FDA-EMA work­shop dis­cuss­es qual­i­ty chal­lenges for PRIME, break­through ther­a­pies

Last No­vem­ber, of­fi­cials from the EMA and FDA met with in­dus­try rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Lon­don to dis­cuss the var­i­ous qual­i­ty chal­lenges that arise when the de­vel­op­ment of in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al prod­ucts is ac­cel­er­at­ed.

The EMA’s launch of its pri­or­i­ty med­i­cines (PRIME) scheme and the FDA’s break­through ther­a­py des­ig­na­tion have en­abled com­pa­nies to speed cer­tain treat­ments to mar­ket, al­though there have been dif­fi­cul­ties in iden­ti­fy­ing pos­si­ble sci­en­tif­ic and reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proach­es to fa­cil­i­tate the type of ro­bust qual­i­ty da­ta pack­ages nec­es­sary to en­sure that pa­tient safe­ty and prod­uct qual­i­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy are not com­pro­mised, ac­cord­ing to a re­port re­leased Wednes­day on the work­shop.

Ramesh Sood

In ad­di­tion to the fo­cus on ear­ly ac­cess ap­proach­es, the work­shop dis­cussed process val­i­da­tion, con­trol strate­gies, good man­u­fac­tur­ing prac­tice (GMP) com­pli­ance, com­pa­ra­bil­i­ty, sta­bil­i­ty and reg­u­la­to­ry tools.

Ramesh Sood, se­nior sci­en­tif­ic ad­vi­sor at the FDA’s Of­fice of New Drugs, dis­cussed the agency’s break­through pro­gram, not­ing the chal­lenges faced by ap­pli­cants col­lect­ing the nec­es­sary man­u­fac­tur­ing da­ta and pro­vid­ing an ad­e­quate man­u­fac­tur­ing con­trol strat­e­gy.

“It be­comes im­por­tant for the Agency re­view­ers to do a risk-ben­e­fit as­sess­ment re­gard­ing [the] risk of less man­u­fac­tur­ing in­for­ma­tion ver­sus pa­tient ben­e­fit,” the work­shop re­port says of Sood’s pre­sen­ta­tion. “This re­quires in­no­v­a­tive risk-mit­i­ga­tion strate­gies to en­sure prod­uct qual­i­ty and re­duce the qual­i­ty-re­lat­ed prod­uct risk to an ac­cept­able lev­el.”

Veroni­ka Jek­er­le

Veroni­ka Jek­er­le of the EMA’s qual­i­ty of­fice al­so dis­cussed the sci­en­tif­ic chal­lenges for PRIME can­di­dates, which in­clude ab­bre­vi­at­ed time­lines that add con­straints to set­ting up com­mer­cial man­u­fac­tur­ing sites.

“An analy­sis ex­am­in­ing sci­en­tif­ic is­sues most com­mon­ly iden­ti­fied by PRIME ap­pli­cants (as in­di­cat­ed by SA [sci­en­tif­ic ad­vice] re­quests) re­vealed the fol­low­ing ar­eas as the most crit­i­cal: start­ing ma­te­ri­als, com­pa­ra­bil­i­ty, process val­i­da­tion, an­a­lyt­i­cal con­trol strat­e­gy, spec­i­fi­ca­tions and sta­bil­i­ty,” the re­port says.

Stu­art Finnie, di­rec­tor of reg­u­la­to­ry CMC at As­traZeneca, al­so pre­sent­ed on a small mol­e­cule prod­uct that earned the FDA’s break­through des­ig­na­tion but ran in­to process val­i­da­tion prob­lems that meant sup­plies of the drug would come four months af­ter ap­proval.

As­traZeneca ap­proached the FDA and dis­cussed de­cou­pling the val­i­da­tion of drug sub­stance and drug prod­uct, and dis­cussed plans to use drug sub­stance man­u­fac­tured in the clin­i­cal fa­cil­i­ty to sup­ply drug prod­uct val­i­da­tion.

“Three key el­e­ments lead to the suc­cess of this pro­pos­al,” the re­port says of the As­traZeneca work. “First­ly, the ap­pli­cant pro­vid­ed the Agency with sig­nif­i­cant ev­i­dence of sim­i­lar­i­ty in terms of qual­i­ty, man­u­fac­tur­ing process and qual­i­ty sys­tem be­tween the clin­i­cal cam­paigns and the pro­posed com­mer­cial cam­paign. Sec­ond­ly, dur­ing the site in­spec­tion there was open and close en­gage­ment be­tween the in­spec­tors, re­view­ers, sub­ject mat­ter ex­perts and qual­i­ty de­part­ments en­sur­ing that ques­tions raised were an­swered swift­ly lead­ing to a bal­anced and aligned view on risk as­sess­ment. Fi­nal­ly, and most im­por­tant­ly, it was clear that through­out the in­ter­ac­tions all par­ties were fo­cused on en­sur­ing sup­ply to the pa­tient.”

Oth­er in­dus­try pre­sen­ta­tions in­volved rep­re­sen­ta­tives from Pfiz­er, Am­gen, Cel­gene, MSD (known as Mer­ck in the US), Bio­gen and sev­er­al vac­cine man­u­fac­tur­ers, among oth­ers.

As far as fu­ture joint EMA-FDA ac­tions, the re­port points to the use of mod­els for sta­bil­i­ty and shelf life de­ter­mi­na­tions, in­no­v­a­tive process val­i­da­tion ap­proach­es and al­low­ing launch­es from clin­i­cal man­u­fac­tur­ing sites.

Ned Sharp­less NIH

“In ad­di­tion, the or­ga­niz­ing com­mit­tee pro­pos­es to de­vel­op a ‘Tool­box- guid­ance’ for PRIME prod­ucts, which shall sum­marise the iden­ti­fied sci­en­tif­ic el­e­ments/reg­u­la­to­ry tools that are al­ready avail­able in the EU to ad­dress some of the chal­lenges faced dur­ing the de­vel­op­ment of prod­ucts un­der PRIME and gen­er­a­tion of ro­bust qual­i­ty pack­ages for MAA [mar­ket­ing au­tho­riza­tion ap­pli­ca­tion] re­view,” the re­port says.

Act­ing FDA Com­mis­sion­er Ned Sharp­less added in a state­ment: “We will con­tin­ue to work with our EMA col­leagues and in­dus­try to dis­cuss ways to ad­dress qual­i­ty chal­lenges as­so­ci­at­ed with ex­pe­dit­ed de­vel­op­ment pro­grams to help en­sure pa­tients re­ceive safe, ef­fec­tive drugs.”

Work­shop Re­port


RAPS: First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

Author

Zachary Brennan

managing editor, RAPS

Brian Kaspar. AveXis via Twitter

AveX­is sci­en­tif­ic founder fires back at No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan, 'cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­nies any wrong­do­ing'

Brian Kaspar’s head was among the first to roll at Novartis after company execs became aware of the fact that manipulated data had been included in its application for Zolgensma, now the world’s most expensive therapy.

But in his first public response, the scientific founder at AveXis — acquired by Novartis for $8.7 billion — is firing back. And he says that not only was he not involved in any wrongdoing, he’s ready to defend his name as needed.

I reached out to Brian Kaspar after Novartis put out word that he and his brother Allen had been axed in mid-May, two months after the company became aware of the allegations related to manipulated data. His response came back through his attorneys.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Novartis CEO Vas Narasimhan [via Bloomberg/Getty]

I’m not per­fect: No­var­tis chief Vas Narasimhan al­most apol­o­gizes in the wake of a new cri­sis

Vas Narasimhan has warily stepped up with what might pass as something close to a borderline apology for the latest scandal to engulf Novartis.

But he couldn’t quite get there.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

FDA to Sarep­ta: Your wide­ly an­tic­i­pat­ed fol­lowup to Ex­ondys 51 is not get­ting an ac­cel­er­at­ed OK for Duchenne MD

In one of the least anticipated moves of the year, the FDA has rejected Sarepta’s application for an accelerated approval of its Duchenne MD drug golodirsen after fretting over safety issues.

In a statement that arrived after the bell on Monday, Sarepta explained the CRL, saying:

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Levi Garraway. Broad Institute via Youtube

Roche raids Eli Lil­ly for its next chief med­ical of­fi­cer as San­dra Horn­ing plans to step down

We found out Monday morning where Levi Garraway was headed after he left Eli Lilly as head of oncology R&D a few days ago. Roche named Garraway as their new chief medical officer, replacing Sandra Horning, who they say is retiring from the company.

Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Af­ter a posse of Wall Street an­a­lysts pre­dict a like­ly new win for Sarep­ta, we're down to the wire on a crit­i­cal FDA de­ci­sion

As Bloomberg notes, most of the Wall Street analysts that cover Sarepta $SRPT are an upbeat bunch, ready to cheer on the team when it comes to their Duchenne MD drugs, or offer explanations when an odd setback occurs — as happened recently with a safety signal that was ‘erroneously’ reported last week.

Ritu Baral Cowen
Endpoints News

Basic subscription required

Unlock this story instantly and join 57,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

UP­DAT­ED: No­var­tis spin­off Nabri­va fi­nal­ly scores its first an­tibi­ot­ic ap­proval

In May, Nabriva Therapeutics suffered a setback after the FDA rejected its antibiotic for complicated urinary tract infections — the Novartis spinoff has now had some better luck with the US agency, which on Monday approved its other drug for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

The drug, lefamulin, has been developed as an intravenous and oral formulation and been tested in two late-stage clinical trials. The semi-synthetic compound, whose dosing can be switched between the two formulations, is engineered to inhibit the synthesis of bacterial protein by binding to a part of the bacterial ribosome.

Saqib Islam. CheckRare via YouTube

Spring­Works seeks $115M to push Pfiz­er drugs across fin­ish line while Sat­suma sells mi­graine play in $86M IPO

SpringWorks and Satsuma — both biotech spinouts that have closed B rounds in April — are loading up with IPO cash to boost their respective late-stage plans.
SpringWorks

Bain-backed SpringWorks is the better-known company of the two, and it’s gunning for a larger windfall of $115 million to add to $228 million from previous financings. In the process, the Stamford, CT-based team is also drawing the curtains on the partnerships it has in mind for the pair of assets it had initially licensed from Pfizer.

Mi­nor­i­ty racial groups con­tin­ue to be dis­mal­ly rep­re­sent­ed in can­cer tri­als — study

Data reveal that different racial and ethnic groups — by nature and/or nurture — can respond differently in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety to therapeutics, but this disparity is not necessarily accounted for in clinical trials. A fresh analysis of the last decade of US cancer drug approvals suggests the trend continues, cementing previous research that suggests oncology trials are woefully under-representative of the racial makeup of the real world.

Van­da shares slide af­ter FDA spurns their big end­point and re­jects a pitch on jet lag re­lief

Back in the spring of last year, Vanda Pharmaceuticals $VNDA served up a hot stew of mixed data for a slate of endpoints related to what they called clear evidence that their melatonin sleep drug Hetlioz (tasimelteon) could help millions of travelers suffering from jet lag.

Never mind that they couldn’t get a planned 90 people in the study, settling for 25 instead; Vanda CEO Mihael H. Polymeropoulos said they were building on a body of data to prove it would help jet-lagged patients looking for added sleep benefits. And that, they added, would be worth a major upgrade from the agency as they sought to tackle a big market.