The hu­man el­e­ment: A biotech up­start hopes to carve a path around faulty an­i­mal mod­els

It’s been a rough few years for lab mice in the lit­er­a­ture. Re­port af­ter re­port scape­goat­ed sci­ence’s fur­ry sub­jects for the pil­ing num­ber of drugs that fail the clin­ic. A Sci­ence study pro­posed build­ing a new “wildling” lab mouse. A well-cov­ered Na­ture pa­per in­di­cat­ed the dif­fer­ences be­tween mice and hu­man brains were re­spon­si­ble for bil­lions of dead-end­ed Alzheimer re­search dol­lars. One Trans­la­tion­al Med­i­cine re­view cit­ed the suc­cess rate of trans­lat­ing can­cer drugs at 8% and an­oth­er con­clud­ed that “even if the next sev­er­al decades were spent im­prov­ing the in­ter­nal and ex­ter­nal va­lid­i­ty of an­i­mal mod­els, the clin­i­cal rel­e­vance of those mod­els would, in the end, on­ly im­prove to some ex­tent.” [ital­ics theirs]

Endpoints News

Unlock this article instantly by becoming a free subscriber.

You’ll get access to free articles each month, plus you can customize what newsletters get delivered to your inbox each week, including breaking news.