Donald Trump. Manuel Balce Ceneta, AP

Ex­ec­u­tive or­der un­der con­struc­tion to peg US drug prices to low­est prices abroad, Trump says

As he mounts his re-elec­tion bid for 2020, pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump un­veiled plans that an ex­ec­u­tive or­der is be­ing pre­pared to im­ple­ment a “fa­vored na­tions clause” to re­duce drug prices in the Unit­ed States, in con­ver­sa­tion with re­porters on the south lawn of the White House on Fri­day.

“We’re work­ing on a fa­vored na­tions clause, where we pay what­ev­er the low­est na­tion’s price is,” Trump said. “Why should oth­er na­tions — like Cana­da — why should oth­er na­tions pay less than us?”

Trump has long lam­bast­ed the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal in­dus­try for its pric­ing poli­cies. Af­ter cap­tur­ing the pres­i­den­cy, Trump pro­claimed drug­mak­ers were “get­ting away with mur­der.” His ad­min­is­tra­tion has since un­veiled a string of pro­pos­als to tem­per pric­ing, in­clud­ing one last year en­gi­neered to peg drug prices to over­seas rates for Medicare ben­e­fi­cia­ries. Whether this plan is the one he re­ferred to on Fri­day is un­clear.

The plan, de­signed to save Medicare more than $17 bil­lion over five years, was re­vealed in late Oc­to­ber ahead of a con­tentious mid-term bat­tle. The HHS out­lined an “in­ter­na­tion­al pric­ing in­dex (IPI)” in which prices for drugs uti­lized by Medicare — the world’s largest drug pur­chas­er — would be bench­marked against oth­er na­tions, in­stead of the way drugs are cur­rent­ly priced: by cal­cu­lat­ing the av­er­age sales price and adding 6% for the providers who man­age the drug sup­ply. Es­sen­tial­ly, in­stead of al­low­ing cheap­er drugs to be im­port­ed in­to the Unit­ed States, Trump’s ba­sic plan is to hold on to the drugs and im­port their prices.

Alex Azar HHS

This is a pi­lot pro­gram, how­ev­er, and is not be­ing primed for ex­e­cu­tion via an ex­ec­u­tive or­der. How­ev­er, to no­body’s sur­prise, the pro­pos­al elicit­ed the ire of the bio­phar­ma lob­by, and drug­mak­ers ar­gued that a num­ber of these na­tions do not ac­cept new med­i­cines due to their pric­ing poli­cies, of­ten re­strict­ing ac­cess or de­clin­ing to adopt them al­to­geth­er. An­oth­er is­sue is many drug­mak­ers aren’t par­tic­u­lar­ly forth­com­ing about the prices they set­tle on for their drugs fol­low­ing ne­go­ti­a­tions with for­eign gov­ern­ments.

A pro­pos­al re­quir­ing drug­mak­ers to di­vulge list prices in tele­vi­sion ads is set to go in­to ef­fect in the com­ing month, but many of the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion’s oth­er drug price pro­pos­als are still be­ing ironed out.

On Ju­ly 1, HHS sec­re­tary and for­mer Eli Lil­ly ex­ec­u­tive Alex Azar sug­gest­ed the ad­min­is­tra­tion had set records by sav­ing pa­tients $26 bil­lion in gener­ic drug costs just the first year and a half of the pres­i­dent’s term. “We have al­so pro­posed that back­door re­bates in Medicare Part D, which amount­ed to $29 bil­lion last year, be de­liv­ered di­rect­ly as dis­counts to pa­tients at the phar­ma­cy counter — as soon as Jan. 1, 2020,” he wrote.

On Sat­ur­day, Trump de­clared he had gar­nered suc­cess in dri­ving down drug prices:

But the claim was read­i­ly dis­put­ed. Poli­ti­fact, owned by the non­prof­it Poyn­ter In­sti­tute for Me­dia Stud­ies, de­clared the claim “most­ly false,” cit­ing da­ta from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s own data­base as well as an analy­sis pub­lished by the As­so­ci­at­ed Press in Sep­tem­ber that in­di­cat­ed that in the first nine months of 2018, there were 96 price in­creas­es for every price cut — al­though the rate of hikes is slow­ing.

Pres­i­den­tial hope­ful Bernie Sanders al­so chimed in:

Da­ta sug­gest that the Unit­ed States spends near­ly twice as much as 10 high-in­come coun­tries on health care — dri­ven by the high cost of la­bor and goods, in­clud­ing phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals and de­vices — but ac­tu­al­ly per­form worse on a num­ber of pop­u­la­tion health out­comes.

De­vel­op­ment of the Next Gen­er­a­tion NKG2D CAR T-cell Man­u­fac­tur­ing Process

Celyad’s view on developing and delivering a CAR T-cell therapy with multi-tumor specificity combined with cell manufacturing success
Overview
Transitioning potential therapeutic assets from academia into the commercial environment is an exercise that is largely underappreciated by stakeholders, except for drug developers themselves. The promise of preclinical or early clinical results drives enthusiasm, but the pragmatic delivery of a therapy outside of small, local testing is most often a major challenge for drug developers especially, including among other things, the manufacturing challenges that surround the production of just-in-time and personalized autologous cell therapy products.

Roger Perlmutter, Merck

#ASH19: Here’s why Mer­ck is pay­ing $2.7B to­day to grab Ar­Qule and its next-gen BTK drug, lin­ing up Eli Lil­ly ri­val­ry

Just a few months after making a splash at the European Hematology Association scientific confab with an early snapshot of positive data for their BTK inhibitor ARQ 531, ArQule has won a $2.7 billion buyout deal from Merck.

Merck is scooping up a next-gen BTK drug — which is making a splash at ASH today — from ArQule in an M&A pact set at $20 a share $ARQL. That’s more than twice Friday’s $9.66 close. And Merck R&D chief Roger Perlmutter heralded a deal that nets “multiple clinical-stage oral kinase inhibitors.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Paul Hudson. Sanofi

New Sanofi CEO Hud­son adds next-gen can­cer drug tech to the R&D quest, buy­ing Syn­thorx for $2.5B

When Paul Hudson lays out his R&D vision for Sanofi tomorrow, he will have a new slate of interleukin therapies and a synthetic biology platform to boast about.

The French pharma giant announced early Monday that it is snagging San Diego biotech Synthorx in a $2.5 billion deal. That marks an affordable bolt-on for Sanofi but a considerable return for Synthorx backers, including Avalon, RA Capital and OrbiMed: At $68 per share, the price represents a 172% premium to Friday’s closing.

Synthorx’s take on alternative IL-2 drugs for both cancer and autoimmune disorders — enabled by a synthetic DNA base pair pioneered by Scripps professor Floyd Romesberg — “fits perfectly” with the kind of innovation that he wants at Sanofi, Hudson said.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Game on: Re­gen­eron's BC­MA bis­pe­cif­ic makes clin­i­cal da­ta de­but, kick­ing off mul­ti­ple myelo­ma matchup with Bris­tol-My­ers

As J&J attempts to jostle past Bristol-Myers Squibb and bluebird for a landmark approval of its anti-BCMA CAR-T — and while GlaxoSmithKline maps a quick path to the FDA riding on its own BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugates — the bispecifics are arriving on the scene to stake a claim for a market that could cross $10 billion per year.

The main rivalry in multiple myeloma is shaping up to be one between Regeneron and Bristol-Myers, which picked up a bispecific antibody to BCMA through its recently closed $74 billion takeover of Celgene. Both presented promising first-in-human data at the ASH 2019 meeting.

FDA lifts hold on Abeon­a's but­ter­fly dis­ease ther­a­py, paving way for piv­otal study

It’s been a difficult few years for gene and cell therapy startup Abeona Therapeutics. Its newly crowned chief Carsten Thiel was forced out last year following accusations of unspecified “personal misconduct,” and this September, the FDA imposed a clinical hold on its therapy for a form of “butterfly” disease. But things are beginning to perk up. On Monday, the company said the regulator had lifted its hold and the experimental therapy is now set to be evaluated in a late-stage study.

Roche faces an­oth­er de­lay in strug­gle to nav­i­gate Spark deal past reg­u­la­tors — but this one is very short

Roche today issued the latest in a long string of delays of its $4.3 billion buyout of Philadelphia-based Spark Therapeutics. The delay comes as little surprise — it is their 10th in as many months — as their most recent delay was scheduled to expire before a key regulatory deadline.

But it is notable for its length: 6 days.

Previous extensions had moved the goalposts by about 3 weeks to a month, with the latest on November 22 expiring tomorrow. The new delay sets a deadline for next Monday, December 16, the same day by which the UK Competition and Markets Authority has to give its initial ruling on the deal. And they already reportedly have lined up an OK from the FTC staff – although that’s only one level of a multi-step process.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 67,200+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

KalVis­ta's di­a­bet­ic mac­u­lar ede­ma da­ta falls short — will Mer­ck walk away?

Merck’s 2017 bet on KalVista Pharmaceuticals may have soured, after the UK/US-based biotech’s lead drug failed a mid-stage study in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Two doses of the intravitreal injection, KVD001, were tested against a placebo in a 129-patient trial. Patients who continued to experience significant inflammation and diminished visual acuity, despite anti-VEGF therapy, were recruited to the trial. Typically patients with DME — the most frequent cause of vision loss related to diabetes — are treated with anti-VEGF therapies such as Regeneron’s flagship Eylea or Roche’s Avastin and Lucentis.

UP­DAT­ED: Ob­sE­va makes case for best-in-class hor­mone sup­pres­sive ther­a­py in pos­i­tive uter­ine fi­broid study

About a month after the Swiss biotech disclosed a failed late-stage study in its IVF program, ObsEva on Monday unveiled positive pivotal data on its experimental treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding triggered by uterine fibroids.

ObsEva in-licensed the drug, linzagolix, from Japan’s Kissei Pharmaceutical in 2015. Two doses of the drug (100 mg and 200 mg) were tested against a placebo in the 535-patient Phase III study, dubbed PRIMROSE 2, in patients who were both on and off hormonal add-back therapy (ABT).

Samit Hirawat. Bristol-Myers Squibb

Bris­tol-My­ers is mak­ing a bee-line to the FDA with pos­i­tive liso-cel da­ta — but is it too late in the CAR-T game?

Bristol-Myers Squibb came to ASH this past weekend with a variety of messages on the new cancer drugs they had acquired in the big Celgene buyout, including liso-cel, the lead CAR-T program picked up in the $9 billion Juno acquisition. And one of the most important was that they had the pivotal efficacy and safety data needed to snag an approval from the FDA next year, with the BLA on track for a filing this month.