Biotech Voic­es: Re­vis­it­ing the 'cy­tokine stor­m' in ARDS; the painful wait for an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry drugs/tar­gets that solve Covid-19 deaths

Biotech Voices is a collection of exclusive opinion editorials from some of the leading voices in biopharma on the biggest industry questions today. Think you have a voice that should be heard? Reach out to senior editors Kyle Blankenship and Amber Tong.

I am a pul­monary and crit­i­cal care physi­cian-sci­en­tist with sub­stan­tial ex­per­tise in crit­i­cal care med­i­cine, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the in­flam­ma­to­ry path­ways in­volved in the acute res­pi­ra­to­ry dis­tress syn­drome (ARDS) and ven­ti­la­tor-in­duced lung in­jury (VILI).

As a re­sult, my lab­o­ra­to­ry has been pur­su­ing mech­a­nis­tic in­sights and ef­fec­tive ther­a­pies for ARDS and VILI for sev­er­al decades. Over this ex­pand­ed time hori­zon, there is abun­dant sup­port for the con­trib­u­to­ry role of the much dis­cussed “cy­tokine storm,” long as­so­ci­at­ed with fa­tal ARDS and now with Covid-19-as­so­ci­at­ed ARDS.

The es­sen­tial na­ture of the elab­o­rat­ed cy­tokines to Covid-19 ARDS out­comes has been ques­tioned in the me­dia and were ini­tial­ly voiced in an ed­i­to­r­i­al by UCSF ARDS ex­perts. It is ap­pro­pri­ate to con­sid­er this point of view; how­ev­er, it must be rec­og­nized that the pri­ma­ry ba­sis for this sen­ti­ment is re­lat­ed to ob­ser­va­tions cen­tered on the in­ter­leukin-6 (IL-6) path­way, well-rec­og­nized to be in­volved in ARDS patho­bi­ol­o­gy.

One ob­ser­va­tion is that me­di­an cir­cu­lat­ing IL-6 lev­els in five Covid-19 co­horts were low­er when com­pared to co­horts of non-Covid-19 ARDS, and the sec­ond ob­ser­va­tion is that sev­er­al high-pro­file tri­als tar­get­ing IL-6 re­cep­tor an­tag­o­nism in Covid ARDS failed to im­prove COVID-19 ARDS mor­tal­i­ty. Specif­i­cal­ly, the IL-6 re­cep­tor an­tag­o­nists tocilizum­ab (Roche/Sanofi) and sar­ilum­ab (Re­gen­eron/Sanofi), both failed to im­prove mor­tal­i­ty in Phase II/III clin­i­cal tri­als of Covid-19 pa­tients with se­vere dis­ease (“Cleanup on IL-6”).

In fact, tri­al ev­i­dence sug­gest­ed that drug re­cip­i­ents may be at in­creased risk for oth­er in­fec­tions, a par­tic­u­lar risk in re­gions where drug-re­sis­tant bac­te­ria are com­mon. The ac­cu­mu­lat­ed fail­ure of tar­get­ing the IL-6 path­way may re­flect sev­er­al fac­tors that are of spe­cif­ic rel­e­vance to IL-6, in­clud­ing the down­stream na­ture of this cy­tokine in the in­flam­ma­to­ry cas­cade, as well as the com­plex role of IL-6 in in­nate im­mu­ni­ty, i.e. ex­ert­ing both an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry and pro-in­flam­ma­to­ry ef­fects.

Over­all, I be­lieve there is wide ac­cep­tance that ARDS patho­bi­ol­o­gy is fun­da­men­tal­ly re­lat­ed to mas­sive ac­ti­va­tion of evo­lu­tion­ar­i­ly-con­served in­flam­ma­to­ry net­works by sep­sis (in­fec­tion in the blood), se­vere trau­ma, and se­vere bac­te­r­i­al or vi­ral pneu­mo­nias in­clud­ing SARS-CoV-2. This in­flam­ma­to­ry ac­ti­va­tion is sub­stan­tial­ly am­pli­fied when pa­tients are placed up­on me­chan­i­cal ven­ti­la­tion, a po­tent in­flam­ma­to­ry stim­u­lus and con­trib­u­tor to ARDS mor­tal­i­ty.

Thus, tar­get­ing of the un­remit­ting in­flam­ma­tion re­mains a crit­i­cal com­po­nent to ad­dress­ing ARDS mor­tal­i­ty, al­beit un­like­ly as a sole ther­a­peu­tic strat­e­gy. This was sup­port­ed by the Unit­ed King­dom tri­als demon­strat­ing ben­e­fit of the po­tent, non-spe­cif­ic an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry steroid, dex­am­etha­some, in se­vere Covid-19 ARDS.

Clear­ly, ARDS is a vex­ing dis­or­der with­out FDA-ap­proved ther­a­pies and a stag­ger­ing un­met need in the cur­rent Covid-19 pan­dem­ic land­scape. The fail­ure of many promis­ing in­flam­ma­tion-fo­cused ARDS drugs in Phase II and III tri­als, such as IL-6 an­tag­o­nists and gam­ma in­ter­fer­on ana­logues, may re­flect is­sues in: 1) tar­get se­lec­tion, i.e. cy­tokines down­stream in the in­flam­ma­to­ry cas­cade; or 2) de­lays in ad­min­is­tra­tion of the an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry ther­a­peu­tic, there­by re­duc­ing its in­flu­ence on damp­en­ing in­flam­ma­to­ry ac­ti­va­tion is min­i­mal.

As a physi­cian-sci­en­tist and ICU care­giv­er, I have been long search­ing for nov­el ap­proach­es to re­duc­ing ARDS mor­tal­i­ty. When serv­ing as the Di­rec­tor of Pul­monary and Crit­i­cal Care Med­i­cine at Johns Hop­kins in 2005, I first re­port­ed the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of eNAM­PT (ex­tra­cel­lu­lar nicoti­namide phos­pho­ri­bo­syl­trans­ferase) as a mas­ter reg­u­la­tor of in­nate im­mu­ni­ty-dri­ven in­flam­ma­tion that con­tributes to ARDS mor­tal­i­ty and is es­sen­tial­ly in­volved in VILI patho­bi­ol­o­gy.

Our sub­stan­tial pre­clin­i­cal da­ta sup­port the tar­get­ing of eNAM­PT with a hu­man­ized mon­o­clon­al an­ti­body (ALT-100 mAb) to sig­nif­i­cant­ly im­pact hu­man Covid-19- and non-Covid ARDS/VILI. We are mak­ing ex­cel­lent progress in mov­ing ALT-100 mAb down the drug de­vel­op­ment pipeline and to ARDS Clin­i­cal Tri­al eval­u­a­tion.

I am to­tal­ly con­vinced that the in­creas­ing avail­abil­i­ty of nov­el strate­gies (such as ALT-100 mAb) will ul­ti­mate­ly al­low for suc­cess­ful tri­als with drugs that re­duce ARDS sever­i­ty and mor­tal­i­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly when we be­gin to em­ploy per­son­al­ized med­i­cine strate­gies in tri­al de­sign.

I do be­lieve, how­ev­er, sim­i­lar to the man­age­ment of many can­cers, that to dra­mat­i­cal­ly move the nee­dle on re­duc­ing ARDS/VILI mor­tal­i­ty, will re­quire a com­bi­na­tion of ther­a­peu­tic ap­proach­es (in­clud­ing an an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry drug). The wait for an FDA-ap­proved ARDS ther­a­py or ther­a­pies has been a frus­trat­ing re­al­i­ty. I am cer­tain many will agree that giv­en the cur­rent Covid pan­dem­ic and like­li­hood of fu­ture pan­demics, we sim­ply can­not af­ford to wait any longer.

Dr. Joe G.N. Gar­cia is an elect­ed mem­ber of the Na­tion­al Acad­e­my of Med­i­cine and CEO of Aqualung Ther­a­peu­tics, an ear­ly-stage biotech com­pa­ny de­vel­op­ing an im­mune-fo­cused, an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry plat­form cen­tered around nov­el ther­a­peu­tic hu­man­ized an­ti­bod­ies for ARDS/VILI pa­tients.

Biotech Voic­es is a con­tributed col­umn from se­lect End­pointsNews read­ers. Read pre­vi­ous pieces here. To in­quire about sub­mis­sions, con­tact Kyle Blanken­ship at kyle@end­pointsnews.com.

Tar­get­ing a Po­ten­tial Vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty of Cer­tain Can­cers with DNA Dam­age Re­sponse

Every individual’s DNA is unique, and because of this, every patient responds differently to disease and treatment. It is astonishing how four tiny building blocks of our DNA – A, T, C, G – dictate our health, disease, and how we age.

The tricky thing about DNA is that it is constantly exposed to damage by sources such as ultraviolet light, certain chemicals, toxins, and even natural biochemical processes inside our cells.¹ If ignored, DNA damage will accumulate in replicating cells, giving rise to mutations that can lead to premature aging, cancer, and other diseases.

Fol­low biotechs go­ing pub­lic with the End­points News IPO Track­er

The Endpoints News team is continuing to track IPO filings for 2021, and we’ve designed a new tracker page for the effort.

Check it out here: Biopharma IPOs 2021 from Endpoints News

You’ll be able to find all the biotechs that have filed and priced so far this year, sortable by quarter and listed by newest first. As of the time of publishing on Feb. 25, there have already been 16 biotechs debuting on Nasdaq so far this year, with an additional four having filed their S-1 paperwork.

Steve Cutler, Icon CEO (Icon)

In the biggest CRO takeover in years, Icon doles out $12B for PRA Health Sci­ences to fo­cus on de­cen­tral­ized clin­i­cal work

Contract research M&A had a healthy run in recent years before recently petering out. But with the market ripe for a big buyout and the Covid-19 pandemic emphasizing the importance of decentralized trials, Wednesday saw a tectonic shift in the CRO world.

Icon, the Dublin-based CRO, will acquire PRA Health Sciences for $12 billion in a move that will shake up the highest rungs of a fragmented market. The merger would combine the 5th- and 6th-largest CROs by 2020 revenue, according to Icon, and the merger will set the newco up to be the second-largest global CRO behind only IQVIA.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Tom Barnes (Orna)

The mR­NA era is here. MPM be­lieves the fu­ture be­longs to oR­NA — and Big Phar­ma wants a seat at the ta­ble

If the ultra-fast clinical development of Covid-19 vaccines opened the world’s eyes to the promises of messenger RNA, the subsequent delays in supply offered a crash course on the ultra-complex process of producing them. Even before the formulation and fill-finish steps, mRNA is the precious end product from an arduous journey involving enzyme-aided transcription, modification and purification.

For Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Gilead’s Kite and Astellas, it’s time to rethink the way therapeutic RNA is engineered.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

S&P ex­pects steady ero­sion in Big Phar­ma's cred­it pro­file in 2021 as new M&A deals roll in — but don't un­der­es­ti­mate their un­der­ly­ing strength

S&P Global has taken a look at the dominant forces shaping the pharma market and come to the conclusion that there will be more downgrades than upgrades in 2021 — the 8th straight year of steady decline.

But it’s not all bad news. Some things are looking up, and there’s still plenty of money to be made in an industry that enjoys a 30% to 40% profit margin, once you factor in steep R&D expenses.

Tal Zaks, Moderna CMO (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi, via still image from video)

CMO Tal Zaks bids Mod­er­na a sur­prise adieu as biotech projects $18.4B in rev­enue, plots post-Covid ex­pan­sion

How do you exit a company after six years in style? Developing one of the most lucrative and life-saving products in pharma history is probably not the worst way to go.

Tal Zaks, Moderna’s CMO since 2015, will leave the mRNA biotech in September, the biotech disclosed in their annual report this morning. The company has already retained the recruitment firm Russell Reynolds to find a replacement.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Ken Frazier, Merck CEO (Bess Adler/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

UP­DAT­ED: Mer­ck takes a swing at the IL-2 puz­zle­box with a $1.85B play for buzzy Pan­dion and its au­toim­mune hope­fuls

When Roger Perlmutter bid farewell to Merck late last year, the drugmaker perhaps best known now for sales giant Keytruda signaled its intent to take a swing at early-stage novelty with the appointment of discovery head Dean Li. Now, Merck is signing a decent-sized check to bring an IL-2 moonshot into the fold.

Merck will shell out roughly $1.85 billion for Pandion Pharmaceuticals, a biotech hoping to gin up regulatory T cells (Tregs) to treat a range of autoimmune disorders, the drugmaker said Thursday.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 102,000+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Glax­o­SmithK­line re­thinks strat­e­gy for Covid-19 an­ti­body — not the Vir ones — af­ter tri­al flop. Is there hope in high-risk pa­tients?

In the search for a better Covid-19 therapeutic, GlaxoSmithKline and Vir have partnered up on two antibodies they hope have a chance. GSK is also testing its own in-house antibody, and early results may have shut the door on its widespread use.

A combination of GSK’s monoclonal antibody otilimab plus standard of care couldn’t best standard of care alone in preventing death and respiratory failure in hospitalized Covid-19 patients after 28 days, according to data from the Phase IIa OSCAR study unveiled Thursday.

Photo: Shutterstock

Bio­phar­ma's suc­cess rate in bring­ing drugs to mar­ket has long been abysmal. Can new tools help rewrite that trou­bled past?

In 2011, a team of researchers at British drugmaker AstraZeneca had a problem they were looking to solve.

For years, drug discovery and development were a wasteland for innovation. Novel drugs largely fell into one of two categories — monoclonal antibodies and small molecules — and new therapeutic modalities were hard to come by. After a rush of promising approvals in the late 1990s — including then-Biogen’s CD20 targeting antibody breakthrough Rituxan — the field stagnated and attrition rates stayed sky-high. What exactly is the industry doing wrong? AstraZeneca asked itself.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.