Bris­tol-My­ers las­sos the next big thing in I/O, grabs '214 rights in a record $3.6B deal with Nek­tar

Af­ter fig­ur­ing for days in a swirling mix of ru­mors about a pos­si­ble buy­out, Nek­tar Ther­a­peu­tics $NK­TR is putting an end to the buzz with a record, multi­bil­lion-dol­lar part­ner­ship deal with Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb for a mi­nor­i­ty share of its ear­ly-stage im­muno-on­col­o­gy drug NK­TR-214.

Look­ing for a ma­jor new com­mer­cial op­por­tu­ni­ty to fol­low up on its two big I/O lead­ers — Op­di­vo and Yer­voy — Bris­tol-My­ers has forged a broad deal that will give the big biotech an ex­clu­sive de­vel­op­ment pe­ri­od to pur­sue a broad new com­bo de­vel­op­ment pro­gram cov­er­ing 20 in­di­ca­tions in­volv­ing 9 tu­mors, match­ing ‘214 with Op­di­vo and Yer­voy.

Stephen Dober­stein

Bris­tol-My­ers $BMY is pay­ing Nek­tar $1.85 bil­lion in cash — in­clud­ing $850 mil­lion for an eq­ui­ty stake — in ex­change for a 35% rev­enue split on ‘214. There’s an­oth­er $1.78 bil­lion in mile­stones, of which $1.43 bil­lion is for near-term de­vel­op­ment and reg­u­la­to­ry mile­stones. That brings the to­tal at stake to $3.63 bil­lion.

That’s a new record for the deal­mak­ing charts, with num­bers that clear­ly in­di­cate that Bris­tol-My­ers — al­ready part­nered with Nek­tar on one small Op­di­vo pact — was not the on­ly in­ter­est­ed part­ner to hunt rights for this drug.

The deal gives Bris­tol-My­ers a pe­ri­od of ex­clu­siv­i­ty on these in­di­ca­tions and tu­mors that ex­tends to a com­mer­cial launch or sev­er­al years af­ter the ef­fec­tive date of the deal. And while the com­pa­ny has 14 months to get them un­der­way, the first tri­als are al­ready be­ing ramped up with a shot at reg­is­tra­tional da­ta that could start rolling in in about 18 to 24 months, ac­cord­ing to the Nek­tar team.

They’re plan­ning an R&D jug­ger­naut, one that will re­quire 15,000 pa­tients and a deep-pock­et play­er like Bris­tol-My­ers, which is all in on I/O as Mer­ck and ri­vals look to over­come their fron­trun­ner sta­tus.

“For years we’ve known how im­por­tant that path­way was but no one was able to safe­ly ac­cess that,” says Stephen Dober­stein, head of R&D for Nek­tar. “This was a sin­gu­lar achieve­ment, a re­al tour de force of pro­tein en­gi­neer­ing.”

And per­haps most im­por­tant­ly for Bris­tol-My­ers and Nek­tar, it’s an achieve­ment Dober­stein and oth­ers be­lieve will not be eas­i­ly mim­ic­ked by any­one else look­ing to achieve the same re­sult.

“There’s a re­al­ly spe­cial syn­er­gy be­tween NK­TR-214 and the way it ba­si­cal­ly changes the im­mune sys­tem and how that syn­er­gizes with the mech­a­nism of ac­tion of Op­di­vo,” adds Jonathan Za­levsky, Nek­tar’s chief sci­en­tif­ic of­fi­cer.

Saurabh Sa­ha

“We now have three ther­a­pies in im­muno-on­col­o­gy with val­i­dat­ed mech­a­nisms in IO which have shown clin­i­cal ben­e­fit,” says Saurabh Sa­ha, se­nior vice pres­i­dent and glob­al head of trans­la­tion­al med­i­cine at Bris­tol-My­ers: PD-1 (Op­di­vo), CT­LA-4 (Yer­voy) and now ‘214. “The T cell is the war­head against can­cer cells,” he adds. And sci­en­tists in both groups are ea­ger to con­tin­ue a broad pro­gram that doesn’t just spur a CD4/CD8 T cell at­tack on the can­cer cells, but al­so rais­es the lev­el of PD-L1 ex­pres­sion on T cells, get­ting them to reach more pa­tients more ef­fec­tive­ly.

Bris­tol-My­ers isn’t just hand­ing over a block­buster up­front. The I/O leader is al­so pay­ing 67.5% to 78% of the clin­i­cal tri­al costs in­volved in the com­bo stud­ies. And the pact leaves Nek­tar with sole pric­ing pow­er, part of a pack­age that leans heav­i­ly in its fa­vor.

The ther­a­py — an in-house project at Nek­tar which has a unique tar­get in the IL-2 path­way — is de­signed to bind to the CD122 re­cep­tor on the sur­face of CD-8 and CD-4 pos­i­tive im­mune cells to whip up an at­tack on var­i­ous can­cers.

That pro­file fit Bris­tol-My­ers per­fect­ly when Nek­tar ear­li­er struck a not un­com­mon 50/50 deal to use their drug in com­bi­na­tion with Op­di­vo (nivolum­ab), match­ing a ther­a­py aimed at dri­ving an im­mune re­sponse with a pop­u­lar check­point block­buster that helps take the brakes off the as­sault.

Jonathan Za­levsky

But Nek­tar at­tract­ed the in­dus­try spot­light at SITC last No­vem­ber with a med­ley of ear­ly-stage da­ta points that un­der­scored ‘214’s wide-rang­ing po­ten­tial. And then Bloomberg stirred the pot a few days ago with a re­port quot­ing sources claim­ing that Nek­tar — a hot­ly buzzed about M&A tar­get — was scout­ing deals, in­clud­ing a po­ten­tial sale.

With that kind of steamy spec­u­la­tion in a hot­house en­vi­ron­ment for biotech ac­qui­si­tions, Nek­tar’s shares have more than tripled in the last 4 months. Those M&A ru­mors were ini­tial­ly damp­ened by to­day’s news of a mega-part­ner­ship in­stead of a buy­out. And dis­ap­point­ed in­vestors quick­ly drove down Nek­tar’s shares more than 3% ear­ly Wednes­day morn­ing, with the stock jump­ing in­to the green by mid-morn­ing as some up­beat as­sess­ments of the deal be­gan to cir­cu­late.

At SITC, Nek­tar’s in­ves­ti­ga­tors not­ed some high­lights on ‘214, in­clud­ing:

•In treat­ment-naïve first-line pa­tients with stage IV melanoma, re­searchers tracked re­spons­es in 7 of 11 pa­tients (63%), with 2 com­plete re­spons­es — no vis­i­ble signs of the dis­ease — and 5 par­tial re­spons­es. Not all of these num­bers are pre­cise. It’s im­por­tant to note though that one of the CRs and one of the PRs were un­con­firmed — em­pha­siz­ing just how ear­ly these re­sults were.

•Among 13 kid­ney can­cer pa­tients with one or more base­line scans, re­spons­es were ob­served in 6 (46%), with 1 com­plete re­sponse and 5 par­tials.

•For a small group of 4 pa­tients with ad­vanced PD-L1/neg­a­tive non-small cell lung can­cer, the in­ves­ti­ga­tors tracked a re­sponse in 3 (75%), with 1 com­plete and 2 par­tials.

“Sin­gle-agent nivolum­ab is known for all these in­di­ca­tions, with a 34% re­sponse for melanoma,” Mary Tagli­a­fer­ri, a top re­searcher at Nek­tar, told me last No­vem­ber. A com­bi­na­tion could prove to be sig­nif­i­cant­ly bet­ter.

That is par­tic­u­lar­ly im­por­tant for Bris­tol-My­ers, which earned $5 bil­lion from Op­di­vo sales last year. While on track to be­come a megablock­buster, new PD-1/L1 check­points are com­ing along that threat­en to over­whelm and com­modi­tize the first bunch of pi­o­neers, of­ten with lit­tle clear da­ta to dis­tin­guish one from an­oth­er. That leaves the fron­trun­ners look­ing for new and bet­ter ways to dis­tin­guish their drugs with com­bi­na­tions in­volv­ing ear­ly-stage ef­forts like this.

For Bris­tol-My­ers, the Nek­tar pro­gram of­fers a clear path to main­tain­ing a lead­er­ship role in I/O.

Ham­mer­ing away at these mech­a­nisms, the bio­mark­ers in­volved and the way these com­bi­na­tions work, says Sa­ha, is cru­cial to the longterm suc­cess of these drugs for pa­tients.

Adds Sa­ha: “This is the on­ly way we’re go­ing to be able to con­quer can­cer.”

Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks (Evan Vucci/AP Images)

A P val­ue of 0.38? NE­JM re­sults raise new ques­tions for Eli Lil­ly's vaunt­ed Covid an­ti­body

Generally, a P value of 0.38 means your drug failed and by a fair margin. Depending on the company, the compound and the trial, it might mean the end of the program. It could trigger layoffs.

For Eli Lilly, though, it was part of the key endpoint on a trial that landed them a $1.2 billion deal with the US government to supply up to nearly 1 million Covid-19 antibodies.

So what does one make of that? Was the endpoint not so important, as Lilly maintains? Or did the US government promise a princely sum for a pedestrian drug?

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Noubar Afeyan, Flagship founder and CEO (Victor Boyko/Getty Images)

UP­DAT­ED: Flag­ship launch­es Sen­da Bio­sciences with $88M in back­ing, look­ing to pi­o­neer the field of 'In­ter­sys­tems Bi­ol­o­gy'

Flagship Pioneering has a fresh company out this week, one that aims to lay the groundwork for a whole new discipline.

Senda Biosciences launched Wednesday with $88 million in Flagship cash. The goal? Gain insights into the molecular connections between people and coevolved nonhuman species like plants and bacteria, paving the way for “Intersystems Biology.”

Guillaume Pfefer has been tapped to run the show, a 25-year biotech veteran who comes from GSK after leading the development of the company’s shingles vaccine.

Daphne Koller, Getty

Bris­tol My­er­s' Richard Har­g­reaves pays $70M to launch a neu­rode­gen­er­a­tion al­liance with a star play­er in the ma­chine learn­ing world

Bristol Myers Squibb is turning to one of the star upstarts in the machine learning world to go back to the drawing board and come up with the disease models needed to find drugs that can work against two of the toughest targets in the neuro world.

Daphne Koller’s well-funded insitro is getting $70 million in cash and near-term milestones to use their machine learning platform to create induced pluripotent stem cell-derived disease models for ALS and frontotemporal dementia.

Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks at the Rose Garden, May 26, 2020 (Evan Vucci/AP Images)

Eli Lil­ly lines up a block­buster deal for Covid-19 an­ti­body, right af­ter it failed a NI­AID tri­al

Two days after Eli Lilly conceded that its antibody bamlanivimab was a flop in hospitalized Covid-19 patients, the US government is preparing to make it a blockbuster.

The pharma giant reported early Wednesday that it struck a deal to supply the feds with 300,000 vials of the drug at a cost of $375 million — once it gets an EUA stamp from the FDA. And once that 2-month supply deal is done, the government has an option on another 650,000 doses on the same terms — which could potentially add another $812 million.

Ar­cus and As­traZeneca part­ner on a high stakes an­ti-TIG­IT/PD-L1 PhI­II can­cer study, look­ing to im­prove on a stan­dard of care

For AstraZeneca, the PACIFIC trial in Stage III non-small cell lung cancer remains one of the big triumphs for AstraZeneca’s oncology R&D group. It not only made their PD-L1 Imfinzi a franchise player with a solid advance in a large niche of the lung cancer market, the study — which continues to offer data on the long-range efficacy of their drug — also helped salve the vicious sting of the failure of the CTLA-4 combo in the MYSTIC study.

No­var­tis buys a new gene ther­a­py for vi­sion loss, and this is one pre­clin­i­cal ven­ture that did­n't come cheap

Cyrus Mozayeni got excited when he began to explore the academic work of Ehud Isacoff and John G. Flannery at UC Berkeley.

Together, they were engaged in finding a gene therapy approach to pan-genotypic vision restoration in patients with photoreceptor-based blindness, potentially restoring the vision of a broad group of patients. And they did it by using a vector to deliver the genetic sequence for light sensing proteins.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sanofi teams up with Mer­ck to pair Keytru­da with a next-gen IL-2 can­di­date from the Syn­thorx buy­out

Nearly a year after snapping up a next-gen immuno-oncology candidate in its $2.5 billion Synthorx buyout, Sanofi is joining forces with Merck to pair the drug with blockbuster Keytruda.

The pharmas are planning a Phase II trial of Sanofi’s non-alpha IL-2 candidate THOR-707 in combination or sequenced administration with Keytruda for various cancers. While the companies are keeping mum about the financial terms and targets, they said the trials will be Sanofi-sponsored.

CMO Merdad Parsey (Gilead)

Gilead hits the brakes on a tri­fec­ta of mid- and late-stage stud­ies for their trou­bled fil­go­tinib pro­gram. It's up to the FDA now

Gilead $GILD execs haven’t decided exactly what to do with filgotinib in the wake of the slapdown at the FDA on their rheumatoid arthritis application, but they’re taking a time out for a slate of studies until they can gain some clarity from the agency. And without encouraging guidance, this drug could clearly be axed from the pipeline.

In their Q3 report out Wednesday afternoon, the company says researchers have “paused” a Phase III study for psoriatic arthritis along with a pair of Phase II trials for ankylosing spondylitis and uveitis. Late-stage studies for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s are continuing, but you can see for yourself how big a hole this leaves in the inflammatory disease pipeline, with obvious implications if the company abandons filgo altogether.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Patrick Soon-Shiong at the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference, Jan. 13, 2020 (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Af­ter falling be­hind the lead­ers, dissed by some ex­perts, biotech show­man Patrick Soon-Sh­iong fi­nal­ly gets his Covid-19 vac­cine ready for a tri­al. But can it live up to the hype?

In January, when dozens of scientists rushed to start making a vaccine for the then-novel coronavirus, they were joined by an unlikely compatriot: Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire doctor most famous for making big, controversial promises on cancer research.

Soon-Shiong had spent the last 4 years on his “Cancer Moonshot,” but part of his project meant buying a small Seattle biotech that specialized in making common-cold vectors, called adenoviruses, to train the immune system. The billionaire had been using those vectors for oncology, but the company had also developed vaccine candidates for H1N1, Lassa fever and other viruses. When the outbreak began, he pivoted.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.