In a ma­jor blow to vac­cine ef­forts, se­nior FDA lead­ers step­ping down

Mar­i­on Gru­ber

Two of the FDA’s most se­nior vac­cine lead­ers are ex­it­ing from their po­si­tions, rais­ing fresh ques­tions about the Biden ad­min­is­tra­tion and the way that it’s side­lined the FDA.

Mar­i­on Gru­ber, di­rec­tor of the FDA’s Of­fice of Vac­cines Re­search & Re­view and 32-year vet­er­an of the agency, will leave at the end of Oc­to­ber, and OVRR deputy di­rec­tor Phil Krause, who’s been at FDA for more than a decade, will leave in No­vem­ber. The news, first re­port­ed by Bio­Cen­tu­ry, is a mas­sive blow to con­fi­dence in the agency’s abil­i­ty to reg­u­late vac­cines.

The bomb­shell an­nounce­ment comes at a par­tic­u­lar­ly cru­cial mo­ment, as boost­ers and chil­dren’s shots are be­ing weighed by the reg­u­la­tor. The de­par­tures al­so come as the ad­min­is­tra­tion has re­cent­ly jumped ahead of the FDA’s re­views of boost­er shots, an­nounc­ing that they might be avail­able by the week of Sept. 20.

A for­mer se­nior FDA leader told End­points that they’re de­part­ing be­cause they’re frus­trat­ed that CDC and their ACIP com­mit­tee are in­volved in de­ci­sions that they think should be up to the FDA. The for­mer FDAer al­so said he’s heard they’re up­set with CBER di­rec­tor Pe­ter Marks for not in­sist­ing that those de­ci­sions should be kept in­side FDA. What fi­nal­ly did it for them was the White House get­ting ahead of FDA on boost­er shots.

FDA’s for­mer act­ing chief sci­en­tist Lu­ciana Bo­rio added on Twit­ter, “FDA is los­ing two gi­ants who helped bring us many safe and ef­fec­tive vac­cines over decades of pub­lic ser­vice.”

“These two are the lead­ers for Bi­o­log­ic (vac­cine) re­view in the US. They have a great team, but these two are the true lead­ers of CBER. A huge glob­al loss if they both leave,” For­mer BAR­DA di­rec­tor Rick Bright wrote, weigh­ing in on the news. “Dr. Gru­ber is much more than the Di­rec­tor. She is a glob­al leader. Vi­sion­ary mas­ter­mind be­hind glob­al clin­i­cal reg­u­la­to­ry sci­ence for flu, Ebo­la, Mers, Zi­ka, Sars-cov-2, many oth­ers.”

Phil Krause

In a let­ter from Marks to staff, he ex­plained:

Janet Wood­cock told End­points that she wish­es Gru­ber and Krause well and thanks them for their sig­nif­i­cant ser­vice.

The long-over­looked safe­ty is­sue weigh­ing on the FDA’s mind on day 1 of marathon gene ther­a­py meet­ing

As the FDA closed out day 1 of its marathon gene therapy hearing, the agency gave an unusual glimpse into their conversations — and conflict — with companies trying to start gene therapy trials.

Routinely, FDA official Andrew Byrnes explained in the only followup question regulators asked during the 8-hour session, the agency has been forced to grapple with an impurity known as empty capsids — a long known but little discussed potential safety issue for gene therapies — and, crucially, how much to push back on companies who refuse to remove them because of how costly or time consuming it might be.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 116,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (Graeme Jennings/Pool/Getty Images)

'Sig­nif­i­cant ques­tions re­main' on ap­proval of Bio­gen's new Alzheimer's drug, con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tees tell FDA

Two prominent House committees are digging deeper into the FDA’s cozy relationship with Biogen as it reviewed and approved its new Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm.

While the committees were briefed by FDA on the situation in mid-July, the chairs are now telling FDA, “This information was helpful, but significant questions remain.”

The House Energy & Commerce and Oversight committee chairs are now requesting in a letter this week to acting commissioner Janet Woodcock that FDA provide very specific info by Sept. 16. The requested information includes the body of evidence upon which regulators relied to determine the use of amyloid beta plaque as a surrogate endpoint as “reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit” for Alzheimer’s disease, and what actually happened between the FDA and Biogen leading up to the approval.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 116,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA posed a sprawl­ing set of ques­tions for two-day gene ther­a­py hear­ing. Here's what com­pa­nies and ex­perts will be watch­ing for

Gene therapy is having a moment. Once confined to academic labs and a couple of companies, the field now encompasses hundreds of trials, dozens of companies and billions of investment dollars.

With greater power, though, comes greater responsibility. The FDA is asking a panel of outside experts to try and define those responsibilities as they debate a lengthy list of 15 questions Thursday and Friday, in a two-day marathon meeting on the future of a field that has promised one-time treatments for some of the most famous and fatal diseases known to medicine.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Kurt Graves, Intarcia CEO

Af­ter 2 damn­ing CRLs and 3 de­nied dis­pute-res­o­lu­tion re­quests, an ail­ing, one-time uni­corn has on­ly a glim­mer of hope left with the FDA

Back in September 2017, the FDA issued its first complete response letter (CRL) for Intarcia Therapeutics’ lead, type 2 diabetes drug, calling on the company — the FDA now says — to address extensive clinical deficiencies, and device and product quality-related issues.

At the time of the CRL, however, the company said in a statement that it did not expect to be ordered to conduct “new pivotal trials or any long lead-time CMC activities.”

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Jim Wilson (L) and Tachi Yamada

Scoop: In­spired by the late Tachi Ya­ma­da, Jim Wil­son launch­es new non­prof­it tar­get­ing un­der­served ul­tra-rare dis­eases

A group of powerhouse biotech leaders is coming together to launch a new nonprofit, one aimed at delivering therapies to rare disease populations they believe pharma is leaving behind.

Jim Wilson, the famed gene therapy researcher, teamed up with the late Tachi Yamada and Braidwell’s Alex Karnal to launch the Institute for Life Changing Medicines. The institute, which officially debuts Thursday morning, will hit the ground running with a program for the ultra-rare Crigler-Najjar syndrome, planning to launch a first-in-human study later this year.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 116,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

HHS Xavier Becerra (AP Images)

Rule­mak­ing au­thor­i­ty re­stored at FDA as a show of sup­port in a tu­mul­tuous time

Just a day after two top career vaccine leaders at FDA retired at a key moment of the pandemic, HHS has now formally reversed a questionable Trump-era memo that had abolished FDA’s ability to write new rules.

That memo from then-HHS Secretary Alex Azar, issued Sept. 15, 2020, rescinded “any prior delegation of rulemaking authority” at the FDA. On Wednesday, however, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra issued a delegation that revoked the 2020 memo as it applies to FDA, and reinstated any delegations to FDA rescinded by the memo.

Guido Oelkers, Sobi CEO

Pri­vate eq­ui­ty, sov­er­eign wealth fund al­ly on an $8B buy­out aimed at tak­ing rare dis­ease play­er pri­vate

A private equity group has joined hands with a sovereign wealth fund out of Singapore to strike a deal to buy Swedish Orphan Biovitrum — a high-profile rare disease player better known as Sobi — for $8 billion and take the company private. But its biggest investor left a back door open to any competing offers, spurring some speculation that the bidding may not be over.

Advent International and a subsidiary of GIC finalized a deal to acquire Sobi for a 34.5% premium on its stock, based on its August 25 closing price, when buyout rumors began to circulate via Bloomberg.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 116,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

James Li, JW Therapeutics CEO

Sis­ter to Juno's liso-cel, JW's rel­ma-cel lands sec­ond-ever CAR-T ap­proval in Chi­na

Juno may have stumbled its way to a distant third finish in the CD19 CAR-T race, but its joint venture in China is heading off to a thriving start.

JW Therapeutics, which took its name from co-founders Juno and WuXi AppTec, has scored the second-ever CAR-T approval by China’s National Medical Product Administration just weeks after Fosun Kite, another joint venture, claimed first.

Now sanctioned to treat relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients who’ve had two or more lines of systemic therapy, relma-cel was developed on the same cell process platform that spawned Juno’s liso-cel — now Bristol Myers Squibb’s Breyanzi — but a different drug in that it’s tailored for Chinese needs.

Rick Jackson (second from left), Bob Rolfe (fourth from left) and US Rep. Diana Harshbarger, R-TN, are were among those on hand in Bristol, TN for the ribbon cutting to USAntibiotics reopening Monday

As bank­rupt­cy neared, work­ers at a US­An­tibi­otics site worked un­til the lights went out. Now, the site will get a sec­ond life

Linda Robbins, the VP of Quality and Regulatory Affairs at USAntibiotics in Bristol, TN was faced with a problem.

The world-class antibiotics facility where she’d worked for the last 30 years was going to shut down. So for five weeks, right up until the point of the lights being shut off, she and her team worked without pay, continuing to package products that had not yet been sealed and keep operations going for as long as possible.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 116,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.