Cel­gene works to calm down anx­ious in­vestors, promis­ing to re-file ozan­i­mod at the FDA in ear­ly 2019

For weeks now, an­a­lysts have been fret­ting over the fu­ture of Cel­gene’s $CELG mul­ti­ple scle­ro­sis drug ozan­i­mod. Turned away at the FDA’s front door with a refuse-to-file let­ter, their at­ten­tion fo­cused on an ac­tive metabo­lite of the drug and spec­u­la­tion over whether or not the big biotech would be forced to run a new hu­man study to sat­is­fy reg­u­la­tors that would set them back years.

Mark Alles

This morn­ing, Cel­gene ex­ecs went to some pains to ex­plain that the de­lay would stretch out on­ly to Q1 2019 as re­searchers un­der­took some bridg­ing non-clin­i­cal stud­ies of the drug. No lengthy hu­man stud­ies would be need­ed, the com­pa­ny added. And they would hus­tle along a Eu­ro­pean ap­pli­ca­tion along­side the FDA pitch in the first few months of next year.

The rea­son for the de­lay: “Ozan­i­mod is me­tab­o­lized in hu­mans to form one ma­jor ac­tive metabo­lite (CC-112273) and oth­er mi­nor ac­tive metabo­lites,” the com­pa­ny re­port­ed. And that metabo­lite has a long half life of 10 to 13 days.

Ever­core ISI an­a­lyst Umer Raf­fat sees this as a pos­i­tive. He notes:

If this metabo­lite was a small % of over­all ozan­i­mod AUC, that would be a rea­son­able con­clu­sion.  How­ev­er, we learned that this metabo­lite is ~90% of AUC in hu­mans… that’s key … be­cause what that means to me is that this metabo­lite is ef­fec­tive­ly the drug as we know it.  Said an­oth­er way, all the Ph 2/Ph 3 stud­ies we saw on ozan­i­mod was ef­fec­tive­ly this metabo­lite.  For that rea­son, it seems that hu­man stud­ies should not be need­ed and that’s what CELG is guid­ing.

Of course, if you were look­ing for a quick­er turn­around, the glass at Cel­gene could look more half emp­ty right now. Not­ed Ge­of­frey Porges:

This new time­line is three quar­ters be­hind what we have fore­cast and may put the com­mer­cial launch in some un­cer­tain­ty giv­en the ex­pect­ed en­try of gener­ic Gilenya. Cel­gene an­nounced that the ozan­i­mod re­sub­mis­sion plan will in­clude bridg­ing non-clin­i­cal stud­ies and ad­di­tion­al analy­sis of ex­ist­ing PK/PD da­ta, but em­pha­sized that ad­di­tion­al hu­man clin­i­cal ef­fi­ca­cy and safe­ty stud­ies are not need­ed.

The drug is a cen­tral part of CEO Mark Alles’ case that the com­pa­ny has a bright fu­ture ahead of it, ca­pa­ble of earn­ing $4 bil­lion to $6 bil­lion. Alles has been rack­ing up a se­ries of new deals, buy­ing Juno for $9 bil­lion, and re­vamp­ing the com­pa­ny’s com­mand struc­ture as a se­ries of em­bar­rass­ing sna­fus raised ques­tions about a com­pa­ny that has long been ad­mired for its abil­i­ty to ex­e­cute quick­ly and ef­fi­cient­ly.

Cel­gene has lit­tle mar­gin for er­ror now. Any new slips will like­ly be se­vere­ly pun­ished.

UP­DAT­ED: A small, ob­scure biotech just won big with their IPO. In this mar­ket. Are you kid­ding me?

How could a small, largely unknown biotech that emerged from stealth mode just months ago with early-stage cancer programs jump onto Wall Street in the middle of a Category 6 financial hurricane and sail through with a $165 million IPO?

And what does that mean for the rest of the industry waiting to see just how much damage global lockdowns will wreak on clinical development?

The biotech is a company called Zentalis. The crew there nabbed an $85 million crossover round late last year — notably waiting 5 years before waving the numbers around to attract attention, according to my read of a FierceBiotech story. Perceptive joined in, but the syndicate was not in general the kind of marquee affair that gets tongues wagging.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Gilead CEO Daniel O'Day attends a meeting with the President and other biopharma leaders at the White House on March 2, 2020 (AP Photo)

Ramp­ing up glob­al pro­duc­tion of remde­sivir, Gilead CEO Dan O’Day de­tails plans to dis­trib­ute 1.5M dos­es to fight Covid-19 — for free

Gilead is still some days away from turning the card on its first round of data on remdesivir’s ability to fight severe cases of Covid-19, but the big biotech is ramping up an emergency supply of a million courses of therapy as it starts free distribution of the drug to tens of thousands of patients under their compassionate use and expanded access program as well as clinical trials.

In his latest open letter posted over the weekend, Gilead CEO Dan O’Day outlined how the company has been successful in cutting production time on remdesivir while repurposing some of their own facilities and turning to contract manufacturers to build a near-term supply of 1.5 million doses. They are still working on efficacy and dosing, but that supply could cover 140,000 courses of treatment. That supply, he added, would be more widely available following a potential approval.

Bob Nelsen at the Milken Institute Global Conference on April 29, 2019 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images)

ARCH chief Bob Nelsen has $1.5B to prove 2 sim­ple points: ‘We’re in the most in­no­v­a­tive time ever’ and in­vestors are stay­ing

ARCH co-founder and managing director Bob Nelsen has a well known yen for the home run swing, betting big on potentially transformative meds and tech and the biotech teams he helps bring together. He thrives and bleeds on the cutting edge. And now Nelsen and the ARCH group have debuted 2 big funds to prove that this is the time for the best of biotech to shine — deadly pandemic be damned.

Two new funds, ARCH Venture Fund X and ARCH Venture Fund X Overage, gathered a combined $1.46 billion. And that’s a record. ARCH Venture Fund IX and ARCH Venture Fund IX Overage closed in 2016 with a combined $1.1 billion. ARCH Venture Fund VIII and ARCH Venture Fund VIII Overage closed in 2014 with a combined $560 million.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Have a new drug that promis­es to fight Covid-19? The FDA promis­es fast ac­tion but some de­vel­op­ers aren't hap­py

After providing an emergency approval to use malaria drugs against coronavirus with little actual evidence of their efficacy or safety in that setting, the FDA has already proven that it has set aside the gold standard when it comes to the pandemic. And now regulators have spelled out a new approach to speeding development that promises immediate responses in no uncertain terms — promising a program offering the ultimate high-speed pathway to Covid-19 drug approvals.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Once fu­ri­ous over No­var­tis’ da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion scan­dal, the FDA now says it’s noth­ing they need to take ac­tion on

Back in the BP era — Before Pandemic — the FDA ripped Novartis for its decision to keep the agency in the dark about manipulated data used in its application for Zolgensma while its marketing application for the gene therapy was under review.

Civil and criminal sanctions were being discussed, the agency noted in a rare broadside at one of the world’s largest pharma companies. Notable lawmakers cheered the angry regulators on, urging the FDA to make an example of Novartis, which fielded Zolgensma at $2.1 million — the current record for a one-off therapy.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Covid-19 roundup: GSK, Am­gen tai­lor R&D work to fit the coro­n­avirus age; Doud­na's ge­nomics crew launch­es di­ag­nos­tic lab

You can add Amgen and GSK to the list of deep-pocket drug R&D players who are tailoring their pipeline work to fit a new age of coronavirus.

Following in the footsteps of a lineup of big players like Eli Lilly — which has suspended patient recruitment for drug studies — Amgen and GSK have opted to take a more tailored approach. Amgen is intent on circling the wagons around key studies that are already fully enrolled, and GSK has the red light on new studies while the pandemic plays out.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

In a stun­ning set­back, Amarin los­es big patent fight over Vas­cepa IP. And its high-fly­ing stock crash­es to earth

Amarin’s shares $AMRN were blitzed Monday evening, losing billions in value as reports spread that the company had lost its high-profile effort to keep its Vascepa patents protected from generic drugmakers.

Amarin had been fighting to keep key patents under lock and key — and away from generic rivals — for another 10 years, but District Court Judge Miranda Du in Las Vegas ruled against the biotech. She ruled that:
(A)ll the Asserted Claims are invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C.§ 103. Thus, the Court finds in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s remaining infringementclaim, and in their favor on their counterclaims asserting the invalidity of the AssertedClaims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Aaron Royston, venBio

In­vest­ing in the time of coro­n­avirus: the good, the bad and the hope­ful, as biotech VC firms close funds worth $3B

Apart from disrupting biopharma R&D and regulatory timelines, the coronavirus pandemic has inevitably ravaged financial markets and eroded investor risk appetite. Investing in the time of coronavirus feels reckless, but if biotech venture funds are any indication, the time is ripe.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,400+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Drug dis­cov­ery in the age of coro­n­avirus

Developing new drugs is incredibly hard. That’s why, despite superhuman efforts from the industry, we’re still looking at 12-18 months minimum before we can realistically hope for a vaccine for Covid-19, and probably months before there’s a proven viable drug treatment.

But our increasing ability to begin to industrialize the drug discovery and development process through an engineering approach means that we have more hope for speeding up this process than ever before — and not just to defeat coronavirus, but to benefit the development of all new medicines in the future.