Bris­tol-My­ers las­sos the next big thing in I/O, grabs '214 rights in a record $3.6B deal with Nek­tar

Af­ter fig­ur­ing for days in a swirling mix of ru­mors about a pos­si­ble buy­out, Nek­tar Ther­a­peu­tics $NK­TR is putting an end to the buzz with a record, multi­bil­lion-dol­lar part­ner­ship deal with Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb for a mi­nor­i­ty share of its ear­ly-stage im­muno-on­col­o­gy drug NK­TR-214.

Look­ing for a ma­jor new com­mer­cial op­por­tu­ni­ty to fol­low up on its two big I/O lead­ers — Op­di­vo and Yer­voy — Bris­tol-My­ers has forged a broad deal that will give the big biotech an ex­clu­sive de­vel­op­ment pe­ri­od to pur­sue a broad new com­bo de­vel­op­ment pro­gram cov­er­ing 20 in­di­ca­tions in­volv­ing 9 tu­mors, match­ing ‘214 with Op­di­vo and Yer­voy.

Stephen Dober­stein

Bris­tol-My­ers $BMY is pay­ing Nek­tar $1.85 bil­lion in cash — in­clud­ing $850 mil­lion for an eq­ui­ty stake — in ex­change for a 35% rev­enue split on ‘214. There’s an­oth­er $1.78 bil­lion in mile­stones, of which $1.43 bil­lion is for near-term de­vel­op­ment and reg­u­la­to­ry mile­stones. That brings the to­tal at stake to $3.63 bil­lion.

That’s a new record for the deal­mak­ing charts, with num­bers that clear­ly in­di­cate that Bris­tol-My­ers — al­ready part­nered with Nek­tar on one small Op­di­vo pact — was not the on­ly in­ter­est­ed part­ner to hunt rights for this drug.

The deal gives Bris­tol-My­ers a pe­ri­od of ex­clu­siv­i­ty on these in­di­ca­tions and tu­mors that ex­tends to a com­mer­cial launch or sev­er­al years af­ter the ef­fec­tive date of the deal. And while the com­pa­ny has 14 months to get them un­der­way, the first tri­als are al­ready be­ing ramped up with a shot at reg­is­tra­tional da­ta that could start rolling in in about 18 to 24 months, ac­cord­ing to the Nek­tar team.

They’re plan­ning an R&D jug­ger­naut, one that will re­quire 15,000 pa­tients and a deep-pock­et play­er like Bris­tol-My­ers, which is all in on I/O as Mer­ck and ri­vals look to over­come their fron­trun­ner sta­tus.

“For years we’ve known how im­por­tant that path­way was but no one was able to safe­ly ac­cess that,” says Stephen Dober­stein, head of R&D for Nek­tar. “This was a sin­gu­lar achieve­ment, a re­al tour de force of pro­tein en­gi­neer­ing.”

And per­haps most im­por­tant­ly for Bris­tol-My­ers and Nek­tar, it’s an achieve­ment Dober­stein and oth­ers be­lieve will not be eas­i­ly mim­ic­ked by any­one else look­ing to achieve the same re­sult.

“There’s a re­al­ly spe­cial syn­er­gy be­tween NK­TR-214 and the way it ba­si­cal­ly changes the im­mune sys­tem and how that syn­er­gizes with the mech­a­nism of ac­tion of Op­di­vo,” adds Jonathan Za­levsky, Nek­tar’s chief sci­en­tif­ic of­fi­cer.

Saurabh Sa­ha

“We now have three ther­a­pies in im­muno-on­col­o­gy with val­i­dat­ed mech­a­nisms in IO which have shown clin­i­cal ben­e­fit,” says Saurabh Sa­ha, se­nior vice pres­i­dent and glob­al head of trans­la­tion­al med­i­cine at Bris­tol-My­ers: PD-1 (Op­di­vo), CT­LA-4 (Yer­voy) and now ‘214. “The T cell is the war­head against can­cer cells,” he adds. And sci­en­tists in both groups are ea­ger to con­tin­ue a broad pro­gram that doesn’t just spur a CD4/CD8 T cell at­tack on the can­cer cells, but al­so rais­es the lev­el of PD-L1 ex­pres­sion on T cells, get­ting them to reach more pa­tients more ef­fec­tive­ly.

Bris­tol-My­ers isn’t just hand­ing over a block­buster up­front. The I/O leader is al­so pay­ing 67.5% to 78% of the clin­i­cal tri­al costs in­volved in the com­bo stud­ies. And the pact leaves Nek­tar with sole pric­ing pow­er, part of a pack­age that leans heav­i­ly in its fa­vor.

The ther­a­py — an in-house project at Nek­tar which has a unique tar­get in the IL-2 path­way — is de­signed to bind to the CD122 re­cep­tor on the sur­face of CD-8 and CD-4 pos­i­tive im­mune cells to whip up an at­tack on var­i­ous can­cers.

That pro­file fit Bris­tol-My­ers per­fect­ly when Nek­tar ear­li­er struck a not un­com­mon 50/50 deal to use their drug in com­bi­na­tion with Op­di­vo (nivolum­ab), match­ing a ther­a­py aimed at dri­ving an im­mune re­sponse with a pop­u­lar check­point block­buster that helps take the brakes off the as­sault.

Jonathan Za­levsky

But Nek­tar at­tract­ed the in­dus­try spot­light at SITC last No­vem­ber with a med­ley of ear­ly-stage da­ta points that un­der­scored ‘214’s wide-rang­ing po­ten­tial. And then Bloomberg stirred the pot a few days ago with a re­port quot­ing sources claim­ing that Nek­tar — a hot­ly buzzed about M&A tar­get — was scout­ing deals, in­clud­ing a po­ten­tial sale.

With that kind of steamy spec­u­la­tion in a hot­house en­vi­ron­ment for biotech ac­qui­si­tions, Nek­tar’s shares have more than tripled in the last 4 months. Those M&A ru­mors were ini­tial­ly damp­ened by to­day’s news of a mega-part­ner­ship in­stead of a buy­out. And dis­ap­point­ed in­vestors quick­ly drove down Nek­tar’s shares more than 3% ear­ly Wednes­day morn­ing, with the stock jump­ing in­to the green by mid-morn­ing as some up­beat as­sess­ments of the deal be­gan to cir­cu­late.

At SITC, Nek­tar’s in­ves­ti­ga­tors not­ed some high­lights on ‘214, in­clud­ing:

•In treat­ment-naïve first-line pa­tients with stage IV melanoma, re­searchers tracked re­spons­es in 7 of 11 pa­tients (63%), with 2 com­plete re­spons­es — no vis­i­ble signs of the dis­ease — and 5 par­tial re­spons­es. Not all of these num­bers are pre­cise. It’s im­por­tant to note though that one of the CRs and one of the PRs were un­con­firmed — em­pha­siz­ing just how ear­ly these re­sults were.

•Among 13 kid­ney can­cer pa­tients with one or more base­line scans, re­spons­es were ob­served in 6 (46%), with 1 com­plete re­sponse and 5 par­tials.

•For a small group of 4 pa­tients with ad­vanced PD-L1/neg­a­tive non-small cell lung can­cer, the in­ves­ti­ga­tors tracked a re­sponse in 3 (75%), with 1 com­plete and 2 par­tials.

“Sin­gle-agent nivolum­ab is known for all these in­di­ca­tions, with a 34% re­sponse for melanoma,” Mary Tagli­a­fer­ri, a top re­searcher at Nek­tar, told me last No­vem­ber. A com­bi­na­tion could prove to be sig­nif­i­cant­ly bet­ter.

That is par­tic­u­lar­ly im­por­tant for Bris­tol-My­ers, which earned $5 bil­lion from Op­di­vo sales last year. While on track to be­come a megablock­buster, new PD-1/L1 check­points are com­ing along that threat­en to over­whelm and com­modi­tize the first bunch of pi­o­neers, of­ten with lit­tle clear da­ta to dis­tin­guish one from an­oth­er. That leaves the fron­trun­ners look­ing for new and bet­ter ways to dis­tin­guish their drugs with com­bi­na­tions in­volv­ing ear­ly-stage ef­forts like this.

For Bris­tol-My­ers, the Nek­tar pro­gram of­fers a clear path to main­tain­ing a lead­er­ship role in I/O.

Ham­mer­ing away at these mech­a­nisms, the bio­mark­ers in­volved and the way these com­bi­na­tions work, says Sa­ha, is cru­cial to the longterm suc­cess of these drugs for pa­tients.

Adds Sa­ha: “This is the on­ly way we’re go­ing to be able to con­quer can­cer.”

Brent Saunders [Getty Photos]

UP­DAT­ED: Ab­b­Vie seals $63B deal to buy a trou­bled Al­ler­gan — spelling out $1B in R&D cuts

Brent Saunders has found his way out of the current fix he’s in at Allergan $AGN. He’s selling the company to AbbVie for $63 billion in the latest example of the hot M&A market in biopharma.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Richard Gonzalez testifying in front of Senate Finance Committee, February 2019 [AP Images]

Ab­b­Vie's $63B buy­out spot­lights the re­turn of ma­jor M&A deals — de­spite the back­lash

Big time M&A is back. But for how long?

Over the past 18 months we’ve now seen three ma­jor buy­outs an­nounced: Take­da/Shire; Bris­tol-My­ers/Cel­gene and now Ab­b­Vie/Al­ler­gan. And with this lat­est deal it’s in­creas­ing­ly clear that the sharp fall from grace suf­fered by high-pro­file play­ers which have seen their share prices blast­ed has cre­at­ed an open­ing for the growth play­ers in big phar­ma to up their game — in sharp con­trast to the pop­u­lar bolt-on deals that have been dri­ving the growth strat­e­gy at No­var­tis, Mer­ck, Roche and oth­ers.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

SQZ, Ery­tech kick off $57M cell ther­a­py part­ner­ship; Jean-Paul Kress lands new CEO gig at Mor­phoSys

→ In a mar­riage of two tech­nolo­gies meant to make cell ther­a­pies more pow­er­ful, SQZ Biotech is team­ing up with France’s Ery­tech Phar­ma for a col­lab­o­ra­tion, with $57 mil­lion re­served for the first project and $50 mil­lion for each sub­se­quent ap­proval (prod­uct or in­di­ca­tion). Hav­ing ac­cess to Ery­tech’s method of fash­ion­ing ther­a­peu­tics from red blood cells, the Cam­bridge, MA-based com­pa­ny said, will am­pli­fy SQZ’s cell en­gi­neer­ing ca­pa­bil­i­ties and al­low them to de­vleop a new class of im­munomod­u­la­to­ry ther­a­pies. Its own tech — so far ap­plied in can­cer but al­so has po­ten­tial in di­a­betes — tem­po­rary dis­rupts the cell mem­brane by squeez­ing the cell, thus cre­at­ing a brief win­dow for tar­get ma­te­ri­als such as anti­gens to en­ter.

FDA re­jects Ac­er's rare dis­ease drug, asks for new tri­al — shares crater

Ac­er Ther­a­peu­tics’ bid to re­pur­pose celipro­lol — a be­ta-block­er on the mar­ket for hy­per­ten­sion — as a treat­ment for a rare, in­her­it­ed con­nec­tive tis­sue dis­or­der has hit a se­vere set­back. The New­ton, Mass­a­chu­setts-based com­pa­ny on Tues­day said the FDA re­ject­ed the drug and has asked for an­oth­er clin­i­cal tri­al.

The com­pa­ny’s shares $AC­ER cratered near­ly 77% to $4.47 in Tues­day morn­ing trad­ing.

Tasly Bio­phar­ma pitch­es long-await­ed IPO — will it trig­ger an­oth­er $1B gold rush on HKEX?

In the run up to the Hong Kong stock ex­change’s an­tic­i­pat­ed rule change — open­ing the door for Chi­nese pre-rev­enue biotechs to go pub­lic clos­er to home — more than a year ago, Tasly Bio­phar­ma was one of the big play­ers whose ru­mored in­ter­est helped stoke en­thu­si­asm for the new list­ing venue. The com­pa­ny has since kept the drum­roll rum­bling in the back­ground, rais­ing a pre-IPO round and con­vinc­ing part­ner Trans­gene to swap own­er­ship in a joint ven­ture for eq­ui­ty. Now the oth­er shoe has fi­nal­ly dropped as ex­ecs out­line plans for a pipeline dom­i­nat­ed by car­dio­vas­cu­lar drugs.

UP­DAT­ED: In sur­prise switch, Bris­tol-My­ers is sell­ing off block­buster Ote­zla, promis­ing to com­plete Cel­gene ac­qui­si­tion — just lat­er

Apart from revealing its checkpoint inhibitor Opdivo blew a big liver cancer study on Monday, Bristol-Myers Squibb said its plans to swallow Celgene will require the sale of blockbuster psoriasis treatment Otezla to keep the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at bay.

The announcement — which has potentially delayed the completion of the takeover to early 2020 — irked investors, triggering the New York-based drugmaker’s shares to tumble Monday morning in premarket trading.

Celgene’s Otezla, approved in 2014 for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, is a rising star. It generated global sales of $1.6 billion last year, up from the nearly $1.3 billion in 2017. Apart from the partial overlap of Bristol-Myers injectable Orencia, the company’s rival oral TYK2 psoriasis drug is in late-stage development, after the firm posted encouraging mid-stage data on the drug, BMS-986165, last fall. With Monday’s decision, it appears Bristol-Myers is favoring its experimental drug, and discounting Otezla’s future.

The move blindsided some analysts. Credit Suisse’s Vamil Divan noted just days ago:

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 53,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Novotech CEO Dr. John Moller

Novotech CRO Award­ed Frost & Sul­li­van Best Biotech CRO Asia-Pa­cif­ic 2019

Known in the in­dus­try as the Asia-Pa­cif­ic CRO, Novotech is now lead CRO ser­vices provider for the grow­ing num­ber of in­ter­na­tion­al biotechs se­lect­ing the re­gion for their stud­ies.

Re­flect­ing this Asia-Pa­cif­ic growth, Novotech staff num­bers are up 20% since De­cem­ber 2018 to 600 in-house clin­i­cal re­search peo­ple across a full range of ser­vices, across the re­gion.

Novotech’s ca­pa­bil­i­ties have been rec­og­nized by an­a­lysts like Frost & Sul­li­van, most re­cent­ly with the pres­ti­gious Asia-Pa­cif­ic CRO Biotech of the year award for best prac­tices in clin­i­cal re­search for biotechs for the fifth year. See oth­er awards here.

With 4 more biotech IPOs due to wrap up Q2, how is the class of 2019 far­ing?

With 22 biotech IPOs on the books and four more set to price in the last week of June, in­vest­ment ad­vis­er Re­nais­sance Cap­i­tal has tak­en the pulse of the re­cent rush.

By the IPO ex­perts’ count, 25 out of 32 health­care of­fer­ings this year have been from biotechs — dif­fer­ing slight­ly from Brad Lon­car’s tal­ly — and the over­all pic­ture is one of un­der­per­for­mance. While they av­er­aged a first-day re­turn of 9.0%, col­lec­tive­ly they have trad­ed down to a 5.9% re­turn. Turn­ing Point $TP­TX and Cor­texyme $CRTX emerged on top at the half-year mark, ris­ing 135% and 109% re­spec­tive­ly.

Eye­ing a $500M peak sales pot, Almi­rall dou­bles down on le­brik­izum­ab as Der­mi­ra lines up PhI­II

With eyes on what it be­lieves is a $500 mil­lion peak rev­enue op­por­tu­ni­ty in Eu­rope, Barcelona-based Almi­rall has stepped up with $50 mil­lion in cash to take up the op­tion on Der­mi­ra’s IL-13 an­ti-in­flam­ma­to­ry drug le­brik­izum­ab just ahead of the start of Phase III. And there’s an­oth­er $30 mil­lion due as the late-stage pro­gram gets geared up.

That shouldn’t be long from now, as Der­mi­ra ex­pects to be­gin the late-stage tri­al work for atopic der­mati­tis be­fore the end of this year as it fol­lows a trail that ex­ecs in­sist leads to block­buster re­turns. Along the way, they’ll need to take on the 600-pound go­ril­la in atopic der­mati­tis: the IL-13/IL-4 drug Dupix­ent, from Re­gen­eron and Sanofi. Ri­vals al­so in­clude Leo Phar­ma, in its piv­otal with tralok­izum­ab, and Anap­tys­Bio in the hunt with a mid-stage pro­gram for etokimab, pre­vi­ous­ly re­ferred to as ANB020.