­con­tin — is re­port­ed­ly con­sid­er­ing bank­rupt­cy. Mean­while, oth­er drug man­u­fac­tur­ers, dis­trib­u­tors and phar­ma­cies are al­so fac­ing hun­dreds of civ­il law­suits for their role in prop­a­gat­ing the opi­oid cri­sis.

“(T)here is lit­tle doubt that Pur­due, the mak­er of Oxy­con­tin, will be next. The po­ten­tial li­a­bil­i­ty and the stig­ma of its as­so­ci­a­tion with the drug over­comes any val­ue of the as­sets,” Sny­der said.

In­sys’ Sub­sys — which is made of fen­tanyl, the man-made opi­oid 50 times more po­tent than hero­in and 100 times more po­tent than mor­phine — was ap­proved in 2012 by the FDA for break­through can­cer pain. Pros­e­cu­tors charged the for­mer In­sys ex­ec­u­tives with in­flat­ing Sub­sys sales by brib­ing doc­tors to pre­scribe the drug to pa­tients with­out can­cer — in an elab­o­rate scheme that in­clud­ed win­ing and din­ing physi­cians, pay­ing them to speak at “ed­u­ca­tion­al events” — there­by fu­el­ing the rag­ing opi­oid cri­sis that kills 130 Amer­i­cans every day. Ju­rors at the tri­al were giv­en a front-row seat to the video en­gi­neered to train the com­pa­ny’s sales reps, in which two im­pec­ca­bly suit­ed men — os­ten­si­bly In­sys em­ploy­ees — rapped about com­pa­ny busi­ness strat­e­gy: “I love titra­tions. Yeah, that’s not a prob­lem. I got new pa­tients, and I got a lot of ‘em…If you want to be great, lis­ten to my voice. You can be great — but it’s your choice.”

Founder John Kapoor — and four mem­bers of the for­mer se­nior ex­ec­u­tive team — face up to 20 years in prison and will be sen­tenced in Sep­tem­ber.

Bat­tered by scan­dal, In­sys in re­cent years sharp­ened its fo­cus on cannabis-de­rived drug de­vel­op­ment, but even in that are­na its track record is trou­bling. In 2016, the Ari­zona-based com­pa­ny re­port­ed­ly do­nat­ed $500,000 to a cam­paign against the le­gal­iza­tion of cannabis in the state, out­rag­ing mar­i­jua­na ac­tivists who ac­cused the com­pa­ny of try­ing to sti­fle com­pe­ti­tion. That skep­ti­cism was war­rant­ed when the fol­low­ing March In­sys’ cannabi­noid oral so­lu­tion Syn­dros was resched­uled by the DEA — at the fed­er­al lev­el cannabis is strict­ly con­trolled in the same sched­ule LSD and hero­in is, and any de­rived prod­uct must be rel­e­gat­ed to low­er cat­e­go­ry be­fore it can be sold — and thus primed for launch.

Im­age: In­sys (Glass­door)

Up­dat­ed: FDA re­mains silent on or­phan drug ex­clu­siv­i­ty af­ter last year's court loss

Since losing a controversial court case over orphan drug exclusivity last year, the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development has remained entirely silent on orphan exclusivity for any product approved since last November, leaving many sponsors in limbo on what to expect.

That silence means that for more than 70 orphan-designated indications for more than 60 products, OOPD has issued no public determination on the seven-year orphan exclusivity in the Orange Book, and no new listings of orphan exclusivity appear in OOPD’s searchable database, as highlighted recently by George O’Brien, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington, DC office.

Illustration: Assistant Editor Kathy Wong for Endpoints News

As mon­ey pours in­to dig­i­tal ther­a­peu­tics, in­sur­ance cov­er­age crawls



Talk therapy didn’t help Lily with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD. But a video game did.

As the 10-year-old zooms through icy waters and targets flying creatures on the snow-capped planet Frigidus, she builds attention skills, thanks to Akili Interactive Labs’ video game EndeavorRx. She’s now less anxious and scattered, allowing her to stay on a low dose of ADHD medication, according to her mom Violet Vu.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Eli Lil­ly’s Alzheimer’s drug clears more amy­loid ear­ly than Aduhelm in first-ever head-to-head. Will it mat­ter?

Ahead of the FDA’s decision on Eli Lilly’s Alzheimer’s drug donanemab in February, the Big Pharma is dropping a first cut of data from one of the more interesting trials — but less important in a regulatory sense — at an Alzheimer’s conference in San Francisco.

In the unblinded 148-person study, Eli Lilly pitted its drug against Aduhelm, Biogen’s drug that won FDA approval but lost Medicare coverage outside of clinical trials. Notably, the study didn’t look at clinical outcomes, but rather the clearance of amyloid, a protein whose buildup is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, in the brain.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Lynn Baxter, Viiv Healthcare's head of North America

Vi­iV dri­ves new cor­po­rate coali­tion in­clud­ing Uber, Tin­der and Wal­mart, aimed at end­ing HIV

ViiV Healthcare is pulling together an eclectic coalition of consumer businesses in a new White House-endorsed effort to end HIV by the end of the decade.

The new US Business Action to End HIV includes pharma and health companies — Gilead Sciences, CVS Health and Walgreens — but extends to a wide range of consumer companies that includes Tinder, Uber and Walmart.

ViiV is the catalyst for the group, plunking down more than half a million dollars in seed money and taking on ringmaster duties for launch today on World AIDS Day, but co-creator Health Action Alliance will organize joint activities going forward. ViiV and the alliance want and expect more companies to not only join the effort, but also pitch in funding.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Matt Gline, Roivant Sciences CEO (Photo by John Sciulli/Getty Images for GLG)

Pfiz­er and Roivant team up again for an­oth­er 'Van­t', set­ting up an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry show­down with Prometheus

Pfizer and Roivant are teaming up to launch a new ‘Vant’ aimed at bringing a mid-stage anti-inflammatory drug to market, the pair announced Thursday.

There’s no name for the startup yet, nor are there any employees. Thus far, the new company and Roivant can be considered “one and the same,” Roivant CEO Matt Gline tells Endpoints News. But Pfizer is so enthusiastic about the target that it elected to keep 25% of equity in the drug rather than take upfront cash from Roivant, Gline said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Roche HQ in Basel, Switzerland. (Image credit: Kyle LaHucik/Endpoints News)

As com­peti­tors near FDA goal­post, Roche spells out its re­peat Alzheimer's set­back

Before Roche can turn all eyes on a new version of its more-than-once-failed Alzheimer’s drug gantenerumab, the Big Pharma had to flesh out data on the November topline failure at an annual conference buzzier than in years past thanks to hotly watched rivals in the field: Eisai and Biogen’s lecanemab, and Eli Lilly’s donanemab.

There was less than a 10% difference between Roche’s drug and placebo at slowing cognitive decline across two Phase III trials, which combined enrolled nearly 2,000 Alzheimer’s patients. In its presentation at the conference Wednesday, Roche said it saw less sweeping away of toxic proteins than it had anticipated. For years, researchers and investors have put their resources behind the idea that more amyloid removal would equate to reduced cognitive decline.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

SQZ Biotech slash­es head­count by 60% as founder/CEO hits ex­it — while Syn­log­ic lays off 25%

It’s a tough time for early-stage companies developing highly promising, but largely unproven, new technologies.

Just ask SQZ Biotechnologies and Synlogic. The former is bidding farewell to its founder and CEO and slashing the headcount by 60% as it pivots from its original cell therapy platform to a next-gen approach; the latter — a synthetic biology play founded by MIT’s Jim Collins and Tim Lu — is similarly “optimizing” the company to focus on lead programs. The resulting realignment means 25% of the staffers will be laid off.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 153,900+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ei­sai’s ex­pand­ed Alzheimer’s da­ta leave open ques­tions about safe­ty and clin­i­cal ben­e­fit

Researchers still have key questions about Eisai’s investigational Alzheimer’s drug lecanemab following the publication of more Phase III data in the New England Journal of Medicine Tuesday night.

In the paper, which was released in conjunction with presentations at an Alzheimer’s conference, trial investigators write that a definition of clinical meaningfulness “has not been established.” And the relative lack of new information, following topline data unveiled in September, left experts asking for more — setting up a potential showdown to precisely define how big a difference the drug makes in patients’ lives.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Illustration: Assistant Editor Kathy Wong for Endpoints News

Twit­ter dis­ar­ray con­tin­ues as phar­ma ad­ver­tis­ers ex­tend paus­es and look around for op­tions, but keep tweet­ing

Pharma advertisers on Twitter are done — at least for now. Ad spending among the previous top spenders flattened even further last week, according to the latest data from ad tracker Pathmatics, amid ongoing turmoil after billionaire boss Elon Musk’s takeover now one month ago.

Among 18 top advertisers tracked for Endpoints News, only two are spending: GSK and Bayer. GSK spending for the full week through Sunday was minimal at just under $1,900. Meanwhile, German drugmaker Bayer remains the industry outlier upping its spending to $499,000 last week from $480,000 the previous week. Bayer’s spending also marks a big increase from a month ago and before the Musk takeover, when it spent $16,000 per week.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.