British bil­lion­aire Jim Mel­lon and high-pro­file part­ners roll the dice on an an­ti-ag­ing up­start

When British bil­lion­aire Jim Mel­lon wants to map out an in­vest­ment strat­e­gy, he likes to write a book first. Out of that process came his most re­cent work — Ju­ve­nes­cence: In­vest­ing in the Age of Longevi­ty. Now he and some close as­so­ciates with some of the best con­nec­tions in biotech are us­ing the book as in­spi­ra­tion to launch a new com­pa­ny — al­so named Ju­ve­nes­cence — with plans to make a big splash in an­ti-ag­ing re­search.

Jim Mel­lon

And they’re plant­i­ng the first seeds now with a new joint ven­ture that will start to lay the foun­da­tion for the pipeline with ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence tech­nol­o­gy.

“We are at an in­flec­tion point for the treat­ment of ag­ing,” says Greg Bai­ley, who likes to high­light some of the new cel­lu­lar path­ways that are point­ing to new ther­a­pies that can counter the ef­fects of ag­ing.

“I think this is go­ing to be the biggest deal I’ve ever done,” Bai­ley tells me in a phone in­ter­view, as his plane was prepar­ing for a take­off.  “It will need repet­i­tive fi­nanc­ing.  Five to $600 mil­lion was raised for Medi­va­tion. As we hit in­flec­tion points, we will need to raise a dra­mat­ic amount of mon­ey.”

Gre­go­ry Bai­ley

Bai­ley, the CEO of Ju­ve­nes­cence, was one of the ear­ly back­ers of Medi­va­tion, where he was a board di­rec­tor for 7 years — be­fore Pfiz­er stepped in to buy the biotech for $14 bil­lion. More re­cent­ly, he helped po­si­tion Bio­haven for an IPO, as­sem­bling a pipeline that in­cludes a late-stage drug in-li­censed from Bris­tol-My­ers Squibb be­fore rais­ing $190 mil­lion a few months ago in their maid­en of­fer­ing. The chair­man at Bio­haven is his long­time col­league De­clan Doogan, a for­mer top Pfiz­er re­search ex­ec who is com­ing in as a prin­ci­pal to the new ven­ture along­side Mel­lon and Bai­ley.

The pri­ma­ry game plan at Ju­ve­nes­cence, ex­plains Bai­ley, is to come up with var­i­ous op­er­a­tions en­gaged in de­vel­op­ing new an­ti-ag­ing drugs. Ju­ve­nes­cence AI is a joint ven­ture they’ve just set up with Alex Zha­voronkov, who runs In­sil­i­co Med­i­cine, based in Bal­ti­more. Mel­lon met Zha­voronkov while he was re­search­ing his book, says Bai­ley, and be­lieves that the tech the sci­en­tist de­vel­oped can il­lu­mi­nate new pro­grams with a bet­ter chance of suc­cess.

“They are go­ing to take up to 5 mol­e­cules from us every year for de­vel­op­ment,” says Zha­voronkov, an en­thu­si­as­tic ad­vo­cate of AI in drug re­search who’s al­so been work­ing on some al­liances with Big Phar­ma play­ers. The group has in­vest­ed about $7 mil­lion in the tech­nol­o­gy so far, he says, get­ting the JV set up. More will fol­low.

Alex Zha­voronkov

“We can gen­er­ate mol­e­cules with spe­cif­ic mol­e­c­u­lar prop­er­ties,” adds Zha­voronkov, who al­so has a spe­cial fo­cus on an­ti-ag­ing re­search.

“The mas­sive lib­er­a­tion of new da­ta needs to trans­form in­to knowl­edge,” says Doogan. “AI is the buzz word; can we take in­cre­men­tal steps, in an it­er­a­tive learn­ing process, cap­ture all knowl­edge?”

Ju­ve­nes­cence Bio will be charged with build­ing the pipeline, says Bai­ley, in part with the mol­e­cules that will be iden­ti­fied through the AI ven­ture. And Doogan will play a lead role in or­ga­niz­ing the team now, much as he was cred­it­ed with at Bio­haven.

Aside from the cel­lu­lar path­ways that have at­tract­ed their at­ten­tion, the biotech will look to ef­fect change in the mi­to­chon­dria, the cell’s pow­er­house, as well as clean up senes­cent cells that ac­cu­mu­late as the body grows old­er. And Bai­ley ex­pects he’ll be work­ing some Bio­haven-like deals to de­vel­op an ad­vanced pipeline at a rapid pace.

The prin­ci­pals chipped in the seed mil­lions for the com­pa­ny and in­vest­ed in the JV with Zha­voronkov. Bai­ley says you can ex­pect to see $20 mil­lion to $50 mil­lion more from a friends-and-fam­i­ly raise be­fore the end of the year. And it’s ex­pect­ed to grow from there.

De­clan Doogan

Doogan plans to re­cruit var­i­ous team lead­ers, in­di­vid­u­als who will be in charge of spe­cif­ic projects with 10 or few­er peo­ple on the crew. Like any biotech, he notes, they plan to re­ly on a se­mi-vir­tu­al struc­ture, with a ma­jor amount of out­sourc­ing in place of staff.

The biotech won’t just be a biotech, says Doogan. It will cov­er “mul­ti­ple do­mains: di­ag­nos­tics, con­sumer, con­ven­tion­al drug de­vel­op­ment — broad ideas to en­gage the con­sumer.”

The key, he says, is fo­cus­ing on not just a longer life, but a bet­ter one.

“Not just longer, but bet­ter longer,” is the way Doogan puts it. “Healthy ag­ing is the ob­jec­tive here.”

That leaves a lot of room.

“There are 52 ways to drop blood pres­sure, but we’ve done noth­ing for os­teoarthri­tis,” says Doogan by way of ex­am­ple.

“We have to be re­al­ly clever,” says Bai­ley. Drugs like No­var­tis’ mTOR in­hibitor everolimus, which con­trols cell growth and pro­lif­er­a­tion, can be a mod­el. Os­teoarthri­tis, a dis­ease as­so­ci­at­ed with ag­ing, can be the kind of dis­ease fo­cus that can dri­ve ear­ly work.

It’s ear­ly days yet for an­ti-ag­ing drug re­search. A few stal­warts like Bob Nelsen at Arch have backed the first few star­tups in the field. But Mel­lon and his col­leagues say now’s the time.

The longevi­ty in­dus­try, Mel­lon said re­cent­ly, is des­tined to grow “in­to the world’s largest in­dus­try.”

And he wants in.

Hal Barron, GSK

Break­ing the death spi­ral: Hal Bar­ron talks about trans­form­ing the mori­bund R&D cul­ture at GSK in a crit­i­cal year for the late-stage pipeline

Just ahead of GlaxoSmithKline’s Q2 update on Wednesday, science chief Hal Barron is making the rounds to talk up the pharma giant’s late-stage strategy as the top execs continue to woo back a deeply skeptical investor group while pushing through a whole new R&D culture.

And that’s not easy, Barron is quick to note. He told the Financial Times:

I think that culture, to some extent, is as hard, in fact even harder, than doing the science.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Michel Vounatsos, Getty Images

UP­DAT­ED: Stay tuned: Bio­gen’s num­bers are great — it’s their wor­ri­some fu­ture that leaves an­a­lysts skit­tish

Biogen came out with an upbeat assessment of their Q2 numbers today, discounting the arrival of a key rival for its blockbuster Spinraza franchise. But the top execs remain grimly determined to not say much anything new about the sore points that have dragged down its stock, including the future of its big investment in Alzheimer’s or how it plans to invest the considerable cash that the big biotech continues to reap.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

PACT Phar­ma says it's per­fect­ed the tech to se­lect neoanti­gens for per­son­al­ized ther­a­py — now on­to the clin­ic

At PACT Pharma, the lofty goal to unleash a “tsunami” of T cells personalized for each patient has hinged on the ability to correctly identify the neoantigens that form something of a fingerprint for each tumor, and extract the small group of T cells primed to attack the cancer. It still has a long way to go testing a treatment in humans, but the biotech says it has nailed that highly technical piece of the process.

UP­DAT­ED: My­ovan­t's uter­ine fi­broid drug looks com­pet­i­tive in PhI­II — but can they van­quish mighty Ab­b­Vie?

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Myovant $MYOV has closely matched its positive first round of Phase III data for their uterine fibroid drug relugolix, setting up a head-to-head rivalry with pharma giant AbbVie as the little biotech steers to the market with a planned filing in Q4.

Here’s how Myovant plans to prevail over the AbbVie $ABBV empire.

In the study, 71.2% of women receiving once-daily relugolix combination therapy achieved the clinical response they were looking for, compared to only 14.7% in the control arm. The data comfortably reflected the same outcomes in the first Phase III — 73.4% of women receiving once-daily oral relugolix combination therapy achieved the responder criteria compared with 18.9% of women receiving placebo — which will reassure regulators that they are getting the carefully randomized data that qualifies for the FDA’s gold standard for success.

Lit­tle Mar­i­nus sees its shares eclipsed as the Sage ri­val fails to com­pare on PPD in PhII

The executive team at Sage $SAGE have skirted another potential pitfall on its way to racking up a big future for its depression drug Zulresso.

Little Marinus Pharmaceuticals $MRNS had sought to challenge the Sage drug with an IV formulation — followed by an oral version — of ganaxolone for postpartum depression. But researchers say their Phase II study failed to positively differentiate itself from a placebo at 28 days — leaving them to hold up “clinically meaningful” data within the first day of administration compared to the control arm.

Roche cuts loose Tam­i­flu OTC rights, hand­ing Sanofi the keys as the phar­ma gi­ant dou­bles down on Xofluza

Roche set out to make a better flu medicine than Tamiflu as that franchise was headed to a generic showdown. Now they’ll see just how well Xofluza stacks up against the mainstay drug after handing off over-the-counter rights in the US to Sanofi.

Sanofi $SNY says it will now step in to negotiate a deal with the FDA to steer Tamiflu into the OTC market, a role that could well involve new studies to ease passage of the drug out of doctor’s hands and into the consumer end of the market. And the French pharma giant will have first dibs over “selected” OTC markets around the world as they push ahead.

Aca­dia is mak­ing the best of it, but their lat­est PhI­II Nu­plazid study is a bust

Acadia’s late-stage program to widen the commercial prospects for Nuplazid has hit a wall. The biotech reported that their Phase III ENHANCE trial flat failed. And while they $ACAD did their best to cherry pick positive data wherever they can be found, this is a clear setback for the biotech.

With close to 400 patients enrolled, researchers said the drug flunked the primary endpoint as an adjunctive therapy for patients with an inadequate response to antipsychotic therapy. The p-value was an ugly 0.0940 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, which the company called out as a positive trend.

Their shares slid 12% on the news, good for a $426 million hit on a $3.7 billion market cap at close.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 55,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Some Big Phar­mas stepped up their game on da­ta trans­paren­cy — but which flunked the test?

The nonprofit Bioethics International has come out with their latest scorecard on data transparency among the big biopharmas in the industry — flagging a few standouts while spotlighting some laggards who are continuing to underperform.

Now in its third year, the nonprofit created a new set of standards with Yale School of Medicine and Stanford Law School to evaluate the track record on trial registration, results reporting, publication and data-sharing practice.

Busy Gilead crew throws strug­gling biotech a life­line, with some cash up­front and hun­dreds of mil­lions in biobucks for HIV deal

Durect $DRRX got a badly needed shot in the arm Monday morning as Gilead’s busy BD team lined up access to its extended-release platform tech for HIV and hepatitis B.

Gilead, a leader in the HIV sector, is paying a modest $25 million in cash for the right to jump on the platform at Durect, which has been using its technology to come up with an extended-release version of bupivacaine. The FDA rejected that in 2014, but Durect has been working on a comeback.