FDA un­veils guid­ance for Covid-19 tri­als

The FDA on Wednes­day is­sued new fi­nal guid­ance to help spon­sors as­sure the safe­ty of tri­al par­tic­i­pants, main­tain com­pli­ance with good clin­i­cal prac­tice (GCP) and min­i­mize the risks to tri­al in­tegri­ty dur­ing the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic.

The guid­ance comes as the Na­tion­al In­sti­tutes of Health last week ini­ti­at­ed the first Covid-19 vac­cine Phase 1 tri­al in Seat­tle. Sanofi and Re­gen­eron Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals al­so an­nounced on Mon­day they have start­ed a Phase 2/3 tri­al at med­ical cen­ters in New York eval­u­at­ing the IL-6 tar­get­ed Kevzara (sar­ilum­ab) in pa­tients hos­pi­tal­ized with se­vere Covid-19.

In ad­di­tion, Gilead has ini­ti­at­ed two Phase 3 stud­ies at sites across Asia to eval­u­ate the safe­ty and ef­fi­ca­cy of the an­tivi­ral remde­sivir in adults di­ag­nosed with Covid-19, as well as in Ne­bras­ka, while Eu­sa Phar­ma said Wednes­day that it ini­ti­at­ed a study at a hos­pi­tal in Berg­amo, Italy for sil­tux­imab, an­oth­er IL-6 tar­get­ed mon­o­clon­al an­ti­body, for the treat­ment of pa­tients with Covid-19 who have de­vel­oped se­ri­ous res­pi­ra­to­ry com­pli­ca­tions.

FDA Guid­ance De­tails

While rec­og­niz­ing that pro­to­col mod­i­fi­ca­tions may be re­quired, and that there may be un­avoid­able pro­to­col de­vi­a­tions due to Covid-19 ill­ness and/or Covid-19 con­trol mea­sures, FDA urges spon­sors and clin­i­cal in­ves­ti­ga­tors to en­gage with In­sti­tu­tion­al Re­view Boards (IRBs)/In­de­pen­dent Ethics Com­mit­tees (IECs) “as ear­ly as pos­si­ble when ur­gent or emer­gent changes to the pro­to­col or in­formed con­sent are an­tic­i­pat­ed as a re­sult of COVID-19.”

But FDA al­so says that such changes to the pro­to­col or in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al plan to min­i­mize or elim­i­nate im­me­di­ate haz­ards or to pro­tect the life and well-be­ing of re­search par­tic­i­pants (e.g., to lim­it ex­po­sure to Covid-19) “may be im­ple­ment­ed with­out IRB ap­proval or be­fore fil­ing an amend­ment to the IND or IDE, but are re­quired to be re­port­ed af­ter­wards.”

David Bo­rasky, VP of IRB Com­pli­ance at WCG, said in a we­bi­nar on Covid-19 tri­als on Wednes­day that IRBs want to know about changes as soon as pos­si­ble and hope that they’ll be re­port­ed with­in five days, but they un­der­stand the cir­cum­stances.

He added that IRBs should not be a road­block to mak­ing changes that are es­sen­tial to main­tain­ing re­search that is eth­i­cal­ly ap­pro­pri­ate, max­i­mizes the safe­ty of study par­tic­i­pants and re­search teams, sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly valid and com­pli­ant with the reg­u­la­tions.

As far as ef­fi­ca­cy as­sess­ments, FDA’s guid­ance “rec­om­mends con­sul­ta­tion with the ap­pro­pri­ate re­view di­vi­sion re­gard­ing pro­to­col mod­i­fi­ca­tions for the col­lec­tion of ef­fi­ca­cy end­points, such as use of vir­tu­al as­sess­ments, de­lays in as­sess­ments, and al­ter­na­tive col­lec­tion of re­search-spe­cif­ic spec­i­mens, if fea­si­ble. For in­di­vid­ual in­stances where ef­fi­ca­cy end­points are not col­lect­ed, the rea­sons for fail­ing to ob­tain the ef­fi­ca­cy as­sess­ment should be doc­u­ment­ed (e.g., iden­ti­fy­ing the spe­cif­ic lim­i­ta­tion im­posed by COVID-19 lead­ing to the in­abil­i­ty to per­form the pro­to­col-spec­i­fied as­sess­ment).”

And pri­or to lock­ing the data­base, the 9-page guid­ance says spon­sors should use its sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis plan to ad­dress how pro­to­col de­vi­a­tions re­lat­ed to Covid-19 will be han­dled for the pre­spec­i­fied analy­ses.

In ad­di­tion, the guid­ance adds that spon­sors and clin­i­cal in­ves­ti­ga­tors should doc­u­ment how Covid-19-re­lat­ed re­stric­tions led to changes in study con­duct and the du­ra­tion of those changes, as well as in­di­cat­ing which tri­al par­tic­i­pants were im­pact­ed and how those tri­al par­tic­i­pants were im­pact­ed.

“Spon­sors, in con­sul­ta­tion with clin­i­cal in­ves­ti­ga­tors and, may de­ter­mine that the pro­tec­tion of a par­tic­i­pant’s safe­ty, wel­fare, and rights is best served by con­tin­u­ing a study par­tic­i­pant in the tri­al as per the pro­to­col or by dis­con­tin­u­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion or use of the in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al prod­uct or even par­tic­i­pa­tion in the tri­al. Such de­ci­sions will de­pend on spe­cif­ic cir­cum­stances, in­clud­ing the na­ture of the in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al prod­uct, the abil­i­ty to con­duct ap­pro­pri­ate safe­ty mon­i­tor­ing, the po­ten­tial im­pact on the in­ves­ti­ga­tion­al prod­uct sup­ply chain, and the na­ture of the dis­ease un­der study in the tri­al,” the guid­ance adds.

Dif­fi­cul­ties in get­ting prospec­tive pa­tients to tri­al sites al­so mean that spon­sors should eval­u­ate whether al­ter­na­tive meth­ods for safe­ty as­sess­ments (e.g., phone con­tact, vir­tu­al vis­it, al­ter­na­tive lo­ca­tion for as­sess­ment, in­clud­ing lo­cal labs or imag­ing cen­ters) could be im­ple­ment­ed when nec­es­sary and fea­si­ble, and would be suf­fi­cient to as­sure the safe­ty of tri­al par­tic­i­pants, FDA says.

“COVID-19 screen­ing pro­ce­dures that may be man­dat­ed by the health care sys­tem in which a clin­i­cal tri­al is be­ing con­duct­ed do not need to be re­port­ed as an amend­ment to the pro­to­col even if done dur­ing clin­i­cal study vis­its un­less the spon­sor is in­cor­po­rat­ing the da­ta col­lect­ed as part of a new re­search ob­jec­tive,” the guid­ance adds.

For a look at all End­points News coro­n­avirus sto­ries, check out our spe­cial news chan­nel.


RAPS: First pub­lished in Reg­u­la­to­ry Fo­cus™ by the Reg­u­la­to­ry Af­fairs Pro­fes­sion­als So­ci­ety, the largest glob­al or­ga­ni­za­tion of and for those in­volved with the reg­u­la­tion of health­care prod­ucts. Click here for more in­for­ma­tion.

Secretary of health and human services Alex Azar speaking in the Rose Garden at the White House (Photo: AFP)

Trump’s HHS claims ab­solute au­thor­i­ty over the FDA, clear­ing path to a vac­cine EUA

The top career staff at the FDA has vowed not to let politics overrule science when looking at vaccine data this fall. But Alex Azar, who happens to be their boss’s boss, apparently won’t even give them a chance to stand in the way.

In a new memorandum issued Tuesday last week, the HHS chief stripped the FDA and other health agencies under his purview of their rule making ability, asserting all such power “is reserved to the Secretary.” Sheila Kaplan of the New York Times first obtained and reported the details of the September 15 bulletin.

President Donald Trump (via AP Images)

Signs of an 'Oc­to­ber Vac­cine Sur­prise' alarm ca­reer sci­en­tists

President Donald Trump, who seems intent on announcing a COVID-19 vaccine before Election Day, could legally authorize a vaccine over the objections of experts, officials at the FDA and even vaccine manufacturers, who have pledged not to release any vaccine unless it’s proved safe and effective.

In podcasts, public forums, social media and medical journals, a growing number of prominent health leaders say they fear that Trump — who has repeatedly signaled his desire for the swift approval of a vaccine and his displeasure with perceived delays at the FDA — will take matters into his own hands, running roughshod over the usual regulatory process.

Anthony Fauci (AP Images)

A press of­fi­cer at An­tho­ny Fau­ci’s NI­AID was un­masked as a hard-right Covid troll. He just re­tired to­day

William B Crews had been a public affairs specialist at the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

That ended today when he informed the agency of his decision to retire, after he was identified as the managing editor at RedState, a prominent Trump loyalist website.

Crews’ RedState duties are performed under the alias streiff. While enjoying the benefits of pseudonymity, he disparaged and worked against NIAID with an incendiary level of rhetoric in the midst of a pandemic.

#ES­MO20: Push­ing in­to front­line, Mer­ck and Bris­tol My­ers duke it out with new slate of GI can­cer da­ta

Having worked in parallel for years to move their respective PD-1 inhibitors up to the first-line treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb finally have the data at ESMO for a showdown.

Comparing KEYNOTE-590 and CheckMate-649, of course, comes with the usual caveats. But a side-by-side look at the overall survival numbers also offer some perspective on a new frontier for the reigning checkpoint rivals, both of whom are claiming to have achieved a first.

Donald Trump, AP

Covid-19 roundup: Trump sug­gests Pfiz­er vac­cine could be first ap­proved; VBI Vac­cines inks de­vel­op­ment deal with Cana­da

President Donald Trump commented Monday morning that Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine candidate could be the first to win approval by regulators.

During an interview on a Fox News’ morning show, the president said Pfizer was doing “very well” when asked which candidate could be approved, according to a Reuters report. He added that J&J could follow up afterward, saying “they’ll probably be a little later.”

UP­DAT­ED: Two wild weeks for Grail end in $8B Il­lu­mi­na buy­out

Grail’s whirlwind two weeks have ended in the wealthy arms of its former founder and benefactors.

Illumina has shelled out $8 billion to reacquire the closely-watched liquid biopsy startup they spun out just 5 years ago and sold off much of its shares just 3 years ago. The deal comes nearly two weeks after the well-heeled startup filed for a potentially massive IPO — one that was disrupted just a week later when Bloomberg reported that Illumina was in talks to buy their former spinout for up to $8 billion.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

As­traZeneca pub­lish­es Covid-19 vac­cine PhI­II pro­to­cols in lock­step with Mod­er­na and Pfiz­er. How are they dif­fer­ent?

Following in the steps of Moderna and Pfizer, the other two American drugmakers currently in Phase III trials for their Covid-19 vaccines, AstraZeneca posted its own study protocols over the weekend. The move is the latest in a series of rare peeks behind the curtain, as such blueprints are typically shared once such trials are completed.

“Given the unprecedented global impact of the Coronavirus pandemic and the need for public information, AstraZeneca has published the detailed protocol and design of our AZD1222 clinical trial. As with most clinical development, protocols are not typically shared publicly due to the importance of maintaining confidentiality and integrity of trials. AstraZeneca continues to work with industry peers to ensure a consistent approach to sharing timely clinical trial information,” the company said in a statement.

Roche vaults to the front of the NL­RP3 clin­i­cal race, pay­ing $448M up­front to bag In­fla­zome

Roche is going all in on NLRP3.

The pharma giant is putting down $448 million (€380 million) upfront to snatch Novartis-backed Inflazome, which makes it a clinical player in the space overnight.

Dublin and Cambridge, UK-based Inflazome is the second NLRP3-focused biotech Roche has acquired in less than two years, and although no numbers were disclosed in the Jecure buyout, this is almost certainly a much larger deal.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Eli Lilly CSO Dan Skovronsky (file photo)

UP­DAT­ED: #ES­MO20: Eli Lil­ly shows off the da­ta for its Verzenio suc­cess. Was it worth $18 bil­lion?

The press release alone, devoid of any number except for the size of the trial, added nearly $20 billion to Eli Lilly’s market cap back in June. Now investors and oncologists will get to see if the data live up to the hype.

On Sunday at ESMO, Eli Lilly announced the full results for its Phase III MonarchE trial of Verzenio, showing that across over 5,000 women who had had HR+, HER2- breast cancer, the drug reduced the odds of recurrence by 25%. That meant 7.8% of the patients on the drug arm saw their cancers return within 2 years, compared with 11.3% on the placebo arm.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 90,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.