BeiGene CEO John Oyler (Image: Endpoints News)

BeiGene's BTK in­hibitor fails to beat mar­ket leader Im­bru­vi­ca in key head-to-head study

BeiGene’s quest to de­vel­op a su­pe­ri­or BTK in­hibitor hit a ma­jor road­block on Mon­day as the com­pa­ny con­ced­ed that the drug failed a keen­ly an­tic­i­pat­ed head-to-head tri­al test­ing its re­cent­ly ap­proved drug, Brukin­sa, against the mar­ket-lead­ing Im­bru­vi­ca.

The re­sults amount to a se­ri­ous set­back for Chi­na’s BeiGene that is hop­ing to po­si­tion Brukin­sa, known chem­i­cal­ly as zanubru­ti­nib, as the best-in-class ther­a­py.

The tri­al, dubbed AS­PEN, test­ed the two ther­a­pies in 229 pa­tients with Walden­ström’s macroglob­u­line­mia (WMG), a rare form of lym­phoma. Brukin­sa failed the pri­ma­ry end­point of su­pe­ri­or­i­ty in com­plete re­sponse rates and “very good” par­tial re­sponse (VG­PR) rates ver­sus Im­bru­vi­ca, the com­pa­ny said.

Over­all, the VG­PR rate was 28.4% in the zanubru­ti­nib arm and 19.2% in the ibru­ti­nib arm (no pa­tients achieved a com­plete re­sponse in ei­ther arm). But since the dif­fer­ence was not sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant, zanubru­ti­nib missed the main goal of the study.

BeiGene’s shares $BGNE tum­bled near­ly 11% to $157 in pre­mar­ket trad­ing on Mon­day.

On the safe­ty side how­ev­er, Brukin­sa emerged bet­ter off. Se­ri­ous ad­verse events were seen in 58.4% pa­tients on the Brukin­sa arm, while 63.3% pa­tients suf­fered such side-ef­fects on the Im­bru­vi­ca arm. There was one death in the Brukin­sa group, and four in the Im­bru­vi­ca group.

Er­ic Hedrick BeiGene

Er­ic Hedrick — who is chief ad­vi­sor to BeiGene and for­mer­ly was re­spon­si­ble for the de­vel­op­ment of Im­bru­vi­ca in his ca­pac­i­ty as in­ter­im chief med­ical of­fi­cer at Phar­ma­cyclics — in­sist­ed the to­tal­i­ty of da­ta was still sup­port­ive of Brukin­sa’s po­ten­tial.

“Ob­vi­ous­ly, the hope was for the pri­ma­ry end­point to be met,” he not­ed in an in­ter­view with End­points News.

“But I think, the pic­ture here…in terms of ef­fi­ca­cy is some­what in­com­plete, you know the changes we do see a high­er VG­PR rate with zanubru­ti­nib and ear­ly PFS re­sults are sort of go­ing in the same di­rec­tion. So, I think this par­tic­u­lar re­sult is more in­com­plete rather than go­ing against our hy­poth­e­sis.”

BeiGene is al­so test­ing Brukin­sa against Im­bru­vi­ca in the head-to-head ALPINE study, which in­volves the larg­er pa­tient pop­u­la­tion of chron­ic lym­pho­cyt­ic leukemia (CLL) pa­tients.

There are some dif­fer­ences in the way that the tri­al is de­signed (for ex­am­ple, it first looks at non-in­fe­ri­or­i­ty and then su­pe­ri­or­i­ty) as well as the fact that it has more pa­tients, which gives BeiGene con­fi­dence that there still could be a pos­i­tive read­out, Hedrick added.

Both Brukin­sa (zanubru­ti­nib) and Im­bru­vi­ca in­hib­it Bru­ton’s ty­ro­sine ki­nase (BTK), an en­zyme that plays a cru­cial role in onco­genic sig­nal­ing that is key for the pro­lif­er­a­tion and sur­vival of leukemic cells in many B-cell ma­lig­nan­cies. J&J and Ab­b­Vie’s block­buster Im­bru­vi­ca was first ap­proved in 2013, but safe­ty and tol­er­a­bil­i­ty is­sues with the drug soon emerged. Since then, sec­ond-gen­er­a­tion BTK in­hibitors, such as As­traZeneca’s Calquence, have been po­si­tioned as safer but equal­ly ef­fi­ca­cious al­ter­na­tives.

“Our hy­poth­e­sis wasn’t to make a safer drug, it was to make a more ef­fi­ca­cious drug by be­ing able to shut down BTK any­where in your body 24 hours a day, sev­en days a week,” BeiGene chief John Oyler told End­points News ear­li­er this year.

But by kick­ing off the head-to-head tri­al long be­fore scor­ing its first FDA ap­proval, BeiGene had sig­naled its con­fi­dence in Brukin­sa.

Weeks af­ter Am­gen took a $2.7 bil­lion stake in BeiGene, the Bei­jing-based biotech se­cured its first-ever FDA ap­proval for Brukin­sa in No­vem­ber — months ahead of sched­ule — for pre­vi­ous­ly treat­ed pa­tients with man­tle cell lym­phoma (MCL), a typ­i­cal­ly ag­gres­sive, rare, form of blood can­cer. In a first, the ap­proval was based on da­ta from pa­tients that were large­ly based out­side of the Unit­ed States.

Co-found­ed by Oyler and Xi­aodong Wang, BeiGene has close ties with the Unit­ed States, the world’s largest phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals mar­ket. In ad­di­tion to a cadre of part­ner­ships with small and mid-sized US drug de­vel­op­ers, the com­pa­ny sells a raft of Cel­gene drugs in Chi­na, while Am­gen has tak­en a hefty  20.5% stake in the drug­mak­er.

Beigene is a promi­nent mem­ber of a pack of Chi­nese biotech firms that have mush­roomed to cater to the sky­rock­et­ing rates of can­cer in the re­gion, with an eye on the lu­cra­tive US drug mar­ket, and have lured mil­lions in ven­ture fund­ing and pub­lic list­ings.

In­vestors and an­a­lysts have been ea­ger­ly fo­cused on the AS­PEN study. “The safe­ty and tol­er­a­bil­i­ty pro­file (for zanubru­ti­nib) are as im­por­tant as the ef­fi­ca­cy da­ta, in our opin­ion, as the Achilles heel for Im­bru­vi­ca is not the lack of ef­fi­ca­cy, but the rel­a­tive­ly high rates of atri­al fib­ril­la­tion and ma­jor he­m­or­rhage,” SVB Leerink an­a­lysts wrote in a note in Oc­to­ber pre­view­ing AS­PEN re­sults.

“(T)his will be the first ran­dom­ized piv­otal tri­al com­par­ing zanu head-to-head vs. the mar­ket lead­ing BTK in­hibitor, and is like­ly to shape in­vestor per­cep­tions of how com­mer­cial­ly com­pet­i­tive zanu could be in larg­er op­por­tu­ni­ties such as CLL. Zanu com­pris­es ~60% of our to­tal BGNE fun­da­men­tal val­ue, so sen­ti­ment ex­it­ing this event is para­mount.”

Ear­li­er this month, at the an­nu­al Amer­i­can So­ci­ety of Hema­tol­ogy (ASH) meet­ing, BeiGene broke out en­cour­ag­ing da­ta on 109 pa­tients from the SE­QUOIA tri­al eval­u­at­ing Brukin­sa against a com­bi­na­tion of Roche’s Rit­ux­an and the chemother­a­py ben­damus­tine in pa­tients with treat­ment-naive chron­ic lym­pho­cyt­ic leukemia/small lym­pho­cyt­ic lym­phoma (CLL/SLL).

The over­all re­sponse rate was 92.7% (101/109), with a par­tial re­sponse rate of 78.9% (86/109), and a com­plete re­sponse rate of 1.9% (2/109), BeiGene said, not­ing that there were four cas­es of dis­ease pro­gres­sion. “Over­all, the safe­ty pro­file for zanu ap­peared large­ly con­sis­tent with pre­vi­ous­ly re­port­ed da­ta. The clin­i­cal ac­tiv­i­ty and safe­ty/tol­er­a­bil­i­ty con­tin­ue to look com­pet­i­tive vs. Im­bru­vi­ca in this dif­fi­cult-to-treat pop­u­la­tion,” SVB Leerink’s An­drew Berens wrote in a note last week.

Mean­while, the FDA last month ex­pand­ed the use of As­traZeneca’s Calquence in pa­tients with CLL.

BiTE® Plat­form and the Evo­lu­tion To­ward Off-The-Shelf Im­muno-On­col­o­gy Ap­proach­es

Despite rapid advances in the field of immuno-oncology that have transformed the cancer treatment landscape, many cancer patients are still left behind.1,2 Not every person has access to innovative therapies designed specifically to treat his or her disease. Many currently available immuno-oncology-based approaches and chemotherapies have brought long-term benefits to some patients — but many patients still need other therapeutic options.3

Pfiz­er’s Doug Gior­dano has $500M — and some ad­vice — to of­fer a cer­tain breed of 'break­through' biotech

So let’s say you’re running a cutting-edge, clinical-stage biotech, probably public, but not necessarily so, which could see some big advantages teaming up with some marquee researchers, picking up say $50 million to $75 million dollars in a non-threatening minority equity investment that could take you to the next level.

Doug Giordano might have some thoughts on how that could work out.

The SVP of business development at the pharma giant has helped forge a new fund called the Pfizer Breakthrough Growth Initiative. And he has $500 million of Pfizer’s money to put behind 7 to 10 — or so — biotech stocks that fit that general description.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 82,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ken Frazier, AP Images

Why Mer­ck wait­ed, and what they now bring to the Covid-19 fight

Nicholas Kartsonis had been running clinical infectious disease research at Merck for almost 2 years when, in mid-January, he got a new assignment: searching the pharma giant’s vast libraries for something that could treat the novel coronavirus.

The outbreak was barely two weeks old when Kartsonis and a few dozen others got to work, first in small teams and then in a larger task force that sucked in more and more parts of the sprawling company as Covid-19 infected more and more of the globe. By late February, the group began formally searching for vaccine and antiviral candidates to license. Still, while other companies jumped out to announce their programs and, eventually and sometimes controversially, early glimpses at human data, Merck remained silent. They made only a brief announcement about a data collection partnership in April and mentioned vaguely a vaccine and antiviral search in their April 28 earnings call.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 82,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Hill­house re­casts spot­light on Chi­na's biotech scene with $160M round for Shang­hai-based an­ti­body mak­er

Almost two years after first buying into Genor Biopharma’s pipeline of cancer and autoimmune therapies, Hillhouse Capital has led a $160 million cash injection to push the late-stage assets over the finish line while continuing to fund both internal R&D and dealmaking.

The Series B has landed right around the time Genor would have listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange, according to plans reported by Bloomberg late last year. Insiders had said that the company was looking to raise about $200 million.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 82,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Fangliang Zhang (Imaginechina via AP Images)

The big mon­ey: Poised to make drug R&D his­to­ry, a Chi­na biotech un­veils uni­corn rac­ing am­bi­tions in a bid to raise $350M-plus on Nas­daq

Almost exactly three years after Shanghai-based Legend came out of nowhere to steal the show at ASCO with jaw-dropping data on their BCMA-targeted CAR-T for multiple myeloma, the little player with Big Pharma connections is taking a giant step toward making it big on Wall Street. And this time they want to seal the deal on a global rep after staking out a unicorn valuation in what’s turned out to be a bull market for biotech IPOs — in the middle of a pandemic.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Gilead re­leas­es an­oth­er round of murky remde­sivir re­sults

A month after the NIH declared the first trial on remdesivir in Covid-19 a success, Gilead is out with new results on their antiviral. But although the study met one of its primary endpoints, the data are likely to only add to a growing debate over how effective the drug actually is.

In a Phase III trial, patients given a 5-day dose of remdesivir were 65% more likely to show “clinical improvement” compared to an arm given standard-of-care. The trial, though, gave little indication for whether the drug had an impact on key endpoints such as survival or time-to-recovery. And in a surprising twist, a 10-day dosing arm of remdesivir didn’t lead to a statistically significant improvement over standard of care.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 82,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Len Schleifer (left) and George Yancopoulos, Regeneron (Vimeo)

Eyes on he­mo­phil­ia prize, Re­gen­eron adds a $100M wa­ger on joint de­vel­op­ment cam­paign with In­tel­lia

When George Yancopoulos first signed up Intellia to be its CRISPR/Cas9 partner on gene editing projects 4 years ago, the upstart smartly ramped up its IPO at the same time. Today, Regeneron $REGN is coming back in, adding $100 million in an upfront fee and equity to significantly boot up a whole roster of new development projects.

And they’re highlighting some clinical hemophilia research plans in the process.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 82,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Mark Genovese (Stanford via Twitter)

Gilead woos fil­go­tinib clin­i­cal in­ves­ti­ga­tor from Stan­ford to lead the charge on NASH, in­flam­ma­to­ry dis­eases

With an FDA OK for the use of filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis expected to drop any day now, Gilead has recruited a new leader from academia to lead its foray into inflammatory diseases.

Mark Genovese — a longtime Stanford professor and most recently the clinical chief in the division of immunology and rheumatology — was the principal investigator in FINCH 2, one of three studies that supported Gilead’s NDA filing. In his new role as SVP, inflammation, he will oversee the clinical development of the entire portfolio.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 82,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Bris­tol My­ers Squib­b's just-launched MS drug Zeposia makes the cut in key ul­cer­a­tive col­i­tis tri­al

In March, Zeposia became the third oral S1P modulator to secure US approval for multiple sclerosis. Now, the drug has succeeded in a key ulcerative colitis study.

The immunomodulator, akin to others in its class, controls lymphocyte trafficking by limiting the white blood cells to the lymphatic system, in the lymph nodes, and thwarting their ability to jam up lymph nodes — precluding their ability to penetrate the bloodstream and the central nervous system.