Bio­Marin isn’t go­ing to let a ri­val’s suc­cess over the week­end get in the way of mak­ing a bee-line to the FDA with an im­per­fect, but pre­sentable, gene ther­a­py for he­mo­phil­ia A.

On Mon­day the biotech $BM­RN re­port­ed that its talks with the FDA and the EMA con­vinced ex­ecs to make a leap for an ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval with da­ta on just a hand­ful of pa­tients. And they’re hand­ing over Phase I/II and in­ter­im Phase III re­sults in Q4 to make their case.

That de­ci­sion was made de­spite a con­sid­er­able back­lash against the lat­est snap­shot of the da­ta, with wors­en­ing ef­fi­ca­cy over time and a low­er ini­tial re­sponse in their piv­otal tri­al — but ex­cel­lent bleed rates, so far. Bio­Marin says that with a break­through drug des­ig­na­tion in the USA and Eu­rope’s prime sta­tus, they have good rea­son to be­lieve they are on track to field the world’s first gene ther­a­py.

In­vestors ap­pear some­what skep­ti­cal though, with Bio­Marin shares down 2.4% in Mon­day af­ter­noon trad­ing.

Here’s the bet they’re mak­ing, out­lined in their lat­est state­ment:

Fac­tor VI­II lev­els sus­tained over a three-year pe­ri­od were suf­fi­cient to achieve strik­ing he­mo­sta­t­ic ef­fi­ca­cy. Fac­tor VI­II ex­pres­sion has en­tered a plateau phase where the rate of de­cline has sub­stan­tial­ly slowed, which could be in­dica­tive of durable, long-term ex­pres­sion.

Leerink’s Joseph Schwartz of­fers a bull­ish as­sess­ment of Bio­Marin’s gam­ble:

Based on BM­RN’s Ph.3 da­ta, the com­pa­ny met their pre-spec­i­fied cri­te­ria for ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval – 8 pts achiev­ing mean fac­tor VI­II/FVI­II lev­els above 40 IU/dL. With on­ly 17 pts (out of 20 pts) eval­u­at­ed so far, it is pos­si­ble that the re­main­ing 3 could pro­vide more con­fi­dence in Val­rox al­though it is not re­quired for ac­cel­er­at­ed ap­proval since BM­RN has al­ready met the bar. The com­pa­ny is fo­cused on get­ting Val­rox to mar­ket as soon as pos­si­ble by sub­mit­ting their fil­ing in 4Q19 based on their Ph.3 in­ter­im analy­sis and aims to com­plete GEN­Er8-1 (6E13 vg/kg) en­roll­ment in ear­ly fall 2019. As­sum­ing BM­RN could in­crease and op­ti­mize ef­fi­ca­cy — re­call, chro­mogenic mea­sures were high­er in Ph.1/2 at weeks 23-26 than Ph.3 (68 IU/dL mean/57 IU/dL me­di­an in Ph.1/2 vs 36 IU/dL mean/33 IU/dL me­di­an Ph.3) — we be­lieve that po­ten­tial stud­ies BM­RN may con­duct lat­er could fur­ther boost sales and in­crease Val­rox’s at­trac­tive­ness among he­mo­phil­ia A pts, es­pe­cial­ly as com­pet­ing pro­grams (i.e., SG­MO/PFE) ap­pear to be de­liv­er­ing com­pet­i­tive ef­fi­ca­cy.

Spark Ther­a­peu­tics $ONCE is wide­ly viewed as the run­ner up for now, while Roche strug­gles to com­plete its $4.3 bil­lion buy­out as soon as pos­si­ble. But Sang­amo/Pfiz­er gar­nered some care­ful sec­ond looks a few days ago as they post­ed bet­ter ef­fi­ca­cy and a fast re­sponse among 4 evalu­able pa­tients. That team al­so out­lined plans to make a leap for­ward on an ac­cel­er­at­ed path­way as they sought to catch up with the two fron­trun­ners.

Any stum­ble at this point could prove a set­back, but if they stay on track Sang­amo and Pfiz­er may set up a sit­u­a­tion where pa­tients can choose an im­per­fect gene ther­a­py or wait for a bet­ter one. And Bio­Marin has out­lined plans to charge in the range of $2 mil­lion to $3 mil­lion per treat­ment — with the ca­pa­bil­i­ty of earn­ing $10 bil­lion to $15 bil­lion a year — adding stick­er shock for pay­ers to the list of chal­lenges.

It’s official. Memorial Sloan Kettering has picked a brain cancer expert as its new physician-in-chief and CMO, replacing José Baselga, who left under a cloud after being singled out by The New York Times and ProPublica for failing to properly air his lucrative industry ties.

His replacement, who now will be in charge of MSK’s cutting-edge research work as well as the cancer care delivered by hundreds of practitioners, is Lisa M. DeAngelis. DeAngelis had been chair of the neurology department and co-founder of MSK’s brain tumor center and was moved in to the acting CMO role in the wake of Baselga’s departure.

More than two years ago Ritter Pharmaceuticals managed to find enough silver lining in its Phase IIb/III study — after missing the top-line mark — to propel its lactose intolerance toward a confirmatory trial. But as it turned out, the enthusiasm only set the biotech and its investors up to be sorely disappointed.

This time around there’s little left to salvage. Not only did RP-G28 fail to beat placebo in reducing lactose intolerance symptoms, patients in the treatment group actually averaged a smaller improvement. On a composite score measuring symptoms like abdominal pain, cramping, bloating and gas, patients given the drug had a mean reduction of 3.159 while the placebo cohort saw a 3.420 drop on average (one-sided p-value = 0.0106).

An early-stage update on Adverum Biotechnologies’ intravitreal gene therapy has triggered investor concern, after patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) saw their vision deteriorate, despite signs that the treatment is improving retinal anatomy.

Adverum, on Wednesday, unveiled 24-week data from the OPTIC trial of its experimental therapy, ADVM-022, in six patients who have been administered with one dose of the therapy. On average, patients in the trial had severe disease with an average of 6.2 anti-VEGF injections in the eight months prior to screening and an average annualized injection frequency of 9.3 injections.

Too often, Alex Arfaei arrived too late. 

An analyst at BMO Capital Markets, he’d meet with biotech or pharmaceutical heads for their IPO or secondary funding and his brain, trained on a biology degree and six years at Merck and Endo, would spring with questions: Why this biomarker? Why this design? Why not this endpoint? Not that he could do anything about it. These execs were coming for clinical money; their decisions had been made and finalized long ago.

In the first of what it hopes will be a couple of major regulatory milestones for its new drug, Ardelyx has bagged an FDA approval to market Ibsrela (tenapanor) for irritable bowel syndrome.

The drug’s first application will be for IBS with constipation (IBS-C), inhibiting sodium-hydrogen exchanger NHE3 in the GI tract in such a way as to increase bowel movements and decrease abdominal pain. This comes on the heels of two successful Phase III trials.