FDA dis­miss­es Alk­er­mes’ pitch on ‘5461, de­mand­ing new de­pres­sion tri­als in a dam­ag­ing set­back

Alk­er­mes $ALKS made a high-stakes gam­ble that the FDA would con­sid­er ap­prov­ing their big de­pres­sion drug ALKS-5461 on the ba­sis of a sin­gle pos­i­tive Phase III study — and they lost. The biotech re­port­ed Mon­day morn­ing that the agency had is­sued a refuse-to-file let­ter for the drug, se­ri­ous­ly de­lay­ing any shot at an OK.

Ac­cord­ing to the com­pa­ny state­ment, the FDA is de­mand­ing more clin­i­cal tri­als to pro­vide a full set of da­ta as well as a “bioavail­abil­i­ty study to gen­er­ate ad­di­tion­al bridg­ing da­ta be­tween ALKS 5461 and the ref­er­ence list­ed drug, buprenor­phine.”

Alk­er­mes’ shares im­me­di­ate­ly plunged more than 20% in pre-mar­ket trad­ing, wip­ing out close to $2 bil­lion in mar­ket cap.

Fac­ing years of ex­pen­sive new clin­i­cal tri­al work, Alk­er­mes ex­ecs im­me­di­ate­ly served no­tice that they plan to ap­peal the de­ci­sion.

“We strong­ly be­lieve that the clin­i­cal de­vel­op­ment pro­gram, in­clud­ing da­ta from more than 1,500 pa­tients with MDD, pro­vides sub­stan­tial ev­i­dence of ALKS 5461’s con­sis­tent an­ti­de­pres­sant ac­tiv­i­ty and a fa­vor­able ben­e­fit-risk pro­file,” said CEO Richard Pops.

“To say we were sur­prised is an un­der­state­ment,” Pops said in a call with an­a­lysts Mon­day, not­ing all the da­ta that were gath­ered to­geth­er and their on­go­ing dis­cus­sions with the FDA through the fil­ing.

An­a­lysts im­me­di­ate­ly start­ed as­sess­ing the dam­age, which will be sig­nif­i­cant.

“This is crit­i­cal and is clear­ly be­low ex­pec­ta­tions,” not­ed Ever­core ISI’s Umer Raf­fat. “It was my base case that the on­go­ing add’l Ph 3 would suf­fice … but that doesn’t ap­pear to be the case.”

Asked if Alk­er­mes was pre­pared to go ahead with a new Phase III pro­gram, Pops de­murred.

“I think the smart thing to do is to wait to see the whites of the FDA’s eyes in a Type A meet­ing,” he said.

Their drug hit back-to-back Phase III fail­ures ear­ly in 2017, send­ing the com­pa­ny’s stock in­to a tail­spin. But a re­designed third Phase III hit with pos­i­tive da­ta, en­cour­ag­ing Pops to be­lieve that he could make a case for the drug by com­bin­ing all of the da­ta. De­vel­op­ers typ­i­cal­ly set up a trio of piv­otal tri­als in de­pres­sion, hop­ing that two out of three can es­cape be­ing tak­en down by a high place­bo re­sponse.

Pops start­ed to re­build the ar­gu­ment for this drug be­fore the ini­tial Phase III dust­up had qui­et­ed down. The com­pa­ny cit­ed a trend to­ward sta­tis­ti­cal sig­nif­i­cance and not­ed that a post hoc analy­sis as­cer­tained that the en­tire 2mg/2mg dose group in one study — FOR­WARD-4 — achieved the crit­i­cal end­point on the Mont­gomery–Ås­berg De­pres­sion Rat­ing Scale (MADRS-6) scores. Re­searchers went back to the draw­ing board, adding new pa­tients and re­jig­ging its sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis plan for FOR­WARD-5.

FOR­WARD-3 sim­ply failed, says Alk­er­mes, due to a high place­bo re­sponse, a com­mon fea­ture in de­pres­sion. Un­like For­ward-4 and For­ward-5, though, For­ward-3 did not use what’s called a se­quen­tial par­al­lel com­par­i­son de­sign, or SPCD. In an SPCD study, the first round of place­bo pa­tients who don’t re­spond to the drug are re-ran­dom­ized be­tween the drug arm and the sug­ar pill, in or­der to quell the high place­bo re­spons­es that have scut­tled nu­mer­ous oth­er tri­als for de­pres­sion.

What are Alk­er­mes’ chances of chang­ing the FDA’s de­ci­sion? Not good. Top of­fi­cials are well es­tab­lished, of­fer­ing re­peat­ed sig­nals that they’re will­ing to be flex­i­ble on the da­ta when need­ed. If this drug failed to get past Janet Wood­cock as well as FDA com­mis­sion­er Scott Got­tlieb, af­ter the FDA re­versed three oth­er re­jec­tions ear­ly in Got­tlieb’s tenure at the agency, it’s un­like­ly cir­cum­stances will change now.

The RTF no­tice is a par­tic­u­lar­ly harsh blow for Pops, who’s been in­sist­ing to in­vestors that the com­pa­ny would get this past reg­u­la­tors and on­to the mar­ket. Fail­ing to even get past the ini­tial re­view and have the ap­pli­ca­tion spurned at the door will not sit well with com­pa­ny back­ers.


Have a new drug that promis­es to fight Covid-19? The FDA will see you now

After providing an emergency approval to use malaria drugs against coronavirus with little actual evidence of their efficacy or safety in that setting, the FDA has already proven that it has set aside the gold standard when it comes to the pandemic. And now regulators have spelled out a new approach to speeding development that promises immediate responses in no uncertain terms — promising a program offering the ultimate high-speed pathway to Covid-19 drug approvals.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

In a stun­ning set­back, Amarin los­es big patent fight over Vas­cepa IP. And its high-fly­ing stock crash­es to earth

Amarin’s shares $AMRN were blitzed Monday evening, losing billions in value as reports spread that the company had lost its high-profile effort to keep its Vascepa patents protected from generic drugmakers.

Amarin had been fighting to keep key patents under lock and key — and away from generic rivals — for another 10 years, but District Court Judge Miranda Du in Las Vegas ruled against the biotech. She ruled that:
(A)ll the Asserted Claims are invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C.§ 103. Thus, the Court finds in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s remaining infringementclaim, and in their favor on their counterclaims asserting the invalidity of the AssertedClaims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Once fu­ri­ous over No­var­tis’ da­ta ma­nip­u­la­tion scan­dal, the FDA now says it’s noth­ing they need to take ac­tion on

Back in the BP era — Before Pandemic — the FDA ripped Novartis for its decision to keep the agency in the dark about manipulated data used in its application for Zolgensma while its marketing application for the gene therapy was under review.

Civil and criminal sanctions were being discussed, the agency noted in a rare broadside at one of the world’s largest pharma companies. Notable lawmakers cheered the angry regulators on, urging the FDA to make an example of Novartis, which fielded Zolgensma at $2.1 million — the current record for a one-off therapy.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Covid-19 roundup: GSK, Am­gen tai­lor R&D work to fit the coro­n­avirus age; Doud­na's ge­nomics crew launch­es di­ag­nos­tic lab

You can add Amgen and GSK to the list of deep-pocket drug R&D players who are tailoring their pipeline work to fit a new age of coronavirus.

Following in the footsteps of a lineup of big players like Eli Lilly — which has suspended patient recruitment for drug studies — Amgen and GSK have opted to take a more tailored approach. Amgen is intent on circling the wagons around key studies that are already fully enrolled, and GSK has the red light on new studies while the pandemic plays out.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 77,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Dai­ichi Sankyo sinks $200M in­to new gene ther­a­py tech from Ul­tragenyx

In a leap to the gene therapy space, Daiichi Sankyo has dropped $200 million to access Ultragenyx’s manufacturing technology, providing the rare disease biotech with plenty of cash and a stock boost amid a general cash crunch.

For $125 million in cash and a $75 million equity investment, Daiichi Sankyo has bought a non-exclusive license to the IP around two platforms with which it plans to develop AAV-based gene therapy products. The Japanese pharma is purchasing the stock $RARE at $60 per share, more than a third above its current price of $44.43.

Arie Belldegrun, Endpoints @ JPM20 Breakfast Panel. Photography by Jeff Rumans.

Mo­tion de­nied: Gilead still on the hook for $1.5B in dam­ages over CAR-T patent dis­pute with Bris­tol My­ers Squibb

Gilead’s bid to overturn a jury verdict that ordered it to pay Bristol Myers Squibb about $752 million for CAR-T patents owned by its subsidiary Juno Therapeutics has ended in vain.

The ruling leaves Gilead vulnerable to an even bigger $1.5 billion payment that Bristol is now demanding — adding fuel to the fiery criticism some analysts are already heaping on its $11.9 billion Kite buyout.

In a 30-page document unsealed on Monday, Judge James Otero of the district court in Los Angeles struck down several different arguments for a new decision. Here are Morgan Stanley analysts’ takeaways:
The court, in particular, denied Kite’s contentions (1) that Juno’s patent is invalid, (2) the damages award was unreasonable, and (3) that a new trial should take place. The court also denied Kite’s argument that its infringement was not willful.
Gilead is likely to appeal to the federal circuit, they noted, but the odds are not in their favor as the same standard for evidence will be applied in that court. Appeals typically take 16 months.

A quiver of ar­rows for im­mune dis­or­ders: Pan­dion scores $80M in fresh fund­ing

Scientists began with making recombinant versions of naturally-occurring human proteins, then graduated to monoclonal antibodies. Now, rather than replicating moieties within the body, researchers are modifying these molecules to have precise biology in a functional manner.

This technology, referred to as bispecific antibodies, is already being employed to fight cancer. In early 2018, Pandion Therapeutics was born to reverse-engineer the science into the realm of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders.

It is 'kind of a proven tech­nol­o­gy': Hep B vac­cine mak­er joins glob­al hunt for coro­n­avirus vac­cine

Using lab-grown proteins that are engineered to mimic the architecture of viruses to induce an immune response, VBI Vaccines is joining the hunt for a coronavirus vaccine — harnessing technology that has initially been proved safe in early trials as a prophylactic for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.

Unlike the raft of the companies in the Covid-19 vaccine race — including Moderna, CureVac and J&J — VBI is taking a pan-coronavirus approach, by developing a vaccine that will encompass Covid-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).

Can a pair of top AveX­is alum­ni steer a new gene ther­a­py up­start to R&D glo­ry? 3 VCs bet $60M on it

VCs love few things more than a proven executive team when it comes to launching a new company. And now a group of A-listers has turned to a pair of top execs out of AveXis to steer the latest gene therapy player into the clinic.

The biotech is Waltham, MA-based Affinia and the two execs are Sean Nolan and Rick Modi — the former CEO and CBO respectively of AveXis, the gene therapy pioneer that fetched $8.7 billion in a sale to Novartis. Nolan has now taken the chairman’s role at Affinia while Modi moves up to the CEO post at the company.